FREE TRIAL - Mips/OCRKit.com
From: Eric Friedman
To: Pedraum Pardenpoosh
cc:
sce:
Subject: Re: More fraud apps showing up Yesterday
Attachments:
sent: 10/16/2013 04:12:12 PM 0000 (GMT)
(China next wesk for me. Wil look 2 weeks ou. Safe travels
On Oct 16, 2013, a 3:08 AM, Pecraum Pardehpoosh < | - t=
Yes of course. Can | other you to find us time next week? Am on a plane right now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:29 PM. Eric Fredmen < [> te:
Pocdraum, when can we tak about tis? App Review is bringing a lasi buter knife fo gun fight. Investment vil
have to be made in making that process more robust or they wil keep gating rolled. There ar things that can be done,
butitis nota smal project and isnt something we can solve i the store alone IMNSHO.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Philip Shoemaker <I
Subject: Re: More fraud apps showing up Yesterday
Date: October 15, 2013 6:13:53 PM PDT
To: Eric Friedman
Ce: Benson Curtis chris Fulbright <J Pcraum
Pardehpoosh
Ifthe apps request § sta and tis witnessed during review, we eject the app
So, iffound, we reject
Does that answer your question?
On Oct 16, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Eric Friedman < | te:
Hi Pritp,
Gan you determine whether tis behavior was evident during App Review fo the apps in Kristen's spreadsheet? If
50,0 you agree tha they shold have been rejected?
Itould also be interesting to know if the app did not behave this way during review and vas later modified (n
tesponse ta seting on some remote system, for example) to take on tis aggressive posture.
Thanks,
Eric
PX-0250.1
CONFIDENTIAL APL-APPSTORE_02089625