September 13, 2018 Via Express Mail Department of Homeland Security ATTN: Office of the Chief Information Officer/Information Quality Officer 245 Murray Lane, SW Washington, D.C. 20528 Re: Via Express Mail Department of Justice ATTN: Office of Legislative Affairs 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Administrative Appeal/Request for Reconsideration of the Denial of Request for Correction Under Information Quality Guidelines To the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice: On January 16, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) (collectively, the “Departments”) issued a report entitled “Executive Order 13780: Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States, Initial Section 11 Report” (“Report”). This report was rife with inaccuracies and methodological flaws, and wholly lacking in transparency and objectivity, all in direct violation of the Information Quality Act (“IQA”) and its implementing regulations. On February 8, 2018, Petitioners here filed an administrative petition (“Petition”), attached hereto as Exhibit 1, identifying at least nine distinct violations under the IQA and requesting that the Departments either rescind or correct the Report. The Departments denied the Petition without responding to the majority of errors that Petitioners identified, in letters attached hereto as Exhibit 2. To the extent that the Departments addressed the identified errors and inadequacies at all, the responses are inadequate. The Departments apparently maintain that their obligations under the IQA are satisfied because the Report included accurate information that was accurately described. The Departments’ premise is wrong, because the Petition pointed out several instances of straightforward data inaccuracies that the Departments have failed to explain. And the Departments misunderstand the IQA’s requirements: placing data in the proper context and identifying the impact of the agencies’ analytic choices on the reported results are critical parts of the Departments’ IQA obligations, especially in light of the IQA’s heightened requirements for information that has an influence on policymaking. As a result, Petitioners bring this administrative appeal and request for reconsideration under the Departments’ IQA regulations, and renew the request set forth in the Petition that the Departments either rescind or correct the Report. I. Background A. President Trump and His Administration Attempt Repeatedly to Link Immigrants to Crime Since the start of his presidency, President Trump has sought to justify his Executive Orders banning Muslims from entering the United States and to rationalize other immigration priorities by connecting immigration to criminality. He has enlisted the Departments in that 1 effort by ordering them to produce non-existent information showing an immigration-crime connection. On January 27, 2017—just one week after taking office—President Trump issued Executive Order 13769, Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States (“EO-1”). EO-1 claimed, without citation, that “[n]umerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001.” Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, 82 Fed. Reg. 8977, 8977 (Feb. 1, 2017). Apparently lacking evidence to cite, Section 10 of EO-1 directed the Secretary of DHS, in consultation with the Attorney General, to collect and publicly disseminate certain categories of information, including: (i) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States involved in certain terrorism-related offenses or who were radicalized after entry into the United States; (ii) information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women in the United States by foreign nationals; and (iii) other information relevant to public safety and security. See id. at 8980-81. According to information provided in response to a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) petition by one of the Petitioners here, on February 10, 2017, the National Security Division (“NSD”) provided to the Office of the Attorney General a chart listing 668 convictions for international terrorism and terrorism-related crimes occurring between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. That chart cautions that it includes 119 individuals who were prosecuted following a broad nationwide investigation after the September 11, 2001 attacks, “regardless of whether investigators developed or identified evidence that they had any connection to international terrorism.” See Ex. 3. And it explains that all of the crimes deal with “charged violations of federal statutes” that were related to terrorism “regardless of the offense of conviction,” and “include[e] investigations of terrorist acts planned or committed outside the territorial jurisdiction· of the United States.” Id. NSD warned that these caveats, included in a preamble to the chart, should always accompany the chart or any quotation of the total number of convictions. Id. NSD suggested that the data would support statements like “[s]ince 9/11, convictions have been obtained against hundreds of defendants for terrorism or terrorism-related charges in Article III courts,” and “[w]e have a long history of using the criminal justice system to incapacitate individuals who pose a threat to the U.S. and its interests here and abroad. Since 9/11, hundreds of convictions have been obtained in our federal courts.” Id. NSD did not suggest that the data it maintains would support conclusions related to immigration policy. According to additional information released by DOJ in response to that same FOIA request, attached hereto as Exhibit 4, DOJ revised the chart provided by NSD by deleting 115 of the foregoing 119 individuals prosecuted after the September 11 attacks, and then crossreferencing the remaining 553 names with its FBI investigation files to determine each defendant’s place and date of birth. But the FBI’s investigation files are error-ridden: the thenChief of Staff to the FBI Director included a note in his email transmitting the document to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General flagging “the use of aliases in I[nternational] T[errorism] matters, factual errors in the initial data, and conflicting DOBs,” which he “highlight[ed] . . . to note the . . . list likely contains gaps or errors . . . .” See Ex. 4. The chart produced using these FBI files states that 392 or 393 of the listed individuals were born abroad (the FBI was unsure 2 whether one individual was born in Jamaica or the United States), 136 or 137 were born in the United States, and 24 were of uncertain place of birth, per the FBI. See id. DOJ passed the chart, so revised, on to DHS on February 22, 2017, and onto the Office of the Attorney General on February 27, 2017. The next day, on February 28, 2017, President Trump announced in his first speech before a joint session of Congress that “[a]ccording to data provided by the Department of Justice, the vast majority of individuals convicted of terrorism and terrorism-related offenses since 9/11 came here from outside of our country.” See Remarks by President Trump in Joint Address to Congress (Feb. 28, 2017). 1 He did not qualify the universe of terrorism-related offenses to which he was referring—whether those related to international terrorism, domestic terrorism, or both. President Trump promised to “take new steps to keep our nation safe and to keep out those who will do us harm.” Id. These remarks echoed his false campaign claims that “scores of recent migrants” were charged with terrorism and that “for every case known to the public, there are dozens and dozens more.” 2 In a letter attached hereto as Exhibit 5, DOJ represented to one of the Petitioners that it searched the records of the Offices of the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, Legislative Affairs, and Public Affairs for any other documents containing data regarding (i) all individuals convicted of all terrorism-related offenses (domestic and international) between 2001 and the date of the initial search, and (ii) all individuals convicted of all domestic terrorismrelated offenses between 2001 and the date of the initial search. DOJ reported that it had no responsive records. See Ex. 5. Courts enjoined EO-1’s immigration provisions in part because they had no foundation in fact, 3 and so President Trump tried again. He issued Executive Order 13780 on March 6, 2017 (“EO-2”). EO-2 revoked EO-1 and made minor changes to its immigration provisions, but still temporarily barred entry by nationals of certain overwhelmingly Muslim countries and all refugees. See Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, 82 Fed. Reg. 13,209 (Mar. 9, 2017). Section 11 of EO-2 tasked the Secretary of DHS and the Attorney General with finding the same categories of information identified in Section 10 of EO-1, and releasing a report with this information every 180 days. See id. at 13,217; see also 82 Fed. Reg. at 8980-81. According to a recent news report, the intelligence community, with the input of the FBI, provided a report to senior Administration officials in September 2017 concluding that refugees did not present a significant threat to the United States. See Dan de Luce and Julia Ainsley, 1 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-joint-address-congress/. See Michelle Ye Hee Lee, Donald Trump’s false claim that ‘scores of recent migrants’ in the U.S. are charged with terrorism, Washington Post, May 2, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/factchecker/wp/2016/05/02/donald-trumps-false-claim-that-scores-of-recent-migrants-in-the-u-s-are-charged-withterrorism. 2 See Washington v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151, 1168 (9th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (noting that the government “pointed to no evidence that any alien from any of the countries named in [EO-1] has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States”). 3 3 Trump Admin Rejected Report Showing Refugees Did Not Pose Major Security Threat, NBC News (Sept. 5, 2018). 4 Then-Assistant Attorney General Rachel Brand acknowledged receiving the report, but indicated that the Attorney General would not be guided by its findings because he “doesn’t agree with the conclusions.” Id. At least one intelligence community official interpreted this to mean that the Department was not “able to have an honest conversation about the risk.” Id. Commenting on this news report, a DHS spokesperson sought to explain the Administration’s rejection of the intelligence community’s conclusions not by disputing their accuracy, but instead by stating that DHS would refuse to rely on “historical data” for immigration policy, because “[i]f we only look at what terrorists have done in the past, we will never be able to prevent future attacks.” Id. This potential bias is made worse by the fact that, according to another news report, DHS did not materially contribute to the report at all, and DHS analysts in fact warned the Trump administration that correlating international terrorism data with citizenship or country of origin misleading. See Team Trump Bypassed DHS Analysts to Produce Bogus Terror Report, the Daily Beast (Jan. 21, 2018). 5 The Attorney General’s office “took charge” of assembling the statistics in the Report, and sent it to DHS only after it was “all but finalized.” Id. B. DHS and DOJ Issue Report Making False and Misleading Claims to Justify President Trump’s Executive Orders On January 16, 2018, the Departments jointly issued the Report at issue here. The Report’s headline claim is that 402 of 549 people convicted of international terrorism-related charges from September 11, 2001 through December 31, 2016 (roughly 73%), were “foreignborn.” Report at 2. Of those 402 “foreign-born” individuals, the Report asserts that 148 were naturalized U.S. citizens (i.e., nationals of the United States) and that 254 were foreign nationals. Id. The Report does not provide any underlying data, but it does acknowledge that it relied on “a list maintained by DOJ’s National Security Division” of those convicted of international terrorism-related charges. Id. The Report’s list of 549 total convictions corresponds with the list that NSD compiled a year earlier, excluding the 119 individuals investigated following the September 11, 2001 attacks. See Ex. 4; see also supra at 2. While the Report states that the list consists of defendants “convicted in cases involving charged violations of federal statutes that are directly related to international terrorism,” and “defendants convicted in cases involving charged violations of a variety of other statutes where the investigation involved an identified link to international terrorism,” it fails to disclose the number of defendants actually convicted of terrorism charges. Report at 2. The Report further estimates that 23 to 27 “honor killings” and 1,500 “forced marriages” occurred every year in the United States between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2016. Id. at 7-8. Yet the Report simultaneously acknowledges that the federal government does not generally track data about gender-based violence against women. Id. Citing an outside study https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-admin-rejected-report-showing-refugees-did-not-posemajor-n906681. 4 5 https://www.thedailybeast.com/team-trump-bypassed-dhs-analysts-to-produce-bogus-terror-report. 4 that was itself based largely on media reports, the Report surmises that 91% of these honor killings occurred because the victim was perceived as “too Westernized.” Id. The Report includes other statistics that have no apparent connection to terrorism. For example, it volunteers that between October 1, 2011 and September 30, 2017, 372,098 noncitizens were deported following convictions for an aggravated felony or two or more felonies. Id. at 9-10. The Report also notes that between 2007 and 2017, USCIS referred 45,858 foreign nationals who applied for immigration benefits to ICE for enforcement action based on information that they had committed crimes. Id. Finally, the Report concludes with a promise to continue to provide similar information to “highlight the threats facing the United States.” Id. at 10. It asserts that DOJ is “committed to” investigating and prosecuting terrorists—and also to denaturalizing citizens who “derive their citizenship through naturalization fraud,” a problem not otherwise discussed in the Report, much less supported by any data. Id. The Report was issued months after the date contemplated by EO-2, even though the data for its central claim were apparently available before EO-2’s promulgation. Its publication instead coincided with a renewed push by the Administration to convince Congress and the American people that stricter immigration laws are needed, including: • A week before the Report was issued, President Trump falsely claimed that twenty-two to twenty-four people immigrated to the United States on the basis of their relation to the suspect in the Manhattan truck attack. CNN Bipartisan Immigration Bill Roundtable Transcript (Jan. 9, 2018). 6 • Five days before the Report was issued, President Trump reacted to the October 31, 2017 Manhattan terror attack with the following statement: “[T]he lottery system is a disaster, we have to get rid of the lottery system. The—as you know chain is—chain migration is a horrible situation. You’ve seen the ads, you’ve seen everything, you know all about chain.” Transcript of Donald Trump Interview with the Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Journal (Jan. 13, 2018). 7 • In the White House, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated that the Report “highlights the urgent need for Congress to adopt immigration reforms identified in the administration’s priorities.” Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Ed O’Callaghan (Jan. 17, 2018). 8 • The White House press release also cites the “facts” set forth in the Report as reason to end so-called “chain migration,” and that the Report “shows, once again, that our current 6 http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1801/09/wolf.01.html. 7 https://www.wsj.com/articles/transcript-of-donald-trump-interview-with-the-wall-street-journal-1515715481. 8 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-sarah-sanders-and-principaldeputy-assistant-attorney-general-ed-ocallaghan01172018/. 5 immigration system jeopardizes our national security.” White House Fact Sheet, Our Current Immigration System Jeopardizes American Security, Jan. 16, 2018. 9 9 • President Trump also tweeted to his millions of followers that the Report showed that “nearly 3 in 4 individuals convicted of terrorism-related charges are foreign-born” and emphasizing that the Report supported ending family reunification and diversity lottery immigration policies. President Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump), Twitter (Jan. 16, 2018, 3:20 PM). 10 • Attorney General Sessions stated that the Report “reveals an indisputable sobering reality—our immigration system has undermined our national security and public safety.” Press Release, Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs, DOJ, DHS Report: Three Out of Four Individuals Convicted of International Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Offenses were Foreign-Born (Jan. 16, 2018). 11 • DHS Secretary Nielsen justified the Report as a way to “intensify screening and vetting” of foreign nationals to prevent terrorism. Id. On live television, she also repeated the 73% number and used this statistic to advocate for the “continual vet[ting]” of lawful permanent residents.” See DHS Report: 73 Percent of Terrorism-Related Offenders over Last 15 Years were Foreign-Born, CBS News (Jan. 16, 2018). 12 • Secretary Nielsen repeated these points in a prepared testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee the same day, stating that “tougher vetting and tighter screening” is warranted. Written testimony of DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen for a Senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing titled “Oversight of the United States Department of Homeland Security” (Jan. 16, 2018). 13 • Several members of Congress, including the Chairman of the House of Representatives’ Homeland Security Committee have also amplified the claims in the Report. See, e.g., McCaul Statement on DHS-DOJ Report on Terrorist Entry Into the United States (Jan. 16, 2018) 14; Lou Barletta, Report Shows 73% of Individuals Convicted of Terrorism Since 9/11 Gained Access Via U.S. Immigration Laws (Jan. 17, 2018). 15 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/current-immigration-system-jeopardizes-american-security/. 10 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/953406553083777029. 11 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/doj-dhs-report-three-out-four-individuals-convicted-international-terrorism-andterrorism. 12 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kirstjen-nielsen-dhs-secretary-terror-charges-report-us-citizens/. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2018/01/16/written-testimony-dhs-secretary-kirstjen-nielsen-senate-committeejudiciary-hearing. 13 https://mccaul.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/mccaul-statement-on-dhs-doj-report-on-terrorist-entry-intothe-united. 14 15 https://barletta.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/report-shows-73-of-individuals-convicted-of-terrorismsince-911-gained. 6 • On January 25, 2018, The Trump Administration released an immigration plan calling for legislation to end family migration, increase the speed of immigration deportations, and fund a border wall with Mexico. See White House Framework on Immigration Reform and Border Security (Jan. 25, 2018). 16 C. Petitioners Request Correction of the Report On February 8, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Request for Correction under the IQA. The Petition explained Petitioners’ interest in enforcing the IQA in this context, Pet. at 2-4, as well as the heightened scrutiny that applied because the Report is “influential” under the IQA. Id. at 4, 5-6. The Petition noted that “[w]hile the Report purports to be a sober, evidence-based analysis of the nationality of those charged with terrorism-related offenses, it instead presents data in a misleading way in order to advance a biased narrative that immigrants present a threat to our country.” Id. at 6. The Petition then discussed nine specific flaws in the Report: 1. Exclusion of domestic terrorism. By limiting the Report’s analysis to international terrorism-related offenses and excluding domestic terrorism, the Report focuses exclusively on “terrorism-related offenses that almost by definition are far more likely to be committed by foreign nationals and excludes those that are far more likely to be committed by U.S. citizens.” Id. at 7. Yet “[d]omestic terrorism convictions account for the majority of terrorism convictions in the U.S. since Sept. 11, 2001, and those convicted of domestic terrorism charges are less likely to be foreign-born than their international terrorism counterparts.” Id. By omitting domestic terrorism convictions— or, alternatively, the fact that domestic terrorism convictions predominate over international ones—the Report misleads readers into believing that foreign-born individuals are the primary perpetrators of terrorism. Id. 2. Distorted information relating to extraditions and capture. The Report’s primary conclusion that 73% of the 549 individuals convicted of international terrorism-related charges were foreign-born is misleading: the Report acknowledges in passing that this number includes those extradited solely for the purpose of prosecution, but nowhere identifies how many such individuals are contained in the relevant dataset. Id. The Petition estimates that 100 members of the dataset were brought to the country just to prosecute them and so are irrelevant to the Report’s central conclusions about immigration. Id. 3. Failure to provide important information about underlying data. The Report relies on a list of terrorism-related convictions maintained by NSD but ignores NSD’s warning that certain “explanations/caveats in the preamble always need to accompany that total number [of convictions listed on the chart]—which is why the chart and the preamble should always be distributed and read together.” See id. at 8. Neither the chart, nor the language in the preamble, was included in the Report. Id. 16 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/white-house-framework-immigration-reform-border-security/. 7 4. Manufactured distinctions between U.S. citizens. The Report’s distinction between those who are U.S. citizens by birth and those who are naturalized citizens departs from both EO-2 and long-standing counterterrorism practice. See id. at 8. 5. Cherry-picked and unrepresentative examples. The Report’s eight so-called “illustrative examples” of foreign-born individuals convicted of international terrorism related charges that the Departments cherry-picked are not obviously illustrative, and the Departments certainly fail to give any explanation of its methodology in selecting its examples that would suggest they are. Id. at 8. The Departments’ attempt to generalize from those flawed examples to opposition to family-based immigration position is therefore also flawed. Id. 6. Failure to provide critical underlying information and context about terrorist watchlist claim. The Report includes data regarding a purported 2,554 encounters with “individuals on the terrorist watchlist . . . traveling to the United States” in 2017 without defining “encounter” or identifying detail about how the watchlist is constructed—detail that is particularly important in light of the general acknowledgement that the watchlist is substantially overbroad. Id. at 9. 7. Gender-based violence. The Report blatantly overstates the number of immigrants convicted of crimes involving gender-based violence, suggesting that aliens were convicted for 69,929 sex crimes between 2003 and 2009 when, in fact, these data deal with arrests between 1955 and 2010. Id. Needless to say, arrests are not convictions, nor is six years anywhere near 55. Id. The Report also fails to mention that a single arrest can be for multiple offenses, which may leave the reader with the false impression that more aliens were convicted of sex crimes than was the case. And it fails to explain why it is reasonable to conclude that sex offenses are “in most instances” gender-based violence against women. In fact, “sex offense” includes prostitution and indecent exposure— offenses that may not involve gender-based violence against women. Id. 8. Honor killings and forced marriages. The Report fails to disclose that its estimate of honor killings comes from a study commissioned by a fervent anti-Muslim critic and that the author of the estimate himself admitted it was “not terribly scientific.” Id. at 10. Similarly, examination of the underlying data reveals that social services organizations “encountered as many as” 3,000 forced marriages in two years, not that these were the number that occurred every two years, as the Report misstates. Id. 9. Lack of transparency. Finally, the Petition critiqued the Report for failing to disclose the a) list maintained by NSD on which the Departments based the bulk of their analysis; b) the list of 1,716 aliens purportedly removed because of “national security concerns,” and c) the 2,554 DHS alleged encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist traveling to the United States. Id. The Petition requests that these flaws show that the Report is “so saturated with bias and a lack of objectivity—both in conception and execution” that it should be withdrawn. Id. at 11. Alternatively, it requests eight specific corrections: 8 1. Include data and appropriate context regarding domestic terrorism-related convictions, including the methodology for determining that a charge has an “identifiable link” to a terror-related investigation and for determining that an offense is “directly related to international terrorism”; 2. Include data and appropriate context regarding the underlying data on which the Report relies, including the number of foreign-born individuals convicted of international terrorism-related offenses who were extradited to the United States for prosecution and the number of convictions for attacks that took place overseas; 3. Explain why drawing a distinction between naturalized citizens and citizens by birth is relevant, as well as why information about the citizenship of the parents of citizens by birth is relevant; 4. Include data to support the assertion that the eight individuals named in the Report are “illustrative,” particularly as to their method of admission to the United States (or, if such data are unavailable, provide context so that the public can judge whether the examples are truly “illustrative”); 5. Provide additional information about DHS’s 2,554 encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist, including how an “encounter” is defined; 6. Correct data and appropriate context regarding gender-based violence, honor killings, and forced marriages; 7. Provide access to the data underlying the Report; and 8. Consult with relevant experts, including career DHS officials and those in the private sector. D. The Departments Respond Only After Petitioners Filed a Lawsuit The Departments’ 60-day deadline to respond to the Petition passed on April 9 without action. On April 30, 2018, Petitioners filed a lawsuit to compel the Departments to respond as required under their regulations. See Protect Democracy Project, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Case No. 18-cv-1087 (D. Mass. Apr. 30, 2018). On June 19, 2018—71 days after their deadline to respond had passed—the Departments provided an interim response stating that they needed additional time to resolve the Petition. In a letter dated July 31, 2018—two days before the government’s response to Petitioners’ complaint was due in court—DOJ denied the Petition, concluding that the “Report outlines the scope and source of the data utilized and, where applicable, provides appropriate caveats, thereby meeting all applicable requirements” under the IQA. See DOJ Response at 2. DOJ dismissed critiques of the Report’s conviction data because the Petition did not identify any inaccuracies, and dismissed any charges of bias as merely “subjective.” Id. at 2-3. In response to concern over inaccurate gender-based data, DOJ acknowledged that it “lacks comprehensive 9 data,” but promised that the Office of Justice Program was currently undertaking two studies to help disseminate accurate information about them. Id. at 3. On August 1, 2018, DHS issued a similar response to the Petition (“DHS Response”), also concluding that neither retraction nor correction of information in the Report was required. Like DOJ, DHS did not dispute that the Report had a “substantial impact” on policymaking. See generally DHS Response. It sought to justify the lack of context in the Report by pointing out that “the Report specifically identified what information was available and noted that because of previous information collection practices some of the data presented did not capture the full spectrum of statistics envisioned by the EO.” Id. at 2. Like DOJ, DHS dismissed the issues identified in the Petition as matters of “interpretation,” not of “accuracy.” Id. DHS then claimed (without citation or other explanation) that questions of interpretation fall outside the scope of the Department’s IQA guidelines. Id. II. Legal Standard As DOJ correctly pointed out in its Response, the IQA Guidelines require that the Departments “ensure the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information disseminated.” See Pub L. No. 106-554 § 515(a); see also Office of Management and Budget, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing Quality, Objectivity, Utility and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies; Republication, 67 Fed. Reg. 8451, 8459 (Feb. 22, 2002) (“[Q]uality” encompasses “utility, objectivity, and integrity.”); DOJ Guidelines (acknowledging OMB’s definition); DHS Guidelines at 4 (same). As explained in the Petition, OMB has articulated clear standards for these terms 17: a) “Objectivity” requires determining whether the information is presented “in an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner,” within a proper context, and whether the substance of the information is “accurate, reliable, and unbiased,” including providing the underlying data when reporting statistics. 18 Agencies should also consult with experts, as appropriate. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8453. b) OMB Guidelines require transparency so that the public can understand the agencies’ methodology and analytic choices so that “the public will be able to assess how much an agency’s analytic result hinges on the specific analytic choices made by the agency.” 19 17 While the DHS guidelines use the word “should” rather than “shall,” OMB has reminded agencies that their Guidelines are, in fact, legally binding, noting that “agency guidelines should not suggest that agencies are free to disregard their own guidelines.” OIRA Review of Information Quality Guidelines Drafted by Agencies (June 10, 2002), at 14; see John D. Graham, MEMORANDUM FOR PRESIDENT’S MANAGEMENT COUNCIL: Agency Draft Information Quality Guidelines, June 10, 2002, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/assets/OMB/inforeg/iqg_comments.pdf. 