Ontario Caucus Priorities 2019 Platform (Ranked) Topic ?anst?adlmd 1 National Pharmacare John Oliver? Comments .m'mmn?lou 2 Housing Affordability Adam iy'aughan 3 Income Security for Seniors Jean Yip 4 Access to Affordable Childcare Karina. Gould Increasing access to affordable. quality childcare. Right now it's too expensive, many women deciding to stop working because can?t justify paying for childcare. Or for lower income women making decisions about childcare that are less safe because they can't afford to get regulated spaces. 5 Jobs: Skilled Labour: Yasrhin Ratansi. . Skilted labor Shortages 6 Mental health Lloyd Longfield Mentai Health: implement measures of success. first . . aid for business, sate downtown 7 Entrironmei?it Environment: score card of interim goals, link to Lloyd Longtield Wmunity energy initiative lthi?nk it Is critical that tackling climate change is a top priority headinginto next year?s election (NE- 8) 8 Indigenous Services Jane Philpott it?s important social policy - but it?s-aiso essential to Indigenous Services to the list of priorities for the platform. i hear from many Ontario MP5 that this iS an isstie cl interest to their constituents. the economic growth off-the country. 9 Poverty Reduction Lloyd Longtield Poverty Reduction: cross-fink to housing, jobs, mental health, food security Adam Vaughan. 11 Small Business Suppon LloyeLonglIeld . gBusiri?ss: simplify regulationsgand tax Broadband 12Digital Infrastructure? . Deb Schulte' 'Digital retiaseucture a?aiiable to all Canadians in our platform. We have so much still to do to get .- broadband services to remote and rural communities Migration 8t? Juiie Eigemwmz scie- .- ., refugees . - i ?School Food POIICX Jolie Dabrusin Anita Vandenbeld .. .:&Frogram 1 . . . "168taading Orders gB?l?dlet Rwy friendly parliament . 1?Ontine Hatred a kit Wants. amine hatred, sectioe. 13 Canadian human rights 18 Sugar Mark Holiar?i?d - Beverages. Lew :11 9Toroatc Haylne Systemgig: . . Campaietmomfeis - on -- Wm?iil-WW . POLICY SUBMISSIONS (Ranked) Policy Proposal 1: National Pharmacare - Health Topic: Pharmacare Theme. 3' - I I - oriember 2B, Prepared by: John Oliver Date. 2018 PROBLEM rosNTincAnon What is the problem opportunity we're raring to salt/9?. Approximately 25% of" Canadians ??3113! choose between putting food on the table and being able to afford prescription medicine; No Canadian should be denied access to necessary prescription medicines because of affordability. What evidence substantiates this concern? Briefly provide several important (SETS, With reference (0 key 5 sources. . a Canada is the oniy country in the world than has a universal healthcare- system that does not provide universal coverage of prescriptiondrugs.E I I i - The World Health Organization has declared that all notices are obligated to ensure equitable access ?0 necessary medicines through pharmaceutical petioles that work in conjunction with broader systems of universal heatth coverage. - Canadians pay some otithe highest drug prices in the world. 10% of Canadians have no health insurance. 1 in 4 Canadians can?t afford. to fill a finish aprescription. We know. that orivateiyiinsuredidrug plans are becoming more expensive, and decreasing in coverage; 2:9 APPROACH AND :3 5 __Witat did as ?say in the 205 platform (if anything)? From'lthe 201.5 platform: ?We will develops pan- 7 (?(3an adian collaboration on health innovation; and writ improve accessto necessary.r preemption - medications. We will join governments to buy drugs in bulk, reducing the cost Canadian :goventmentsi'oay to?trthese drags, and making them'rnore affordable for Canadians," What have we done since?What (opaci?s?trshad?? We joined the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Wig; Platform 201 Alliance, in order for drugs along with theiifirovinces and territories. We are Currently "making changes to the Patented Medicine Renew Board regulations totllower prices. While this has Saved some annoy, we are still payi?rig someot drugs in the world. and Constantia stitt?Can?t ?afford their prescriptions: . . 