Subject: Re: Apple App Review Issue ==]
From: "Shaan Pruden” | I
Received(Date): Wed, 01 May 2019 21:19:13 +0000
a}
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 21:19:13 +0000
10s not right, but apparently it is wha it is. Let me send to Trystan regardless, but it *s not likely
to change.
Shaan
On May 1, 2019, at 10:51 AM, Tom Reyburn | | NN
Hi Shaan,
We need to escalate this intemally please. LinkedIn has been rejected for using the same
language on their subscription call o action button that Apple uses in our own apps. It isn *t right
for Apple to be using the exact language we are telling developers is not allowed. Could you
please escalate so that Apple ’s apps can provide a exemplar model for other developers to
follow? Altemately, we should allow all other apps on the App Store to use the same language
Apple is using
Thanks,
Tom
Begin forwarded message:
from: soa tart, FR
Subject: Re: Apple App Review Issue
Date: April 30, 2019 at 1:14:19 PM PDT
To: Tom Reytur I
Justus
Hey Tom,

I've reviewed a number of trial flows over the last few days and noticed that
Linkedin's design is very much in line with Apple's own flows/language. Can you
please help me understand what Apple is doing differently from our flows? | can
ask the team to move the fine print above the CTA as that is the major difference

I'see. I'd appreciate any guidance you have on the below.
Sofia
PX-0857.1
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY APL-EG_02802892