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459; see also DOJ Guidelines (“DOJ components will ensure disseminated information, as a matter of substance and presentation, is accurate, reliable, and unbiased. Objectivity is achieved by using reliable data sources, sound analytical techniques, and documenting methods and data sources.”); DHS Guidelines at 3-4. 18 67 Fed. Reg. at 8456; see also id. at 8453 (“[A]gencies must make their methods transparent by providing documentation, ensure quality by reviewing the underlying methods used in developing the data and consulting (as appropriate) with experts and users, and keep users informed about corrections and revisions.”); id. at 8456 (“The primary benefit of public transparency is not necessarily that errors in analytic results will be detected, although 19 10 They also require that the information be useful, “the uses of the information not only from the perspective of the agency but also from the perspective of the public.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. c) Finally, the OMB Guidelines require integrity. Integrity is defined as the “protection of the information from unauthorized access or revision, to ensure that the information is not compromised through corruption or falsification.” Id. at 8460. The Departments’ responses overlook that “influential” information—information that “will have or does have a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or important private sector decisions”—are held to an even higher standard. Id. This information requires “a high degree of transparency about data and methods,” including “sufficient transparency about data and methods that an independent reanalysis could be undertaken by a qualified member of the public.” Id. (emphasis added). 20 In this way, DOJ’s attempt to dismiss references to the Attorney General’s statements as outside the scope of the IQA misses the point; the Petition does not independently challenge the Attorney General’s statements under the IQA (or those of the DHS Secretary or the President that Petitioners cite here). Rather, the Petition uses them to show that the Report has already had “a clear and substantial impact on important public policies.” Id. III. Argument As the Petition explained, the Report violates the IQA by failing to include information that is accurate, clear, complete, reliable, and unbiased, both in substance and in presentation, as well as by failing to adhere to proper transparency standards. Pet. at 6 (citing 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459). The agencies’ response does not even address many of the Petition’s identified IQA violations, each of which alone necessitates reconsideration of the Departments’ denials: • Conviction data presented without proper context - The conviction data was given without the caveats and explanations required by NSD, see Pet. at 8; supra at 2, and so the information was not “presented in the proper context” as required by the IQA—and certainly not with the “high degree of transparency” required for influential information—nor was it “clear” or “complete.” See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459; see also DHS Guidelines at 3 21 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 19. error correction is clearly valuable. The more important benefit of transparency is that the public will be able to assess how much an agency’s analytic result hinges on the specific analytic choices made by the agency.”); DOJ Guidelines (“Transparency refers to a clear description of the methods, data sources, assumptions, outcomes, and related information that will allow a data user to understand how the information product was designed or produced. Guidelines to ensure transparency in statistical information covers the dissemination of information, including both presentation and the reporting of information sources and limitations.”); DHS Guidelines at 4. 20 See also DOJ Guidelines (defining “influential information” as “that which is expected to have a genuinely clear and substantial impact at the national level, or on major public and private policy decisions as they relate to federal justice issues”); DHS Guidelines at 4 (similar). 21 DHS Guidelines at 3 (“Where appropriate, data should have full, accurate, and transparent documentation, and should identify and disclose error sources affecting data quality.”). 11 • Terror watchlist data unclear and not transparent - The Report details the number of “encounters” that the Departments had with those on a “terrorist watchlist,” all the while failing to even suggest the standards that the agency uses to place individuals on the watchlist, or even define “encounters.” See Pet. at 9. This renders the information unclear, 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459, and makes it impossible for “the public [to] be able to assess how much an agency’s analytic result hinges on the specific analytic choices made by the agency.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8456; see also DHS Guidelines at 3 22 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 19. • Gender-based violence statistics inaccurate - Neither DOJ nor DHS dispute that the Report is wrong when it claims that a GAO report found that aliens were convicted of 69,929 sex crimes between 2003 and 2009. See Pet. at 9. The IQA does not permit agencies to openly, knowingly misrepresent government data. 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459 (requiring that information be “accurate”). See DHS Guidelines, supra note 18 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 18. • Gender-based violence statistics unclear - Neither DOJ nor DHS address their failure to explain that a single arrest can be for multiple offenses, or their assumptions that sex offenses are “in most instances” gender-based violence against women. See Pet. at 9. Such violate the IQA’s transparency requirements, and are far from clear in presentation, especially in light of the fact that “sex offense” includes prostitution and indecent exposure, which is not clearly gender-based violence against women. See DHS Guidelines at 3 23 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 23. • Honor-killing study biased and unreliable - The Report fails to disclose that its estimate of honor killings comes from a study commissioned by a fervent anti-Muslim critic. See Pet. at 9-10; 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459 (prohibiting bias and requiring that data be reliable). And while the DOJ Response concedes that the IQA requires the use of “reliable data sources,” DOJ Response at 2, the author of the estimate himself admitted it was based on media reports and was “not terribly scientific.” See Pet. at 10; see also DHS Guidelines at 10 24 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 18. DOJ implicitly acknowledges the Report’s inaccuracy on this point when it admits that it is conducting two separate studies on “honor violence,” which would be unnecessary if the data on which it originally relied were reliable. See DOJ Response at 3. DHS Guidelines at 3 (“In assessing the usefulness of information disseminated to the public, Components should consider the uses of the information from the perspective of the public. When transparency of information is relevant for assessing information’s usefulness from the public’s perspective, Components should consider transparency when developing and reviewing the information. (Transparency refers to the clear, obvious and precise nature of the information.)”). 22 23 DHS Guidelines at 3 (“Sometimes, in disseminating certain types of information to the public, other information must also be disseminated in order to ensure an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased presentation.”). DHS Guidelines at 10 (“[T]he agency needs to identify the sources of the disseminated information (to the extent possible, consistent with confidentiality protections) and, in a scientific, financial, or statistical context, the supporting data and models, so that the public can assess for itself whether there may be some reason to question the objectivity of the sources”). 24 12 • Honor-killing study inaccurately presented - Similarly, examination of the underlying data reveals that social services organizations “encountered as many as” 3,000 forced marriages in two years, not that these were the number that occurred every two years, as the Report misstates. See Pet. at 10. Again, the IQA requires that the data be presented in an “accurate” manner. 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459; see also DHS Guidelines, supra note 18 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 18. • Underlying data not disclosed - Finally, the Petition critiqued the Report for failing to disclose the a) list maintained by NSD on which the Departments based the bulk of their analysis; b) the list of 1,716 aliens purportedly removed because of “national security concerns,” and c) the 2,554 DHS alleged encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist traveling to the United States. See Pet. at 10; see also DHS Guidelines, supra note 24 and DOJ Guidelines, supra note 19. The Responses largely ignore these issues and suggest that the Petition merely asks for “context,” which need not be provided because the data included is itself accurate and some limitations of the data are disclosed. See DHS Response at 2; DOJ Response at 2. It is true that the Petition seeks, in part, additional context for the claims in the Report, but that is a basis for granting the Petition, not denying it. The IQA clearly requires that “information [be] presented within a proper context,” See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. Data must be correct in substance, to be sure, but must also be “accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased” in presentation. 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459; see also DHS Guidelines at 3 (same). “Sometimes, in disseminating certain types of information, other information must also be disseminated in order to ensure an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased presentation.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459; see also DHS Guidelines at 3 (same). The public must “be able to assess how much an agency’s analytic result hinges on the specific analytic choices made by the agency,” and any information must be useful “not only from the perspective of the agency but also from the perspective of the public.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. See also DHS Guidelines at 10 (same). This is even more important when an agency disseminates data. 67 Fed. Reg. at 8460 (requiring that the data and methods used to generate influential statistical information being sufficiently transparent that a qualified member of the public could undertake an independent reanalysis). The Departments nowhere defend the context actually provided in the Report. In fact, the Departments’ curation of the data here is highly misleading. For example, the DOJ Response contends that even if the conviction data (i) ignored domestic terrorism, (ii) included those extradited to the United States for prosecution, and (iii) distinguished between U.S. citizens by birth and naturalized citizens “the data used was accurately stated and clearly described.” DOJ Response at 2. The conviction data, however, was not accurately stated. The Deputy Director of the FBI admitted to factual errors in the investigation files on which DOJ relied, making both the Departments’ methodology “limited in [its] ability to accurately identify a date/place of birth,” and rendering the conviction data “likely [to] contain[] gaps or errors.” See supra at 2. In doing so, the Departments did not meet its obligation to, in DOJ’s words, “ensure objectivity by using reliable data sources and document[] methods and data sources.” DOJ Response at 2. 25 And even assuming that the conviction data is DHS’s attempt to avoid its DQA obligations by pointing to language in the Report that the Departments do not have “complete, final” is itself misleading. The relevant sentence, in full, reads as follows: “While DHS and DOJ 25 13 accurate, technical correctness is not necessarily enough to satisfy the Departments’ obligations under the IQA, as explained infra. The Report includes convictions “where the investigation involved an identified link to international terrorism.” Report at 2. This, however, is unclear. As Petitioner’s FOIA request revealed, the data in fact includes anyone charged with terrorism, “regardless of the offense of conviction.” See supra at 2. This means that the Report’s data may include convictions where all terrorism charges were ultimately dropped, or where the defendant was in fact acquitted of terrorism. This is not merely a theoretical problem. Examining the data obtained from the FOIA request, it turns out that only 360 defendants included in NSD’s list were convicted after facing at least one charge directly related to international terrorism. See supra at 2. The Report’s description gives no hint that around one-third of the 549 convictions on which the Report relies were not for terrorism charges at all. Id. This poses a transparency problem under the IQA: the Departments made a significant analytic choice with a clear impact on the Report’s analytic result, but gave the public absolutely no way to determine the magnitude of that impact. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. A similar problem runs through the Department’s exclusion of domestic terrorism and inclusion of those defendants only in the country for prosecution. In a publication that the Report fails to disclose, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) found that 62 of 85 violent extremist attacks since September 11, 2001 resulting in a fatality were perpetrated by farright extremists. See U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, Countering Violent Extremism: Actions Needed to Define Strategy and Assess Progress of Federal Efforts, at 29-32 (Apr. 2017). And Petitioners have estimated that around 100 of the 360 defendants were only brought to the country for prosecution. See Pet. at 7. While the limitations’ descriptions may have been “clear on [their] face,” DHS Response at 2, their significance was not. As a result, the presentation of the data was neither “clear” nor “complete,” and it did not allow the public (or, as described below, government officials, including the President) to assess the impact of the Departments’ analytic choices. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. DOJ explains the Departments’ decision to distinguish between U.S. citizens by birth and naturalized citizens by pointing to the provision in EO-2 allowing the Departments to include additional information related to public safety. See DOJ Response at 2. This explanation, however, does not track the Report, which included the information in the section supposedly discussing data related to “foreign nationals,” see Report at 2, and not the separate section addressing “additional information,” see id. at 8-10. In any event, neither the Report nor the Responses make any effort to explain why this distinction is related to public safety and security. To the contrary, “[t]his distinction is a departure from the long-standing practice of treating American citizens equally in the context of counterterrorism efforts.” Pet. at 8. The decision to depart from longstanding agency practice and professional consensus should have been made only after expert consultation, see 67 Fed. Reg. at 8453 (requiring expert consultation “as do not yet have complete, final information about these individuals available at the time of this report’s publication, the following are illustrative examples among the 402 convictions of foreign nationals or naturalized U.S. citizens.” Report at 2-3. Read in context, the “complete” and “final” qualifiers at most qualify the choice of the 402 “illustrative” examples, not the conviction data itself. See infra at 14. Even if the Departments’ intended the language to qualify more, it is certainly not “clear,” as required under the IQA. 14 appropriate”), and with careful explanation to allow the public to properly assess the impact of this significant analytic choice. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. Indeed, the Departments’ failure to root this distinction in any reasoned decision-making process, combined with the Departments’ utterly gratuitous comment that it is “committed” to denaturalizing U.S. citizens, see Report at 10, may even suggest bias. See id. (prohibiting bias). Similar problems are present in the cherry-picked “illustrative examples,” which exclusively focus on individuals who arrived in the country either through the visa lottery program or family-based immigration. See Pet. at 8. While DOJ attempts to brush off any critique as merely Petitioners’ subjective conclusions, DOJ Response at 2, it fails to explain any objective measures by which the Departments chose their examples. Did the Departments carefully categorize how each person on their list arrived in the United States, and select a proportional number of examples from the most common categories? Did they randomly select several examples using some sort of computer program or draw names out of the proverbial hat? Or did they look solely for the most egregious examples within a few select categories based on pre-selected policy priorities set by the Administration? It is simply impossible to tell from the Report—though the fact that not one of the eight examples include someone involuntarily extradited to the United States suggests that the examples are not representative of the underlying data. See Pet. at 7. Whatever these examples are “illustrative” of, it certainly is not the objectivity and transparency required under the IQA. See DOJ Guidelines, supra note 18. Indeed, the fact that senior DOJ officials expressly refused to credit any data by the intelligence community that did not support the pre-existing “conclusions” of the Attorney General about refugees, see supra at 3-4, suggests that not only is the Report misleading, but that it was in fact a post hoc justification for the Administration’s pre-conceived policy preferences. See Pet. at 6. This is not just the “subjective conclusion” of Petitioners, cf. DOJ Response at 2; the former government officials who attended meetings on Administration immigration policy agreed and concluded that they were unable to express any contrary opinion, no matter where the facts actually led. See supra at 3-4. And DHS officials themselves warned against conflating terrorism and nationality in the manner of this Report. See supra at 4. A one-sided presentation of facts is a quintessential case of bias under the IQA. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459 (requiring both data and its presentation to be “unbiased”). If the Report merely reflected the Attorney General’s (or the President’s) subjective belief about refugees or other immigration policy, the Departments were obligated to “make it clear that what is being offered is someone’s opinion rather than fact.” See id. at 8460. The Report fails to do so, and therefore violates the IQA. Ultimately, the public cannot help but be misled by the Report. The Report may even have misled the Secretary of Homeland Security and the President of the United States, both of whom cited the 73% conviction number without any of the qualifications or caveats on which the Departments rely so heavily in their responses. See supra at 5. And they joined with the Attorney General in reading the Report to link immigration to terrorism—a conclusion that may be inconsistent with reality once the assumptions the Departments baked into their analysis are brought to light. If the technicalities on which the Departments depend failed to impress themselves on the Departments’ own Principals, as well as the President of the United States, then it simply defies credulity that the Departments have met their IQA obligations with respect to the general public. 15 IV. Conclusion As the Petition explained, the Report violates the Departments’ obligations under the IQA. The Departments’ Responses fail to adequately address the issues raised in the Petition. As a result, and for the reasons stated above, Petitioners request the Departments reconsider their denial of the Petition, rescind, and/or make all of the suggested corrections requested in the Petition, see supra at 8-9. Sincerely, /s/ Ben Berwick Ben Berwick, Counsel Protect Democracy 10 Ware St. Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel.: (909) 326-2911 Email: ben.berwick@protectdemocracy.org /s/ Faiza Patel Faiza Patel Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law 120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271 Tel.: (646) 292-8335 Fax: (212) 463-7308 Email: faiza.patel@nyu.com /s/ Benjamin Wittes Benjamin Wittes Senior Fellow and Research Director in Public Law The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington DC 20036 Tel.: (202) 797-4386 /s/ Michael Crowley Michael F. Crowley P.O. Box 211 Belmont, MA 02478 Tel.: (617) 752-2250 Email: mfcrowley@gmail.com cc: The Honorable Mick Mulvaney, Director The Office of Management and Budget 725 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20503 16 The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 4706 Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Mr. John Kelly, Acting Inspector General Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 0305 Department of Homeland Security 245 Murray Lane, SW Washington, DC 20528-0305 The Honorable Charles E. Grassley, Chairman The Honorable Dianne Feinstein, Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-6050 The Honorable Ron Johnson, Chairman The Honorable Claire McCaskill, Ranking Member Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs United States Senate 340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC, 20510 The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, Chairman The Honorable Jerrold Nadler, Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary United States House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Trey Gowdy, Chairman The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Government Reform United States House of Representatives 2157 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 17 EXHIBIT 1 February 8, 2018 Via FedEx The Honorable Jeff Sessions Office of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Via Email and FedEx Joseph F. Klimavicz Chief Information Officer U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Email: Joseph.Klimavicz@usdoj.gov Via FedEx The Honorable Kirstjen M. Nielsen Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 Via Email and FedEx Richard Staropoli Chief Information Officer U.S. Department of Homeland Security 245 Murray Lane, SW Washington, DC 20528 Email: DHS.InfoQuality@hq.dhs.gov Re: Request for Correction Under Information Quality Guidelines Attorney General Sessions, Secretary Nielsen, Mr. Klimavicz, and Mr. Staropoli: On January 16, your agencies—the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”)—issued a report entitled “Executive Order 13780: Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States, Initial Section 11 Report” (hereinafter the “Report” or the “Section 11 Report”).1 As has been widely reported—and as described in more detail below—the Report is rife with inaccuracies, methodological flaws, and a lack of transparency and objectivity. As such, it falls well short of the data quality obligations imposed by Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001, Pub L. No. 106-554 § 515(a), 44 U.S.C. § 3516 note (hereinafter the “Data Quality Act” or “DQA”), as well as the implementing guidelines adopted by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”)2 and your agencies3 (hereinafter the “Information Quality Guidelines” or the “Guidelines”). Despite its many flaws—or, more accurately, because of them—the Report has been cited and amplified by the Administration as evidence of the need for more restrictive immigration policies. Indeed, the Report was the subject of a dedicated White House press briefing, where Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated that it “highlights the urgent need for Congress to 1 “Section 11” refers to the provision of Executive Order 13780 pursuant to which the Report was issued. See Office of Management and Budget, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies; Republication, 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002) (“OMB Guidelines”). 2 The DOJ Guidelines can be found at https://www.justice.gov/iqpr/information-quality. The DHS Guidelines can be found at https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/dhs-iq-guidelines-fy2011.pdf. 3 1 adopt the immigration reforms identified in the administration’s priorities.”4 And President Trump has repeatedly tweeted about the Report, inaccurately characterizing its findings as showing that “nearly 3 in 4 individuals convicted of terrorism-related charges are foreign born.”5 Because the Report is being used as part of a misinformation campaign targeted at the American public to justify and support certain immigration policies, it is critical that corrective action be taken to ensure that the public is accurately informed. Therefore, we submit this request for correction under your agencies’ Information Quality Guidelines and ask that you issue a corrected version of the Report that adheres to the requirements of the Guidelines or, in the alternative, that you retract the Report in its entirety. Given the urgency and importance of this matter, we ask that you take these actions as soon as possible, and certainly expect that you will provide a response within 60 calendar days as required by the Guidelines. The Requestors Have Strong Interests in the Correction of the Inaccurate Data Protect Democracy is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing our democracy from declining into a more authoritarian form of government. To advance this mission, Protect Democracy engages in advocacy and public education to defend core democratic norms and institutions. Protect Democracy has identified the politicization of independent institutions, the spread of disinformation, and the delegitimization of minority communities as particularly acute threats to our democracy, and has actively worked to counter these threats.6 The Report is a striking example of these threats, as it presents highly politicized and misleading information dressed up as objective data and statistics, in order to portray immigrants as a danger to our country. As such, the retraction or correction of the Report would advance Protect Democracy’s mission. The Brennan Center at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. Through its Liberty & National Security Program, the Brennan Center advocates for effective national security policies that respect constitutional values and the rule of law. In recent months, these efforts have included publishing research evaluating President Donald Trump’s “extreme vetting” as counterterrorism policy,7 serving as counsel for plaintiffs challenging the travel ban stemming from Executive Order 13780, and providing other related analysis and commentary directly implicating the data Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and then-Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Ed O’Callaghan (“Press Briefing”), Jan. 17, 2018, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/press-briefing-bypress-secretary-sarah-sanders-and-principal-deputy-assistant-attorney-general-ed-ocallaghan01172018 (transcript of briefing). 4 5 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/953406423177859073. See, e.g., Protect Democracy and Stand Up Ideas, The Republic at Risk: American Democracy One Year into the Trump Administration, available at https://protectdemocracy.org/update/republic-at-risk. 6 Harsha Panduranga, Faiza Patel and Michael Price, Extreme Vetting and the Muslim Ban, available at https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/extreme-vetting-and-muslim-ban. 7 2 at issue in the Section 11 Report.8 As such, retraction or correction of the Report would advance the Brennan Center’s mission. Benjamin Wittes is a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and the Editor in Chief of Lawfare, a publication concerned with integrity in national security decision-making. He writes frequently about issues related to national security and terrorism, and has written specifically about the Section 11 Report and President Trump’s claim that “according to data provided by the Department of Justice, the vast majority of individuals convicted of terrorism and terrorismrelated offenses since 9/11 came here from outside of our country.”9 He also filed a Freedom of Information Act request with DOJ for documents related to the President’s claim—in particular, whether data exists to support the claim and whether DOJ actually provided the President with such data. That request is now the subject of ongoing litigation.10 Nora Ellingsen is a student at Harvard Law School and has worked on national security and terrorism issues. Previously, Nora worked for five years as a Staff Operations Specialist in the Counterterrorism Division of the FBI. In that role, she assisted FBI Special Agents and Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the investigation and prosecution of subjects of FBI international terrorism investigations within the United States and abroad. Since 2016, she has covered national security issues, including international terrorism prosecutions, on Lawfare, including a series of articles using available data to evaluate the President’s claim that “the vast majority of individuals convicted of terrorism and terrorism-related offenses since 9/11 came here from outside of our country.” As a journalist and academic focused on issues directly related to the Report, Nora has an interest in the accuracy of data about terrorism. Retraction or correction of the Report would advance this interest. Michael F. Crowley is a Senior Fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and a former Senior Policy Analyst with OMB, serving in that capacity from 2004 until 2013 under both Republican and Democratic administrations. With extensive oversight experience involving DOJ, as well as its crime statistics programs, Mr. Crowley has longstanding professional interests in the accurate, fair, and unbiased presentation of data, as well as concerns about the misuse of data to inform government policy. Government policies and strategies that are formulated on the basis of misinformation risk targeting the wrong “problems” and misusing taxpayer resources. The Report is striking because it misuses data in an attempt to mislead, and creates an unsuitable, improper basis for governmental policymaking in the context of immigration and terrorism. As such, it appears to justify immigration policies by assigning See, e.g., Faiza Patel, Why the Trump Administration is Trying to Make Muslim Immigrants Seem Dangerous, Wash. Post, Jan. 29, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/01/29/why-the-trumpadministration-is-trying-to-make-muslim-immigrants-seem-dangerous/?utm_term=.6b3e82fa1ce1. 