1" 3,224,?; . no.9. . . Proposed new taffetatitre;i Era-scream a" apie'sentences howtne at would work, the outcome it woeld base, ane?how itiaddres??es me mam prooiem. ms written tiresome-oriented.ianguagea . . That the Government of provinces a?dtemtones heatthcare'providers, patients ans indigenous commenities to'deveiora a contagion tary drag tomato? . :13 That the Government of Granada attend the Cenerta Hearth Act to irtotade an. pr. 2 by a health care practitioner and diepeneeo outside at hospitats tn wehe eemmon voluntary netional as part oi tee definition oi an "insured heatet eeniice? etteer the eat. - in Short. create a nationet drugs covered by the federai eevemnteett eta! wet etevide neceseary prescriptions tn Canadians tree of ottarge. - is there sneezing we know about! similar ideas feteietiveeift?em domestic or international n: I Bn?efly describe (if info availabte?f There are many intemetienal to look at. The Standingcommittee er: Heeltti incited at a number of there. The cioee'et model that they believe eeuld workin Canada. white achieving the goats et- cost re?ection, WSSEITY medicine COVGtaget and coet'teduction te the UK model. . e. was that we need a made in Canada There are many domestic studies Showing the need and potential path temard in Cenaea The most prominent is "E?narrnaceze 2020? written by a numbegzof pro?tineet Canadian researchers, and it many medicai protessionate, interest groups, and indiietry. The report proposes four main etetnes the report: . - :33: - Access: universal to necessary medicines -- Fairness: lair dis?tributiett- efjprescription drug costs .5 Safety: safe and approeriate prescribing, and; .. vetee for money; maximum heaith benefii?per doliar ?eent. Ultimately it calis fora universabpijgarmaoare-eregram. 3. Detergent: coe'ntte Hove many tit-affect? Estimated OGSES per a truly universal phannacare program We enact every-Qanadiae: . .t lithe Parliamentaw Budget Officer estietetes that under a national etegie payer plat-treeteg Quebec?s gold If Calumet? pm 2m p atedgformulatywwe spend $20.4 billion per yeer.?We are eetftentty spene?eig $28.5 hiilion a year meteecrip?em?gketegs. After for pricing aneiteeasumption changes this represents settings it roughly $42 mitten; .. This does not take into igaccountiitirtijter cost Savings throughout the healthieaiteieystern?et better health This is iuetge- price of etegs. .. g; is there. aniexisting ?endt?ng program that this couiit?bedra wn from or repurposed? Yes, thereregea 4. STAKEHOLDER awaneness worries win? the Conservatives and ct331433.? . t. 0N Caucus Submission Noe: Hire over the years. . . Canadian Nessing Students Association are also in'suppert"1332;, II ?rs; -. I Conservatives; Th?j - heesani'te coins?t 535" cost resection measures aed . I much mont?iy. They appear to - 8* taxpayers 'n likei foc WWQIWS ?"33 5.3" this pharmacare 3: US on 0; hat i?ey are min: Sign of Canadians? in a less 9pr I .. I ?supiw are mgram. and have run on venous models hEr seppoii'oi a universal pharr?nac . I . I ?Mesi stakeholders with the orexiemel vair?arors wemighi engage in sup?oft of a anrversal Who are the key stakefioim ceoticai industry age exception oi 2he insurance industryand the enema phannacere program. . . . - urli?netzenai Nurses: The Canadian of Nurses Unions has been calling of a universal Wew?mm?drug program for everyone _in Canada since 199?. They are d'ae Nurses Association and the phannecare program aed have been actively lobbying for one. The Came ineir ?oaters: Most physicians will acne on one basasIthBY Want ?on? number of gatieei?s fill and ?nish {heir prescription. There is not a coheSi?fe if?? the Canadian Doctors grouse have spoken out in support incindin'g: Coiiege. of Family 0? Cane 3' for Medicareg British Sclerosis college of Family Physicians . II Labour: Theii'iabou?r movement is iosupp'ori of'a rsai-progr?am and have been Iae?vel? JObmeQ for Large Unions &groups insupbort include: - - - cesgr?ss .- - "iUnifi'rr i National Farmers Union- Qanadian Union'of Public . ., . National Union of Public and Empie'jrees I I 1' General Erepioyejes . ceagressof {anioni?stirees o?f . I 5 . ui Ueited' Food Commercial Workers Canada" a . -- -- -- United Steelworkersof Canada .Gfeups: Most social organizations are {arg?eiy in: ?supper-i. This includes; -. if . - . Canadian Assocramof?ocrai (mass Wii?out Poverty Werkers .. is .. 5' centresCaeada .- Founda??on I . I nus-Many provincial and regional groups WeW?S'Shelters .. . H?iaergement fmm? Canada Segiors' ?81 aria-rel if. 5i . Cana?aen Aesociation _ot?eti . Persons ,2 ?3 . 3?25?; m. I -. Er gr.? .. . 