8 Benjamin Wittes, Did the Justice Department Really Support the President's Misstatement to Congress? Let's Find Out, Lawfare, Apr. 7, 2017, https://www.lawfareblog.com/did-justice-department-really-support-presidentsmisstatement-congress-lets-find-out; Benjamin Wittes, The Friendliest Lawsuit Ever Filed Against the Justice Department, Lawfare, Aug. 12, 2017, https://www.lawfareblog.com/friendliest-lawsuit-ever-filed-against-justicedepartment; Lisa Daniels, Nora Ellingsen and Benjamin Wittes, Trump Repeats His Lies About Terrorism, Immigration and Justice Department Data, Lawfare, Jan. 16, 2018, https://lawfareblog.com/trump-repeats-his-liesabout-terrorism-immigration-and-justice-department-data. 9 10 See Wittes v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, No. 1:17-cv-1627-RC (D.D.C. Aug. 11, 2017). 3 extreme risk to a population cohort on a basis that has little factual or analytical merit. Because the Report conflates terrorism and gender-based violence risk with this cohort, it hazards misdirecting federal anti-terrorism, crime, and immigration efforts in ways that are counterproductive, doing little to mitigate any actual terrorism or crime risk. Further, the Report does not meet the requirements of the DQA and is inconsistent with OMB Guidelines regarding the same. The Departments’ Information Quality Guidelines Requires that Disseminated Data Such as the Section 11 Report Meet Certain Quality Standards The DQA required agencies to adopt policies and procedures “for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies.” See Pub L. No. 106-554 § 515(a). As explained in the OMB Guidelines implementing this requirement, “the fact that the Internet enables agencies to communicate information quickly and easily to a wide audience not only offers great benefits to society, but also increases the potential harm that can result from the dissemination of information that does not meet basic information quality guidelines.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8452. As used in the Guidelines, “quality” encompasses “utility, objectivity, and integrity.” Id. at 8459; see also DOJ Guidelines (acknowledging OMB’s definition); DHS Guidelines at 4 (same). Several aspects of the DQA and its implementing Guidelines are particularly relevant here. First, “[t]he more important the information, the higher the quality standards to which it should be held.” Id. In particular, agencies should provide an added level of scrutiny to information defined as “influential”—that is where “the agency can reasonably determine that dissemination of the information will have or does have a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or important private sector decisions.” Id. at 8460; see also DOJ Guidelines (defining “influential information” as “that which is expected to have a genuinely clear and substantial impact at the national level, or on major public and private policy decisions as they relate to federal justice issues”); DHS Guidelines at 4 (similar). Second, disseminated information must be objective. As explained in the OMB Guidelines: “Objectivity” involves two distinct elements, presentation and substance. a. “Objectivity” includes whether disseminated information is being presented in an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner. This involves whether the information is presented within a proper context. Sometimes, in disseminating certain types of information to the public, other information must also be disseminated in order to ensure an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased presentation. Also, the agency needs to identify the sources of the disseminated information (to the extent possible, consistent with confidentiality protections) and, in a scientific, financial, or statistical context, the supporting data and models, so that the public can assess for itself whether there may be some reason to question the objectivity of the sources. Where appropriate, data should have 4 full, accurate, transparent documentation, and error sources affecting data quality should be identified and disclosed to users. b. In addition, “objectivity” involves a focus on ensuring accurate, reliable, and unbiased information. In a scientific, financial, or statistical context, the original and supporting data shall be generated, and the analytic results shall be developed, using sound statistical and research methods. 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459; see also DOJ Guidelines (“DOJ components will ensure disseminated information, as a matter of substance and presentation, is accurate, reliable, and unbiased. Objectivity is achieved by using reliable data sources, sound analytical techniques, and documenting methods and data sources.”); DHS Guidelines at 3-4. When information purports to describe certain risks, the Guidelines expressly incorporate by reference the quality principles in the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996, 42 U.S.C. § 300g-1(b)(3)(A) & (B), requiring that agencies use “the best available, peer-reviewed science and supporting studies,” and data “collected by accepted methods or best available methods.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8460; accord DOJ Guidelines; DHS Guidelines at 5. Agencies should also consult with experts, as appropriate. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8453. Finally, the Guidelines require transparency so that the public can understand the agencies’ methodology and analytic choices, and they require that the information be useful.11 “In assessing the usefulness of information that the agency disseminates to the public, the agency needs to consider the uses of the information not only from the perspective of the agency but also from the perspective of the public.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. The Report Fails to Comply with the Guidelines the Agencies Have Set for Themselves The Report fails to satisfy the agencies’ information quality obligations in multiple respects. As an initial matter, the Report should be subject to a heightened degree of scrutiny because it is “influential” as defined by the Guidelines. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8460; DOJ Guidelines; DHS Guidelines at 4. The Report was issued pursuant to Executive Order 13780 and is clearly intended to advance the Administration’s immigration agenda and to have “a clear and substantial impact,” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8460, on federal immigration policy. Indeed, the release of See, e.g., 67 Fed. Reg. at 8453 (“[A]gencies must make their methods transparent by providing documentation, ensure quality by reviewing the underlying methods used in developing the data and consulting (as appropriate) with experts and users, and keep users informed about corrections and revisions.”); id. at 8456 (“The primary benefit of public transparency is not necessarily that errors in analytic results will be detected, although error correction is clearly valuable. The more important benefit of transparency is that the public will be able to assess how much an agency's analytic result hinges on the specific analytic choices made by the agency.”); id. at 8460 (“If an agency is responsible for disseminating influential scientific, financial, or statistical information, agency guidelines shall include a high degree of transparency about data and methods to facilitate the reproducibility of such information by qualified third parties. . . .With regard to analytic results related thereto, agency guidelines shall generally require sufficient transparency about data and methods that an independent reanalysis could be undertaken by a qualified member of the public.”); DOJ Guidelines (“Transparency refers to a clear description of the methods, data sources, assumptions, outcomes, and related information that will allow a data user to understand how the information product was designed or produced. Guidelines to ensure transparency in statistical information covers the dissemination of information, including both presentation and the reporting of information sources and limitations.”); DHS Guidelines at 4. 11 5 the Report appears to have been timed to coincide with active congressional negotiations over immigration policy, and the Executive Branch has amplified the Report’s conclusions and repeatedly cited them as a justification for more restrictive immigration policies.12 President Trump himself characterized the Report’s findings as showing that “nearly 3 in 4 individuals convicted of terrorism-related charges are foreign born”—eliding the distinction between international and domestic terrorism—and invoked it as support for restrictive immigration policies.13 In general, the Report falls well short of the requirements of the DQA and the Guidelines that “disseminated information [be] presented in an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner” and “within a proper context.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. While the Report purports to be a sober, evidence-based analysis of the nationality of those charged with terrorism-related offenses, it instead presents data in a misleading way in order to advance a biased narrative that immigrants present a threat to our country. According to Attorney General Sessions, the Report “reveals an indisputable sobering reality—our immigration system has undermined our national security and public safety.”14 DHS Secretary Nielsen described the Report as “a clear reminder of why we cannot continue to rely on immigration policy based on pre-9/11 thinking that leaves us woefully vulnerable to foreign-born terrorists, and why we must examine our visa laws and continue to intensify screening and vetting of individuals traveling to the United States to prevent terrorists, criminals, and other dangerous individuals from reaching our country.”15 And according to the White House, the Report “shows, once again, that our current immigration system jeopardizes our national security” and that it is “TIME TO END CHAIN MIGRATION AND THE VISA LOTTERY.”16 The Report manifests a lack of objectivity and even outright bias in several specific ways, all of which violate the DQA and the Guidelines. While this list is not exhaustive, the Report violates the legal requirements in the following respects: See, e.g., Our Current Immigration System Jeopardizes American Security (“White House Fact Sheet”), Jan. 16, 2018, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/current-immigration-system-jeopardizesamerican-security; Dep’t of Justice, Office of Pub. Affairs, DOJ, DHS Report: Three Out of Four Individuals Convicted of International Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Offenses were Foreign-Born (“DOJ Press Release”), Jan. 16, 2018, available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/doj-dhs-report-three-out-four-individuals-convictedinternational-terrorism-and-terrorism (linking the Report’s findings to a “list of legislative priorities”); Press Briefing (“[T]his report highlights the urgent need for Congress to adopt the immigration reforms identified in the administration’s priorities.”). 12 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/953406423177859073. Indeed, the Report seems to be constructed specifically to back up President Trump’s assertion—made during a February 28, 2017 address to Congress—that “[a]ccording to data provided by the Department of Justice, the vast majority of individuals convicted of terrorismrelated offenses since 9/11 came here from outside of our country,” regardless of what the data actually shows. See Michelle Ye Hee Lee, President Trump’s Claim That Foreigners are Responsible for “the Vast Majority” of Terrorism Convictions Since 9/11, Wash. Post, Aug. 15, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/factchecker/wp/2017/08/15/president-trumps-claim-that-foreigners-comprise-the-vast-majority-of-terrorismconvictions-since-911/?utm_term= f5afaa051d0a. 13 14 DOJ Press Release. 15 Id. 16 White House Fact Sheet. 6 1. Exclusion of domestic terrorism. The Report is limited to “terrorist acts planned or committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States over which Federal criminal jurisdiction exists and those within the United States involving international terrorists and terrorist groups,” and omits “individuals convicted of offenses relating to domestic terrorism.” Report at 2. In other words, the Report includes only those terrorism-related offenses that almost by definition are far more likely to be committed by foreign nationals and excludes those that are far more likely to be committed by U.S. citizens. While there is nothing inherently wrong with an analysis of international terrorism-related charges, by focusing exclusively on the contribution of foreign-born individuals to the problem of terrorism while omitting significant categories of domestic actors, the Report leaves the reader with the impression that foreign-born individuals are the primary perpetrators of acts of terrorism more generally. To the contrary, “[d]omestic terrorism convictions account for the majority of terrorism convictions in the U.S. since Sept. 11, 2001, and those convicted of domestic terrorism charges are less likely to be foreign-born than their international terrorism counterparts.”17 2. Distorted information relating to extraditions and capture. The Report’s primary conclusion is that, of the 549 individuals convicted of international terrorism-related charges in U.S. federal courts between September 11, 2001 and December 31, 2016, 73 percent were foreign-born. See Report at 2. This includes 254 non-citizens and 148 naturalized citizens. Id. However, the Report mentions only once—and only in passing—that these numbers include “defendants who were transported to the United States for prosecution,” id., but nowhere identifies how many such individuals are contained in the relevant dataset. This omission leaves the reader with the impression that the convicted individuals were predominantly immigrants to the country. In fact, it is highly likely that the data included approximately 100 individuals who were extradited into the United States or captured and brought to the United States for prosecution, and thus would not have been affected by U.S. immigration policy and/or interacted with the U.S. immigration system.18 The inclusion of these individuals without a clear explanation is inconsistent with the requirement that information be presented in an “accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner” and put “in a proper context.” 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. Nora Ellingsen and Lisa Daniels, What the Data Really Show About Terrorists Who “Came Here,” Part III: What If You Included Domestic Terrorism Cases, Lawfare, Apr. 11, 2017, https://lawfareblog.com/what-data-really-showabout-terrorists-who-came-here-part-iii-what-if-you-included-domestic; see also Faiza Patel, Trump Administration’s Fuzzy Math on Terrorist Origins is More Than Misleading—It’s Dishonest, Just Security, Jan. 16, 2018, https://www.justsecurity.org/51084/trump-administrations-fuzzy-math-terrorist-origins-misleading-itsdishonest (“[A]ccording to an April 2017 Government Accountability Office report, ‘far right wing extremist groups’ had perpetrated 73 percent of deadly attacks in the U.S. (quoting U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, Countering Violent Extremism: Actions Needed to Define Strategy and Assess Progress of Federal Efforts at 4, Apr. 2017, available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/683984.pdf)). 17 See Lisa Daniels, Nora Ellingsen and Benjamin Wittes, Trump Repeats His Lies About Terrorism, Immigration and Justice Department Data, Lawfare, Jan. 16, 2018, https://lawfareblog.com/trump-repeats-his-lies-aboutterrorism-immigration-and-justice-department-data; Nora Ellingsen and Lisa Daniels, What the Data Really Show About Terrorists Who “Came Here,” Part I: Introduction and Overview, Lawfare, Apr. 11, 2017, https://lawfareblog.com/what-data-really-show-about-terrorists-who-came-here-part-i-introduction-and-overview. 18 7 3. Failure to provide important information about underlying data. The Report relies on a list of terrorism-related convictions maintained by DOJ’s National Security Division (“NSD”). According to documents obtained in response to a FOIA request submitted by Mr. Wittes, NSD never shares this data without including a lengthy explanatory preamble. Indeed, in an email regarding the underlying NSD data, a senior NSD official emphasized that “[t]he scope and limitations of the information contained in the chart are fully described in its preamble, which should always accompany the chart.” See Exhibit A. Later in the same email, the official again explained that “the explanations/caveats in the preamble always need to accompany that total number [of convictions listed on the chart]—which is why the chart and the preamble should always be distributed and read together.” Id. Yet, the Report does not include much of the information contained in the preamble, thereby omitting important context about the underlying data. 4. Manufactured distinctions between U.S. citizens. As alluded to above, the Report draws a distinction between those who are U.S. citizens by birth and those who are naturalized citizens. See Report at 2. This distinction is a “departure from the long-standing practice of treating American citizens equally in the context of counterterrorism efforts—without any basis in fact, study or analysis” and is irrelevant in the context of national security law or immigration law.19 Yet, the Report does not even attempt to explain why it is relevant for its own purposes. Indeed, the Report goes so far as to suggest—again, without any explanation—that the citizenship status of parents of the U.S. citizens by birth who were convicted of terrorism-related offenses might be relevant data. See Report at 2 n.1. In this respect, the Report even departs from its authorizing Executive Order, which instructs the Departments to provide certain information on “foreign nationals,” without any mention of foreign-born U.S. citizens. See Exec. Order No. 13780, 82 Fed. Reg. 13209, 13217 (Mar. 6, 2017). 5. Cherry-picked and unrepresentative examples. The Report provides eight “illustrative examples” of the 402 foreign-born individuals convicted of international terrorismrelated charges. Id. at 3. Of those eight individuals, two entered the United States as a result of the visa lottery program (one as the recipient of a visa and one as the child of a recipient) and five were admitted as family members of naturalized citizens or lawful permanent residents. According to the White House, this shows that “[a] significant number of terrorists have entered the United States solely on the basis of family ties and extended-family chain migration,” that “[t]errorists have also entered the United States through the visa lottery program,” and that “chain migration” and the visa lottery present a threat to our national security. See White House Fact Sheet. However, the Report provides no information about how many of the 394 other foreign-born individuals entered the United States as a result of “chain migration” or the visa lottery program, and thus, there is no way to know whether the examples are indeed “illustrative.” Carrie Cordero and Paul Rosenzweig, Beware the Slippery Slope in the DOJ-DHS Report on Foreign-Born Terrorists, Lawfare, Jan. 19, 2018, https://www.lawfareblog.com/beware-slippery-slope-doj-dhs-report-foreignborn-terrorists. 19 8 6. Failure to provide critical underlying information and context about terrorist watchlist claim. The Report states that “[i]n fiscal year 2017, DHS had 2,554 encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist . . . traveling to the United States.” Report at 9. But the underlying data is not provided, and it is widely acknowledged that the watchlist is substantially overbroad.20 Furthermore, the Report does not define what counts as an “encounter,” including whether the number includes someone who was an inconclusive or incorrect match with a name on the watchlist. See Report at 9. 7. Gender based violence. The Report’s section on violence against women repeatedly misrepresents or fails to put into proper context the sources on which it relies, in an apparent attempt to create the false impression that immigrants are more likely to commit acts of gender-based violence. See Report at 7-8. For example, the Report relies on a 2011 GAO report for the proposition that “aliens were convicted for [sic] 69,929 sex offenses” during the period from 2003-2009. Id. at 8. This claim is wrong in several obvious ways. First, the number 69,929 comes from a table in the GAO report that estimates the number of “Criminal Alien Arrest Offenses by Type of Offense.”21 An arrest is not a conviction, as the GAO report explicitly states.22 And “a single arrest can be for multiple offenses,” so 69,929 offenses does not mean that 69,929 people were arrested.23 The claim that the 69,929 “convictions” occurred over the seven year period from 2003-2009 is also mistaken, as the GAO “analysis includes criminal aliens with arrests dating from August 1955 to April 2010.”24 Finally, the Report assumes, without explaining its assumption, that “sex offenses . . . in most instances constitutes genderbased violence against women.” Report at 8. At the same time, the Report admits that this assumption is “not explicitly stated in the [GAO] report” and indeed, for state arrest offenses and convictions, the GAO report defines “sex offenses” to include “indecent exposure” and “prostitution,”25 the latter of which is more often charged to women.26 8. Honor killings and forced marriages. The Report’s discussion of honor killings and forced marriages is similarly flawed. The Report states that an “estimated . . . 23-27 honor killings occur every year in the United States.” Report at 8. That number comes from a study commissioned by a group headed by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a fervent critic of Islam who has been characterized as trafficking in discourse stigmatizing Muslim communities and “argu[ing] that immigrants have no interest in being law-abiding See Harsha Panduranga, Trump Administration’s Watchlist Data Overstates Terror Threat, Just Security, Jan. 23, 2018, https://www.justsecurity.org/51301/misleading-data-terrorist-watchlist-adds-confusion-doj-dhsnumbers/?utm_campaign=website&utm_source=TakeCareBlog&utm_medium=Email. 20 U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, Criminal Alien Statistics: Information on Incarcerations, Arrests, and Costs at 21 (Mar. 2011), available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/320/316959.pdf (emphasis added). 21 22 See id. at 18 n.24. 23 Id. 24 Id. at 18 (emphasis added). 25 Id. at 54. See U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Arrests in the United States, 1990-2010 (Oct. 2012), available at https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/aus9010.pdf. 26 9 citizens.”27 Furthermore, according to the lead researcher who produced the “23-27” number cited in the administration’s report, the estimate was “not terribly scientific” given the lack of data available: it was arrived at by extrapolating based on the frequency of honor killings in selected European countries and combining that with American crime and demographic figures.28 The Report’s estimate that “approximately 1,500 forced marriages occur every year in the United States,” Report at 8, also misstates the underlying data. That statistic comes from a 2014 study commissioned by the Bureau of Justice Statistics that relied on data from the Tahirih Justice Center.29 But that data showed only that legal and social service providers “encountered as many as 3,000 cases of forced marriage during [a] two year window, not that the marriages occurred during that time.”30 Furthermore, those cases could have occurred outside the United States, and “[b]oth the victims and perpetrators were diverse in religious, ethnic, and national background, including U.S. citizens and immigrants.”31 As a general matter, the Report portrays forced marriages as a problem attributable to immigration, when it is in fact a significant domestic issue.32 9. Lack of transparency. The Report suffers from a general lack of transparency about the underlying data on which it relies. As previously mentioned, it provides no information that can be used to assess whether the individuals named in the Report are truly “illustrative.” More fundamentally, while the Report is largely based on “a list maintained by DOJ’s National Security Division” and subsequent DHS analysis of that list, Report at 2, neither the list nor the analysis has been made public.33 The same can be said of the list of 1,716 aliens who were removed because of “national security Anna C. Korteweg and Gökçe Yurdakul, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Religion, Culture and the Politicization of Honour-Related Violence: A Critical Analysis of Media and Policy Debates at 9 (Oct. 2010), available at http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/httpNetITFramePDF?ReadForm&parentunid=E61F80827BF3409FC1 257744004DC465&parentdoctype=paper&netitpath=80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/E61F80827BF3409FC1 257744004DC465/$file/KortewegYurdaku.pdf. 27 Jesse Singal, Here’s What the Research Says About Honor Killings in the U.S., New York, Mar. 6, 2017, http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/03/heres-what-the-research-says-about-american-honor-killings.html. 28 See Tahirih Responds to Incorrectly Cited Gender-Based Violence Research in DHS/DOJ Report, Jan. 17, 2018, http://www.tahirih.org/news/tahirih-responds-to-incorrectly-cited-gender-based-violence-research-in-new-dhs-dojreport. 29 30 Id. 31 Id. See Anjali Tsui, Dan Nolan and Chris Amico, Child Marriage in America: By the Numbers, Frontline, July 6, 2017, http://apps frontline.org/child-marriage-by-the-numbers. 32 Indeed, according to reports, DHS did not even conduct an analysis as claimed by the Report. See Spencer Ackerman, Team Trump Bypassed DHS Analysts to Produce Bogus Terror Report, Daily Beast, Jan. 21, 2018, https://www.thedailybeast.com/team-trump-bypassed-dhs-analysts-to-produce-bogus-terror-report. To the contrary, “DHS . . . does not track or correlate international terrorism data by citizenship or country of origin, and have warned the Trump administration that doing so risks a misleading portrait of both terrorism and immigration.” Id. The Report “did not include the contributions of those career DHS officials tasked with providing professional and objective analysis.” Id. As such, the Report was issued without consultation with individuals with relevant subject matter expertise, in contravention of the DQA and the Guidelines. 33 10 concerns,” Report at 7, and, as discussed above, the 2,554 DHS “encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist . . . traveling to the United States,” Report at 9. In short, there is no way for the public to assess the reliability of the underlying data or the agencies’ analysis of that data, as required by the DQA and the Guidelines. See 67 Fed. Reg. at 8459. Individually, each one of these flaws requires correction to ensure that the Report satisfies the requirements the agencies have set forth in the Guidelines. Taken together, the effect is magnified and they render the Report deeply misleading. The Agencies Should Retract the Report or Make the Following Corrections to Adhere to the Information Quality Guidelines We believe that the Report is so saturated with bias and a lack of objectivity—both in conception and execution—that the appropriate course is to retract it in its entirety, and we ask that you do so. However, should you decline to retract the Report, we would ask that you take the following steps to correct it and reissue a revised version: 1. Include data and appropriate context regarding domestic terrorism-related convictions; 2. Include data and appropriate context regarding the underlying data in which the Report relies, including the number of foreign-born individuals convicted of international terrorism-related offenses who were extradited to the United States for prosecution; 3. Explain why drawing a distinction between naturalized citizens and citizens by birth is relevant, as well as why information about the citizenship of the parents of citizens by birth is relevant; 4. Include data to support the assertion that the eight individuals named in the Report are “illustrative,” particularly as to their method of admission to the United States (or, if such data are unavailable, provide context so that the public can judge whether the examples are truly “illustrative”); 5. Provide additional information about DHS’s 2,554 encounters with individuals on the terrorist watchlist, including how an “encounter” is defined; 6. Correct data and appropriate context regarding gender-based violence, honor killings, and forced marriages; 7. Provide access to the data underlying the Report; and 8. Consult with relevant experts, including career DHS officials and those in the private sector. Conclusion The American people rely on the U.S. government to provide accurate, objective, and unbiased data. In our democracy, that allows the public to understand the policy choices facing our country and to hold our government accountable. Your agencies, which are responsible for law enforcement and homeland security, must maintain the trust of the American people in order to fulfill their missions. Furthermore, Congress has mandated the adoption of information quality guidelines and, pursuant to that obligation, each of your agencies has adopted such guidelines. The Report fails to adhere to these legal requirements and fails to provide accurate 11 and objective information as required by the DQA and your agencies’ Guidelines. We ask that you retract the Report or make the corrections set forth above. We look forward to hearing from you and thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, /s/ Ben Berwick__________________ Ben Berwick, Counsel Protect Democracy 10 Ware St. Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel.: (909) 326-2911 Email: ben.berwick@protectdemocracy.org /s/ Faiza Patel___________________ Faiza Patel Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law 120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271 Tel.: (646) 292-8335 Fax: (212) 463-7308 Email: faiza.patel@nyu.com /s/ Benjamin Wittes______________ Benjamin Wittes Senior Fellow and Research Director in Public Law The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington DC 20036 Tel.: (202) 797-4386 /s/ Michael F. Crowley____________ Michael F. Crowley P.O. Box 211 Belmont, MA 02478 Tel.: (617) 752-2250 Email: /s/ Nora Ellingsen Nora Ellingsen Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel.: (626) 372-2197 Email: 12 cc: The Honorable Mick Mulvaney, Director The Office of Management and Budget 725 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20503 The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 4706 Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Mr. John Kelly, Acting Inspector General Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 0305 Department of Homeland Security 245 Murray Lane, SW Washington, DC 20528-0305 The Honorable Charles E. Grassley, Chairman The Honorable Dianne Feinstein, Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-6050 The Honorable Ron Johnson, Chairman The Honorable Claire McCaskill, Ranking Member Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs United States Senate 340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC, 20510 The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, Chairman The Honorable Jerrold Nadler, Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary United States House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Trey Gowdy, Chairman The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Government Reform United States House of Representatives 2157 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 13 EXHIBIT A Matthews, Patricia (NSD) . . - From: Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:18 PM To: Toscas, George (NSD) Subject: FW: NSD Chart of Convictions FYI. Message From: Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:17 PM To: Tucker, Rachael (0A6) Subject: RE: NSD Chart of.Convictions Thanks. Credit goes to George and N50 for pushing hard to get this done! If you have not met George yet, let me know and I will introduce you next week! Original Mes?age-Jm From: Tucker, Rachael (DAG) Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:16 PM To: Gauha r, Tashina (ODAG) Subject: Re: NSD Chart of Convictions . Tash! Thank you. This is great. >_0n Feb 10, 2017, at 11:14 PM, Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) wrote: . Hi Rachael. N50 has worked hard to update the chart to now include the 2016 numbers. You can see the revised chart attached herein. Per the e-mail below, NSD sent the document to the OLA for delivery to Congress. N50 IS comfortable with your sending this chart to the WH and/or DHS as needed to get the additional information for the stats we previously discussed. . Let me know if you need anything else from me on this. - Thanks and harm a great weekend. --Tash From: Toscas, George (NSD) - Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 5:10 PM To: Burton, Faith (OLA) , Johnson, Joanne E. (OLA) Cc: Weinsheimer, Bradley (NSD) ; Gauhar. Tashina AG) ; Toscas, George (NSD) (NSD) (a to - . Subject: NSD Chart ofw Convictlons (911/0 #6 Faith and Joanne, Here is the chart covering public/unsealed convictions from 9/11/01 through 12/31/16 (updated as of 2~10~17). Let us know if you have any questions. . - . . The chart lists public international terrorism and terrorism-related convictions from 9/11 thrbugh the end of 2016. Since it contains information from public cases, additional supporting information can be found in-public court documents (if folks ca re to search the public court dockets). The scope and limitations of the information contained in the chart are fully described in its preamble, which should always accompany the chart. . Here are some general statements that are supported by the chart/preamble and could be used publicly: . "Since 9/11, convictions have been obtained against hundreds of defendants for terrorism or terrorism-related charges in? Article courts.? . "We have a long history of criminal justicesystem to incapacitate individualswho pose a threat to the US. and its interests here and abroad. Since 9/11, hundreds of. convictions have been obtained in our federal courts." (IMPORTANT FYI 7 We do not use the total (600+) number of convictions listed on the chart in any statements because the explanations/caveats in the preamble always need to accompany that total number - -which is why the chart and .the preamble should always be distributed and read together. Call me if you'd like to discuss this issue or need any further explanation. Thanks.) GZT . Chart of Convictions 9-11-01 to 12-31-16 Updated 2-.10-17.pdf> WMODUCTION TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION CHART 0F EVTERNA TIONAL TERRORISM AND TERR ORISM-RELA TED CONWCTIONS FROM 9/11/01 TO 12/31/16 . The National Security Division?s Chart ?of Public/Unsealed International Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions tracks public/unsealed convictions resulting from international terrorism investigations conducted since September 11, 2001, including investigations of terrorist acts planned or committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States over which Federal criminal jurisdiction exists and those within the United States involving international terrorists and terrorist groups. Convictions listed on the attached chart involve the use of a variety of Federal criminal statutes available to prevent, disrupt, and punish international terrorism and related criminal activity. The convictions are the product of the Department?s aggressive, consistent, and coordinated national enforcement effort with respect to international terrorism that was undertaken after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Criminal cases arising from international terrorism investigations are divided into two categories, according to the level of coordination and monitoring required by the Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division (or its predecessor section in .the Criminal Division). This nationwide coordination and monitoring of international terrorism matters is designed to ensure coherent, consistent, and effective use and application of the statutes available for use in the prosecution of such matters. . Category I cases involve charged violations of federal statutes that are directly related to I international terrorism (regardless of the offense of conviction). These statutes prohibit, for example, . terrorist acts abroad against United States nationals, the use of weapons of mass destruction, conspiracy to murder persons overseas, providing material support to terrorists or foreign terrorist organizations, receiving military style training from foreign terrorist organizations, and bombings of public places or government facilities. A complete list of Category] offenses is found in Appendix? A. Category 11 cases involve charged violations of a variety of other statutes where the investigation involved an identi?ed link to international terrorism. These Category II cases include offenses such as those involving ?'aud, immigration, ?rearms, drugs, false statements, perjury, and obstruction of justice, . as well as general conspiracy charges under 18 U.S.C. 371. Prosecuting terror-related targets using Category II offenses and others is Often an effective method and sometimes the only available method - of deterring and disrupting potential terrorist planning and support activities. This approach underscores the wide variety of tools available in the US. criminal justice system for disrupting terror activity. Examples of Category II offenses are listed in Appendix. B, and examples of Category II cases are described in Appendix to illustrate the kinds of connections. to international terrorism that are not apparent ?'om the nature of the offenses of conviction themselves. The attached chart includes the defendant?s name, district, charging date, charges brought, classi?cation category, conviction date, and charges of conviction. If a convicted defendant has been sentenced, the relevant date and sentence imposed is included. The chart includes only public/unsealed convictions ?'orn September 11, 2001 to December 31, 2016. The chart does not include defendants whose convictions remain under seal, nor does it include defendants who were charged with terrorism or terrorism-related offenses but, as of December 31, 2016, had not been convicted either at trial or by . Page 1 of 8 Updated February 10, 2017 #2 guilty plea. The chart does not include convictions related solely to domestic terrorism. Note that the chart maintained by the National Security Division is distinct from statistics maintained by the Bureau of Prisons to track inmates with terrorist connections. The chart lists more than 3 60 defendants classi?ed in Category I and more than 300 defendants classi?ed in Category II. The chart is organized by conviction date, with the most recent convictions ?rst. The last group of defendants included on the chart were identi?ed during the course of the nationwide investigation conducted after September 11, 2001, and were subsequently charged with acriminal offense. Individuals whose convictions arose from this initial terrorism investigation were included on the chart at that time regardless of whether investigators developed or identi?ed evidence that they had any connection to international terrorism. Since then, additional defendants have been added to this chart only if, at the time of charging, they appeared to have a connection to international terrorism, even if they were not charged with a terrorism offense. The decision to add defendants to the chart is made on a case-by?case basis by career prosecutors in the National Security Divisionfs Counterterrorisrn Section, whose primary responsibility is investigating and prosecuting international and domestic terrorism cases to prevent and disrupt acts of terrorism anywhere in the world that impact on signi?cant United States interests and persons. - Page 2 of 8 Updated February 10, 2017 Appendix A Category I Offenses Aircraft Sabotage (18 U.S.C. 32) Animal Enterprise Terrorism (18 U.S.C. 43) Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons (18 U.S.C. 112, 8?7 8, 1116, 1201(a)(4)) Use of Biological, Nuclear, Chemical or Other Weapons of Mass Destruction (18 U.S.C. 175, 175b, 229, 831, 2332a) Production, Transfer, or Possession of Variola Virus (smallpox) (18 U.S.C. ?-17Sc) Participation in Nuclear and WMD Threats to the United States (18 U.S.C. 832) Conspiracy Within the United States to Murder, Kidnap, or Maim Persons or to Damage Certain Property Overseas (18 U.S.C. 956) Hostage Taking (18 U.S.C. 1203) Terrorist Attacks Against Mass Transportation Systems (18 U.S.C. 1993) Terrorist Acts Abroad Against United States Nationals (18 U.S.C. 2332) Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries (18 U.S.C. 2332b) Bombings of places of public use, Government facilities, public transPortation systems and infrastructure facilities (18 U.S.C. 2332f) Missile Systems designed to Destroy Aircraft (18 U.S.C. 2332g) Production, Transfer, or Possession of Radiological Dispersal Devices (18 U.S.C. 2332b) Harboring Terrorists (18 U.S.C. 2339) Providing Material Support to Terrox'ists (18 U.S.C. 2339A) Providing Material Support to Designated Terrorist Organizations (1 a U.S.C. 2339B) Prohibition Against Financing of: Terrorism (18 U.S.C. 23390) Receiving Military-Type Training ?'om an EFTO (18 2339B) Narco-Terrorism (21 U.S.C. 1010A) Sabotage of Nuclear Facilities or Fuel (42 U.S.C. 2284) Aircraft Piracy (49 U.S.C. 46502) . . Violations of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1705(b)) involving E.O. 12947 (Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process); E.O. 13224 (Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Page 3 of 8 Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism or Global Terrorism List); and 13.0. 13-129 (Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With the Taliban) Page 4 of 8 napalm Examnles of Catego_rv II Offenses. Crimes Committed Within the Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States (18 113,114, 115,111], 1112,1201, 2111) ?Violence at International Airports (18 U.S.C. 37) Arsons and Bombings (18 U.S.C. 842(m), 842(n), 844(1), 844(1)) Killings in the Course of Attack on a Federal Facility (18 U.S.C. 930(c)) False Statements (18 U.S.C. 1001) Protection of Computers (13 U.S.C. 1030) False Information and Hoaxes (18 U.S.C. 1038) Genocide (18 U.S.C. 1091) Destruction of Communication Lines (18 U.S.C. 1362) Sea Piracy (18 U.S.C. 1651) 1 Unlicensed Money Remitter Charges (18 U.S.C. 1960) Wrecking Trains (18 U.S.C. 1992) Destruction of National Defense Materials, Premises, or Utilities (18 U.S.C. 2155) Violence againstMaritime Navigation and Maritime Fixed Platforms (18 U.S.C. 2280, 2281) Torture (18 U. s. c. 2340A) War Crimes (13. -.s C. 2441) I International Traf?c 1n Arms Regulations (22 U. S. C. 2778, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, 22 F. R. 121- -130) . Crimes in the Special Aircraft JUrisdiction other than Aircraft Piracy (49 U.S.C. 46503 -46507) Destruction of Interstate Gas or Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities (49 U.S.C. I60123(b)) Page 5 of 8 Appendix Examples of Categog; II Terrorism-Related Convictions . Fort Dix Plot (conspiracy to murder members of the U.S. military). In 2008, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Ibrahim Shnewer, Dritan Duka, Shain Duka, Eljvir Duka and Serdar Tatar were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. ?1117,;in connection with a plot to kill members of the U.S. military in an armed attack on the military base at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The defendants were also convicted of various weapons charges. The government?s evidence revealed that one member of the group conducted . surveillance at Fort Dix and Fort Monmouth in New Jersey, Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, and the U.S. Coast Guard in Philadelphia. The group obtained a detailed map. of Fort Dix, where they heped to use assault ri?es to kill as many soldiers as possible. During the trial, the jury viewed secretly recorded videotapes of the defendants performing small- -arms training at a shooting range in the Poconos Mountains in and of the defendants watching training videos that included depictions of Amencan soldiers being killed and of known Islamic radicals urging jihad against the United States. Fawaz Damrah (citizenship fraud). In 2004, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Northem District of Ohio, Fawaz Damrah was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 1425 for concealing material facts in his citizenship application. The government?s evidence showed that in his citizenship application, Damrah concealed ?om the U.S. government his membership in or af?liation with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), aka. the Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine; the Afghan Re?igees Services, 1110., aka. Al-Kifah Refugee Center; and the Islamic Committee for Palestine. Dainrah further concealed the fact that he had, prior to his application for U. S. citizenship, ?incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution? of Jews and others by advocating violent terrorist attacks against Jews and others. During the trial, the govemment?s evidence included footage of a 1991 speech which Damrah called Jews ?the sons of monkeys and pigs,? and a 1989 speech' in which he declared that ?terrorism and terrorism alone is the path to liberation.? Soliman Biheiri (false statements and passport fraud). In 2003 and 2004, following two jury trials 1n the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Soliman Biheiri was convicted of violating 18 U. S. C. 1425 and 1546 for a passport, as well as 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 1015 for making false statements to federal agents. Biheiri was the president of BMI, Inc., a New ersey-based investment ?rm. The government?s evidence showed that Biheiri had deliberately deceived federal agents during a June 2003 interview in which he denied having business of personal ties to Mouse Abu Marzook, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist and a leader of Hamas. In fact, the government?s evidence showed that Biheiri had managed funds for Marzook both before and a?er Marzook was designated as a terrorist by the U. S. government in 1995. Speci?cally, the government presented ?les seized Page 6 of 8 ?'om Biheiri?s computer showing that Marzook had invested $1 million in US. business ventures managed by Biheiri and his investment ?rm. Mohammad Salman Farooq Qureshi (false statements). In 2005, following the entry of a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Qureshi was convicted of'violating 18 U.S.C. 1001 for making false statements to. the FBI regarding the nature and extent of his involvement with-al-Qaeda member Wadih E1 Hage, and the non- governmental organization Help Africa People. Qureshi was interviewed by the FBI in 1997, 1998, 2000, and 2004 in relation to terrorism crimes and during those interviews lied about his knowledge of El Hage, Help A?ica People, and-other al Qaeda members. The proffer ?led in support of the plea agreement established Qureshi?s connections to and contacts with El Hage, his contact with a subject under investigation in Oregon, and his activities and ?nancial support of Help Africa People, a non-governmental organization believed to have been used by El Hage . and others to provide cover identities and funds in connection with the 1998 attacks on the United States Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. By Qureshi?s admissions, at least $30,000 in Qureshi?s funds were given to E1 Hage in Nairobi, Kenya. E1 Hage is serving a life sentence for his role in the East Africa Embassy bombings. Sabri Benkahla (perjury, obstruction, false statements). In 2007, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Sabri Benkahla was convicted on two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. ?1623, for perjury, one count of violating 18 U.S.C. 1503 for obstructing justice, and one count of violating 18 U.S.C. 1001 for making false statements to the FBI. These false statements included denial of his involvement with an overseas jihad training camp in 1999, as well as his asserted lack of knowledge about individuals with whom he was in contact. The government?s evidence revealed that the grand jury and FBI in 2004 sought to question Benkahla about his contacts with Ibrahim Buisir of Ireland, and ManafKasmuri of - Malaysia, both of whom are Specially Designated Global Terrorists, as well as those with Ahmed Abu Ali, his friend and fellow student at the University of Medina, until both were arrested by Saudi authorities in June 2003. Further, the government?s evidence revealed that?the grand jury and FBI sought to question Benkahla about his contacts with an individual suspected of being Malik al-Tunisi, a facilitator for the al-Zarqawi terrorist network in Iraq. Akram Musa Abdallah (false statements). In 2009, following the entry of a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Akram Musa Abdallah was convicted of violating l8 U.S.C. 1001 for making false statements to the FBI. Inlanuary 2007, Abdallah knowingly made a false material statement to special agents of the FBI during an interview in connection with?the federal investigation and prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief Development (HLF) and its of?cers. At the time of the interviews, Abdallah knew the HLF was a Specially Designated Global Terrorist organization. Abdallah also knew that when he was interviewed, the HLF and its of?cers were pending trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, for crimes including providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization. During the interviews, Abdallah told FBI agents he was not involved in Page 7 of 8 ?mdraising activities for the HLF, when, in fact, betWeen approximately 1994 and 1997, Abdallah was involved in numerous fundraising activities, including collecting donations, organizing, facilitating and coordinating fund raising events on behalf of the HLF in the Phoenix metropolitan area. In July 2004, the HLF and seven of its principals were indicted on a variety of charges stemming from its ?nancial support of Hamas, and in November 2008, after a two? month trial, those defendants were convicted on all charges. Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT 2 U.S. Department of Justice Of?ce of Legislative Affairs Of?ce of the Assistant Attorney General Washington, D. C. 20530 JUL 371 2018 Ben Berwick Counsel Protect Democracy 10 Ware Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Faiza Patel Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law 120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271 Benjamin Wittes Senior Fellow and Research Director in Public Law The Brookings Institute 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Michael F. Crowley PO. Box 211 Belmont, MA 02478 Nora Ellingsen 1563 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 Dear Mr. Berwick, Ms. Patel, Mr. Wittes, Mr. Crowley, and Ms. Ellingsen: The Department of Justice (Department) writes in ?irther response to your February 8, 2018, request for correction under the Information Quality Act (IQA) and the Department?s implementing guidelines. See U.S. Dep?t Justice, Information Quality: Ensuring the Quality of the Information Disseminated by the Department (N 0V. 1, 2016) (the Guidelines?), available online at justice. gov/iqpr/information?quality. Your request seeks retraction and correction of information in Executive Order 13780: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States Initial Section 11 Report (Initial Section 11 Report or Report). The Department provided an interim reSponse on June 19, 2018. As noted in that Ben Berwick Faiza Patel Benjamin Wittes Michael F. Crowley Nora Ellingsen Page Two response, the Department required additional time to resolve your request given the-number and complexity of issues raised in your request. The Department has considered your IQA request reviewed against the Initial Section 11 Report. The IQA Guidelines require that Department components ensure the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information disseminated. Consistent with the directive to ensure objectivity by using reliable data sources and documentation of methods and data sources, the Initial Section 11 Report outlines the scope and source of the data utilized and, Where applicable, provides appropriate caveats, thereby meeting all applicable requirements. In your objections to the Initial Section 11 Report, you ?rst raise a concern about over- inclusivity. Your letter asserts that the Report violated the IQA by drawing ?a distinction between those who are US. citizens by birth and those who are naturalized citizens.? As you acknowledge on page 7, however, the Report provided ?gures for both foreign-bom individuals and foreign nationals. It is no violation to provide additional data, particularly when Executive Order 13780 requires ?[a]ny other information relevant to public safety and security as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General.? The letter does not challenge the reliability or accuracy of this information. Second, your letter alleges that the Report ignores instances of domestic terrorism. The Report, however, clari?es that the Report ?does not include individuals convicted of offenses relating to domestic terrorism, nor does it include information related to terrorism?related convictions in state courts.? As you may be aware, the federal criminal code contains no statute speci?cally prohibiting ?domestic terrorism,? which is often prosecuted at the state level, and the Department therefore does not possess comprehensive data on such activity, assuming such data would have been reSponsive to the Executive Order. In light of the accurate descriptions of the data used in the Report, and the relevant caveats and noted limitations, the data contained in the Report is not misleading. Third, your letter alleges that the inclusion of individuals extradited to the United States for prosecution is misleading. Again, the data used was clearly stated and accurately described. The Report stated that the ?information includes . . . defendants who were transported to the United States for prosecution.? Id. The accurate description of the data included allows the reader to draw his or her own conclusions. Fourth, your letter alleges that the Report?s examples of foreign nationals perpetuate a ?biased narrative? and are misleading. That charge is a subjective conclusion based on your interpretation of the Report and is premised on the alleged existence of a preexisting Ben Berwick Faiza Patel Benjamin Wittes Michael F. Crowley Nora Ellingsen Page Three ?narrative.? The Department disagrees with your subjective conclusion and its premise and, in any event, your conclusion presents no cognizable Violation of the Department?s Guidelines. Fifth, you have also noted a lack of data in the federal government regarding domestic violence and honor killings. The Report acknowledges that the ?federal government lacks comprehensive data regarding incidents of such offenses,? as there is no federal statute speci?cally addressing honor killings and most domestic violence offenses are prosecuted at the state level. Id. at 8. In an effort to disseminate information about these crimes, which are of a complex and highly sensitive nature, the Of?ce of Justice Programs (OJ P) is conducting two independent reviews of relevant research pertaining to honor violence in the United States. The ?rst is an internal review, led by social science and research assistants at the National Institute of Justice who specialize in gender-based Violence. This review will result in a report summarizing the current state of research with regards to scope, scale, methods, context, and the criminal justice response. The second review anticipates an externally commissioned report by a researcher who specializes in exploring and understanding honor crimes in the United States. Finally, your letter takes issue with certain statements of the Attorney General in a press release announcing the Report. Such statements are, of course, not part of the Report that is the subject of your request. In any event, the IQA Guidelines do not apply to press releases announcing or supporting the release of information. U.S. Dep?t Justice, Information Quality: Ensuring the Quality of the Information Disseminated by the Department (Nov. 1, 2016), Any statements made by the Department as part of a press statement in advance of the release of this Report are outside the scope of the IQA. 1d. For the reasons above, the Department has determined that there is no inconsistency with the IQA Guidelines. The Department concludes that neither retraction nor correction of information in the Initial Section 11 Report is required under the IQA Guidelines. Ben Berwick Faiza Patel Benjamin Wittes Michael F. Crowley Nora Ellingsen Page Four The Department?s IQA guidelines provide petitioners with the right to request reconsideration of the Department?s denial. Any request for reconsideration must be received within 45 calendar days from the date of this letter. Please direct such a request to: Department of Justice ATTN: Of?ce of Legislative Affairs 950 Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Sincerely, Maw Jessica E. Hart Intergovernmental and Public Liaison US. Department of Homeland Security Washington. DC 20528 gun. Homeland any? Security 1(4- August 1, 2018 Ben Berwick Counsel Protect Democracy 10 Ware St. Cambridge, MA 02138 Faiza Patel Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law 120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271 Benjamin Wittes Senior Fellow and Research Director in Public Law The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW Washington, DC 20036 Michael Crowley PO. Box 211 Belmont, MA 02478 Nora Ellingsen 1563 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 02138 Dear Mr. Berwick, Ms. Patel, Mr. Wittes, Mr. Crowley, and Ms. Ellingsen: The Department of Homeland Security (?Department?) writes in further response to your February 8, 2018, request for correction under the Department?s Information Quality Act guidelines. Your request seeks retraction and correction of information in the Executive Order 13780: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States Initial Section 11 Report (?Initial Section 11 Report? or ?Report?). The Department provided an interim response to your request on June 19, 2018. As noted in that response, the Department required additional time to resolve your request given the number and complexity of issues raised in your request. The Department has now completed its review of your IQA request and its contentions in connection with the Initial Section 11 Report and the Department?s IQA guidelines. Based on information presently available, the Department has determined that there is no inconsistency with the information contained in the Initial Section 11 Report and the Department?s IQA guidelines. Section 11(i) of Executive Order (130) 13780 required the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, to provide information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been: charged with terrorism- related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism-related activity, af?liation with or provision of material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national-security-related reasons. Pursuant to Section 11(i), the Department and the Department of Justice (DOJ) worked collaboratively to provide the information for the Initial Section 11 Report. In the request, you ask that additional data, context, and explanations be provided. For instance, you argue that the Report should include information on domestic terrorism. However, the Report speci?cally identi?ed what information was available and noted that because of previous information collection practices some of the data presented did not capture the full spectrum of statistics envisioned by the E0. Report at 1. As the Report makes clear on its face, the scope of the data on terrorism convictions is con?ned to international terrorism-related offenses. Id at 2. On this point as with other data, the information contained in the Report is annotated to explain the data being provided, and the Report contains caveats for the data limitations. For example, the report provides that and DOJ do not yet have complete, ?nal information? concerning the 402 convictions of foreign nationals or naturalized US. citizens. Id. at 2-3. Where data was not available, the lack of data is either noted in the report or other sources of estimated data are referenced with citations to those sources. Id. at 8 n. 15. Much of your request does not speci?cally challenge the accuracy of the data contained in the Report, but rather requests that the Report be amended to include ?appropriate context.? In addition, you advance arguments based not on the data in the Report itself, but on your differing interpretation of that data, which do not warrant correction under the Department?s IQA guidelines. As noted in the Report, the Department will endeavor to provide additional information in future reports that are required to be issued under the E0. With respect to such future reports, the Department is working to re?ne the available data, provide more detail where practicable, and examine other datasets that might warrant release in the interest of transparency about the threat environment, especially the challenge of terrorist recruitment and radicalization. Based on its review of your request, the Department concludes that neither retraction nor correction of information in the Initial Section 11 Report is warranted, and therefore denies your request. As noted above, the Department will be providing additional information, consistent with privacy protections and other limitations, in future reports issued pursuant to the requirements of Executive Order 13780. The Department will take the points raised in your IQA request into consideration in the preparation of future reports. The Department?s IQA guidelines provide petitioners with the right to an administrative appeal. Any appeal of the Department?s decision on your request must be submitted within 45 business days of this response letter. Please direct any appeals to: Department of Homeland Security ATTN: Of?ce of the Chief Information Of?cer/Information Quality Of?cer 245 Murray Lane, SW Mail Stop 0136 Washington, DC 20528 Email: DHS.InfoQuality@hq.dhs.gov Fax Number: 202-343-2530 Sincerely, WW Tyrone Huff EXHIBIT 3 Matthews, Patricia (NSD) From: Sent: To: Subject: Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG} Friday, Febrwary 10, 2017 11 :18 PM Toscas, George (NSD) FW: NSD Chart of Convictions FYI. ----Original Message----From: Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:17 PM To: Tucker, Rachael (OAG} Subject: RE: NSD Chart of.Convictions Thanks. Credit goes to George and NSD for Pl!Shing hard to get this done! If you have and I will introduce you next week! not met George yet, let me know -----Original Message----- · From: Tucker, Rachael (OAG) Sent: Friday, Fel)ruary 10, 2017 11:16 PM To: Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) Subject: Re: NSD Chart of Convictions . Tash! Thank you. This is great. > _On Feb 10, 2017, at 11:14 PM, Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) wrote: > > Hi Rachael. NSD has worked hard to update the chart to now include the 2016 numbers. You can see the revised chart attached herein. Per the e-mail below, NSD sef)t the document to the OLA for delivery to Congress. > > NSD is comfortable with your sending this chart to the WH and/or DHS as needed to get the additional information for the stats we previously discussed. > > Let me know if you need anything else from me on this. > > Thanks and have a great weekend. > > --Tash > . > ------------------ > From: Toscas, George (NSD}. > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 5:10 PM > To: Burton, Faith (OLA) ; Johnson, Joanne E. (OLA) > Cc: Weinsheimer, Bradley (NSD} ;' Gauhar. T.ashina l~AG) ; Toscas, George (NSD) Subject: NSD . Chart of_"J 4-, l'C,,, Convictions · · i_ = ··. w, ·,v > > 1 #6 > Faith and Joanne, > > Here is the chart covering public/unsealed convictions from 9/11/01 through 12/31/16 (updated as of 2-10-17). Let us know if you have any questions. > > The chart lists public international terrorism and terrorism-related convictions from 9/11 through the end of 2016. · Since it contains information from public cases, additional supporting information can be found in·public court documents {if folks care to search the public court dockets). The scope and limitations of the information contained in the chart are fully described in its preamble, which should always accompany the chart. > > Here are some general statements that are supported by the chart/preamble and could be used publicly: > > "Since 9/11, convictions have been obtained again.st hundreds of defendants for terrorism or terrorism-related charges in Article Ill courts." > > "We have a long history of usinRthe criminal justice.system to incapacitate individuals.who pose a threat to the U.S. and its interests here and abroad. Since 9/11, hundreds of convictions have been obtained in our federal courts." > > {IMPORTANT FYI -We do not use the total {600+} number of convictions listed on the chart in any statements because the explanations/caveats in the preamble always need to accompany that total number - - which is why the chart and . the preamble should always be distrib11ted and read together. Call me if you'd like to discuss this issue or need any further explanation. Thanks.) > >GZT > >. > > > 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION'S CHART OF PUBLIC/UNSEALED INTERNATIONAL TERJlORISM AND TERRORISM-RELATED CONVICTIONS FROM 9/I1/01 TO 12/31/16. The National Security Division's Chart ·of Public/Unsealed International Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions tracks public/unsealed convictions resulting from international terrorism investigations conducted since September 11, 2001, including investigations of terrorist acts planned or committed outside the territorial jurisdiction· of the United States over which Federal criminal jurisdiction exists and those within the United States involving international terrorists and terrorist groups. Convictions listed on the attached chart involve the use of a variety of Federal criminal statutes available to prevent, disrupt, and punish international terrorism and related criminal activity. The convictions are the product of the Department's aggressive, consistent, and coordinated national enforcement effort with respect to international terrorism that was undertaken after the September 11, 200 I terrorist attacks. Criminal cases arising from international terrorism investigations are divided into two categories, according to the level of coordination and monitoring required by the Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division (or its predecessor section in.the Criminal Division). This nationwide coordination and monitoring of international terrorism matters is designed to ensure coherent, consistent, and effective use and application of the statutes available for use in the prosecution of such matters. Category I cases involve charged violations of federal statutes that are directly reiated to . international terrorism (regardless of the offense of conviction). These statutes prohibit, for example, terrorist acts abroad against United States nationals, the use of weapons of mass destruction, conspiracy to murder persons overseas, providing material support to terrorists or foreign terrorist organizations, receiving military style training from foreign terrorist organizations, and bombings of public places or government facilities. A complete list of Category I offenses is found in Appendix A. • Category II cases involve charged violations of a vaijety of other statutes where the investigation involved an identified link to international terrorism. These Category II cases include offenses such as those involving fraud, immigration, firearms, drugs, false statements, perjwy, and obstruction ofjustice, . as well as general conspiracy charges under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Prosecuting terror-related targets using Category II offenses and others is often an effective method- and sometimes the only available method - of deterring and disrupting potential terrorist planning and support activities. This approach underscores the wide variety of tools available in the U.S. criminal justice system for disrupting terror activity. Examples of Category II offenses are iisted in Appendix B, and examples of Category II cases are described in Appendix C to illustrate the kinds of connections. to international terrorism that are not apparent from the nature of the offenses of conviction themselves. The attached chart includes the defendant's name, district, charging date, charges brought, classification category, conviction date, and charges of conviction. If a convicted defendant has been sentenced, the relevant date and sentence imposed is included. The chart includes only public/unsealed convictions from September 11, 2001 to December 31, 2016. The chart does not include defendants whose convictions remain under seal, nor does it include defendants who were charged with terrorism or terrorism-related offenses but, as of December 31, 2016, had not been convicted either at trial or by. Page I of8 Updated February 10, 2017 #2 guilty plea. The chart does not include convictions related solely to domestic terrorism. Note that the chart maintained by the National Security Division is distinct from statistics maintained by the Bureau ofPrisons to track inmates with terrorist connections. The chart lists more than 360 defendants classified in Category I and more than 300 defendants classified in Category II. The chart is organized by conviction date, with the most recent convictions first. The last group of defendants included on the chart were identified during the course of the nationwide investigation conducted after September 11, 2001, and were subsequently charged with a.criminal offense. Individuals whose convictions arose from this initial terrorism investigation were included on the chart at that time regardless of whether investigators developed or identified evidence that they had any connection to international terrorism. Since then, additional defendants have been added to this chart only if, at the time of charging, they appeared to have a connection to international terrorism, even if they were not charged with a terrorism offense. The decision to add defendants to the chart is made on a case-by-case basis by career prosecutors in the National Security Division'.s Counterterrorism Section, whose primary responsibility is investigating and prosecuting international and domestic terrorism cases to prevent and disrupt acts of terrorism anywhere in the world that impact on significant United States interests and persons. Page 2 of8 Updated February 10, 2017 Appendix A Category I Offenses Aircraft Sabotage (18 U.S.C. § 32) Animal Enterprise Terrorism (18 U.S.C. § 43) Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons (18 U.S.C. § § 112, 878, 1116, 1201(a)(4)) Use ofBiological, Nuclear, Chemical or Other Weapons ofMass Destruction (18 U.S.C. §§ 175, 175b, 229, 831, 2332a) Production, Transfer, or Possession ofVariola Virus (Smallpox) (18 U.S.C. § 175c) Participation in Nuclear and WMD Threats to the United States (18 U.S.C. § 832) Conspiracy Within the United States to Murder, Kidnap, or Maim Persons or to Damage Certain Property Overseas (18 U.S.C. § 956) Hostage Taking (18 U.S.C. § 1203) Terrorist Attacks Against Mass Transportation Systems (18 U.S.C. § 1993) Terrorist Acts Abroad Against United States Nationals (18 U.S.C. § 2332) Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries (18 U.S.C. § 2332b) Bombings ofplaces ofpublic use, Government facilities, public transportation systems and infrastructure facilities (18 U.S.C. § 2332£) Missile Systems designed to Destroy Aircraft (18 U.S.C. § 2332g) Production, Transfer, or Possession of Radiological Dispersal Devices (18 U.S.C. § 2332h) Harboring Terrorists (18 U.S.C. § 2339) Providing Material Support to Terrorists _(18 U.S.C. § 2339A) Providing Material Support to Designated Terrorist Organizations (18 U.S.C. § 2339B) . Prohibition Against Financing o~Terrorism (18 U.S.C. § 2339C) Receiving Military-Type Training from an FTO (18 U.S.C. § 2339D) Narco-Terrorism (21 U.S.C. § 1010A) Sabotage of Nuclear Facilities or Fuel (42 U.S.C. § 2284) Aircraft Piracy (49 U.S.C. § 46502) Violations ofIEEPA (50 U.S.C. § 1705(b)) involving E.O. 12947 (Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process); E.O. 13224 (Blocking Property .and Prohibiting Transactions With Page 3 of8 Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism or Global Terrorism List); and E.O. 13129 (Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With the Taliban) Page 4 ofS AppendixB Examples of Category II Offenses Crimes Committed Within the Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States (18 u.s.c. §§ 7, 113, 114, 115, 1111, 1112, 1201, 2111) .Violence at International Airports (18 U.S.C. § 37) Arsons and Bombings (18 U.S.C. §§ 842(m), 842(n), 844(f), 844(!)) Killings in the Course of Attack on a Federal Facility (18 U.S.C. § 930(c)) False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) Protection of Computers (18 U.S.C. § 1030) False Information and Hoaxes (18 U.S.C. § 1038) Genocide (18 U.S.C. § 1091) Destruction of Communication Lines (18 U.S.C. § 1362) Sea Piracy (18 U.S.C. § 1651) Unlicensed Money Remitter Charges (18 U.S.C. § 1960) Wrecking Trains (18 U.S.C. § 1992) Destruction of National Defense Materials, Premises, or Utilities (18 U.S.C. § 2155) Violence against Maritime Navigation and Maritime Fixed Platforms (18 U.S.C. §§ 2280, 2281) Torture (18 U.S.C. § 2340A) War Crimes (18 U.S.C. § 2441) International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 U.S.C. § 2778, and the rules and regulations promulgated · thereunder, 22 C.F.R. § 121-130) Crimes in the Special Aircraft Jurisdiction other than Aircraft Piracy (49 U.S.C. §§ 46503-46507) Destruction of Interstate Gas or Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Facilities (49 U.S.C. § 60123(b)) Page 5 of8 AgpendixC Examples of Category II Terrorism-Related Convictions . Fort Dix Plot (conspiracy to murder members of the U.S. military). In 2008, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Ibrahim Shnewer, Dritan Duka, Shain Ouka, Eljvir Duka and Serdar Tatar were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. §1117, in connection with a plot to kill members·ofthe U.S. military in an armed attack on the military base at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The defendants were also convicted of various weapons charges. The government's evidence revealed that one member of the group conducted . surveillance at Fort Dix and Fort Monmouth in New Jersey, Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, and the U.S. Coast Guard in Philadelphia. The group obtained a detailed map of Fort Dix, where they hoped to use assault rifles to kill as many soldiers as possible. During the trial, the jury viewed secretly recor!ied videotapes of the defendants performing small-arms training at a shooting range in the Poconos Mountains in Pennsylvania and of the defendants watching training videos that included depictions of American soldiers being killed and of known Islamic radicals urging jihad against the United States. Fawaz Damrah (citizenship fraud). In 2004, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Fawaz Damrah was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1425 for concealing material facts in his citizenship application. The government's evidence showed that in his citizenship application, Damrah concealed from the U.S. government his membership in or affiliation with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a.k.a. the Islamic.Jihad Movement in Palestine; the Afghan Refugees Services, Inc., a.k.a. Al-Kifah Refugee Center; and the Islamic Committee for Palestine. Damrah further concealed the fact that he had, prior to his application for U.S. citizenship, "incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution" of Jews and others by advocating violent terrorist attacks against Jews and others. During the trial, the government's evidence included footage of a 1991 speech in which Damrah called Jews ''the sons of monkeys and pigs," and a 1989 speech in which he declared that ''terrorism and terrorism alone is the path to liberation." Soliman Biheiri (false statements and passport fraud). In 2003 and 2004, following two jury trials in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Soliman Biheiri wai, convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1425 and 1546 for fraudulently procuring a passport, as well as 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1015 for making false statements to federal agents. Biheiri was the · president ofBMI, Inc., a New Jersey-based investment firm. The government's evidence showed that Biheiri had deliberately deceived federal agents during a June 2003 interview in which he denied having business or personal ties to Mousa Abu Marzook, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist and a leader ofHamas. In fact, the government's evidence showed that Biheiri had managed funds for Marzook both before and after Marzook was designated as a terrorist by the U.S. government in 1995. Specifically, the government presented files seized Page 6 of8 from Biheiri's computer showing that Marzook had invested $1 million in U.S. business ventures managed by Biheiri and his investment firm. Mohammad Salman Farooq Qureshi (false statements). In 2005, following the entry of a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Qureshi was convicted of-violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements to the FBI regarding the nature and extent of his involvement with al-Qaeda member Wadih El Hage, and the nongovernmental organization Help Africa People. Qureshi was interviewed by the FBI in 1997, 1998, 2000, and 2004 in relation to terrorism crimes and during those interviews lied about his knowledge of El Hage, Help Africa People, and-other al Qaeda members. The proffer filed in support of the plea agrel)ment established Qureshi's connections to and contacts with El Hage, his contact with a subject under investigation in Oregon, and his activities and financial support of Help Africa People, a non-governmental organization believed to have been used by El Hage and others to provide cover identities and funds in connection with the 1998 attacks on the United States Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. By Qureshi's admissions, at least $30,000 in Qureshi's funds were given to El Hage in Nairobi, Kenya. El Hage is serving a life sentence for his role in the East Africa Embassy bombings. Sabri Benkahla (perjury, obstruction, false statements). In 2007, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Sabri Benkahla was convicted on two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. §1623, for perjury, one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1503 for obstructing justice, and one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements to the FBI. These false statements included denial of his involvement with an overseas jihad training camp in 1999, as well as his asserted lack of knowledge about individuals with whom he· was in contact. The government's evidence revealed that the grand jury and FBI in 2004 sought to question Benkahla about his contacts with Ibrahim Buisir of Ireland, and ManafKasmuri of · Malaysia, both of whom are Specially Designated Global Terrorists, as well as those with Ahmed Abu Ali, his friend and fellow student at the University of Medina, until both were arrested by Saudi authorities in June 2003. Further, the government's evidence revealed that-the grand jury and FBI sought to question Benkahla about his contacts with an individual suspected ofbeing Malik al-Tunisl, a facilitator for the al-Zarqawi terrorist network in Iraq. Akram Musa Abdallah (false statements). In 2009, following the entry of a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Akram Musa Abdallah was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements to the FBI. In.January 2007, Abdallah knowingly made a false material statement to special agents of the FBI during an interview in connection with the federal investigation and prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development (HLF) and its officers. At the time of the interviews, Abdallah knew the HLF was a Specially Designated Global Terrorist organization. Abdallah also knew that when he was interviewed, the HLF and its officers were pending trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, for crimes including providing material support to a foreign · terrorist organization. During the interviews, Abdallah told FBI agents he was not involved in Page 7 of8 fundraising activities for the HLF, when, in fact, between approximately 1994 and 1997, Abdallah was involved in numerous fundraising activities, including collecting donations, organizing, facilitating and coordinating fund raising events on behalf of the HLF in the Phoenix metropolitan area. In July 2004, the HLF and seven of its principals were indicted on a variety of charges stemming from its financial support ofHamas, and in November 2008, after a twomonth trial, those defendants were convicted on all charges. Page 8 of8 National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01-12/31/16 Defendant 1 Singh, Balwlnder D"1riot Charge Date DNV 18-0ec-13 Charges Category Conv Date I 29-No,-16 1819220) and 924(a)(2)i 18/1958; 2x18/1001(aX2) Vnd!ctmenl]; 18/2339B(e)(1); 18/924{b); I 29-Nov-16 18/2332b(a)(1) and 2 18/9-,u(S.1{1); 1o,c..>,>l<>OIJI\U/ 8f1d (i) [Complain!J; 18/23398; 181924{b); 26/5861(d); 2 Sullivan, Juslin WDNC 22.Jun-15 26/5861(d); 18/9220) and 924{a}(2); 18/1958; 2x1.8/1001 (a)(2); 2x1812332b [Superseding 3 Hicks, Martonn NDIN 12-Jul-16 18/842(p)(2)(A) II 28-0ct-16 181842(p}(2}(A} 4 Jalloh, Mohamed BaHor EDVA 03-Jul-16 18/23398 I 27-0ct-16 18123398 5 Jama. fv\ma Osman EDVA 24-Jun-14 I 25-0ct-16 1x 18/23398 and 20x 2339B and 2 6 Dhfrane, Hinda Osman EDVA 24-Jun-14 I 25-0ct-16 1x 18/2339B end 6x 23398 and 2 7 Bhassan. Mahmoud Amin Mohamed EDVA 16-Jan-16 I 24-0cl.-16 18/2339B; 18/1001 8 Van Hefl.en, Joshua Ray WDWI 28-0c:t-14 20-0ct-16 18/2339B 9 Portorreal, Luis EDVA 20-0ct-16 "'"'""""'' I 1811001 II 20-0ct-16 1811001 10 Al Hardan, Omar Faraj Saeed S01X 06-Jan-16 18/23398; 1811425; 1811001 {by Indictment] I 17-0ct-16" 18/2339B 11 Qamar, Harts EDVA 07-Jul-16 18/2339B I 17-0ct-16 12 aka Nuh Amrlkl, aka Nuh DMA 12~un-15 18/2339B [by ComplalntJ; 18123398 and 2-{by lndidment]; 1612339B(aX1) and 2; 18/2332b(a)(2) & (c) [by Superseding Indictment] I 22-Sep-16 18/23398(&)(1}; 18/2332b(a)(2} & (c) 13 Thomas, Keonna EDPA 03-Apr-15 I 20-Sep.16 18/2339B 14 Demlrtas, lrfan DDC 08-0ec-11 I 15-Sep-16 18/2339B encl 2 II 1&'922(a)(6) and 924{a)(2); 1&'922(g)(3) 1~16 and 924(a)(2) II 12-Sep.16 1811001(a)(2) II 15-Aug-16 18/1001(8)(2) 07-0ec-16 I 11-Aug-16 18/23396(&)(1) 26-Jan-17 63 months imprisonment ; judicial order of removal 20 yrs lmprisonmenL 50 )T'S SR I 01-Aug•16 18/1114; 18/23398; 18/924{ c) 05-0eo-16 30 )T'S Imprisonment. llfatlme SR I 26-Jul-16 18/2339B(a)(1) 13-0ec-16 5 yrs imprisonment, 6 yrs SR I 21-Jun-16 18123398; 18123398 and 2; 20/1097(a) 19-0ct-16 30 yn; hnprisonment; lifetime SR I 21-Jun-16 2x 18/23398; 26x 18/1344 26-Sep--16 30 yrs Imprisonment; lifetime SR I 15-Jun-16 18/23396; 18/1030 23-Sep-16 20 yrs Imprisonment, 10 yrs SR 15 16 Rovlnskl. Nicholas Alexander Andalusl Rayyan, Khalil Abu McCain, Marchello EDMI SDCA 04-Feb-16 16-Jan-15 20 X 18123398 and 2; 18/23398 {by indictment); 18/23398, 2Dx 18/2339B end 2 [by SUpessedlng lndictmeiltl 20 x 18123398 and 2; 18/23398 [by indictment]; 1812339B, 20x 18/2339B and 2 [by SlJpersedlng lndictmenll 18/23398 and 2 (byComplaln(]; 2x 18/2339B; 18/1001 ...... lndiclmentl 18/2339B {by criminal compialnt]; 18123398 [by 18/23398 [by Complaint]; 18/23398 [by lndlctme..n 1812339A and 2; 18/2339B and 2; 18/2339D and 2- 18/92Afc't1\IA1 and fB\and2 181922(9)(3) [by Complaint]; 181922(aX6) and 924(a)(2); 922(g){3) end 924(a)(2) [by Indictment 2/16/1ffi 3X 922(g)(1) [by Indictment]; 5x 922(g)(1 ); 181931 [by Superseding lndlctmenl]; 5x 181922{g)(1); 18/931; 1811001(a)(2) (by Second Superseding 10-Feb-17 11 yrs imprisonment, 5 yrs. SR 25-0d.-16 18/2339B 20-Dec-16 lndlclmentl EDMI 17-Mar-14 Lutchman, Emanuel WDNY 30-0eo-15 19 Cornell, CIViSlOpher Lee SDOH 21-Jan-15 2ll Nalsheh, Islam Said NDCA 20-Apr-16 21 Badawi, Muhanad COCA 22--May-15 17 Hamdan, Mohammad Hassan 18 22 Shuzayel, Nader COCA 22-May-15 23 Ferlzl,Ardit EDVA 06-0ct-15 18123398 [by Complaint], 18/23398 [by lndlctmenn 18/1001'aV2' "'-·· fnfonnatfon1 1812339B(a)(1) 18/1114; 16/924(c) {by complaint]; 18/1114; 181373; 181924{c) {by lncHclmenl]; 18/373; ,,.....,.; c\• 1811114• 1,.,..,.,_,.B ...:. 51J--....,fnn 1612339B(a)(1l [by lnfonnatfon] 18/23398 [by complaint]; 2x 18123398 [by l~ndlctment]; 18/23398; 18/2339B and 2; 20/1097 edl-- Indictment' 118'2339B {by complaint]; 2x 18/2339B [by indlclment]; 2x 18123398; 26x 1811344 [by -JTn,. lndfctn'i·~ 18123398; 1811030; 1811028A [by Complaint]; 2x 18/2339B; 1811028A; 18/1030(a}(2) and (c '" lu21rs"ii' ..... rn_.,_._ __., 5 yrs probation Page 1 of24 Updated February 10, 2017 88 months Imprisonment : judicial Ofder of rem°"' National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 24 Farah, Mohamed Abdihamld DMN 18-Apr-15 18123398(&){1); 2x 1812339B(a)(1) and 2 [by Complaint]; 1812339B(e)(1); 2x18/2339B(a)(1) and 2; 18/1001 [by Superseding lndlclment]; 181956{a); 3x 2339B; 18/1621; 18/1001 [by Secon~ "· lj...., ' .~ I 03-Jun-16 I I 18/956;2x 18/2339Band2; 18123398; 18/1821; 1811001 16-Nov--16 30 yrs Imprisonment. Lifetime SR 03-Jun-16 181956; 18/2339B; 18/2339B and 2 16-Nov-16 30 yrs imprisonment. Ufellme SR 03-Jun-16 181956(a) end 2; 2x18/2339B(a)(1) and 2; 18/23398(&)(1); 20/1097 16-Nov-16 35 yrs lmprfsonment, lifetime SR -•• 1812339B(a)l1J; 18/2339(&J\1J and 2 {by 25 Daud, Abdlrahman Yasin OMN 26 Omar~ Guled Ali OMN complalnt]; 18/2339B(a)(1); 18/2339B(a)(1) and 2 18-Apr-15 [by Superseding Indictment}; 18/956{a); 2x 18/23398; 18/1621 [by 2nd Supe,sedlng lndldmentl 18/2339B(a)(1); 18/2339(a){1) end 2 (by complaint]; 2x1812339B(a)(1} [by Superseding 18-Apr-15 • lndlctmen!J; 18/956(a); 2x 18/2339B(a)(1) and 2; 1812339B(a)(1); 20/1097 [by Second Superseding 27 Blair, Alexander OKS 10-Apr-15 28 Ahmed, Hamza NaJ OMN 04-Feb-15 29 Farah, Adnan Abdlhamid OMN 18-Apr-15 Rabbanl, lmmn EDNY 13-Jun-15 31 Young, Jaelyn Oelshaun NOMS 08-Aug-15 32 Abdulkacler, Munir SOOH 22-May-15 33 Fan't>kh, Joseph Hassan EDVA 16-Jsn-16 Kareem, Abdul Malik AbdUl (aka "Oecarus Thomas•) 35 OAZ 10-Jun-15 Al-Ghazi, Amir Said Abdul Rahman (previously kna.m as Robert McCoDum) NDOH 19-Jun-15 36 Dakhlalla, Muhammad Oda NDMS 08-Aug-15 37 Warsarne, Abdlrizak Mohamed DMN 0~15 38 Booker, John T. (aka Mohammed Abdullah Hassan) OKS 10-Apr~1s 39 el-Hamidi, Ali Alvi {aka Issa A!Yemini) EONY 11-Feb-15 40 Pham, Minh Quang SONY 24-May-12 41 Elfgeeh,Mufid WDNY 16-Sep-14 42 Edmonds, Hasan NOil 02-Apr-15 43 Saadeh, Nader ONJ 01-Aug-15 / lnforniationl 1811001 [by Complaint]; 2x 18123398, 18/1001 [by Indictment]; 18/2339B(a)(1); 1812339B(a)(1) and 2; 1811001; 20/1097 [bySupersedlrtg lndlclmenl]; 1--·-·a\'. 2x1812339B· 18/1001· 20/1097fa\ 18/2339B(a)(1) [by complaint]; 18/2339B(a){1) [by Superseding Indictment]; 18/956(a); 1812339B(aX1); 2x 18/1621 [by 2nd Superseding II 23-May-16 181371 and 2 18-0cM6 15 months imprisonmenl; 2 years SR I 25-Apr-16 18/2339B; 20/1097 15-Nov-16 15 yrs Imprisonment, 20 yrs SR I 14-Apr-16 18/2339B(a)(1) 15-Nov-16 10 yrs imprisonment, 20 years SR 18/372 [by Information] 18/2339B [by Complaint]; 18/23398; 18/2339B and 2 ..... lndlclrrr·" · 18/1117 and 1114; 18/2339B; 1&'924( c) [by Complaint]; 18/1114; 18/2339B; 181924( c) [by Information returned on 2/26/1f!l 18/2339B [by Complain!J; 18/2339B [by lnformauon1 II 08-Apr-16 18/372 I 29-Mar-16 18123398 11-Aug-16 12 yrs lmprisoninent; 15 yrs SR I 24-Mar-16 23-N-15 67 ~Abdul WakD Khalil" AI-Abbacll, Saddlq_(aka Sufiyan al-Yemeni aka SOGA EDNY 10-Ape-09 68 Hashl, Msdhi Mohammed EDNY 18-0ct-12 18/23398; 181924{c) [by Indictment]; 2x 18/23398; 18/924(c) [by Superseding lnclldment]: 3x 2339B; 181924(c) [by 2nd SUpersed!ng Indictment] I 12-Msy-15 18/2339B 1129/2016 108 months Imprisonment Ahmed, All Yasin EDNY 18-0cl-12 18/23398; 181924(c); 2x 18/2339B; 18/924(c) {by Supe,sed/ng lnd'1ctment]; 3x 23398; 181924(c); 18/23390 [by 2nd SUpersetllng Indictment] I 12-May.15 18/2339B 15-.Jan-16 11 years Imprisonment (The court recommsndS to the bureau of prisons that defendenJ be sent ba'ck ID Sweden for Incarceration.) 66 69 """""'' ,~ ation' I . Page3of24 Updated February 10, 2017 National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 70 71 72 EDNY 18-0cM2 18/2339B; 181924(c); 2x 18123398: 18/924(c) [by Superseding lndicbnent]; 3x 2339B; 18/924(c): 18/2339D (by 2nd Sl.lperseding lndlctmenl] Moreno EDVA 23-0c:t-13 21/963, 959(c); 18/924(0); 211960a & 960a{b) Tsamaev; Ozhokhar DMA 27.Jun-13 SONY 12-Sep-05 Yusuf, Mohamed Martinez, Julian Manuel 75 76 .II 12-May-15 1812339B ' U-May..15 21/952, 959, 960, and 963 and 1an Matanov, Khalrullozhon OMA 29-May-14 18/2332a(a)(2}; 18/844(1) [l)y Complaint]; [7x 1812332a; 3x 18/2332f; 3x 18/844 (I) & (n); 9x 18J924(c) & OJ; 6x 18/924{c); 1x 18/2119 (2): 1x 1811951 bv lndlctmentl 18/371; 1812339A; 2x 18123398 18/1519, 3x 1811001 (a)(2) (by Indictment]; 18/1001(aX1), 3x 1001(a)(2) {by supei'Sedlng Herrera, Osvaldo Jose Lope;: EDVA 23-0ct-13 21/963, 959{c); 181924{0); 21/960a & 960a(b) II 23-Mar-15 211952, 959, 960, and 963 and 1812 1812339A; 18/2332a(a) [by lndlclment]; 18/2332a(a); 2x 18/2339A(a); 2x 18/2339B(a)(1); 18/371; 18/111(&)(1); 18/1114(3) [by SUparaeding I 12-Mar-15 1812339A; 18/2339B; 18/371 1812339A; 18/2332a{a) {by Indictment]; 18/2332a(a): 2x 18/2339A(a); 2x 18/2339B(aX1 ); 18/371; 181111(8)(1); 1811114{3) {by Superseding I 12-Mar-15 1812339A; 18/371 73. Aswat. Haroon Rashid 74 I Qazi, Raees Alam SOFL 3().Nov-12 indlctmentl Guilty on an counts: 7x 18123328; 3x 1B/2332f; 3x 181844 (I) & (n}; 9x 1&'924{c) & O); 6x 181924(c); 1x 1812119 (2); 1x 1811951 I 08-Apr-15 I 30-Mar-15 2x 18123398 11 years lmprisonmenl: (The court recommends 1s:Jan-1S to the bureau of prisons that defendant be sent back to SWeden for Incarceration.) 9-Sep-15 144 months Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR 24-Jun-15 Sentenced to death end multiple consecutive life sentences 16-0ct-15 II 24-Mer-15 3x 18/1001{a)(2); 18/1001(a)(1) 18-Jun-15 22-Jlln-1s · 11.Jun-15 20 years Imprisonment 30 months In custody with aedlt from 5/30/14 untn 7/1/15; 36 months SR 156 months Imprisonment: 5 yrs SR 35 yrs imprisonment, 10 yrs SR lnd[rl....,,n11 n Qazi, Sheheryar Alam SOFL 30-Nov-12 11-Jun-15 20yrs imprisonment and 5 yrs SR lndlctmentl 78 Quintero, Hemies Andrade EDVA 23-0ct-13 21/963, 959{c); 18/924(0); 21/960e & 96Qa(b) 79 Naseer,Abld II 12-Mer-15 21/952, 959, 960, and 963 and 18/2 22.Jun-15 EDNY 07.Jul-10 164 months imprisonment 5 yr.. SR I 04-Mer-15 2x 18/2339B; 181924{c )(1)(8)(11) 24-Nov-15 40 yr.. imprisonment; lifellme SR 80 Yusuf, Abdullahi Mohamed DMN 24-Nov-14 I 26-Feb-15 18/2339B 14-Nov-16 tnme-served and 20 yrs SR I 18/2332(b); 18/1114, 1116 and 1117; 28-Feb-15 18/844(1)(1), (f3), end 844{n); 1812155(8) endfbl Life Imprisonment on counts 1, 3, and 5, and 15-May-15 120 months Imprisonment on count B, the terms to run com:urrenllv I 13-Feb-15 1813 19-Jun-15 II 02-Feb-15 1811001(8) 11~15 54 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR 07-Apr-15 SONY 08-May-00 Khan, Reaz Qadir DOR 27-Deo-12 EDVA 14-Nov-14 EDVA 23-0ct-13 21/963, 959(c): 18/924(0); 21/960a & 960a(b) II 17-0ec-14 211952. 959, 960, and 963 and 18/2 85 Coffman, Heather Blzabelh otalvaro, Jose Nolber Zul··~-a Esse, Amine Mohemud 2X 18/23398; 18J924(c)(1)(8)(ii) & 18/924(0) 18/2339B {by complalnl]; 18/2339B(a)(1) [by lnformatlonl 1~b), 18/1114, 1116, and 1117; 181956(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), 18/844(n), 1S/2155(a) and(bl 1812339A [by Indictment]; 18/3 (by superseding lnfonnationl 18/1001(8) DMN 20-Nov-14 I 20-Nov-14 18/23398 85 Morgan, Donald Rey MDNC 27-Mey-14 I 30-Qct-14 18/23398: 18/922(g)(1); 18/924{a)(2) 87 Phllllpos, Robel Kidane OMA 29-Aug-13 18/2339B 18/922(g)(1) and 18/924{8)(2); [18123398 by lnfonnatlon1 2x 18/1001(8)(2) II 28--0d-14 2x 18/1001(e}(2) EDNC 01-Apr-14 1812339A I 16-0ct-14 1812339A 18/1001 1812339A; [1812339A; 18/23398; 18/956; 18/371 (18/23390 precficate); 18/1117 by Superseding lndlc:tmenll 1812339A; [1812339A; 18/2339B; 18/956; 18/371 (18/23390 predicate): 18/1117 by supenledlng lndlctmentl II 03-0ct-14 18/1001 I 25-Sep-14 1&'2339A; 18/956; 18/1117 23-Feb-15 25 yr.. Imprisonment; lifetime SR I 25-Sep-14 1S/2339A; 18/2339B; 18/371 (18/23390 predicate); 18/1117 23-Feb-15 25 )'TS Imprisonment lifellme SR 21/963, 959(c); 181924{0); 21/960a & 960a(b) II :z>.Sep-14 21/952, 959, 960, end 963 and 18/2 3-Mar-15 144 monlhs imprisonment; 5 yrs SR I 19-Sep-14 6-Feb-15 25 years Imprisonment 81 al Fawwaz, Khalid 82 83 84 . Jorden, Akba Jihad 89 Furreh, Mahdi Hussein OMN 24-Sep-14 90 Deleon, Ralph Kenneth COCA 28-Nov-12 91 Kabir, Sohlel COCA 12-0ec-12 ""'"' EDVA 23-0ct-13 93 Bary, Adel Abdel SONY 94 Conley, Shannon Maureen llCO 22-Apr-14 95 zea, Marcos Alonso EDNY 17-0ct-13 92 Piedrahita, German Dario ......,.. ; ·----; ·-··· '···-,,... ; 96 Kadyrt>eyev, Dies OMA 08-Au9-13 1812332a; 18/844(n); 18/2155; 2x 18/844(f): 2x 1812332a & 18/2; 224x 18/930(c), 18/1111 & 1812; 44x 18/1111, 18/1114 & 1812; 4x 18/1111, 18/1116 & 1812; 18/844{h) & 18/2; 2x 18/924{c) & 1812. [18/844(e) & (n): 18/844(e) & 18/2; 18/371 •..,,..,f.,...,..,,., bv 18/371 (18/23398 predicate) 18/956; 18/2339A& 18/2; 18/2339B & 1812; 2x 18/1512 & 18/2 18/371 (18/1519 predicate); 18/1519 & 18/2 97 ~ . Avin Marsalis EDNC 01-Apr-14 1812339A 18/844(e) & (n); 18/844(e); 181371 (1812332(8) predicate) 87 months Imprisonment 3 yr.. SR 108 months Imprisonment 5 yrs SR 13-Mey-15 243 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR 5-Jun-15 36-months 111\prisonment; 3 yrs SR 5-Jul-16 108 months Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR II 10-Sep-14 18/371 (18/23398 predicate) 23.Jan-15 IHI I 09-Sep-1'4 18123398; 18/1512 2Q.Apr-15 25 yr.. imprisonment 3 yr.. SR II 21-Aug-14 18/371 (18/1519 predlcale); 18/1519 & 18/2 2-Jun-15 72 months Imprisonment; 3yrs SR I 12-Aug-14 1812339A 5-Jul-16 92 months imprisonment 5 yrs SR Page4of24 Updated Februa,y 10, 2017 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01-12/31/16 98 lbrahlm, Abd!nasslr Mohamud 99 Tazhayakov, Azamat 100 101 Kauser Mohammed, Gufran Ahmed Khan, Rahatul Ashlklm 31-Jul-14 18/23398; 18/1546 I 31.Jul-14 18/23398; 18/1546 5-Feb-15 15 yrs Imprisonment OMA 08-AIJg-13 18/371 (18/1519 predicate); 1811519 & 18/2 II 21-Jul-14 18/371 (18/1519 predicate); 18/1519 & 18/2 5-Jun-15 42_ months imprisonment; 3 yrs SR SOFL 21-May-13 15x 18/23398 & 1812; forfeHure I 11-Jul-14 18/2339B 17-0eo-14 15 yrs lmpriSonment; 5 yrs SR; forfeiture WOlX 18-Jun-14 1812339A [1812339A by Indictment]: {18/2339B by I 02-Jul-14 111/Zl39A 25-SeJr15 10 yrs Imprisonment; 10 yrs SR I 27-Jun-.14 111/2339B 5-Jun-15 1812332a: 26/5861(d) & 2615871; forfeiture 2x 18/1546(8) & 18/2; forfeiture; [1811001; 18/1028 bv$u~""1nn lnformatlonl 18/1203; 1811203 & 18/2; 181371 (1812339A predicate); 2X 1812339A & 18/2; 2X 18/2339B; 2X 1812339B& 1812; 18.12339A; 18/371, 50/1705(b) & 31 C.F.R. 545.204&545..,,,.,'bl 2X 18/23398; 1M24(c) & 18/2.; 16/924(0) I 10-Jun-14 18123328; 26/5861(d) & 26/5871 5-Nov-14 II 03-Jun-14 18/1001 i 18/1028 16.Jul-14 102 Wolfe, Mlchael Todd WOlX 18-Jun-14 103 Osmaksc. Sarni ·MDFL 02-Feb-12 104 Abassl,Ahmed SONY 22-Apr-13 · Mustsfe, Mustafa Kamel (aka 105 Abu Hamza, aka Abu Ham7.a al Masri) 82 months Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR 40 yrs Imprisonment; Dfe SR; forfeiture Time served (15 months); 1 yr SR;judlc:ial order of removal I 18/1001 II 24-Apr-14 18/1001 23-JUl-14 5 yrs Imprisonment: 3 yrs SR 18/2332{b);18/2339A; 1812.339A & 18/2; forfeiture I 26-Mar-14 18/2332{b);1812339A; 16'2339A & 1812 ~14 2x 18f2339A I 19-Mar-14 2x 1812339A 14-.Jan-15 life Imprisonment: forfetture 20 yrs Imprisonment: life SR; $17,000 211963, 959(c); 18/924(0) 4x 1811203(a); 18/924(c) & 1812; 1812339A; 18/2339B II 19-Mar-14 21/952. 959, 960, and 963 and 18/2 24-Sep-14 188 months in prison; 5 yrs SR I 18-Mar-14 3x 18/1203(a) & 18/2 24-0ct-14 27 yrs imprisonment; 2 yrs SR 07-Mar-12 [18/2339B by Indictment]; [18/1519 by Information] II 13-Jan-14 18/1519 13-Jan-14 7 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR 11-0ct-13 18/1542; 18/23398 1812339A & 18/2; 18/371 (18/2339Apredlcate); 11W58· 18/1958la\12\IA\ 181371 (1812339A predicate); 1812339A& 1612; 1""56 18/2339B & 1812; 18/924(c) & 1812;forfelture [211960a; 18/23398 & 18/2; 181924(c) & 18/2; ...__,elture nv su---edinn lndict:menn I 27-0ec-13 30-Jun-14 13 yrs Imprisonment; 10 yrs SR I' 10-Dec-13 "'11112339A 11h!IA-14 12.5 yrs imprisonment 5 yrs SR I 1812339A & 18/2; 18/371 (18/2339A 10-Doo-13 nredlcatel . 11h!LA-14 Time &el"Ved; 3 yrs SR I 10-Dec-13 111/2339B -14 10 yrs Imprisonment SONY 19-Ap,--04 EONY SOFL 21-Feb-13 Alkadhl, Soloman Zeld 108 Abu Ghayth, SUieiman SONY 01-Mar-13 109 Beu, Shelton Thomas MOFL · 18-Jul-13 110 Quiceno, Sonia Cruz EOVA 23-0ct-13 111 Herrera, Alexander Beltran DOC 14-0ec-10 112 Baxam, Craig Benedict OMO 113 Nguyen, Slnh Vlnl'I Ngo COCA 114 Ahmad, Babar OCT 06-0et--04 115 Ahsan, Syed Talha OCT 2lhhm-06 SONY 02-Aug-12 116 Viglakis, loannis lnfonnatlonl 18/1203; 18/1203 & 18/2; 18/371 (182339A predicate); 1812339A; 2x 1812339A & 1812; 19-May-14 2X 18/23398; 2x 18123398 & 18/2; 181371, 50/1705/bl & 31 CFR 545 204 545 2""'bl 29-Apr-14 2x: 18fl339B 107 106 ' Babafeml, Lawal Olanlyl I 18/2339B .9-Jan-15 Ufe Imprisonment 12-Aug-15 22 yrs Imprisonment ( 25-Apr-14 restitulloo 30 months Imprisonment; 3 .yrs SR 117 AI-Khattab, Yousef Mohamld EOVA 30-0d.-13 1812281A(2){B) II 30-0ct-13 18/2261A(2)(8) 118 Ueneza, Matthew Aaron NOCA 07-Mar-13 I 10-0ct-13 1812332a 27-Feb-14 15yrs Imprisonment life SR 119 NadaraJah, Piratheepan EDNY 14-&p--06 I O&-Oct-13 2x 18/2339B 25-Mar-14 24 months Imprisonment: 3 yrs SR 120 HatTOUn. Eric FINA 20-Jun-13 I 19-$ep-13 181371 (22/2778 predicate) 19-Sep-13 llme served; 3 yrs SR 121 Abukhdair, Mohammed Abdul Rahman 1812332a 2x 18/23398 {2x 18123398; 2x 23329 by I lndlctmentl s" 18123398 and 1812332a [18/371 (2212778 -"cate' '- /nfomialionl SOAL 19-0ec-12 1812339A; 1811542 I 06--Aug-13 11112339A 20-0ec-13 15 yrs Imprisonment: 3 yrs SR 122 Sriskandarajah, SUresh EONY 28-DeoO!l 18/2339B; 50/1705(b) & 1812 I 02-Jul-13 111/2339B 28-0d-13 24 i:nonths Imprisonment: 3 yrs SR; Judicial order of removal COCA 28-Nov-12 1812339A I 07-May-13 1812339A; 181371 (18/2339D predicate) 16-Mar-15 10 yrs Imprisonment: 10 yrs SR SOAL 19-0ec-12 1812339A I 19-Apr-13 20-Dec-13 15 yrs Imprisonment; 3 rs SR EONY 23-lleo-10 3x 1811001 II 25-Mar-13 3x 18/1001 20-Sep-13 13 yrs Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR SOFL 12-May-11 211: 1812339A; 2x 18123398 I 04-Mar-13 2x 1812339A; 2x 18/2339B 123 ' WOlX 124 125 126 Vldriales, Miguel Alejandro Santana Wilson Jr., Randy Lamar Hameed Shehadeh, Abdel Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Sher All 127 Doreh, Issa SOCA 22-0ct-10 128 Moa!in, Basaaly Saeed SOCA 22-0cl.-10 129 Mohamud, Ahmed Nasir Team SOCA . 14-Jan-11 1812339A; 18/23398; 181956; 1811956(a)(2)(A) & (h) {1812339A; 2x 18/23398; 18/1956(aX2l(A) & h\ bu Secorld S fnn lndlctmenfl 2x 1812339A; 1...........98; 181956; 18/19~(a){2){A) & (h) {2x 1812339A; 2X 18123398; 18/1956(a){2)(A) & (h) by 5econd SUperaeding lndictmenti 1812339A; 18/23398; 181958; 18/1956(al{2}(A) & {h) [1812339A; 18/23398; 1811956(a}(2)(A) & (h) bu Second Suner.;Mjnn Ind!~ enn 1812339A 23-Aug-13 25 yrs lmprlsorvnent; 5 yrs SR 18-Nov-13 10 yrs Imprisonment: 3 yrs SR I 22-Feb-13 1812339A; 2x 18/2339B; 18/1956(a)(2)(A) & (h) I 22-Feb-13 2x 1812339A; 2x 18/23398; 18/1958{a)(2)(A) & (h) 18-Nov-13 18 yrs Imprisonment: 3 yrs SR I 22-Feb-13 1812339A; 18/23398; 18/1956(a){2){A) & (h) 31-Jsn-14 6 yrs Imprisonment 3 yrs SR Page5of24 Updated February 10, 2017 National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 130 Mohamud, Mohamed Mohamed 22-0ct-10 SDCA 131 Gojali, Arifeen David COCA 132 Kal!ebe. Justin EDNY 22-Jan-13 133 Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis, Qu~ Mohammad EDNY 134 Mohamud. Mohamed Osman 135 1812339A; 18/2339B; 18/956; 1811956(aX2)(A) & (h) [1812339A; 2x. 18/23398; 18/1956{a)(2)(A) & 1ih\ hv Second Su--edlnn Jnd!ctmenl.1 22-Feb-13 I 1812339A; 2X 18/2339B: 18/1956(a}(2}(A) & (h) 18-Nov-13 13 yrs Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR 16-Mar-15 5 yrs Imprisonment; 10 yrs SR 1812339A [18/28398 by cornplalnt]; [1812339A, 18/23398 by Information· I 13-Feb-13 1812339A I oa.-Feb-13 1812339A; 18/23398 15-Nov-12 1812332a {a); 18123398 I 07-Feb-13 1812332a 09-Aug-13 30 yrs imprisonment; lifetime SR DOR ig.Nov-10 1812332• I 31-Jan-13 1812332a 01-0ct-14 30 yrs Imprisonment; lifetime SR Abdu~, Abu Khalid WDWA 07-JuJ..1t 18/1114{1) & 18/1117; 1812332a; 18/373(a); 2x. 18/924(c) & 1&'2; 2x 18/922(g)(1) &·1812 I 06-0ec-12 18/1114{1) & 18/1117; 18/23328 25-Mar-13 18 yrs imprisonment; 10 yrs SR 136 Henareh, Slavosh SONY 14.Jul-11 21/963; forfeiture II 27-Nov-12 21/963; forfellure 20-Mar-13 210 months imprisonment; 5yrs SR 137 Omar, Mahemud Said OMN 20-Aug-09 2x 1812339A; 2x 18/2339B; 18/956 I 18-0ct-12 2X 1812339A; 2X 18/2339B; 18/956 13-May-13 20 yrs imprisonment: life SR 138 Arbabslar, Manssor (aka Mansour) SONY 20-0ct-11 I 17-0ct-12 2X 18/1958; 181371 (1812332b pred'icate); fort"eilure 30-May-13 25 yrs Imprisonment 3 yrs SR; $125,000 forfeiture 139 Brice, Joseph Jeffrey EDWA 03-May-11 I 25-Sep-12 26f5861(f); 1812339A 11-Jun-13 12.5 yrs imprisonment; Dfe SR; 05-Sap-14 36 months imprisonment; $1,750,000 fOffeiture 29-Jan-13 Ufe Imprisonment; life SR I . -28-Nov-12 1<0 Aksu,Celln SONY 14-Jul-11 141 Hammadl, Mohanad Shareef WDKY 26-May-11 142 Velasa>, Mauricio Santoyo EDVA 24-May-12 COCA 3().Aug-11 NDIL 29-Sep-10 OMA 29&!>-11 143 Mihalik. Oytun Ayse 144 Masri, Shaker 145 Ferdaus, Rezwan 146 Aldswsarl, KhaRd AII-M NDTX 09-Mar-11 147 Khalifl, Amine El EDVA 17-Feb-12 148 EI-Hanafl, Wesam SONY 02-Mar-10 149 Subaslc,Anes EDNC 22-Jul-09 150 Ahmed, Mohamed lbrahlm SONY 22-Feb-10 151 Hasanoff, Sablrhan SONY 02-Mar-10 152 Abdo, Naser Jason WD1X . 09-Aug-11 153 Khalid, Mohammad Hassan EDPA 20-0ct-11 154 Yousef, Jamal SONY 06-J,l-09 155 MedunJanln, Adls EDNY 08-.Jan-10 18/1117; 2x 18/1958; 18123328; 1812332b; forfeiture [2X 18/1958; 181371 (1812332b predicate); forfeib.Jre by Superseding Information) 26/5861(f) {2615861(f); 181842(p)(2)(A); 1812339A b" Sunersedinn /ndlctmentl 211963; 18/23398; 1812332g; folfeiwre [21/963; 18123398; 1812332g; 18/1623; forfeiture by 5u~.....,i~A Jnfornialion' 5x 1812339A: 4x 18123398; 18/23329 [5x 1812339A; 4x 18/23398: 1812332g; 2x 18/1546{a) b" Su.....,rsedl..,. lndlctmenn . 21!960, 21/963 & 1812; forfeiture (18/23398 by Information, 18/1001 [3x 1812339A; 1811001 by SUpersedlng lndlctm.....:.., 18/2339B; 1812339A 181844{f); 18/2155; 18/844(d): 26/5681(d); 18J2339A• 18/23391:l• forfeiture 18/23328(8) 18/23328(8) 18/23398 [2x 18/23396; 2x 50!1705(e ,; ,.,.,eiture by superseding Indictment] [18123398; 18/371 (18/2339B predicate); forfeiture by Super.iedlng -'· -"on1 1812339A; 1&'956(a) [1812339A; 1&'956(a); 2x 18/1425(a); forfeiture by SUpersedlng lndlctment) 2x 18/2339B; 18/371 {1w"'339D predicate); 18/23390; forfeiture (2x 18/2339B; 181371 (18/2339D predicate); 18/23390; forfeiture; 18/924(c) by Superseding lndicbnenl] [2x 18/371 (18/2339B and 1812339[) predicates); forfeiwre by 1 rsedl..,., 18/2339B [2X 18/23398; 2x 50J1705(a); forfeiture by Superseding Indictment) (18/23396; 18/371 (18/23398 predicate); forfeiture by Superseding lnformatiani 26/5861(d) & 26/5871; 2x 18/922(9)(2) & 924(a)(2) {18/2332a(8)i 18/1114(3) & 1811113; 4x 18192 .. -• • SU..... rsedln" lndlctmenll 1612339A 21/960a; forfeiture [21/960a; 18/23398; forfeiture bu Su ------ lndictmentl 181956(a); 18/2339D [18/23328(a); 18/956(a); 18/23398 & 18/2; 18/2339B; 18/23390 & 18/2:" 1812332b; 1812332b & 18!2; 2x 18/924(c) & 18/2. b - rsedl- Indictment I 22-Aug-12 I 21-Aug-12 211963; 18123398; 1812332g; 18/1623; ""'"""'" 5x 18/2339A; 4X 18/23398; 18/2332g; 2x 18/1546{8) ' I 2o-Aug-12 16/2339B 14-0eo-12 13 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR; $125,000 fine I 10-Aug-12 1812339A 29-Mar-13 5 yrs Imprisonment; 1 yr SR I 30-Jt.11-12 18/2339B 11-Dec-12 118 morrths Imprisonment: 20 yrs SR I 20-Jul-12 181844(f); 1812339A 01-Nov-12 17 yrs imprisonment; 10 yrs SR I 27-Jun-12 18/23328(8) 13-Nov-12 Life imprisonment: 5 yrs SR I 22-Jun-12 18/23328(8) 14-Sep-12 30 yrs Imprisonment: 1Oyrs SR I 18.Jun-12 18/23398; 18/371 (18/2339B predicate); forlollu~ 20-Jan-15 15 yrs Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR I 9!23/11; 6/14/2012 2X 18/1425(8); 1812339A; 181956(8) 24-Aug-12 30 yrs Imprisonment: 5 yrs SR; $1,000 fine I 13-Jun-12 27-Mar-13 111 months imprisonment; Judicial order of removal upon completion of sentence I 04-Jun-12 30-Sep-13 18 yrs lmprfsonmenl; 3 yrs SR; $70,000 forfeiture I 24-May-12 10-Aug-12 Life lmprtsonment 5 yrs SR; $3,000 fine I 04-Ma.y-12 1612339A 17-Apr-14 5 yrs imprisonment; 3 yrs SR I 04-May-12 18/2339B 11-0ct-12 12 yrs Imprisonment I 18/23328(a); 18/956(a): 1a,m9B & 18/2; 01-May-12 18/2339B; 18/2339D & 18/2; 1812332b; 1812332b & 1812; 2X 18/924(c) & 18/2 16-Nov-12 Life plus 95 yrs Imprisonment 2x 181371 (18/2339B and 18/2339D predicates); forleiture 18/2339B; 18/371" (18/2339B predicate); '""""""' Page6 of 24 Updated February 10, 2017 18/2332e(e); 18/1114 & 1811113; 4x 18/924(c) 2- National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01-12/31/16 156 Hassoun, Sarni Samlr NOil 157 Hamdan, Moussa All EOPA 158 Abdelrahman, Idriss SONY 159 Toure, Harouna SONY 1812332a; 18/844{1) 18/2339B; 5x 18/371; 18/473; 1811543 & 1812; 1812314 & 18/2; 8X 18'2320 & 18/2" 2x 1811001 30-May-13 17-Apr-12 18/2339B 16-Nov-12 I 17-Apr-12 18123398 15-Nov-12 I 2x 18/2339B; 2x 50/1705(a); 18/371 27-Mar-12 {18/922 predicate) 18123328; 18f844(1) 18/2339B; 5x 181371; 18/473 & 18{2; 18/1543 & 18'2; 10x 1812314, 21 & 18/2; Bx 18f2320(a), 21 & •"""·2x 11111001 I 23-Apr-12 I 20-Apr-12 30-IJeC-09 21/9608; 18/2339B;forfe1ture I 30-~2); 1812332a; 18/842(p)(2){N; 16-Dec-11 11x1 ·8X18/23398·18/2332n I I II 18/111(a)(1), 18/111(b) & 18/1114 18/1114 & 18/1117; 18/23328; 1&'924(c); 181922'"' & 18/2 18123398. 18/1001(aX2l: (18123398 by · lnfoonatlon1 1812339A; 18/23398; 18/1001(a)(2) 1812339A; 18/871(a); 1&922(gX5)(A) 181371 (181373 & 1812261A(1), 18/842(p) & 18/2261A(1), 18/875(c), 18/2261A(2){B) 09-Feb--12 predicates); 1&'875(c) & 1812; ------1A12"B\& 1ICI~ 10.f'eb-12 I 12-0ec-11 08-0oc-11 27-0ct-14 13-Jul-12 22-Jun-12 15 yrs Imprisonment judicial order of removal; '°""""'" 188 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR 11.5 yrs Imprisonment 3 yrs SR 14-May-12 Time served; 3 yrs SR OS-Jun-12 7.5 yrs In prison; life SR 25~-~prisonment 10 yrs SR; $111,215.98 12-Apr-12 210 months lmprlsOnmenl; 7 yrs SR 29Jen-13 l4o yrs lmpnsonment; life SR 18/111(a)(1) and (b) 19-Apr-12 92 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR; $1,000flne 18/1114(1) & 1117; 1812332a; 18/922(g) & 08-Apr-13 17 yrs lmprlsonment; 10 yrs SR 18/2339B 13-Apr-12 12 yrs Imprisonment; 5 years SR 11-Dec-12 8 yrs hnprisonment; 3 yrs SR I I 01-0ec-11 18/2339B I 15-Nov-11 11112339B 12-Mar-12 51 months imprisonment forfeiture; removal 18/23398; 1811028A(a)(2) 24-May-12 20 yrs hnprlsonment: 3 yrs SR; S10,000 fine 18123398; 1812332g; 1811512; forfellura 04-No>-13 S yrs hnprisonment; 2 yrs SR 19-Jun-12 05-Apr-12 140 mon1hs Imprisonment; 2 yrs SR: 25 __:yrs imprisonment; 5 yrs SR; $15,000,000 16-May-13 20 yrs Imprisonment life SR I I 02-0ec-11 14-Nov-11 1·- 178 Wehbe, Bachar SONY 14-Jul-11 179 Yusuf, Mohamud Abdi EOMO 21-0c:l-10 18" Bout, VlktDI' SONY 24-Apr-08 181 All, Amina Farah OMN 06-Jul-10 18/23398; 18/1028A(a}(2) 18/2339B: 1812332g [18123398; 1812332g: 19/1512· forfeiture hv SU ·--...,n" Information' 4x 18/23398; 181371; 18/1015(a) 18/2332(b); 18/2332g(a)(1), (b); 18/1114 & 18/11i7" 18/23398· forfeiture 13x 18/2339B{a)(1) I 20-0cl-11 4X 18/23398 18/2332(b); 18/2332g(a)(1), (b); 18/1114 & 1811117· 18/23398 13X 18/2339B(a)(1) OMN 06-Jul-10 18/2339B(a){1): 3x 18/1001(e)(2) I 20-0c::t-11 18/2339B(a)(1); 2x 18/1001(a)(2) 16-Mey-13 10 yrs hnprisonment life SR 13-0et-11 18/2339A 13.Jan-12 15 yrs Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR; $5,000 fine 162 """"" Hawo Hassan. Mohammad Omar I I I 04-NA 24-NO'r09 189 UI Haq, lrfan DOC 01-Mat-11 190 All,Qaslm ODC 01-Mar-11 ODC 03-Mar-11 15-Sep-10 19f Yousaf, Zahld 192 Younis, Mohammad SONY 193 Begolly, Emerson Winfield EDVA/ WDPA 14-Jul-11 1812339A; 18/956(a); 18/922(d){1) 181371 (1812314"predlcate); 1812314 & 18/2 I,.,.,.,, ,; ..., ·--~aA"'lluJi.llJ; ,.......,... re lnfonnatlon] 181371; 8/1324(a)(2)(B)Oi); forfeiture (18/2339B by lnfonnatlon1 ' 181371; 8/1324{a)(2)(B)(ii); fcffeiture (18/2339B by lnformetlonl 181371; 18/1960 & 18/2;forfetture 181373(a), 18/842{pX2XA) 194 Zazl, Mohammed wan EONY 28-Jan-10 195 Mohamed, Omer"Abdl DMN 17-Nov--09 196 Kazlu, Bellm EONY 18-Sep--09 197 Rana, Tahawwur Hussain Dogirama, Anderson Chama"uro NOil 11>-0ot-09 18/1512(k); 18/1512(c}; 1811512{b}(3}; 1811519; 18/1so::iia·1-1a11001i81121 • 18/1546 2x 1812339A; 18'956; 3X 18'924(c) 181956; 1812339A; 18/2339B & 18/2; 181924(0) & 9241c\11l1Bllfll 2X 1812339A; 18/2339B SONY 31-Mar-09 SONY 200 Rengifo, Alejandro Palacios 201 Boyd,ZBl--11 2x 18/1203 ""'"9-12 5 yrs imprisonment; $3,000,000 restitution 214 Boyd, Danlel EONC 22-J\ll-09 2x 18/1203 1B/2339A; 18/956(a); 2x 18/924(c); 2x 1Bl922(d}(1); 181924/b\; 2x 18/1001; 18/1117 181956; 1812339A; 18/1001; 18/1028(8)(2), (b)(4) I 09-Fel>--11 1812339A; 18/956; forfeiture 24-Aug-12 18 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR; $3,000 fine I 1812339A: 18/956; 18/1001; 18/1028(a}(2), 01-Fel>--11 •-·•4•&"' 06-Jan-14 10 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR; $2,500fine I 17-Nov-10 18/844(n) 25-Jan-11 fife imprisonment; $33,816,561 restitution 215 Larose. COileen EOPA 04-Mar-10 &m 18/2332(b); 101,:,56(8)(1), (a){2}(A); 18/1114, 1116. 1117; 18123328(8}{1), (a){3); 18/844(n); 18/2155(a)(b); 2x 18/844(1}(1), {f)(3); 2x 12-Mar-01 1 18/2332a{a)(1), (8)(3); 224x 181930{c); 45x ~.8!.~~~1, 1114; 4X 18/1111, 1116; 18/844(h)(1), 216 Ghallani, Ahmed Khalfan SONY 217 TalaVera, Uf1S8S SDFL 01-0cl-09 181371; 4xS0/1705 & 18/2; 4x 18/554 & 18/2 I 20-Dct-10 218 Chesser, Zachary Adam EDVA 20-0d-10 18/2339B; 18/875(c); 18/373 I 20-0d-10 I I 1 219 Cromltie, James SONY 02-Jun-09 4x 18/2332a(a)(2)(C ): 2x 1812332g(a)(1). (b}(1), (b)(4), (c) (1); 18/1114& 1117; 18/1114 & 18/2 220 Naidu, Balraj DMD 26-Fol>& I 18/1001(a): 18/1015(e): 18/1425(a) I 18/23329; 21/846; 1812342; 1812320if211846; 21/841(a)(1); 18/2320 & 18/2(a); 1~342(a); 18/2332g(a)(1){A), {a)(1)(8), (c){1) by l"'·-·rsectl= 1nc1ictmenti i 18/371; 50/1705 & 1812; 18/554 & 1&/2 SDFL 01-0ct-09 18/371; 50/1705& 1812; 18/554& 1~ 22S Sedaghaty, Pirouz DOR 17-Feb-o5 181371; 26/7206(1) & 1812; i I II 230 Cordoba-Bennudez, Juanllo SONY 05-Feb-09 18/2339B i I Kad!r, Abdul EDNY 28-Jun-07 233 Roc:kwoOd, Nadia OAK 21.Jul-10 234 RockwoOd, Paul OAK 235 EI-Slddlg, Abdel Azim 236 Nur, Abdel -m Hamed, Mubarak WDMO 238 Shahzad, Faisal SONY 18/1001(a){2) [Information] 18/1956(h), 3x 18/1956(a)(1)(8}(1), f982CaX1) & 06-Mar-07 11bv11 1812332f(a)(1); 181844(n); 18132(a)(,); 18137(a); 28-Jun-07 18/1992(a)(4)(B) [1812339A by SU~lng lnfonnat1~1 · . 18/371, 2X 18/1956{h), 11X 1811956(a)(2)(A), 3x 06-Mar-07 18/1956(a)(1)(8){ij, 19X 50/1701-~~• 3x 1--·1 261721" 18/982 'a"1 1 & - '1' 1812332a; 1812332b; 18/924(c); 1~d) & 1812; 181844(0 & 18/2 [all by complaint]; 2?( 18/2332a: 04--May-10 2x 18/924(c); 2x 18/2332b; 18/844(f; 2lC 181844(n); 18/844(1) [all by lncllctrne, fl 239 Mirza, Adnan ·smx 22-.00 240 Smadl, Hosam Maher Husein NOlX 07-0ct--09 241 Tobias-Rodriguez, Osman Jose SDFL - WDMO EDNY 21.Jul-10 19-Feb-10 18/371, 181922(g)(5)(8), 50/1705(bj1and 3x 18/922g(5)(8) (substantive) (SI: 1 ~ 181371 & 50/1705{b); 7x 18/922(g)(5)(A) & a)(2)] 18/2332a(a)(2J(A), (8), and (D); 18/2332f(a)(1)(A) and IBl 2--'blf1lfE' I 18'23398; 211953 I 18/1344; 18/1956 & 1957; 1812314; 1811001 [& 18123398 (a}(1), (d)(1){A), (d}{1){0}. (d)(1)(E) by ' lnformalionl 2lC 18/1001 [charged by Supersedl~ Information with 1811512 fc1f2l1 I 2X 18/23398, 2x50/1701(b) &31 595.204 &595205& 1812 , 18/1001{a)(2) [Sl: 1812332a; 18/9~; 18/23398; 18/2339D· 18110011 I 24-May-11 135 months imprisonment; 5 yrs SR ~~onths and a day; ordeled deported to 14-0ec-10 1 01-0ct-10 01-0ct-09 232 18/23398; 21/963 I SDFL 28-Jun-07 25 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR 211846; 21/841(a)(1); 1812320 & 1812(a); 1812342(a): 18/2332g(a)(1)(A), (aX1){8), (c)(1) Safadi, Khaled T. Gonzalez-Neira. EmiHo Jacinto BJNY 29-Jun-11 06-0ct-10 227 Defreitas, RusseD 25 yrs bnprisonmen); 5 yrs SR I 17-Aug-05 231 29-Jun-11 1811015(a) COCA I 25 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR 14-0cl-10 Chen, YI Qing 18/2332f(aX1); 18f84/l(n); 18/32(a)(1); 18/37(a); 1Bl19921aV4ll5l• 18/19921a"8\ 1812332f{a){1); 18/844(n); 18/32(a)(8); 18137(a): 18/r-•av41151- 18/1992'a"8' ! 18/1Q01(a)(2) [Information] 07-Sep-11 II 226 228 ii,· _.,, """1utioo 181371 21.Jan-11 6 months probaUon 15-Sep-10 181371 04-Jan--11 1 yr probation · 09-Sep-10 181371; 26/7208(1) & 18/2 10-Aug-10 18/2339B 27-Sep-11 01-Jun-11 03-Feb-10 Abclow, AbdllW Munye DMN 13-0-0ot-09 I II I - 1812339 •; 18/1512(k) 16-lloo-09 18/371 07-Dec-09 50/1705{b) 02-Nov-09 1811623(e) (by Information] 18/2339C, 181371 16-Jun-10 . 24J8n-13 1 yr & 1 day Imprisonment; 2 yrs SR; $3,000 '"" 35 yrs Imprisonment; Life SR 9 months Imprisonment; deportation to Sen-•I 23-AIJg-13 3 yrs probation 40 months Imprisonment; 5 yrs SR; removal to 14-0ec-12 Pakistan 11.Jen-12 6 months probation timesefV8d: 1 yr SR; nottoassoci8tewill'1 07--Mey-10 mn-befs of MEK 16-Mey-13 2 yrs Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR 07-May-10 19-Apr-10 121 months;3 yrs SR; Restitution 15-Ap(-15 5 years probation 18/1960(e) & 18/2 1D-Dec-09 Uma sefV8d; 2 yrs SR; $250 fine II 28-Aug-()9 18/1960(e) & 18/2 01-0oo-OO time served; 2 yrs SR; $250 fine II 28"""9-09 1811960(a) & 18/2 02-0oo-OO time served; 2 yrs SR; $250 fine II 17--Aug-09 1811956{h} os-&,-09 I 12-Aug-09 2x 18/2339A(a); 2x 18/23398(8}{1) 14-Doo-09 an months; 2 yrs SR 17 years Imprisonment encl 30 yeais of ·"'"ed release 18/23398 I 07--Aug-09 18/2339B 07- '"time served: ordered deported to Yemen 04-Jm>-03 18123398 I 07-Aug-09 18123398 07- lime served; ordered deported to Yemen OMN 19-Feb-09 1812339A; 18/956; 2X 18/1001 I 28.Jul-09 14-May-13 3 yrs Imprisonment; 20 yrs SR 21/963, 960 & 959 & 18/2 I ,1812339A. 21/963, 960 & 959 & 18/2; 211960a; 26-Jun-09 18/23398 09-Sep-13 194 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR 15.Jun-09 "" I II 1 - 18/2339A(a) 28-Aug-()9 274 Corredor-lbague, Jose Maria DOC 15-lle<>-05 275 Socrates, Nachlmuthu EONY 14-Sep--06 18123398; 2x 181371 I I -= 18/23398; 18/371 11-May-12 I 09.Jun-09 18123398 11-Feb-11 Time se,vect; 3'Yrs SR 18/23398; 181371 06-Sep-12 9 yrs Imprisonment; 5 yrs·SR 2x 18/371 276 Ahmed, Syed Haria NOGA 23-Mar-06 m Kandasamy, Karunakaran EONY 21-May-07 278 Patpanathan, V!ler.ihanthar EONY 14"'ep-06 1812339A, 18/23398, 181956, 1812332b 18123398 [6/09/09 SUpl3fSElidlng Information: 18/23398 & 1813711 18/23398 279 Thavaraja, Prelheepan EONY 14-Sep-06 18/23398; 181371 I 09-JW>-09 280 Vln!l}'89amoorthy, Murugesu EONY 14"'ep-06 18/23398; 2x 181371; 50/1705 (b), 18/2 I """""-09 18123398 27-Apr-11 Time served; 3 yrs SR 20-May-09 18/23398 09-Jul-09 92 months imprisonment encl a years SR; ordered deported baclt to Cenada et -ncr• ·~•on of sentence 281 Waraame. Mohammed Abdullah DMN 20.Jan-04 2x 18123398, 3>t 18/1001 I I 10.Jun-09 1812339A 1 yr & 1 day imprisonment; 3 yrs SR ('hith commu-"'- service\•,.,.,. 000 fine 1 - 13 yrs Imprisonment 14-Feb-11 Page 10 o/24 Updated February 10, 2017 Tune-served; 3 yrs SR National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 112.5 months Imprisonment: 15 yrs SR 22.Jun-06 1812339A, 18/2339~. 181844(n), 18/2384 I 12-May-09 18/2339A, 18/2339B, 18/844{n) 19-Nov--09 22..Jun-06 1812339A, 18/23398, 18/844(n), 1812384 I 12-May-09 1812339A, 18123398 1....,.00 72 monlhs Imprisonment: 10 yrs SR 22.Jw>OO 1812339A, 18123398, 18/844(n), 1812384 I 12-May.()9 1812339A, 18/23398 10-Nov-09 84 months imprisonment 10 yis SR 22.Jun-06 1812339A, 18/23398, 18/844{n), 1812384 I 12-May--09 1812339A. 18/23398, 18/844{n), 18/2384 2....... 162 months Imprisonment 35 yrs SR Phanor, Stanley Grant SDFL SOFL SOFL SDFL SDFL 22.Jun-06 I 12-May-09 1812339A, 18123398 19-Nov--09 96 months Imprisonment; 15 yrs SR 287 Kassir, Oussama SONY 06-Fol>-06 1612339A, 18123398, 18/844{n), 1812384 2x 1812339A; 18/2339A(a); 4x 2339B(a}(1); 2x I 12-May-09 286 AbdaDah, Akram OAZ 181956(a); 181842(p)(2)(A); 18/371: 18/229(a) 1a/2291~\ was dis~•~--~..; 19-Au~S 18/1001 II 06-May--09 18/1001 289 al-Merri, Ali Saleh Kalah COIL 26-Fel>-09 2x 18/23398 I 30Apc--09 18/2339B 290 lsse, Abdifatah Yusuf OMN 19-Feb--09 1812339A: 18/956 I 24-Apc--09 282 Abraham, Patriek 283 AugusUn. Burson 284 Augustine, Rotschlld 285 Batiste, Narseal 286 15-Sop--09 ,,. .05-Mar-10 18 months; 3 yrs SR 29-0a--09 100 months Imprisonment 3 yrs SR 18/2339A 14-May.13 1812339A 26-A<,g-10 3 yrs Imprisonment 20 yrs SR 120 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR: & no contact with SOGT Zulktfll Abdhlr 2x 1812339A; 18/2339A(a); 4x 23398(a)(1); 2X 181956(a); 18/842(p)(2){A); 18/371 291 Abdhlr, Rahmat NDCA O1-Aug-07 2x 1812339A, 13x50/1705(b), 18/1001 I 31-Mar-09 292 Al Ghazi, Tereq Mousa SONY· 29-May-07 1~B; 18/2332(b); 18/11'.14and 1111; 1812332- I 18/2339B; 18/ 1114, 1117 & 3238; 17-Mar-09 1812332n raV1\ ,.,..,4\ & 3238 293 Al Delaes:na, Wesam ooc 09-se,,-05 I 26-Feb--09 18/2332(b}(2) 18/2332{b); 18/2332a(aX1} & (aX3); 18/924(c)(1)(A) & (c)(1}(B)(fi); 181924(0) .• ,mro• 18/2339A; 18/2339B: and 18/1001 on 1812339A; 18/23398 [both by Information]: 18/1001 [by supplemenlel Information on 8/12/09] I 18-Feb--09 2X 18/1960(a); 1S/1956(h) II 05-Feb-09 18/1960(a) 28.J,n-09 294 Hassan, Kamal Said OMN 11-Feb-09 295 Ranjha, lmdad Ullah OMO ,23-May-07 296 Vinas, Bryant Neal EONY 28-.Jan-09 18/956 [by lndlc:lment]; 18/2332(b)(2), 18/2339B, 18/2339D [by Superseding Information] I 297 Sabaratnem, Sahllal EDNY 1- 2X 18/2339B(a)(1); 2x 2332g (a)(1), (b)(1), (c}(1) I 298 lhanlgasalam, Thlruthanlkan EDNY 1- 2x 18/23398 (a)(1); 2x 2332g (a)(1). (b)(1), (c)(1) I 299 Sarachandran, Ssthajhan EONY 1- 3X 18/2339B (a)(1); 2x 2332g (a)(1), (b)(1), (c)(1) I 300 Yograrasa, Naclarasa EONY 1- 2x 18/2339B I 2x 18/2339B (a)(1); 2x 2332g (a)(1), (b){1), 27.Jon-09 1•cV1\ 2x 18123398 (aX1); 2x 2332g (aX1), (b){1), 27.J"""9 1•cvn 311: 18/2339B (a)(1); 2x2332g (a)(1), (b)(1) 28.J,n-09 &fcV11 26.Jaa-09 "'1812339B 301 Sandhu, Parvaz Mahmood OMO 23-May-07 18/1960; 1611956(h) II 21..Jan-09 · 18/1956(h) 302 Ahmed, Khaleel NDOH 13-lleo-07 I 15-Jan-09 303 Ahmed, Zubafr A. NOOH 13-lleo-07 I 15.Jao-09 304 Bahwel,Saleh SONY 1-6 I 305 Iqbal, Javed SONY 15--Nov-06 306 Duka, Drttan DNJ 05-Jun-07 307 Duka, Bjv!r ONJ 05.Jun-07 308 Duka, Shairi ONJ 05-Jun-07 309 Shnewer, Mohamad lbrahlm ONJ 05-Jun-07 18/956(a)(1) {1812339Abylnformadonon • 1/151091 18f956(a)(1) [18/2339Aby lnfonnatlon on 1/15/09.. 2 X18123398; 2X 18/2339B & 2; 4x 18/371; 3X 22/287c&2; E013224; 31 CFR594 2 X18/2339B; 2x 18/2339B & 2; 4x 181371; 3X 221287c&2· EO 13224· 31 CFR594 18/1117; 18/1114 & 18/2; 181924(c)(1)(A), 924(c)(1){B)(H) & 18/2; 181922(0) & 1812; 2x 18/922·· -.-.5-. & 18/2 18/n17: 18/1114 & 1812: 18/924{cX1)(A), 924'c"1\1911111 & 1~""-18/9.....,_,;~ & 18/2 18/1117; 18/1114 &: 1812; 18/924(c)(1)(A), 924{c)(1)(B)(il)& 1812; 181922(0) & 1812; 2X 181922·,.:.-.5, & 1- -18/1117; 18/1114 & 1812; 18/924(c)(1)(A), s2Alc"1'•e·-· & 1812· 310 Tatar, Serdar DNJ 05-Jun-07 311 Abdulqadar, Mufid NDlX 26.Jol-04 312 Abu Baker, Shukri , NDlX 26.Ju\-04 25 years Imprisonment end 5 yrs SR 16-Ap<--09 25 years; plus en additional 18 month sentence in a separate case {to be served 13-May-13 10 yrs Imprisonment: 20 yrs SR 24-Mar-09 I- conaiirentl;,;- Time Setwd; SUper'llised Re1eaSe 2 years; • Assessment '"'100 18/2332(b){2), 1812339B, 1812339D [Information] 25-Jan-10 25 years Imprisonment; 5 yrs. SR 25-Jan-10 25 yeara Imprisonment; 5 yrs. SR ~-Jan-,10 26 yen Imprisonment: 5 yrs. SR 22.Jan-10 25-MaoO!l 14 yrs imprisonment; 3 yrs. SR Imprisonment 21 months, service of tha sentence having begun September 20, 2007: 3 1812339A 12..Jul-10 100 months Imprisonment; 3 years SR 1812339A 12.Jul-10 120 tnonths Imprisonment; 3 years SR 30-0ec-08 18/23396&2 23.J"o-09 17 months Imprisonment; 3 years SR; 200 hours of community service; $7,500fine J 23-0oo-OB 18/23396&2 23-Apc--09 69 months' imprisonment; 3 years SR II 18/1117: 18/924(c)(1)(A). 924(c)(1)(B)(ll) & 22-0oe-OS 18/2; 18/922(0) & 18/2; 2x 18f922(g){5) & ,an 28-Apr-09 Ufo II ·22-0eo-OS 18/1117; 181922(9){5)& 18/2 II II II 18/1117; 18/1114 & 18/2 1x 18/2339B; 1x 50/1701-1706; 1x 18/1956(h); 18/982'a11 1' 10x18/2339B; 11x 5011701-1706; 1x 18/1956(h); 10x 18/1956(a)(2XA); 1x 26n'206(1); 1x 181371; 18/982(a)(1) O1.Jul-09 I I 22-0ec-OS 1811117 1X 18/2339B; 1X 50/1701-1706; 1X 24-Nov-08 18/1956....'• 18J982ta"1' 10x18123398; 11x 50/1701-1706; 1x 24-NoV-08 18/1956(h); 10x 18/1956(aX2)(A); 1x 26/7206(1); 1x 181371; 181982(e)(1) Page 11 of24 Updated February 10, 2017 ~- ,.....,... 28-Apr-09 1811117; 18/924(c)(1)(A), 924(c)(1)(B){II) & 22-0eo-OS 1812; 181922(0) & 1812; 2x 1&'922(gX5J & 1"" 18/1117; 18/924(c)(1)(A), 924(c)(1XB){II) & 22.Qec.08 18/2 SR Ufe: Resutution $125,000 Ufe; Res1ltution $125,000 29-Apc--09 life; Res1ilution $125,000 29-Apc--09 396 months: life on SR: Restitution $125,000 27-May--09 20 years; 3 yrs SR 27-Moy-09 ..;c,,,_.,_ . ,..,. -- National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 313 Bashi, Ghassan #2 NDlX EI-Mezaln, Mohammed NDlX 315 Odeh, Abulraham NDlX 316 Al Kassar, Monzer SONY 29-May-07 317 Godoy, l.JJ!s Felipe Moreno SONY 29-May-07 318 Arroyave, Diego Alberto.Ruiz SDlX 319 Chughtal, Mazhar.Iqbal DMD 320 Ranjha, Salfullah AnJum DMD ,.....,.1 321 Smulian, Andrew 322 314 26-Jul-04 2lov-08 1"1:2 208 000 I 30-Ju~a 1Bf2332(b); 1811114, 1117; 18/2332g(a)(1), (b); 18/23398 (al(1), (d){1) 23-May-12 5 yrs Imprisonment: 5 yrs SR; $15,000,000 forfeiture II 22-Ju\-08 18/1956(h) 14-Apr-09 time served; 3 yrs SR I 1"-lw,-08 1812339A 18-Dec-08 180 mos; 3 yrs SR; $100 SA 13-Jun-08 18f956(a)(1); 1812339A; 2x 18/842{p){2l(A) 21-0ct-09 20 yrs imprisonment; life on supervised release 18/956(8}(1); 1812339A; 2x 181842(pl(2)(A) 21-0cl:-09 18/2339B (]5-()eo-08 06-Mal-08 Saql, Muhammad Rlaz DMD 23-May-07 323 Mohamed, Ahmed Abdell8tlf Sh"" MDFL 30-Aug-07 324 Amawi, Mohammad Zaki NDOH 16-Feb-06 18/956(8)(1); 1812339A; 18f842(p)(2}(A); 18/871 I 325 El-Hindi, Marwan Olhm8n NDOH 16-Feb-06 18/956(a){1); 1812339A; 18/842(p)(2l{A), 1811001 ] 326 Maz!oum, Wasslm I. NDOH 18-Feb-06 18/956(8)(1); 18/2339A I 13-Jw>-08 181956(8){1); 1812839A 21-0ct-09 327 Paul, Christopher SDOH 11-Apr-07 18/ 371 & 2339A; 1812332&; 18/2339A I 03-Jun-08 18/23328(al(1), (2). (3) and (b) 26-Feb-09 328 Hupper, Rlchan:I David SDFL 1-• 23398 [by lnfonnation] I 21-May-08 1812mB 21-Aug-08 329 Chhun, Yaslth COCA 31-May-05 18/956(a); 18/9S6(b); 18/371; 18/2332a(b) I 22-Jun-10 330 Abll-:llhaad, Hassan OCT 21-Mar-07 1812339A. 18/793(d) I 18/956(8); 18/956(b); 18/371; 18/23328(b) 18/2339A, 181793(d) (NOTE: on 314109 the 05-Mo,-08 ~~~cquftted Abujlhaad on the 2339A 331 Doudzal, Mohammad DMD 31-Aug-06 18'371; 18/1505; 18/1001 II 04-Feb-08 332 Naeem, Nedi& 31--Aug-06 18/371; 18/1505; 1811001 II 04-Feb-08 · 333 Mubayyftl, Muhamed OMA 11~ 18/10D1(a)(1), 18/371. 3x 2617206(1), 2617212(e) II 334 Muniasser, Emadeddln OMA 11-May-05 18f1001(a)(1), 18/1001(8){2), 181371, [26/7212{8) dismissed 12/13/07] II 13-Jun-08 16-Apr-08 18/371; 18/1505; 1811001 18/371; 18/1505; 18/1001 18/1001(a){1), 3x2617206(1), 26/7212(8), 11-Jan-08 18/371 -miftmlssed 613108: 18/371' 18/1001(8)(1), 18/1001(a)(2J, 18/371 11.Jon-08 [Dismissed 613108: 18/371 & 1 count of 18/10011 8 months Imprisonment; 2 yrs SR 364 days lmprfSonment; 2 yrs SR 18-Jul-08 11 mon1hs; 3 yrs SR; $500 SA; $100D fine 17-Jul-08 20-Dec-07 18/371, 18/2315, 2617206, 181981, 28/2461 II 17-Dec-07 1812315 336 Ponton Caro, Carmen Maria SOFL 03-Jon-06 18123398: 3x 18/28398 (a){1) & 1812; 18/371; 3x 8/1324(a){2)(8)(1i) & 18!2; 3x 8/1324(a){1){A)(iv) & 18/2 [Superseding Indictment 2/24i06] I 07-Dec-07 18/23398 ,.,,..... 18/23398; 4x 18/23398 (a)(1) & 18/2; 18/371; 4x 8/1324{a){2l(B)(ll) & 18/2; 4x8/1324{a)(1){A){lv) & 18/2;18/1956(h) & 18/1956{8)(3){A); ~~~~8)(3){A) & 18/2 [Superseding Indictment I 07-Dec-07 18/23398 29-feb-08 II 05-Dec-07 2x8/1324 29-Feb-08 I 30-Sep-08 29-Aug-08 18-Jan-08 1 338 Gamboa. Edlzon Ramirez SDFL 03-Jan-08 339 Shareef, Derriclc NDIL 04-Jan-07 18/371; 3x 8/1324(a)(2)(8)(11) & 18/2; 3x 8/1324(a){1)(A)(w) & 18/2 [Superseding Indictment 2/2 :..;. 18/2332a(al(2)(0); 181844(1) 340 EI-Shwehdl, Z.Uhalr Hamed 31-0ct-07 2Bn206{1); 2617212(8) II 341 Nab!I, Nabl SDOH DMD 28-No....07 18/2332a(a)(2)(D) 19-No....07 2617206(1) & 7212{8) 31--Aug-06 18/371; 18/1505; 18/1001; 18/1546 II 19-Nov-07 18/371: 18/1505; 18/1001; 18/1546 Page 12 of24 Updated February 1o, 2017 Life 18-Apr-08 02.Qeo-03 03-Jan-06 line 18-Apr-08 WDKY SOFL 20 years' imprisonment 46 months lmprfsonment; 2 yrs SR; $15,000 120 monthS Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR SUieiman. Eyed Salamanca. Victor Daniel 13 yrs Imprisonment {Includes sentence for . fraud conviction'100 months Imprisonment (8.3 yrs); life on su- --•--~ release 03-Ap,-09 335 337 I 24-Feb-09" 30 years' Imprisonment -SONY DMD 65,..m . 12 months Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR; $10,000 108 Months Imprisonment; 3years SR; $100 SPA; $15,000 Fine; Restitution $1,243,162.04 70 monthS Imprisonment. 3 yrs SR. $100 assessment & removal 70 mon1hs Imprisonment. 3 yrs. SR, $100 assessment & removal upon completion of sentence . """"' 36 months Imprisonment. 3 yrs. SR. $200 assessment &ramoval upon completion of 420 Months; 5 yrs. SR; fine of $5,000 3 yrs probation; $138,098.12 restitution 22 months; 3 yrs SR National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01-12/31/16 342 Muthana, Abdulla Kasem (or Qasseml Ahmed EDCA 28-Sop--06 6x 18/1956{a)(3) [by Information filed 11/15/2007) II 16-Nov-07 6x 18/1956(a){3) 02.Jun-08 30 months imprisonment; 3 yrs SR; $600SA 343 Mohelsen, Jalal Sadat SOFL 03-Jan-06 18123398; 3x 18/2339B (a}(1) & 1812; 181371; 3x 8/1324{a)(2){B){ii)'& 18/2; 3x 8/1324{a)(1)(A)(lv) & 1812 [Superseding lndlclment 2/24/06) I 14--Nov-07 18/2339B 25-Feb-08 70 months lmprlsonmenL 3 yrs. SR, $100 assessment & removal 03-JaMl6 II 14-Nov-07 18/371, 2x 8/1324 345 """"'' SDFL Abdullahu, Agron ONJ 05-Jun-07 II 31-0ct-07 181371 346 Ulloa Melo, Jose 1lto Ublo SOFL 03-Jsn-06 I 29-0ct-07 18123398(&)(1) SOFL 03-Jan-06 II 29-0ct-07 181371; 8/1324(a)(2){B)(ii) I 22-0ct-07 I 344 347 Tapasco Romero, Nicolas Bautista Martinez, Jorge De Los . . . . . 181371: 3x8/1324(a){2)(B){ll)& 18/2; 3x 8/1324(a){1)(A)[lv) & 1812 [Superseding Indictment 2124/061 18/922(g)(5) [18/371 by superseding rmormauon filed 1D/31/071 18/23398; 3x 18123398(8)(1) & 18/2; 181371; 3x 8/1324{a)(2){B)(II) & 1812; 3x 8/1324(a)(1)(A){lv) & 18/2 ISu,.,..rsedinn lndictrnent:2/24"""1 18/371; 3x 8/1324{a)(2)(B}(li); 3x 8/1324(a)(1 )(A){lv) [Superseding Indictment 2124,nd,, 18123398; 18/23398 (a)(1) & 18/2; 181371: 8/1324(a){2)(B)(ii) & 18/2; 8/1324(a)(1)(Al(lv) & 18/2tS1J....rsedin~ lnd'~ent """4_..., 18/23398; 18123398 (a}(1) & 1812; 1811956(h)& 18/1956(a)(3}(A): 18f1956(e)(3)(A) & 1812 lrS1J---..:..j.:...: Indictment 212-.,-,,;;;, - 25-F..,,. 31.-Mar-08 36 months imprisonment, 3 yrs. SR, $300 assessment & removal 20 months: 3 years SR 30 months Imprisonment 04.Jan-08 3 years Imprisonment; 2 yrs SR (amended on 3/13/2008 to time served & 2 YfS SR) 18/2339B(a)(1) 04-Jan-08 30 months Imprisonment 15-0ct-07 18123398 04.Jan-08 time served 34a Londono, Bernardo Valdes SOFL O:Won-06 349 Lopez, Jullo Cesar SOFL 03-Jell-06 350 Morales, Luis Alfredo Daza (aka Fernando) SDFL 03-Jan-06 18.123398; 3x 18t2339e (a)(t) & 1812; 18/371; 3x 8/1324(a)(2)(B)(D) & 18/2; 3x8/1324(a)(1)(A)(lv) & 1812 [ ~ g Indictment 2/.24/06) I 15-0cl-07 18/2339B 04-Jan-08 30 monthS Imprisonment 351 Nguyen, Vlnh Tan COCA 2o--Ooo-06 18/1544 II 15-0ct-07 18/1544 14-Nov-07 14 months; 2 yrs SR 181922(g)(S)(B) [1B/956(a)(1); 181371 & 1812339A: 1812339A: t81922(gX5l(B): 18/1001: 5x 181621; 181505; forfeiture (181924, 28/2461(c), 21/853) by SUpersecllng tndldmant] I 16-Aug-07 18/956(a)(1); 18/371 & 1812339A; 1812339A 22.Jan-08 188 months Imprisonment 18/956(a}(1); 18/371 & 1812339A: 1812339A [all lndlctmentl I - 16-'"g-07 18/956(a)(1); 1sr.m: 1812339A 22.Jon-OIJ 152 months Imprisonment 18/956(8)(1); 181371; 1812339A I 16-Aug-07 18/956(a)(1); 18/371; 1812339A 22.Jon-OIJ I 18/371; 1812339A; 1812339A & 18/2; 13-Aug-07 l1i:1J1073 21 yrs imprisomlant; 20 yrs SR[9-Sep--14 Amended Jud : 23-0cl-15 time served II 02-Aug-07 3x 18/1546(8) 14-Mo,-08 time served I 31-Jul-07 31-Jul-07 I 13-Jul-07 10 yrs Imprisonment a60 mos. imprisomlent; 3 yrs.SR; $500 spacial 352 Hassoun, Adham SOFL OW,n-04 353 Jayyousl, Kifeh Wael SOFL 01-!leo-04 354 Padnla, Jose SOFL 17-Nov-05 355 Ujaama, Eamest James #2 SONY 13-Aug-07 356 8-Zahabl, Mohammed OMN 24--Jun-04 357 Abdi, Nuradin M. SCOH 14--Jun-04 358 Reynolds, Micheal CUrtls MOPA 03-0ct-06 359 360 Pineda, Juvenal Ovidlo Ricardo Palmera (aka Simon Trinidadl Sabir, Rafiq Abclus Varatharasa, Thirunavukarasu DOC SONY 13-May-04 27-Jun-05 1'"··Su-----''-• 181371; 1812339A; 1612339A & 18/2; 18/1073 {by lnfonnetlon' 2x18/1001: 3x 18/1546(8) (added 12/6105 ln edln" lndrctmenn 18/371, 2339A, 181956; 23398, 2x1546 1812339A; 18/23398; 18/373; 18/842(p)(2); 2x 2815841 58B1'd'&5871 '" 1812339A 1812339A; 18/2339B; 18/373; 18/842(p)(2): 1x 26/5841 5861/ri\ & 5871 1812339A; 4x 18/1203(a) I 09-Jul-07 2x18/2339B and 2 18/2339B: 18/371 & 2212ns; 2x 18/1956(al(21(Al, 181924(0) I 21-May-07 2x18/2339B and 2 I . 18/1203 10-May-07 18/23398, 2212:r78 ..,. 116-Nov-07 ' 28-Jan-08 60 years hnprisonment ""'""')7 300mos; 2yrsSR 03-Jan-08 57 months Imprisonment 10yr..,$1000 fine,&3yrsSR OMO 03-0ct-06 S01X 02-Apr-07 18123390 I 19-Apr~7 18/233!l0 20-Jul-07 363 Osman, Henlffa Bin OMO 1- 18/23398;"18/371 & 22/2778; 2x 18/1956(e)(2)(A), 18/924(0) I 05-Apr-07 18/1958, 18123398 31-0ct-08 · 37 mos; 3 yrs SR; $200 SA 364 Shah, Tarlk SONY 27-Jun-05 18/2339Bx3 I 04-Apr-07 18/23398 07-Nov-07 15 )'88IS Imprisonment 365 Brent, Mahmud Fan.iq SONY 07--Nov-05 2x18/23398 I 02-Apr-07 18/2339B 25-Jul-07 15 years Imprisonment 20-May-05 18/23328, 181924(0). 211963, 21/846, 21/853 [SI: 2339B(a)(1); 211960(b)(1)(B) & 21/963; 21/841(b)(1)(A){D) & 21/846; 18/924(0) & 924!cl(1lCAl1 I 27-Mar-07 2339B 15-Jun-07 50 months, 2 yrs SR wf aed"ll for time served in US and Columbia 361 362 366 Maldonado, Daniel Joseph Rodriguez-Acevedo, Heer.or SOFL Page 13 of24 Updated February 10, 2017 National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 367 SUbandl, HaJI .DMD 19-Sep-06 368 Wotulo, Erick DMD 19-Sei>-06 18/23398; 18/371 & 2212ns; 2x 18/1956(aX2)(A), 18/924(c) [& dlargecl 10/03/06 w/ 181371, 18/1956(a}(2)(A), 22/2778] 18/23398: 181371 & 2212.na: 2x 18f1956l8v2VA\ 18/92Alcl . 369 Benkhala, Sabrl EDVA 09-Feb-08 NDIL Ashqar, Abdelhaleem Hasan Abdelra,lq NDIL 372 Rusi!, Reinhard DMD 03-0ol--06 181371, 18/1956{a)(2}(A), 18/2778 II 31.Jan-07 18f1956(a){2)(A), 18/2778 373 Soedirdja, Helm! DMD 03-0d--06 18/371, 18/1956(a){2}(A), 18/2TT8 II 31.Jan-07 18/1956{a)(2){A), 18/2TT8 II 30.Jen-07 18/922(g)(S)(B) & 924{a)(2) II 04-Jan-07 1811001 (a)(1) [Information] 07-May-07 1 yr probation; fine of $250 end a SA of $100 I 20-IJec.06 1812339A, 18/1956 (a)(2)(A) 12..sep-07 14 yrs imprisonment ["VACATED) II 29-No,-06 1813 II 29-NoV-06 18/1001 370 371 Saleh, Muhammad Hamid '°""" 18123396; 1811956(a}(2)(A) [& 18/1956(a}(2)(A); 2212778 in separate plea] I 08-Mar-07 I 2>-Fob-07 18/2339B, 1811956 18/1623; 18/1503; 18/1001 (a) II 05-feb-07 19-Aug-04 18/2339B (dis'!1lssed before trial); 18/1962, 18/1503 I 19-Aug-04 18/1962, 18/401(3) & 1503 II . 10-Jul-08 30 months Imprisonment & 3 years SR 121 monthS imprisonment, 3 yrs SR. $17,500 fioo 01-Feb-07 18/1503 11.Jul-07 21 months imprisonment 01-Feb-07 18/401(3)&1503 21-Nov--07 135 months Imprisonment Qazi, SDl}( 28-Nov-06 375 Subeh, Mohammed WDNY 22-Apr-04 376 Awan, Khalid #2 EDNY 08-Mar-06 377 Kamran, lrfan oco 26-Mar--03 378 Qayyum, Abdul oco 26-Mar-03 18J922(g){5}(B) & 924(a)(2) 3x 18/1001 [& 1x 1811001 by Superseding lnfonnation' 1812339A, 1811956 (e)(2)(A) 3x 18/371, 4X 811324, 3X 18/1001 (18/3 by sU-rsedin" lnformaflon1 3X18/371, 4x8/1324, 3x 18/1001 379 Wimams, Koble Dlallo SDTX 22-Nov-06 18/371, 181922(g)(5)(B), 50/1705{b) I 2 - · 18/371 380 Farhane, Abclulrahman (or Abdul Rah} SONY O&-Fol>-08 18/2339A.18/1001 [11/09/065upersedlng Information: 181371 & 18/1001(0)(2)) I ............ 381 Aref, Yassln Muhlddln NDNY 18/2339A, 18/23398, 18/1956, 18/1546, 18/1001 I 11-0cl-06 362 Hossain, Mohammed Mosharref ~DNY 06-Aug-04 1812339A. 18/23398, 18/1956 I 383 Grecula, Ronald SDTX 16-Jun-05 18/23398 {18123398; 21/841(~!(1), (b}(1)(C) & 846 b" Su '! lndlclmen 384 Shorbagf, Mohamed Ben'o, Una (aka Lina Recla) NOGA EDMI 28-Aug--06 385 20-Ap,--OS 386 BerTO, Noure EDMI 387 Serro, semi Ahmad EDMI 388 Serro, Sadek EDMt 389 Serro, Zelnab 390 Bern>, Abdul Ha6m 391 392 Berro, Almlre Ali-Sadek Bello, Houda Mohamed . _ 37 mos; 3 yr.; SR;- $200 SA 24-Jul-07 18/1623; 18/1503; 18/1001 (a) 374 Shiraz Syed 14-lleo-07 12 months & 1 day for each count (to run 27-Apr-07 concurrently); 2 yrs SR for each count l,00f100IT8fll\' 12 months & 1 day for eadl count (to run 27-Apr--07 concurrently}; 2 yrs SR for eadl count 11CO!lCUrrent\ ...-..._ 17-May-07 10 months; 3 yrs SR -- lime served 29-Nov--06 1 year probeHon 07...,..., 54 months, $5000 fine; 3 yrs SR 181371, 18/1001 16-Apr--07 13 yrs Imprisonment (156 months); 2 yrs SR 18/1956(h); 18J2339A; 18123398, 18/19~~•aV31f8\• 18/1001 08-Mar--07 15 yrs Imprisonment 11-0cl-06 1812339A, 18123398. 1811956, (aU counts) 08-Mer--07 15 yrs Imprisonment I 21--Sep-06 18/23398 13,feb-07 5 years Imprisonment, 3 yrs SR 18/2339B I 28-Au9--06 18/23398 27-Feb-07 92 months Imprisonment 1811001, 181982 II 14-Aug--06 18/1001 20-Doo-06 181371, 18/157, 18/1344, 18/1956, 18/982 II 181371 (conspiracy to cornmttbankand mall 14-Aug--06 fn>,d) 30-Jon-07 1 year probation 8 months' imprisonment; 2}'rs SR; $124,549 restitution w11'1usband semi 8elTo (also dlarneci\ 26-Apr-04 181371, 18/1344, 18/1001, 181982 II 14-Aug-08 181371 (conspiracy to commit bank end mall fraud) 30-Jon-07 ,.....,-04 181371,18/157, 18(1344, 1811956, 1811962, II 11-Aug-06 18/1962 (d) EDMI 26-Apr-04 181371, 18/157, 18/1344, 18/1956, 18/982 II 11-Aug-06 18/371 78 months' Imprisonment: 3 ytS SR; restitution 111:1 224003 15 months' Imprisonment, 3 yrs SR. restitution 31.Jan-07 l•cc• 878 EDMI 26-1\p,-04 181371, 18/157, 18/1344, 18/1956, 181982 II 09-Aug--06 181371 12-0eo-Oti 35 months' imprisonment, $421,120 res"librtion 09-Aug-06 18/1344 24-Jan-07 1 day Imprisonment with time served; 3 yrs SR 12 months' and 1 daylmprfsonment EDMI EDMI ... ,.....,... 20-Apr-05 ,.....,... 20-Apr-05 181962 II 1811344 27 months imprisonment; 2}'rs SR; $124,549 restitution wlwlfe Noura Serro (elso charged) 31.Jan-07 18/1344, 18/1956, 18/982, 181371 II 09-Aug-06 1811344 12-Deo-06 18/371, 18/1344, 18/1956-1957, 18/1001, 1811349, 18/1962, 181982 II 03-Aug-06 18/1962 05-0eo-06 70 months imprisonment, $669,125 restitution 393 Serro, Abdulamlr EDMI 394 EI-Sablanl, BIiai EDMI 26-Apr-04 18/371, 18/157, 18/1344, 18/1956, 16/982 II 03-Aag--06 181371 02-Jul-06 1 day; 3 yrs SR;$ 469,174.25 restitution 395 Bern>, Abdul Karim Akram EDMI 20-Apr-05 18/1001, 18/982 II 31.Jul--06 18/1001 30-N-06 1S8mos&SyrsSR 424 Elfgeoh,A,ef EDNY EONY 03-Feb-03 21.&,p-05 18/1960, 18/371 07-Feb-06 51 mos Imprisonment 425 Maatouk, Ali MDFL 10-Feb-05 18/1960, 18/371 18/371 (& 8/1325 by superseding Information on 9/1""'~· II 14-Sep-05 8/1325 07-0d:-05 24 mos probation 426 KhBIII, Nejl Antoine Abl SONY" 18-Jun-04 18/23398, 50/1705, 18/371 I 09-Aug-05 18/23398, 50/1705, 18/371 02-F- II 28-Jul-05 12-Apr-06 60 months (57 months in EDAR 04-a-00134 to run eoncurrentw/ 60 months In EDAROS-aSR· "100 --, -t"utfon 00200'· 3 6 months; 2 yr.s SR II 31-May-05 181922(0). 2615861(d) 24-0d-05 57 mos, 3 yrs SR II 29-Apr-05 I 28-Apr-05 02-May--05 time581'Ved 28-Apr-05 24 mos; 3 yrs SR; $100 SA 418 419 Paracha, Uzalr Abu Ali, Ahmed Omar EDVA 03-Feb-0.5 427 Grinberg, Tomer SONY 16--Jun-04 428 AI-Uqelly, Ahmed Hassan MDTN 07-0cl-04 429 Wagner, Michael SOIA 27-Jul-04 18/371 18/922(0); 181924(aJ, 261584126/5861(d), 26/5871 & 1812 18/922, 18/931, 18(1001 430 Walker, Marie Robert WOlX 09-08<>-04 2x 50/1705 Page 15of24 Updated February 10, 2017 161311 18/1001 50(1705 02-Fel>-06 1+Mar-06 2 yrs probation on each count (concurrent): $10 190 restilullon 24 mos, $879, 056 resltutlon National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 SDTX -· 21-May.03 18/2339B I 14-Apr-05 18/233~6 01-Deo-05 61 months Berjaoul, lssam EDMl 29-Jan-03 181371, 18/1956 II 11-Apr-05 18/1956 437 Abodeyah, Akrem ON.I 03-Deo-03 211844 II 01-Apr-05 211844 12-se,,-06 15-Jw,-05 Time served (6 mos) 438 Kouranl, Mahmoud Youssef EOMI 19-Nov-03 18123398, 181371 I 01-Mar-05 18/371 14.Jun-05 54 mos, 3yrs SR, SA 439 Carpenter, cedric SDMS 31-AI.Jg-04 18/2339B; 181371, 21/846, 21/853, 181922 I 28-Feb-05 18/23398, 18/922 20-May-05 440 RarlSOfl, L.smoot 18/23398, 18/371, 21/846, 21/853 18-Aug-04 21/841, 18/924, 2212n8. 23390 I I 28-Feb-05 18/23398 11·Feb-05 2212na, 18/23398 20-Mey-05 Gamarra-Munno, Csrios Qureshi, Mohammad Salman SDMS MDFL 31-Aug-04 441 11•Feb-05 18/1001 25-A>,g-05 10·Feb-05 18/371: 18/373; 18/956{a)(1)&(a)(2)(A) 1Q.Feb-05 2x 18/371: 1812339A; 2x 18/1001 16-0ci-06 15-JUl·10 120 months imprisonment 2 yrs SR 1().Feb-05 2X 181371; 1812339A 2X 181371; 13x 18/1956; 2617206; Bx 1.-.00 2817201; 1811546; 28x 1811347; 1811001; 3l 18/1343 16-0d-06 20 months; 2 yrs. SR 27-0ct-05 264 mos; 3 yrs SR 2S-Oec-04 1811001 29-0eo-04 time served, 3 yrs SR 60 mos., 3 yrs SR 431 Lakhani, Hemant ONJ 432 Berro, Hussein A EOMI 433 Al-Timlml,Afl EDVA 434 Jemel, Samih Fad! 435 436 DA2 Barrera-De Amaris, Fanny """'" 1af2339A, 2212na. 18/1956, 18/542 18-Dec-03 . 1812339A, 22/2778, 18/1956, 18/542 I 27-Apr-05 26-Ap,--04 II II 18/157 50/1705, 181371, 18/924{c}&A. 18/844(h), 26-Apr-05 1812384 18/373 8/1324, 18/2314, 18/2315, 18/1956, 26-Al)r-05 18/371, 18/157, 18/1344 50/1705, 181371, 18/924{c)&A, 18/844(h), 18/2384 18/373 18/371, 18f.!314, 18/2315, 18/1956 & 1957, 1811001, 31/5322{8), 8/1324 13-Mar-03 27../1.pr-05 I - ·11 18/1001, 31/5322, 18/371 12-Bep-05 47y,s 24-0ct-06 14.5 months 13-Jul-05 Me 07-0ct-05 120 mos, 08-Aug--05 WDLA 13-0ct-04 4x18/1001 443 Sattar, Ahmed Abdel SONY 09-Apr-02 181371; 181373: 18/956(a)(1) & {aX2)(A) I 444 Stewart, Lynne SONY 09--Apr-02 2X 18/371; 1812339A; 2x 18/)001 445 Yousry, Mohammed SONY 09--Apr-02 2X 181371: 1812339A I I 446 Dhafir, Rs6t NDNY 19-Feb-03 50/1101. 18/1956, 181311, 2an201c, 26fl201. 18/1001, 18/1546, 1811347, 18/1343, 1811341 I ' 447 Al Mosaleh, All Mohammed OMN 28-Jul-04 3x18/1001 II 448 Mohamed, Zameer COCA 21-May-04 18/844(e) II 21.Qeo-04 18/844(8) 31-Mar-05 449 Stelllye. All Khaleel DOR 16-Mar-04 181922 II 19-Nov--04 181922 01.Jun-05 450 El Hage, Saleh Eldin All SDTX 17-&,p-04 8/1326 II 17--Nov-04 8/1328 Ayash, Hasan All ""uerta, l;"IJi'l rem,....., 452 (Comm8ndanle EOAR 05-Mo,--04 31/5324, 18/1343, 1_8/1425 II 16-Nov-04 31/5324, 18/1343, 18/1425 SDTX 04-llec-02 181'23398, 21/841, 21/846 I 25-0ct--04 II 12-0ct-04 442 Fo 451 453 Shaikh, Kannan (aka Kamran Akhtar' - WDNC 05-Aug--04 . 4x 1811001, 811253, 18/1028 . 120 months, 3 yrs SR 48 mos. w/ aedil time served, 3 yrs SR (to be SUS""nded If return to Pakistan'' 288 months; 5 yrs SR 30 months+ 60 to 84 months 13-May-05 5 yrs probation, $400 SA 18/233~, 21/841, 21/846 31--May-06 Ufe Imprisonment 3x 18/1001, 8/1253, 18/1028 24.Jan-05 time served; 3 yrs SR Bihelri, Sollman S. #2 EOVA 06-May-04 2x 18/1001; 18/1546 II 455 Ahmed, Fanda SDTX 16-Aug-04 8/1325; 18/1001, 18/1543 II 456 Raja, Manthena ONJ 10-Sep-04 18/1956 II 10-Sep-04 18/1956 457 Khan. lmran DCO 26-Mar-03 2x18/371, 18/1028 II 31-Aug.04 EONY 27-Aug-04 181844(n) II 27•Aug--04 18/844(n) 1811028 14-Joo-05 - 13 mos. & 1 dayw/ credit for lime served; 2 yrs SR 13-Deo-04 time served: 3 yrs SR 20-0d-05 24 mos., 3 yrs SR 31-Aug-04 """""""' 5 yrs Imprisonment. 3 yrs SR & continued mental health treatment I -07.Jul.Q4 8x50/1701-1706; 12x 18/1001: 2X181371; 18/1957 {snd 181371; 50/1701-1706; 18/1956{h) on 4/13/05] 13-0d-06 80 months lncart:eratlon I 07.Jul-04 7x 50/1701-1706; 2x 18/1001; 2x 181371; 18/1957 {and 181371; 10x SOl1701-1706; 18/1956(h): 9x 18/1956(8)(1)(8)(1) on 411:WS] 11-0cl-06 7 yrs (84 months) lncarcerallon, 3 yrs SR 459 Turner, Yildlrlm Beyozlt EOPA 23-J"""' 18/844(e) Complaint; Charged wilh 18/1001 by Information 8/9J04 II 25-Aug-04 18/1001 460 NasraDah, Hussein EOMI 2!hlan-03 18/1344, 18/513{8) II 17-Aug--04 18/1344 461 al-Amoudl, Abdurahman Muhammad EOVA 28-sep-03 462 Elashl, Basman NOTX 20--Feb-02 463 Bashi, Bayan NDTX 20-Feb-02 - 68 mos for 1812339A; 3 yr SR; each wl $2000 fine& c100SA 29 mos; 3 yrs SR; $2000 fine; $100 SA 6 months Imprisonment. 1 yr. SR, $100 454 SO /1701 et seq.; 18/1001, 1812332d, 18/1956, 31/5324. 18/1544, 18/1425, 3115322. 26fl206(1), 26fl21?/al 19X 50/1701-1706; 13x 18/1001; 3x 181371; 18/1956(h); 9x 18/1956(e)(1JB)(i); 18/1957 (by SSI 8121/03}And 181371; 10x 50/1701·1.706; 18/1956(h); 9x 18/1956{a)(1XB}(i) (by revised SSI 4114/051 · 19x501170M706; 11x 18/1001;3x 181371; 1et1956(h); 9x 18/1956(a)(1)B)(I); 18/1957 {by ssr 8/21/03] Arni 18/371; 10x 50/1701-1706; 18/1956(h); 9x 18/1956(a)(1J{B)(i) [by revised SSI 4/14/05] 17 monlhs' Imprisonment 18-Feb-05 . 18/1001 (convicted); {Also pleaded gulltyto 12-0cl-04 18/1546 on 10/06/20041 27-S.p-04 8/1325; 18/1001, 18/1543 458 [Elshafay, James 3YrS SR I Page 16 of24 Updated February 10, 2017 50/1705, 18/1425, 2617212 02-Mar-07 time served; Immediate Deportation to Turkey 05-Apr.05 1 day imprisonment; 3 yrs SR; $351< restitulion; $100 SA 14-0ot-04 23 yrs (276 months) [reduced to 197 months on 7/22/11] National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 - 464 Elashl, Ghassan NOlX 2o.Feb-02 ,m,~ ;= 1811956(h); 9x 18/1956(a)(1)8)(1); 18/1957 SSI 8121/03] And 181371; 50/1701-1706; 18/1956(h); 9x 18/1956(a)(1XB)(i) [by revised SSI {by ,ox I 07-Jul-O!I 50/1701-1706; 2x 18/1001; 2x 1~71; 18/1957 [and 181371; 10x50/1701-1706; 1811!JSS(h); 9x 18/1956(a)(1XB)(l) on 4113/05] 4x50/1701-1706; 3x 18/1001; 2x 18/371; - 12-0cl-06 80 months Incarceration, 3 yrs SR 24-Jan-06 66 mos; reduced to 60 months on 2'1/06 465 Elashl, Hazim NOlX 20-Feb-02 9x 50/1701 -1706; 11x 18/1001; 2x 18/371; 18/1957 - SSI 8/21/031 I 07-Jul-04 466 Damrah, Fawaz Mohammed NOOH 16-Deo-03 18/1425 II 17-Jun-04 18/1425 ·457 Alferehln, Osama Musa Romero-Penchano, Csr1os Adolfo OAZ 15-Sep-03 18/1425(8) II 11hluo"4 18/1425{8) SDlX 21--May-03 16/2339B I '"""""' 18/23398· 469 Babar, Mohammed Junald SONY 03,1,n-04 2x18/2339A, 2x2339B, 50/1705 I 03-Jun-04 2x18/2339A, 2x23398, 5011705 10-0ec-10 470 Hassan, Abdulghefur Abdul EDNY 13-l'eb-03 31(5324. 18/371 II 01-Jun-04 31/5324 06-Jan--05 471 Hameed, Molnuddeen Ahmed DNJ 13-Aug-03 18/371 {lo violate 18/1960) [by Information 19-Apr-04 18/371 (to violate 18/1960) 06-J""-05 time served; 2 yrs SR 472 Abraham, Yehuda DNJ 19-Aug.P3 04/20/20041 18(1960 II II 30-Mar-04 18/1960 14-Nov-05 2 yrs probation; $10,000 line 473 Daher, Mohamad EOMI 23-Jarwl3 18/1962(d), 18/1029 & 18/2 II 09-Mar-04 18/1962(d) 18-Aug-04 3 yrs probation; $60K restitution; $100 SA 474 Fawaz, lssam Hassan EOMI 23-Jan-03 18/1962{d), 1811029 II 09-Ma,-04 18/1962{d) 14-Jul-04 475 Abdur..ffaheem, Hammad EDVA ·25-Jun-03 1812339A. 18/ I 04-Mo,-04 18/371, 1812339A, 181924(0) 476 Chapman, Selfulleh EDVA 25,hm-03 1812339A. 18/371, 18/960, 18/924(c)&{h)&(o), 1811001 I 04-Mo,-04 181371, 1812339A, 181924{0) 4n Khan, Masoud Ahmad EDVA 25-l-04 18/1001 Olhl,>-04 60 months; 3yrs SR 483 Talyi. Vaudat MustBfa EOLA 09-Jan-04 ~50(1702 & 1705(b) I 29-Jan-04 zx."50/1702 28-Apr-04 5 mos lrnprionment : 1 yr SR. $25K. fine 464 Mora, Adriana Gladys SOlX 04-Sep-03 18/2339B; 21/841 I 26-Jao"4 18123398; 211841 30-1\w-07 120mos; 5yrsSR: $2.00SA 485 Mamre, Sayed Abdul EONY 03-Jun--03 18/1001, 21/844(a) II 23-Jan-04 18/1001 26-May-04 37 mos., 3 yrs SR 466 ~mcfi. lbrahlm Atvned EDVA 25-Jun-03 1812339A. 18J371, 18/960, 18/924(c}&(g)&(o), I 16-Jan-04 18/924(c), 1 ~ 09-Apr-04 120 mos, 3 yrs SR 487 Royer, Randall Todd EDVA 25-J,n-03 50/1705, 1812339A. 23398, 181371, 1812S84, 1819&1, 1B/924(c}&(g), 181844 I 16-Jan-04 181924(c), 18/844 09-Ap,-04 2Dyems 488 Sallam, TarekAbdelhamld COCA 07-Apr-03 15x 18/1343, 2X42/408, 31'5324 II 08-J,n-04 18/1343 17-May-04 18 mos, 3}'11 SR. restlhrtlon 489 Foley, Lori· COCA 30-Jul-03 15x 18/1343 II 22-0..,03 18/1343 15-Mar-04 · 1o-Nov-03 3115324 09-Jan-04 466 18/1957 2 months; 4 mos. house arrest: 2 2-s,p-04 denallJrallzatlon time served, 36 mos SR+ denat'n & deport 01-0,o-05 36 months time served (4 years and 8 months) &10 yrs ordered to continue cooperating with the government as a condition of his supervised SR; release 490 Sarsour, JsmB Salem EDWI 22-Jan-03 :m. 18/960, 18/924(b}&(c)&(g}&{h) 18/960 18/92Mc"'~o' 181844 31/5324 """'l-05 ---06 36 mos., 3 yrs SR 15 months; 2 yrs SR; $100 SA; $5000 Ane 52 mos. on each rount (reversed 9/1JD6 end re senlenced on 8/16107 to 52 mos. total' 29-Jul-05 780mos. 2!hlw-05 life 37mos, 3yrsSR. restltullon 57 months custody snd 5 years SR 57 months custody and 5 years SR 5 mos for each count; 2 yrs SR ; $200 SA; 175 500 restllutlon . II Page 170124 Updated February 10, 2017 15 mos., 3 yrs SR, restitution 2 yrs probation w/condttrons: $2500 fine; 25K ......00 National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 Rutz. EDdn Alberto Arroyave SDlX 04-Dec-02 18/2339B, 21/841, 211846 I 05-N<,,-03 1812339B 492 Haydous, Fadl EDMI 24-Apr-03 18/2314, 18/922(gX1} II 28-0ct-03 493 Batlle, J¢freY Leon DOR 0a-Ocl-02 18123398, 2384, 924, 50/1705 I 494 Ford, Patrice Lamumba DOR 03-0cl-02 18123398, 2384, 1956. 924, 50/1705 495 Biheifi, SOiiman s. EDVA 07--Aug-03 496 Lewis, October Martinique DOR 497 Aatlque, Mohammed 498 499 491 31-May-06 180months 1812314 31-Mar-05 2:7 mon1hs Imprisonment- To run concurrently w/ Q!M'.:R-0013i.14 In Western Olslrict NY, Plus 1 day consecutive; credlted with tlme In WDNY; 2 yrs SR (concurrent w/ WONY) 16-0ct.-03 1812384 24-Nov-03 18years I 16-0d-03 18/2384 24-NoV-03 18 years 18/1425, 18/1001, 18/1015 II 09-0ct-03 18/1425, 1,811015 12.Jan-04 12 months 03-0ct-02 18/2339B,2384, 1956, 50/1705 I 26-Sep--03 18/1956 01-Dec-03 36 months EOVA 25-Jun-03 181371; 18/960; 18/924(0); 2x 181924(c) n 22-Sep-03 181924(c), 18/960 17-Doo-03 126 months Abdallah, Hassan EDTIC 20-Mar-03 18/659. 1812342, 18/371 II 19-Sep-03 18/2342 08-Apr-04 5 yrs Probation Bilal, Ahmed lbrahlm DOR DOR 03-0ct-02 18/2339B, 1812384, 18/924, 50/1705 I 16-Sep--03 50/1705; 181824(c) OS-Fob-04 03-0cl-02 18/2339B, 1812384, 50/1705 I 18-Sep--03 50/1705; 18/924(c) OS-Fob-04 EDMI 23-Jan-03 18/1962(d), 18/2342 & 1812, 1812315 & 1812, 2339i:u~;,;·, .,..,. I 18-Sep--03 18/2339B; 18/1962 18-Doo-03 57 months; 3yrs SR; $657K n,stitution II 11-Deo-03 12 months, 1 day 27.Feb-04 293mcs; Syrs SR; SA & restltullon (Commandanle Napo) ;oo Bl7al, Muhammad Ibrahim 501 Makkl, Hassan Moussa 502 Akhdar, Ali Mohamad EDMI 03-Fob-03 18/1962(d) 503 Tchlbas.sa, Artur 25-Sep.91 18/1203, 181371 504 Khafagl, Bassam Kamel DOC EDMI 2.Wan-03 18/1344; 18/1546 505 Kwon, Yong Kl EOVA EDVA 25-Jun-03 18/960, 18J924(c)&(g)&(h), 181371 EDVA 506 flJ7 Surratt. Donald Thomes Hasan, Khwaja Mahmood 0 10years I 1 - 18/1962 12-Sep-03 18/1203, 181371 II. 09.sep-03 18/1344; 18/1546 1,..,.,,..,, Timeserved/1O months II 25.Aug-03 181371, g24(c) & (h) 07-Nov--03 138months 25-Jun-03 181960, 181924{b)&(c)&(o), 18/371 II 22-lwg-03 181371, 924(b) O7-Nov-03 46 months 25-Jun-03 18/1001, 181924, 181371 II 21-lwg-03 181371, 924 O7--Nov-03 135months 14-Aug-03 1811546 06-Nov-03 5 monthS, 2yrs SR. $500 fine, $400 SA - ,... 508 Jubara, Hosam Yousef MDFL 19-Mar-03 18/1546 II 509 Hawash, Maher Mofeld DOR 02-May-03 18/23398. 2384, 924, 50/1705 I llt>AUg-03 50/1705 09-Feb-04 510 Akhdar, Bies EOMI 03-Feb-03 18/1952, 18/1962, 18/1952. 1811512 II 29-Jul-03 18/1962 08-'ao-O•f ra,ti1ution 511 Hatfield, G. Wilflam NDNY 03-Jul-03 2617206 II O3-Jul-03 26/7206 O1-Jun-05 2yrs probation, $15Kflne 512 Ohafir, Priscilla NDNY O1.Jul-03 01-Jul-03 18/1001 06-Jun-05 2yrs probation, S1OK fine & restitution 513 Jensen, Uwe SDTIC 04-Dec-02 18/1001 18/23398, 21/841(a)(1}, (b)(1)(A), 21/846 II 2.Wun-03 18123398; 21/841; 21/846 31-May-06 168 months 514 Rodriguez. Ma~ EDTIC 20-Mar-03 18/659, 18/2342, 181371 II 19.Jun-03 181371 29-Apc-04 12 monlhs 515 Samhan, Husam Addelhafiz (Sammy) COCA 25-Mar--03 42/408(e)(7}(B) II 42/408 O2-Jul--03 112 days, 3yr SR 516 Al-Bakri, Mukhtar WDNY 21-0ct-02 2x1812339A I 19-May-03 18f2339A 03-Doo-03 10 yrs, 3 yrs SR. $200011ne, $100 SA 517 AJl,Ahmed NDNY 16-May-03 26/7206 II 16-May-03 2617206 20-May-05 2yrs probation, $1 SK fine I - Page 18 of24 Updated February 10, 2017 70 months, 3 yrs SR. $100 SA. $2,062,500 National Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 . WDNY 21-0cl-02 2,(18/23398 I 12-May-03 18/2339B 04-lleo-03 96 months, 3SR, $1 OOSA Farts, lyman EDVA 30-Ap,--03 2x18/2339B, I 01-May-03. 18/371, 2x2339B 28-0ct-03 SR, 520 Jarwan,Ayman NONY 19-Feb-03 4x 181371 II 25-Apr-03 2x 181371 521 Varela. Carlos All Romero SDTX 04-lleo-02 18/23398, 21/841, 21/846 I 23-Apr-03 1812339B, 21/846 518 Taher, Yaseln 519 20 yrs (60 mos wlaeclil forUme served, 3 yrs $100 SA & 180 : : :/credit to be ser.ed conseetrtivel" 5 ·· S 100 SA 522 AI-Wahaldy, Osameh NDNY 1Q.Feb-03 50/1701 etseq. I 22-Apr-03 50/1701 el seq. 19-0ct-05 18mos. 120 months lmpriso001ent, 5 yrs SR, $200 15-Jun-09 1s----'al assessment 24-/wg-05 2yrs probation, $SK fine 523 Shlshanl, Omar 21.Jul-02 18/513, 181545, 181371 II 21-Apr-03 18/545, 18/371 18-NoY-03 57 months, 2 yrs SR, $200SA 524 Awde, Sallm Nemlr EDMI EDMI 05-Fel>-03 18/1962{d) II 18-Apr-03 18/1962 08-Apr-04 Time served/14 months, 3 yrs SR, $100 525 lsmaU, NabU Mohamad EDMI 23-Jao-03 18/196Z(d) ·II 18,-Apr-03 18'1962 08-Apr-04 ~Ml02~-90011; 3yrsSR;$100SA; 1 7 500 resti' ·· · n 526 Bowman, Brandy EDMI 03-Fob--03 1811962(d) II 16-Apr-03 18/1962 08-Ap<-04 527 Gordon, Carol EDMI 23-Jan-03 18/1962(d) II 16-Apr-03 18/1962 (conspiracy RICO) 08-Apr-04 7 monlhs; 3 yrs SR; $202,500 restitution; $100 SA 528 Ujaama, Earnest James WDWA 28-Aug-02 18123398, 1812339A, 18J956(a){1) and {b); 181924 I 14-Apr-03 50/1705 13-Feb-04 24 months {plus 24 monlhs for SR violation) I QS.Ap,--03 1S/2339A 17-Deo-03 114 months, 3Yl'S SR, $100SA I 07--Apr-03 18/1546, 18/1028, 1029, 1543 01-$ep-05 78 months, 3 yrs SR II 04-Apr-03 18/982 25-Jul-03 18/1962 17-Jun-04 18 months. 2 yrs SR. forfeltl.n (Oma served): 3 yrs SR; $100 SA: 250010 yrs, 3 yrs SR. $1500llne, $100SA Time served/ 12 mos concurrent WI sentence In 4 months, 3 yrs SR In WDNY, $45,750 it100 SA 529 Alwan, Sahlm WDNY 21-0ct-02 530 Hmlmssa, Youssaf EDMI 27-&!p-01 531 Florez-Gomez, Llbardo SDFL 12-Nov-02 2x18/2339A 1811546, 18/1028{!!!)(6), 18/1029, 181371, 18'1543 1812339A 18/1960, 181982 532 Hariri, Mohamad Ahmad EDMI 23-Jan.OO 18f1962(d) II 01-Apr-03 533 Goba,Yahya WDNY 21-0ct-02 2x18/2339B 10-Doo-03 ""'8(1, WDNY 21-0c:t-02 2x18/2339B I I 25-Mar-03 18/2339B 534 24-Mar-03 18/2339B 09-0oo-03 96 months, 3SR; $100SA SOCA 15-Nov-02 8/1324 II 19-Mar-03 8/1324 19-Jun-03 12 months+ 1 day, 3yrs SR SOCA 1....,,,..2 811324 II 1..--00 8/1324 17..hm-03 10 months, 2:yrs SR SDCA 1....,,,..2 8/1324 II 18-Feb-03 811324 03-Ma,--03 llme served, 1 yrs SR I 10-Feb-03 1811962 17-Feb-06 120 mos 20-F""'3 121 mos, 3 yrs SR 535 536 537 Shafal Boughader-Mucharrafille, Salim Serrano-Valdez, Pabfda Alvarez-Duenas, Jose Guillermo I 31-Jen-03 22.Jan-03 1812339A, 1811962.18/371, 18/1956, 18/1341, 18(1343 18f2332(b): 18/1114, 1116, 1117; 18f844(n): 18f2155(a)& (b) [and 1812155{b) by &Jpersedlng lnformetl01'11 181922{g)(1) II 31.Jan-03 18/922(gX1) 01-Aug-03 46 months, 3 yrs SR 21-0ct-02 2x 18/2339B, 50/1705 I 16-Deo-03 84 months, 3yrs SR, $100SA ~2 18/1546(8) [10/08J03 by SSI: 2x 1811546; 3X 18/1546(a): 18/1028(a)(4); 2x 18/1001) II 10.Jan-03 50/1705 18/1546(a) [On 3/04/04 pleaded to SSI charges 18/1546(8), 2x18/1001, 18/1028fe'14\1 21-0ct-02 18/1546 oa-Ap,-04 21-Qct-02 Tm SN/deport 21-0ct-02 Tm SN/deport 114-Feb--08 Life 27.Jan-11 30 yrs Imprisonment; 3 yrs SR II 18(1546 1812332a; 1812332(b); 1811111, 1114, 1116, 30.Jul-02 1117· 18/844· 1B/1001 2x18/2339B, 18/1325, 18/1546, 3x18/2342; 23J,o-02 3x18J1956, 3X18/1029, 18'1962 18/371 {plea), 2x18/1029, 18/1956, 21.Jun-02 18/196., 2x18/2342 28-Feb-03 51 months; 3 yrs SR I 17-Jun-02 50/1702 & 1705, 18/1029, 18/1956, 1811343 53S Arnaout, Enaam M. NOil 09-0<1--02 539 AI-Naffi, Mohamed &Jlelman SONY 22-Mar-01 540 Johnson. John Earl NDNY 541 Ga!ab, Faysal WDNY Issa, Mohamed Ahm~ EDMI 543 Basnan, Osama Yousef SDCA 11.sep-02 2x 1B/1546(a), 18/2 II 544 Owelkat, Majeda Jabarah, Mohammed SDCA 04-Sep--02 II SONY 30-Jul-02 Hammoud, Mohamad WONC ,.....,,.,,1 Hammoud, Ch8wkl WDNC 28-Mar-01 18/154S{a} 18/2332(b); 18/1111, 1114, 1116, 1117; 181 2332a· 181844· 18/1001 9x18/1956; 6x18J2342; 6x18/1029; 3x18/1325; 3x18/1546; 2x18/1962; 2x18/1341, 2x2339B 4x18/2342; 7x18/1956; 4x181371: 3x18/1029; 2x1811962· 2x18/1341 - Elashyl, lhsan NDTX 07-Feb-02 542 545 546 ... 547 Mo"'°"' 13x 50/1702 end 1705{1>); 10x 18/1029 (a){2)(5), 12x 18/1956 (a}(1){A){I), 4x 18/1343 I I 18121S5(b) """'""' 21-0ct-02 Page 19of24 Updated Februaiy 10, 2017 23-0a--02 6 mos.; 3 yrs SR BOP 48 months (for each count) (to run concurrently); SRfor3 yrs (each count){~rrentty); Reslilulion $281,892.52: National Seculity Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrolism and Terrolism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 549 Harb, Said WDNC 28-Mm"-01 18/2339B, 1812339A, 181201A, 18/1956, 18/2342, 18/371, 1344A, 18/1029, 18/215, 18/1324, 1812314 1811962 I 25-Feb-02 1812339A, 18/371, 18/~956, 18/1962 1s.Mar-03 THE FOLLOWING CONVICTIONS AROSE FROM THE NATIONWIDE INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED AFTER SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 550 Murshed, Ahmed WDNY 06-De<>-01 551 Peters, Troy M. EDNY 22-May-02 811324 18/1962; 15/78j{b) & 78ff; 18/1951; 18/1503; 27-Jul-06 8/1324 13-N0\<-06 18/1951 [on CR-00521] & 15/78j(b) & 78ff on CR-006201 10-Dec-07 26/7202 27-Jan-06 Tlme Served; special assessment $200: 706 300 restitution 3 yrs probstlon, $5000 18/1503 21-Jut-06 3 yrs probation, $2500 fine II 25-Jul-06 552 Gujar, Tariq NONY 05-0ct-05 II 07-0ct-05 553 Wingate, Lynn EDNY 22-May-02 18/1962; 18/1503; 181371 II 23-Jun-05 554 Villalobos, Herbert EDVA 23-May.-05 18/1028 end 2 II 23-May-05 18/1028 and 2 I 1812332A, 18/23328, 18'844, 18/1114, 22-Apr-05 49146502, 18/32 55S Moussaout, Zacarias EDVA 11-Dec-01 556 Royer, Jeffrey EDNY 22-May-02 557 Bgindy, Amr I. EDNY 22-May-02 558 Benmoum8n, Elmellanl WDPA 5511 Mahmoud, Amna _.EDNY 4 Months. 2 yrs SR 04-May-06 lffe iflprisonment; On 1/04110, the 4th Circuit affumed Moussaoui's conviction and sentence and denied his motion to remand. 02.Qct-06 72 months imprisonment; 3 years SR; Special assessment of '"'900 1~un-06 135 months; 3 yrs SR; SA $1400;forfe!lure of $1,568,000 II 1811962; 2x 18,1371, 1811503, 18/1512, 4x 15178"''b' & 78ff· 18/1962(d); 2x 18/1951(8); 5x 151780)(b) & 24-Jan-05 78ff; 2x 18/1343; 18/371 [& 2x 18/1001; 18/3147 on 8/01._"' 10->lov-04 18/371 29-0eo-04 time served, SR 12 months II 01-0ct-03 1811029x2 16-!leo-03 3 years prob $67,306.00 II 15-Jul-03 18/371 28-0lov-04 18/1962; 7x 15178J(b) & 78ft"; 3X 18/1951; 18/1503; 181151212\fB\• 2x 18/371 3x 1811951(8); 18/1962(d); 14x 15f78(j){b) & 78ft"; 11x 18/1343; 2X 18/371; 1811503 [& 2x 18/1001; 18131471 18/371 01-0ct-03 1811029x2 II 24-Jan-05 ""' 15-Jul-03 181371 [by lnfonnation) 18/371, 18/659 II 17-Jun-03 18/371 EDNY 04-0eo-01 18l1029x2 II 17-Mar-03 18/1029x2 Hussain, Qioudluy EDNY 04.Qeo-01 1811029A&B, 1811956 II 17-Mar-03 18/1029B Awan, Khalid EDNY 04-0eo-01 1811029A&B. 18/1956 II 17-Mar--03 18/1029B - DSC 03-Jan-03 18/1344, 18/1028 II 03-Jan-03 18 /1344 and 1028 03-Jan-03 14 months time served 24-Doo-02 15-Jan-03 Time served (15 Months) 3 yrs. SR 11:.oec.o2 181371 18/2332a(a){1). 2332(b)(1), 924(c), 04-0ct-02 49l46505(b)(3) & (C), 49146506(1), 49/4650418'321ai 11··-·- 04-Doo-03 Time served (4 months), 2 yrs. SR 30-"o-03 Ufa Imprisonment . Hansen, Robert 561 AbuaU, Hussein 562 Sarwer,SUhaD 563 564 Khatib, Yaser Al-Had!, Nageeb Abdul Jabar 566 Mohamed 567 Ahmed, Rabi 565 ... 2!hl,I-05 25-0ct-01 560 568 18132 time served, 2 yeara SR; and deportation proceedll1gs pUtsuant to Tille 18/ 3583(d), Deft shaD not re-enter or attempl to re-enter US wilhoot written authorization of Sec. of II 18/371 2617202 (Information) 1812332A, 18/23328, 18/844, 18/1114, 49146502, 41 Months; 3 yra SR Reid, Richard EDNY NDIL 16-0cl-02 18/1546 II ON.I 25-0ct-01 II OMA 16-Jan-02 18J371, 181659 1812332a(a){1), 2332(b){1), 924(c), 49/46505(b)(3) & (C), 49146506(1), 49146504 18J32f9\f1'D'"" ""'1...,,,. I 18/1546 Pmballon for 3 years; Fine In the amount of 02...,,... '--500 . Time served (5 months), 3 yrs. SR Ahmad, Ahmad Abeed Ahmad EDVA 30-Sep-02 18/1548 II 30-Sep-02 30-Sep-02 Time_sarved, 1 yr. SR 570 Sarama, Nabn NpcA 12-Deo-01 8/1325, 1811546, 1811001, 18/1028 II 25-&p-02 8/1325 25-Sep-02 Time served (10 Months), 1 yr SR 571 Koshak, Abdurahman Khahil WOPA 16-5ep-02 1811462 II 16-Sep-02 16/1462 16-Sep-02 lime served, 3 yrs.SR 572 Tebbakh,Karim EDNY 27-Jun-02 2x18 /2315 II 05-Sep-02 10-0e<>02 Time served 3 years SR 573 Oulal, Jean Tony MDFL 20-Feb-02 1811001 II 05-Sep-02 Time served. 2 yrs SR 574 Almari, Saleh All EDVA 30-Jul-02 1811341, 18/1343, 181371 II 15-Aug-02 18/1001 30-J,l-02 1811341, 1343, 371 18-0ci.-02 4 Monlhs, 2 yrs SR 575 Al Alias, Hussein SONY 25,10-02 18/1001 II 25-Jut-02 1811001 22-0ct-02 Time served; 2 yrs SR, $700 576 Cleveland, Denick EDNY 22-May-02 18/1962; 18/371; 1811951 II 17-Jul-02 1811962 23-0ct-06 4 yrs probation; $5000 fil'I& 577 Undh, John Walker EDVA 05-Feb-02 I 15-Jul-02 50/1705; 18/844 04-0ot-02 20Years °"'""'2 18/1343, 18/1001, 18/1029. 24-lan-03 35 mos., 3 yrs probation, restitution & $600 4x 50/1705, 18/2332(b), 18/924, 3x 1&'23398, 181844 11· 18/1546 2X18 /2315 578 Bashmouny, Ahmed .A])dulla EDNY 01-Nov-01 18/1343, 18/1001, 18/1029 579 Abdoulah, Mohadar Mohamed SDCA 02-Nov-01 1811001, 18/1548 II 02-Jul--02 18/1001 02-0ct--02 Time served (335 days), 3yrs SR 580 Khan, Ayub AD SONY 14-Jan-02 1811029 II 20-Jun--02 18/1029 1"""9-02 1 Year, 1 day. 3 yrs SR, $15,000 Page20of24 Updated February 10, 2017 ' National Security Division Chart of Public-JUnsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 -12/31/16 ' 581 Trabelsl, Kamel Mohammed COCA 05-Jun-02 42/408(a)(7)(A): 18/1546(b)(1); 42/408(s)(7)(c) on 11/20/01 II 10-Jun-02 582 AI-Marabh, Nabll WDNY 06-0,o-01 2x 18/1001, 8/1324, 8/1325 II 583 Azmelh, Mohammed SDNY 14-Jan-02 18/1029 584 Butt, Asher Iqbal II EDPA 20-May.02 18/1543 585 Al-Saraf, Kumelt WDPA 04--0ol-01 566 Hussein, Mohamed DMA 567 Iqbal, Javeld EDNY 18/1546 24-Jun-02 08-Jun-02 8/1324 03-Sep--02 8 months, 3 yrs. SR 0lh.lun-02 1811029 18-Sep--02 Time served (9 Months), SR 36 months II 06-Jun-02 18/1543 12-Sep-02 18/1028 II 29-May-02 181371 14-Nov-01 2x 1811860 II 30-Ap,-02 30-Nov-01 18/371; 18f1028(a)(2), 18/1028{s)(6), 18/513 II 22..J\pr-02 Time served, 3yrs SR, comply w/ INS 6 """"'' 23-/wg-02 3 Years Probetlon, $250 1811960x2 22-Jul-02 18 Months, 2 yrs. SR 181371; 18/1028(a)(2) 17-5ep--02 16 Months. 3 yrs SR 588 Almutar1, Mubarek NDlN 12-0ct-01 18/1344, 18/1014 II 17-Apr-02 1811344 29.Jul-02 21 Months, 3 yrs SR 569 Al Rababeh, Eyad EDVA 05-Mar-02 18/1028x2 II 17-Apr-02 18/1028x2 17-May-02 8 Months, 3 yn;. SR 590 Albred, Kamel WDPA 04--0ol-01 18/1028 II 16-Apr-02 18/1028 29-Jul-02 3 Months Probation, $250 591 Alshomary. Halder WDPA 04-0ct-01 18/1028 AI-Atabl, Wsthek II 15,-Apr-02 1811028 592 WDPA 04-0cl-01 18/1028 II 10-Apr-02 18/1028 1 - 2 1YeerPrcbsllon,$250 1 - 3 Months Probation, $350 593 Refel, Mohammed Ibrahim NDOH 20-<'ob-02 18/1001, 1811546 II 10-Ap,-02 18 / 1546 end 8/ 1325 10-Apr-02 Time sen,ed, 3 yrs. SR 594 Butt. Moeen lslam EDPA 06-M,,,-02 8N325 II 1()..Apr-02 811325 13-Jun-02 rune served, 3 years SR SDCA 04-Jan-02 18/1546, 42/408 II 29-Mar-02 29-Mar-02 time served. 3 yrs SR WDPA 04--0a-01 1811028 II 28--Mo,-02 1811028 16-Aug-02 3 Years Probation 04--0ol-01 18/1028 II 2~r-02 02.,-Od-01 2x 1811001 II 14-){2) 17..Jan-02 18(1001 Alubeidy, All Al Qaryuli, Mohammed WDPA 04-0cl-01 18/1028 14..Jan-02 18/1028 11-Apr-02 3 Yea!S Probation, S250 MDFL 31.Qct-01 18/1546, 8/1325 10-Jan-02 18/1546, 811325 08-Mar-02 Ume served, 3yrs SR Hyde.-, Salman COCA 21..Qec-01 1811028, 18/1546 10-Jan-02 18/1546 25-Mar-02 4 mos., 3yrs SR WDMO 14-Nov-01 4x 18/1344, 18/1958, 18/2314 Olhleo-02 18/1344 06-Mar-02 ilnie served, 3 yrs SR, $1,000 EOVA 15-Nov-01 1811001x2 I oa..ian-02 18/1001 x2 03-Jan-03 63 Days, 2 yrs probation, $500 COCA 21-Dec-01 18/1028, 18(1546 II 03-Jan-02 18/1028, 1811546 11-Feb-02 ilme served, 3yrs SR DMT 22-0cl.-01 18/922(9) II 02..Jan-02 f81922{g) 28-Mar-02 10 Months,10 months SR - ' 629 630 ...31 632 833 834 Rizvi, Arsalan Absar ........ 635 Badrl,Adel 636 Abassi, Sabre 637 Atta, Ahmed Nawaz 638 Abu-ll>alda, Maher Yousef . II Page22of24 Updated February 10, 2017 25-Ap<.()2 6 mooths; 3..yrs SR; $10,000 27-Feb-02 11me Served (8 Months), 3 yrs. SR Nalional Security Division Chart of Public/Unsealed Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions 9/11/01 - 12/31/16 639 Kopke, Roxanne EDVA 15-Nov-01 8f1306c.p II 20-Dec-01 8/1306c.p 20-lleo-01 50 Day, 640 Menepta, Mujahid Abdul WOOK 29-No,-01 18/922(g)(1) II 19-Deo-01 18/922{g)(1) 03-Ap<-02 15 Monlhs, 3 yrs SR 641 Awad, Hadlr EDVA 1]-Doc-01 18/1546 642 Al-Baras, Alawl Hussain WOPA 04-0<1-01 17-Dec-01 1811546 18/1028 01-Mar-02 2 Years SR EOVA 13-0,o-01 '3-0a-01 18/513 18N02B 13-Mar-02 13-0,o-01 181513 6 months sup, Release 11-Jan-02 · MDFL 4 Months, 3 yrs SR 31-0ct-01 18/1325 12-Dec-01 18/1325 10-Jan-02 Time served (3 Months); 3 yrs SR 644 Abdi, Mohamed ___ ,, Nennlne Hanl Al Khammash, 645 Ahmad, Hafiz Khalil MOFL 13-Nov-01 646 El Zaatari, Salam lbrahlm WOPA 01-Nov-01 12-0ec-01 18/1546 49/46505(b}(1) 19-Deo-01 Tlme served, 2 yrs SR 647 Farid.Abdul 12-De;c-01 MDNC 29-0cl-01 49 / 46505(bX1) 18/1014 12-Dec-01 limesented 11-0ec-01 18/1014 26-Mar-02 Time served (6 months) 3 yrs. SR 648 Ktiamis, Sherif MOFL 03-0ct-01 18/1001 O7-0ec-01 18/1001 19-Dec-01 Time served + 7 days, 3yrs SR EDVA 25-0ct-01 18/1028 x4 30-0d-01 06-0eo-OI 18/1O28x4 MDNC 181911 15-Feb--02 21 Months, 2 yrs SR 06-0ec-01 18/911 26-Fab-02 nme served (5 mos). 1 yr. SR 30-Nov-01 18/922, 924 and 371 05-Ap,-02 24 Months, 3 yrs SR 18/922, 924 and 371 643 649 Martinez-Flores, Luis 650 Siddiqui, lmltiaz 651 Plene, Vincente Rafael 652 Upshur, Traci 653 Hafaiedh, Ben Sarni Fath! S64 Iqbal, Jawa!d 655 . .,,,,,,, """'' . 18/1546, 18/1001, 18/1621 II 18-Sep-01 . 181922, 18/924 and 181371 1._,.1 18/922, 18/924 and 181371. COCA 30-Nov-01 1.......1 1811546, 421408, 18/1001 05-Apr-02 15 Months, 2 yrs SR 19-&p-01 8/ 1325 3IH on data.· Itlooks like we are only missing approx 30 POBs. As we discussed, this was a manual pull by our an!llysts. Please let rile know if You have any concerns or follow-ups. · Thanks, run "Given the use of alisses in IT matters, factual errors. in the Initial data, ·anci conflioo,;g DOBs, databsse checks are limited in their ability to accurately identify a dlj!e/place of birth. We higWight ·ibese concerns to note the attached list likely contains gaps or e!fors, although we endeavored to provide the most accurate data as rapidly as possible. This spresdsheet conta!D3 the unclassified version of the data that removes the FBI case file." •I #3 Tosca·s, George (NSD) From: Toscas, George (NSD) Monday, February 27, 2017 1_0:38 PM Tucker, Rachael (OAG); Hunt, Jody (OAG) Toscas, George (NSD) Copy of UNLCASS_Post_9-11_prosecutions-22_Feb_2017_Final - minus penttbom Cat I1.xlsx Copy.of UNLCASS_Post_9-11_Prosecutions-22_Feb_2017_Final - minus penttbom Cat I1.xlsx Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: ·•.',-:-.: Here is the FB'(di'art with the 115 Category II Penttbom convictions deleted (leaving 553 convictions on this ·,:. · chart). «Copy of UNLCASS_Post_9-11_Prosecutions-22_Feb_2017_Final - minus penttbom Cat I1.xlsx» # 5 1 A 1 Name 2 Samhan Husam Addelhafiz 3 Nguyen Sinh Vinh Ngo· 4 Vidriales Miguel Alejandro Santana 5 Chhun Yasith 6 Mohamed Zameer 7 Badawi Muhanad 8 Elhuzayel Nader 9 Dandach Adam 10 Deleon Ralph Kenneth 11 Kabir Schiel 12 Gojali Arifeen David 13 Mihalik Oytun Ayse 14 Chen YiQing 15 Nguyen Vinh Tan 16 AwadaMonir 17 Sailam Tarek Abdelhamid 18 Foley Lori 19 al-Marri Ali Saleh Kalah 20 Finton Michael C. 21 Rockwood Nadia 22 Rockwood Paul 23 Abdallah Akram 24 Jamal Samih Fadl 25 Alferahin Osama Musa 26 Kareem Abdul Malik Abdul 27 Conley Shannon Maureen 28 Kamran lrfan 29 Qayyum Abdul 30 Khan lmran 31 Ahmad Bahar 32 Ahsan Syed Talha 33 Abu-jihaad Hassan 8 District CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA CDCA COCA CDCA CDCA CDCA COCA COCA COCA CDIL COIUSOIL DAK OAK OAZ DAZ DAZ DAZ DCO DCO DCO DCO OCT OCT OCT D C DOB E of Birth Country of Birth Israel USA Mexico Cambodia • Tanzania Sudan USA CA USA ("/1 hfohanistan CA Philippines Afghanistan USA Turkey Taiwan Vietnam Lebanon t:alifornia IUK MA I Qatar USA UK USA Jordan Lebanon Kuwait Geo-ia Kenya USA CA Pakistan United Kingdom United Kingdom USA Pakistan Pakistan F FBI Case? I b3 b6 b7C b7E B A 34 Demirtas lrfan 35 Herrera Alexander Beltran 36 UIHaqlrfan 37 AliQasim 38 YousafZahid 39 Arevalo Ana Isabel Pena 40 Gutierrez Vergara Luz Mary 41 Rubio Nancy Cornie 42 Corredor-lbague Jose Maria 43 Al Delaema Wesam 44 Pineda Juvenal OVidio Ricardo l'almera 45 Kurbanov Fazliddin 46 Blair Alexander 47 Booker John T. 48 Loewen Terry 49 Rovinski· Nicholas Alexander 50 Tazhayakov Azamat 51 AliAftab 52 Mubayyid Muhamed 53 Muntasser Emadeddin 54 Reid Richard 55 Tsarnaev Dzhokhar 56 Matanov Khairullozhon 57 Phillipos Robel Kidane 58 Kadyrbayev Dias 59 Ferdaus Rezwan 60 Mehanna Tarek 61 Baxam Craig Benedict 62 Martinez Antonio 63 Naidu Balraj 64 Muhammad Anar 65 Ranjha lmdad Ullah 66 Sandhu Parvez Mehmood E D C DDC Turkey DDC Colombia DDC DDC Paklstan Pakistan Pakistan DDC Colombia ,_OLOMBIA DDC DDC I DDC DDC COLOMBIA Boyaca COLOMBIA cs IRAQ COLOMBIA Uzbekistan United States United States DDC DDC DID DKS . DKS DKS DMA I KS United States IRI USA DMA Kazakhstan DMA Pakistan DMA Lebanon DMA DMA Libya Unlted Kingdom DMA DMA Kyrgystan DMA Massachusetts DMA Kazakhstan DMA DMA DMD DMD DMD Kyrgystan USA MA or USA l>A USA MARYLAND USA MARYLAND _I Singapore USA DMD Pakistan DMD DMD Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan F b3 b6 b7C b7E B A 67 68 69 70 71 Chughtal Mazhar Iqbal DMD Ranjha Saifullah Anjum Saqi Muhammad Riaz Doudzai Mohammad Naeem Nadia DMD DMD DMD DMD 72 73 74 75 76 77 Nabil Nabi Varatharasa Thirunavukarasu Osman Haniffa Bin Subandi Haji DMD DMD DMD DMD DMD DMD 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 Wotulo Erick Rusli Reinhard Soedirdja Helmi Abdurahman Zacharia Yusuf Musse Hanad Mustofe Yusuf Abdullahi Mohamed Esse Amina Mohamud Furreh Mahdi Hussein Omar Mahamud Said Mahamud· Ahmed Hussein Ali Amina Farah DMD DMN ·DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN Hassan Hawo 88 Mohamed Omer Abdi 89 Abdow Abdow Munye 90 91 92 93 94 9S 96 97 98 Ali Adarus Abdulle Ahmed Salah Osman Warsame Mohammed Abdullah lsse Abdifatah Yusuf Hassan Kamal Said EI-Zahabi Mohammed Al Mosaleh Ali Mohammed Farah Mohamed Abdihamid Oaud Abdirahman Yasin - C D A.fghanistan ,fghanistan ,fghanistan Sri Lanka Malavsia !Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Pakistan Pakistan Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghanistan Afghanistan Sri Lanka Malaysia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia USA IMN USA I Kenya Kenya . Somalia Somalia !Somalia Somalia Somalia Somalia Somalia Somalia Somalia DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN DMN E Somalia Somalla Somalia Minnesota Unknown Somalia Somalia Lebanon Iraq U.S.A. Kenya F b3 . b6 b7C b7E 99 Omar Guled Ali B A 100 Ahmed Hamza Naj 101 Farah Adnan Abdihamid 102 Warsame Abdirizak Mohamed 103 Saadeh Alaa 104 Topaz Samuel Rahamin 105 Alessa Mohamed 106 Almonte Carlos 107 Duka Dritan 108 Duka Eljvir 109 Duka Shain 110 Shnewer Mohamad Ibrahim 111 Tatar Serdar 112 Abdullahu Agron 113 Lakhani Hemant 114 Abodayah Akrem 115 Raja Manthena 116 Hameed Moinuddeen Ahmed 117 Abraham Yehl.Ida 118 Saadeh Nader 119 Singh Balwinder 120 Navarrete Beltran Diego Alfonzo 121 Hussain Muhammad Abid 122 Tchibassa Artur 123 KHAN Reaz Qadir 124 MOHAMUD Mohamed Osman 12S SEDAGHATY Pirouz 12Ei STEmYE Ali Khaled 127 BATTLE Jeffrey Leon 128 FORD Patrice Lamumba 129 LEWIS October Martinique 130 BILAL Ahmed Ibrahim 131 BILAL Muhammad Ibrahim . DMN DMN DMN DMN [)NJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNJ DNV DOC DOC DOC DOR DOR DOR DOR DOR DOR DOR DOR DOR C D N/A E Kenya United States United States United States USA USA USA Dominican Republi< Macedonia Macedonia Macedonia Jordan Turkey Macedonia India Jordan India I India Afghanistan Jordan I India Columbia Pakistan Angola Pakistan Somalia Iran Lebanon Clllifornla Minnesota (UNKNO' N/A INJ New Jersey lNJ I Unknown Unknown Unknown Aoridal Oregon/ I I us us us us us F b3 b6 b7C b7E A HAWASH Maher-Mofeid 132 . 133 Ayesh Hasan Ali 134 Teausant Nicholas Michael 135 Muthana Abdulla Kasem 136 Hayat Umer 137 Haya! Hamid 138 Talyi Yaudat Mustafa 139 Rayyan Khalil Abu 140 Abdulmutallab Umar Farouk 141 Masfaka Mohamad Mustapha Ali 142 Berra Lina 143 Berra Noura 144 Berra Sarni Ahmad 145 Berra Sadek 146 Berra Zeinab 147 Berra Abdul Halim 148 Berra Almire Ali-Sadek 149 Berra Houda Mohamad 150 Berra Abdulamir 151 EI-Sablani Bilal 152 Berra Abdul Karim Akram 153 Farhat Ali Abdul Karim 1S4 Farhat Amira Ali 155 Berra Hussein A. 156 Berjaoui lssam 157 Kourani Mahmoud Youssef 158 Nasrallah Hussein 159 Daher Mohamad 160 Fawaz lssam Hassan 161 Daher Ali 162 Haydous Fadi 163 Makki Hassan Moussa 164 Akhdar Ali Mohamad B . C n E Jordan (present-da• Palestine DOR EDAR CA EDCA USA Yemen EDCA Pakistan EDCA EDCA EDLA EDMI EDMI EDMI t:alifornia USA Columbia I Mfchi•'''" INil USA Nigeria EDMI Syria Kuwait EDMI Lebanon EDMI Lebanon Lebanon EDMI EDMI Lebanon EDMI EDMI EDMI Lebanon Michigan USA Iran Lebanon EDMI Lebanon EDMI EDMI EDMI Michi2an USA Kuwait Kuwait EDMI EDMI Lebanon EDMI Lebanon EDMI Lebanon EDMI EDMI Lebanon ILebanon Lebanon Lebanon EDMI EDMl Liberia EDMI Lebano~ Lebanon Lebanon EDMI EDMI Lebanon F b3 b6 b7C b7E A 165 Khafagi Bassam Kamel 166 Akhdar Elias 167 Shishani Omar 168 Awde saHm Nemir 169 Ismail Nabil Mohamad 170 Bowman Brandy 171 Gordon carol 172 Hmimssa Youssef 173 Hariri Mohamad Ahmad 174 Issa Mohamed Ahmed 175 Hamdan Mohammad Hassan 176 Berra Akram Abdul Karim 177 Berra Jamal Saadallah 178 Nasser Saleh Alli 179 Omian Monasser 180 Omian Sadik 181 Wasil Jarallah 182 Rahal Nemr Ali 183 Rania M. Fawaz Rahal Rania M. Fawaz Rahal 184 Makki Ali 185 MakkiTarek 186 Ramie Jasminka 187 Yusuf Mohamud Abdi 188 Moore Joseph Charles 189 Shears Keyona Tenea 190 Jordan Akba Jihad 191 Brown Avln Marsalis 192 Subasic Anes 193 Hassan Mohammad Omar Alv 194 Sheriff Hysen 195 Vaghi"Ziyad 196 Boyd Dylan 197 Boyd Zakariya EDMI a EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMI EDMO EDMO EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC EDNC r D Egypt E Lebanon Jordan Lebanon Lebanon USA USA Morocco Lebanon Kyrgyzstan Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Yemen Yemen Yemen Yemen Lebanon Lebanon Sierra Leone Sierra Leone Bosnia and Herzegi Somalia Kentuky USA USA North Carolina USA NewJerse" USA Bosnia-H Bosnla-Herzegovia Egypt Egypt Kosovo . Kosovo (Yugoslavia liordan Jordan Massach USA Massach USA F b3 b6 b7C b7E 198 Boyd Daniel A 199 Juraboev Abdurasul Hasanovlch 200 Hasbajrami Agron 201 AI-Abbadi Saddiq 202 Hashi Madhi Mohammed 203 Ahmed Ali Yasin 204 Yusuf Mohamed 205 NaseerAbid 206 Zea Marcos Alonso 207 Babafemi Lawal Olaniyi 208 Nadarajah Piratheepan 209 Srtskandarajah Suresh 210 Hameed Shehadeh Abdel 211 Kaliebe Justin 212 Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis ouazi Mohammad 213 Medunjanin Adis 214 Mylvaganam Ramanan 215 Zazi Mohammed Wali 216 Kaziu Betim 217 Ibrahim Kareem 218 Defreitas Russell · 219 KadirAbdul 220 NurAbdel 221 Ahmedzay Zarein 222 Afzali Ahmad Wais 223 Zazi Najibullah 224 Jaji Naqib 225 Zazi Amanullah 226 Taleb-Jedi Zanaib 227 Hadzovic Sulejmah 228 AI-Moayad Mohammed Ali Hasan .. 229 Zayed Mohammed Moshen Yahva B EDNC EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNV EDNV EDNV EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNV EDNY EDNY r ·D I California_ Uzbekistan IAibania USA E !Uzbekistan Diber, Albania Yemen ;omalia Somalia ;omalla Somalia :nmalia Somalia Unknown Pakistan Unknown New York . Nigeria Nigeria Sri Lanka I Sri Lanka Sri Lanka USA NY NY USA angladesh Bangladesh Bosnia Bosnia ri Lan•~ Sri Lanka Pakistan I NY New York !Trinidad Trinidad Guyana Guyana Nigeria Nigeria Unknown . Unknown Afghanistan Afghanistan Unknown Afghanistan Pakistan Pakistan Unknown Pakistan · Afghanistan Iran United States Unknown Unknown Yemen Unknown Yemen b3 b6 b7C b7E A 230 Socrates Nachimuthu 231 Kandasamy Karunakaran 232 Patpanathan Vijayshanthar 233 Thavaraja Pratheepan 234 Vinayagamoorthy Murugesu 235 Vinas Bryant Neal 236 Sabaratnam Sahilal 237 Thanigasalam Thiruthanikan 238 Sarachandran Sathajhan 239 Yograrasa Nadarasa 240 Awan Khalid 2 241 Elshafay James 242 Hassan Abdulghefur Abdul 243 Maflahi Numan 244 Malike Sayed Abdul 245 Rabbani lmran 246 al-Hamidi Ali Alvi 247 Siraj Shahawar Matin 248 FNU LNU FNU LNU 249 Elfgeeh Abad 250 Elfgeeh Arel 251 Thomas Keonna 252 Khalid Mohammad Hassan 253 Hamdan Moussa Ali 254 Hazime Latif Kamel 255 Ramirez Jamie Paulin 256 Larose Colleen 257 Mohamed Alaa Allia Ahmed 258 El-Najjar Hamze 259 Kassem Moustafa Habib 260 Katz Michael 261 KaneMaodo 262 Turner Yildirim Beyozit B EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDNY EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA EDPA C D Unknown Unknown E Unknown Unknown I Sri Lanka Unknown Unknown Sri Lanka I USA INY Sri Lanka Unknown Unknown Sri Lanka Unknown Sri Lanka Unknown Unknown Pakistan New York INY Unknown Unknown Yemen Unknown Afghanistan N/A I USA NYI Yemen Unknown Pakistan Unknown Unknown Unknown Yemen Unknown Yemen Unknown Pennsvlvania United States I Saudi Arabia Lebanon I Lebanon Missour United States Michigan United States Unknown Egypt !Lebanon Lebanon Unknown Lebanon United States Unknown Unknown Senegal Unknown Turkey F Ir r - - r r Ir r - - r r Ir I- b3 b6 b7C b7E A 263 Abdallah Hassan 264 Rodriguez Marlon 265 Jalloh Mohamed Bailor 266 Jama Muna Osman 267 Dhirane Hinda Osman 268 Elhassan Mahmoud Amin Mohamed 269 Portorreal Luis 270 Qamar Haris 271 Hamidullin lrek 272 Amin Ali Shukri 273 Martinez Julian Manuel Moreno 274 Herrera Osvaldo Jose Lopez 275 Quintero Hermes Andrade 276 Coffman Heather Elizabeth 277 Otalvaro Jose Nolber Zuluaaa 278 Piedrahita German Dario Brand 279 Quiceno Sonia Cruz 280 AI-Khattab Yousef Mohamid 281 Harroun Eric 282 Velasco Mauricio Santoyo 283 Khalifi Amine El 284 Morton Jesse Curtis 285 Melaku Yonathan 286 Ahmad Jubair 287 Ahmed Farooque 288 Chesser Zachary Adam 289 Benkhala Sabri 290 AI-Timimi Ali 291 Biheiri Soliman s. 2 292 al-Amoudi Abdurahman Muhammad 293 Abdur-Raheem Hammad 294 Chapman Seifullah 295 Khan Masoud Ahmad EDT)( B EDT)( EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA EDVA r D E Syria Unknown El Salvador !Sierra Leo Seirra Leone !Somalia Somalia N/A Somalia Sudan !Sudan UKNOWN United States New York United States lratarist Tataristan (USSR) Sudan !Sudan Columbia Columbia Columbia I Virginia United States Columbia COiumbia Columbia L NJ USA IC< USA Colombia Morocco Pennsylvania · USA Ethiopia Pakistan Pakistan United States I Maryland United States United States Egypt Eritrea United States USA I USA ... F - - . .-- f.- .--1-- t- .-t- - t- f.- .-f,-- t- 1-1-- - - ,.... b3 b6 b7C b7E B D E A 296 AI-Hamdi Ibrahim Ahmed 297 Royer Randall Todd EDVA EDVA Yemen 298 Biheiri Soliman S. EDVA Egypt 299 Aatique Mohammed EDVA 300 Kwon Yong Ki EDVA 301 Surratt Donald Thomas EDVA EDVA 302 Hasan Khwaja Mahmood 303 Farislyman C USA I Pakistan South Korea I EDVA USA Pakistan India Fr France 304 Moussaoui Zacarias 30S Lindh John Walker EDVA EDVA 306 Begolly Emerson Winfield EDVA Pennsylvania 307 Ferizi Ardit EDVA Unknown Kosovo 308 Farrokh Joseph Hassan EDVA Pennsylvania USA 309 Chandia Ali Asad EDVA Unknown Pakistan 310 Abu Ali Ahmed Omar 311 Brice Joseph Jeffrey 312 Sarsour Jamil Salem 313 Osmakac Sarni 314 Bell Shelton Thomas EDVA EDWA EDWI USA USA hx USA United States Israel MDFL • FL Yugoslavia United States 315 Mohamed Ahmed Abdellatif Sherif 316 Gamarra-Murillo Carlos MDFL MDFL MDFL 317 Jubara Hosam Yousef MDFL Israel 318 Fariz Halim Naji MDFL Puerto Rico, USA 319 Al-Arian Sarni Amin MDFL Kuwait 320 Maatouk Fad\ Mohammed MDFL Lebanon 321 MaatoukAli 322 Donald Ray Morgan MDFL MDNC Lebanon 323 Reynolds Mrchael Curtis MDPA 324 AI-Uqaily Ahmed Hassan 325 Kodirov Ulugbek MDTN Kuwait Colombia North Carolina I USA New York 326 Llaneza Matthew Aaron NDAL NDCA Iraq ' lzbekista, Uzbekistan I USA Arizona! 327 Abdhir Rahmat NDCA Unknown Malaysia " L1-- 1-- L 1-L.... 1--L.... 1--- L1-- 1-l.. 1-- L ,__ ,__ 1--L.... '1-- 1-- b3 b6 b7C b7E A 328 Sadequee Ehsanul Islam 329 Ahmed Syed Haris 330 Natsheh Islam Said 331 ShorbagiMohamed 332 Edmonds Hasan 333 Edmonds Jonas 334 Khan Mohammed Hamzah 335 Tounisi Abdella Ahmad 336 Masri"Shaker 337 Hassoun Sarni Samir 338 Khan Raja l.ahrasib 339 Rana Tahawwur Hussain 340 Headley David Coleman 341 Shareef Derrick 342 Salah Muhammad Hamid Khalil 343 Ashqar Abdelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq 344 Arnaout Enaam M. 345 Hicks Mariann 346 Young Jaelyn Oelshaun 347 Oakhlalla Muhammad Oda 348 Arel Yassin Muhiddin 349 Hossain Mohammed Mosharref 350 Dhafir Rafil 351 Hatfield G. William 352 Dhafir Priscilla 353 Ali Ahmed 354 Jarwan Ayman 355 AI-Wahaidy Osameh B NDGA NDGA NDGA NDGA NDIL . NDIL NDIL NDIL NDIL NOil NDIL NDIL NOil NDIL NDIL NDIL NDIL NDIN NDMS NDMS NDNY C D 11,irginia USA Pakistan IGaza Georgia Louisiana Gaza USA USA Illinois USA Syria I Lebanon Lebanon Pakistan Pakistan I USA USA Jordan iordan Syria USA I.A USA h•nknftmK Palestine Iraq I NDNY NDNY NDNY NDNY NDNY NDNY NDNY E Bangladesh Iraq Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown I Unknown. Unknown Unknown Unknown Israel b3 b6 F f--- - r- ,-.. f-- f-- - - rf-- ,__ f-- - - b7C b7E A 356 Johnson John Earl 357 AkiAmera 358 Aki Hor 359 Ahmed Khaleel 360 Ahmed Zubair A. 361 Amawi Mohammad Z.aki 362 El-Hindi Marwan Othman 363 Mazloum Wassim I. 364 Damrah Fawaz Mohammed 365 Refai Mohammed Ibrahim 366 Abood Bilal 367 Aldawsari Khalid Ali-M 368 Smadi Hosam Maher Husein 369 Abdulqader Mufid 370 Abu Baker Shukri 371 Elashi Ghassan 2 372 EI-Mezain Mohammed 373 Odeh Abulraham 374 Elashi Basman 375 Elashi Bayan 376 Elashi Ghassan 3n .Elashi Hazim 378 Elashyi lhsan 379 Abukhdair Mohammad Abdul 380 Wilson Jr. Randy Lamar 381 Mccain Marchello 382 Kodaimati Mohamed Saeed 383 Doreh Issa 384 Moafin Basaaly Saeed 385 Mohamud Ahmed Nasir Taalil 386 Mohamud Mohamed Mohamed B NDNY r Florida NDOH NDOH NDOH NDOH NDOH NDOH NDOH NDOH NDOH NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX. NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX NDTX SDAL SDAL SOCA SOCA SDCA SDCA SDCA SDCA D IIllinois E United States IOH !Lebanon IJL I Syria I I INY Alabama I I USA Lebanon India USA USA Jordan Lebanon Jordan Syria Iraq Saudi Arabia Jordan · Jordan Brazil Palestinian Territori Jordan Palestinian TerritorJ, Palestinian Territori, Palestinian Territori Palestinian Territori, Saudi Arabia Palestinian USA USA United States Syria Somalia Somalia Somalia Ethiopia F b3 b6 b7C b7E A 387 Yusuf Nima Ali 388 Afridi Muhammed Abid · 389 Ali llyas 390 Boughader-Mucharrafille Salim SDCA SDCA SDCA SDCA 391 Serrano-Valdez Patricia B D C E N/A Somalia Pakistan Pakistan Mexico SDCA Unknown Unknown 392 Alvarez-Duenas Jose Guillermo SDCA Unknown Unknown 393 Basnan Osama Yousef SDCA Saudia Arabia 394 Dweikat Majeda 39S Shah Syed Mustajab 396 Mohamed Omar Abdi 397 Said Mohamed Hussain 398 Qazi Raees Alam 399 Qazi Sheheryar Alam 400 Kauser Mohammed Gufran Ahmed 401 Alkadhi Soloman Zaid 402 Khan Hafiz Muhammad Sher Ali 403 Talavera Ulises 404 Arteaga-Tapia Carlos Alberto 405 Safadi Khaled T. 406 Gonzalez-Neira Emilio Jacinto 407 Tobias-Rodriguez Osman Jose 408 Abraham Patrick 409 Augustin Burson 410 Augustine Rolschild 411 Batiste Narseal 412 Phanor Stanley Grant 413 Hupper Richan:! David 414 Ponton Caro Carmen Maria 415 Salamanca Victor Daniel 416 Gamboa Ediz1m Ramirez 417 Moheisen Jalal Sadat SOCA SDCA SOCA SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL . SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL West Bank Pakistan Somalia Kenya Pakistan Pakistan Saudi Arabia . . Unknown Unknown Mombasa KSA North Carolina ~akistan USA Pakistan . Paraguay Peru Peru Lebanon Jnknown Paraguay 5uatamala Guatamala •aiti Haiti Florida USA USA Florida llinois USA USA J'lorida !Pennsylvania USA Colombia Colombia IColombi, Colombia Columbia !Unknown I Israel F - - I- -- >-- >-- - -- I- - I- I- - - -. b3 b6 b7C b7E A 418 Tapasco Romero Nicolas Ricardo 419 Ulloa Melo Jose Tito Libio 420 Bautista Martinez Jorge De Los Reyes 421 Londono Bernardo Valdes 422 Lopez Julio Cesar 423 Morales Luis Alfredo Daza 424 Hassoun Adham 425 Jayyousi Kifah Wael 426 Padilla Jose 427 Rodriguez-Acevedo Hector 428 Florez-Gomez Libardo 429 Carpenter Cedric 430 RansOn Lamont 431 Abu Hamza Abu Hamza, 432 Abu Ghayth Sulaiman 433 Younis Mohammad 434 Dogirama Anderson Chamaouro 435 Ortiz Edilberto Berrio 436 Rengifo Alejandro Palacios 437 llanal-Ramos Yarlei 438 lbarguen-Palacio Jorge Abel 439 Loban Roque Orobio 440 Ghailani Ahmed Khalfan 441 Cromitie James 442 Payen Laguerre 443 Williams Onta 444 Siddiqui Aafia 445 Alishtari Abdul Tawala lbn Ali 446 Kassir Oussama 447 Al Ghazi Tareq Mousa 448 Elahwal Saleh 449 Iqbal Javed 450 Al Kassar Manzer B SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SOFL SDFL SDFL SDFL SDMS SDMS SDNY SONY SDNY SDNY SONY SDNY. SDNY SDNY SONY SDNY SDNY SONY SONY SDNY SONY SONY SDNY SDNY SONY SONY ·c D E Unknown Columbia Colombia - Colombia Colombia Colombia Colombia Colombia Unknown Unknown Columbia n 1 • banon Lebanon ordan Jordan New York USA tolom Colombia !Col Colombia UNKNOWN UNKNOWN "'~udi Saudi Kuwait Kuwait I Pakistan Colombia I Unknown Colombia Unkqown Colombia Jnknown Colombia Jnknown Colombia Jnknown Colombia Jnknown Colombia New York Unknown Jnknown Haiti ~ewVork United States lnknown Pakistan t,lewYork us I Lebanon Syria Egypt Pakistan ~/A N/A N/A J: ------ - -,-- - - ,-- - -:-- - - -- --,-- ,-- - .b3 b6 b7C b7E A 45T Godoy Luis Felipe Moreno 452 Smulian Andrew 453 sattar Ahmed Abdel 454 Stewart Lynne 455 Yousry Mohammed 456 Pham Minh Quang 457 Aswat Haroon Rashid 458 al Fawwaz Khalid 459 Bary Adel Abdel 460 Abassi Ahmed 461 Viglakis loannis 462 Henareh Siavosh 463 Arbabsiar Manssor 464 Aksu Cetin 465 EI-Hanafi Wesam 466 Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim 467 HasanoffSabirhan 468 Yousef Jamal 469 Abdelrahman Idriss 470 Toure Harouna · 471 Nayyar Patrick 472 Warsame Ahmed Abdulkadir 473 lssaOumar 474 Wehbe Bachar 475 BoutViktor 476 Williams David 4TT Cordoba-Bermudez Juanito 478 Shahzad Faisal 479 Hashmi Syed 480 UJaama Earnest James 2 481 Sabir Rafiq Abdus 482 ShahTarik 483 Brent Mahmud Faruq B SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY SONY ~ONV SONY SONY r D Unknown E. Chile United Kingdom Egypt Unknown United States New York Egypt Vietnam UK United Kingdom Kuwait Unknown Egypt Tunisia Unknown Greece Unknown Iran Unknown Iran . Turkey NV USA Ethiopia China Unknown Lebanon Unknown Unknown Mali Unknown Mali Unknown USA Unknown Somolia Unknown Mali Unknown Lebanon r•nknown Tajikistan USA NY Unknown Colombia Jnknown Pakistan Pakistan unk !Colorado or United States New York Jamaica or United S 'New York United States Ohio United States - - ,__ - - - ,__ 1-- -- - , __ 1-- - - -- , __ , __ - b3 b6 b7C b7E A 484 Farhane Abdulrahman 485 Paracha Uzair 486 Grinberg Tomer 487 Babar Mohammed Junaid 488 AI-Nalfi Mohamed Suleiman 489 Jabarah Mohammed Mansour . 490 Khalil ·Naji Antoine Abi 491 Paul Christopher 492 EI-Shwehdi zuhair Hamed 493 Abdi Nuradin M. 494 Al Hardan Omar Faraj Saeed 495 Bujol Barry Walter 496 MirzaAdnan 497 Arroyave Diego Alberto Ruiz 498 Maldonado Daniel Joseph 499 Qazi Shiraz Syed 500 Williams Kobie Diallo 501 Grecula Ronald 502 Barrera-De Amarfs Fanny Cecilia 503 El Hage Saleh Eldin Ali 504 Blanco Blanco 505 Ahmed Farlda 506 Romero-Panchana Carlos Adolfo 507 Mora Adriana Gladys 508 Ruiz Elkin Alberto Arroyave 509 Jensen Uwe 510 Varela Carlos Ali Romero 511 Davis Leon Nathan 512 Wagner Michael B SDNY SONY SONY SDNY SONY SONY SDNY SDOH SDOH SDOH SDlX SOTX SOlX SDlX SDlX SOlX SOT)( SDTJ< SDTJ< SDTX SDTX SDTX SDTX SDTX SDTX SDTX SDTX SOGA SOJA D C I Morocco Pakistan Israel Pakistan Sudan lakistan Pakistan Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Unknown Yemen Yemen Unknown Yemen Unknown Unknown Unknown Washington StateJ USA Yemen I NYJ USA I New York USA New York USA Michigan USA USA New York Lebanon Somalia I Bangladesh lfexas United States bH F ,'-- - c- f- f- - - f- ff- - - -f--- f--- - b3 b6 b7C b7E 546 Abdo Naser Jason 547 Abdul-Latif Abu Khalid 548 Mujahidh Walli S49 Ujaama Earnest James 550 Van Haften Joshua Ray 551 Lutchman Emanuel 552 Elfgeeh Mufid 553 Albanna Mohamed 554 Walker Mark Robert A B WDTX WDWA WDWA· WDWA WDWI WONY WONY WONY WOTX C D ITexas Californiil California ColoradoJ Illinois Unknown •emen,1 Unknown I I E United States United States United States United States USA USA Yemen Yemen USA F - -- b3 b6 b7C b7E EXHIBIT 5 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy Suite 11050 1425 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Telephone: (202) 514-3642 July 24, 2018 Mr. Benjamin Wittes c/o Justin Florence The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC 20036 Re: DOJ-2017-003569 (AG) DOJ-2017-003819 (DAG) DOJ-2017-003820 (OLA) DOJ-2017-003821 (PAO) 17-cv-01627 (D.D.C.) VRB:BPF Dear Mr. Wittes: This is a final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests dated and received in this Office on April 14, 2017. On June 12, 2018, you reached an agreement with OIP to resolve certain issues in dispute in this litigation, whereby OIP would conduct a search for records containing data of (i) all individuals convicted of all terrorism-related offenses (domestic and international) between 2001 and the date of the initial search, or (ii) all individuals convicted of all domestic terrorism-related offenses between 2001 and the date of the initial search. In exchange, you agreed not to challenge the adequacy of any of OIP’s search for records responsive to your requests or the appropriateness of any of OIP’s withholdings pursuant to the FOIA’s statutory exemptions. This response is made on behalf of the Offices of the Attorney General (OAG), Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), Legislative Affairs (OLA), and Public Affairs (PAO). Please be advised that searches have been conducted on behalf of OAG, ODAG, OLA, and PAO, consistent with the above-referenced settlement agreement, and no responsive records were located. This satisfies our agreement. For your information, Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(c) (2012 & Supp. V. 2017). This response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA. This is a standard notification that is given to all our requesters and should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist. -2If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact Chetan Patil of the Department’s Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch, at 202-305-4968. Sincerely, Vanessa R. Brinkmann Senior Counsel