15:5 Socratron erI I. Q: I 23x6 . g3 61.. . if?es gregafgelygn Sf?ponmis I ?gin:fc33,33Magm?? - . . . x' . . . - T1 ?i . Policy-Proposal 2: HouSi?g A?ordab? . i Theme: Affordable Home - Topic? .- ""tieusingfeffordebiirt?! . Ownership . i? 7 Date: Member-2?, 2013 Prepared by . pnoeLert IDENTIFICAUON emai *5 the emitter?! I opportunity we re trying to satire? Bescribe bne?y, 1 Help feet time; teeme tezyers purchase housing Meat evidence substaetietee res emcee}? grietiyl promcie severe! importertt fads},- With reference 30 key sourcesbuy their first home ?399 had berriere? em in place by government worried about high Iretrie e1? personal debt Resume mean areas; market forces have peshed prIces beyond the reach 0 ii Canadians Irene te gamer ?rst? glee buyers - trite APPROACH mommathietstt'ad??WhIle we have submzel investments and .7 me?a?ordable homing, meet otf?eese initiatives beige 311an need-2" ?tthe be very cereiul not to pregame ?are would iIIikeiy I . . Markham am 3129 Inga" na?onaf? . lbasismay?w create reli--.. -. sumac: a Guitars 0! mm w-mimmest rate wastied 3951 time bun 13W .. to the pmi??fh i . '4.bath 390 CW etetalktn ano . isfmwet whecausgea interest rates are gengup an tune r- Bod eh mt a bad mg, good for egg}: stress tests are hurtlnIg dreams of ?rst I. was is on social housing but they use anxiety abou: Wet-land the feat abeut not buying a house but the NDP: Devan largely by Wire affordability to bretden the my speak to a th sp?aulatlon tax at with Wm!? The NDP it! 86 have had schIeISS or external validators we might engage date? - Home Burtdetet?eneratton Squeeze Mortgage professionals aniliemummpames' . 03 {3 a 8?15?. the aspiratms of Miltenhlals aIedI building 39th that makes young people comment they can ?2 Whet have they said about this it; Atty other relevant canalderaeehs (yegtona ete t?eung voters "and In particular yoeeg urban voters with t. gee?hart at Liberal voters. We to address them directly and create 3 def" ham {and obweue: tied for first time buyers The NDP wet into AffordablI Heusmg -- ng IAfterdabllt'ty. We must deIeeth I . .- r?i?erenceto .. 3 Jane 2016ere Pf? partners - . Eeeanceedgg :gg??f?f?ee Care Bene?t ehici; Iiiong teeth the Femiiy Caregivm i g?i?e Canadians with up to $6 W?i?i??fg?amam with up 2% 15 Weeks; 5% tine new Family Caregiye'r Bette at: e: (Budget 20?. 6) In infrastructure, 63 invested $229 (Bum: 201-?) and $3 4 billion my we heyeaeiso teeggporteenIors: . Starree amtic miment for GIS benefits; ii Ie care' .. . 2? invested $6 over 10 yeere ie heme an pa Ia Iv .. 3) "?reated the Naeenal Dementia Strategy supported by $39 over 5 years and $4 million thereafter; . II meted $260 mil ran to create 6 'te-atiereebie heesmg $3 imredueed new accessibility f: rsiatreri? 53 ejeew Framework. 6 Directed the Prrerecei Sensumer Agency or Canada to were with the Minister. of Seeiers, beaks and seniors ps to. create a code of mgduct re gurcie rinks In their 6% sewicee to seniors. dug-n2"- - . . 4: I. 69*? we . . ?lseniorstremfaifeg; 57 063 seniors-eutI Of" Enhancement .. Evwill receive 11 Currently, must be converted to FiFiiFs when the holder reaches 71. This tosses; them to withdraw stories that they may not need at that time and Increases their' i?OOme above the ciawback point. it is isiesrtant to update the mandatory RESP to conversion age to ten est higher life a it 'cies and the reality that many individuais remain active and working later tn rite The current 1-1 years oiti Conversion date does not accurately re?ect the realities of many seniors across the many By raising the age it will allow seniors to make decisions based on what wilt be best for theiri iitzlual situation rather than applying a bi tanket poiicy footage. Raise the OPP Survivor Benefit many women ate senitirs today, their spouse? 3 OPP Benefit represents a- or?isei seems st ;.=inoome. In part this Is because women have been disproportionately reopensibie tor unpaid jg responsrinIties iike raisirig families providing elder care are maintaining the home. As a result as totroduoed In 2016 making a direct comparison oii?soit so -. a some pertiort 01mg: . .s. bene?ts. to Sweden easily as tees ose a different system and are in the Pensron WAHENESS 4 come/333 mo STAKEHOLDER A .. . 9 How does this the Conservatrves and NDP . 'me' reducing the t) 203: Pt?ogv? seniors greater {texibitity in managing thee? ?etaremeot moo Y. . thdrawai 33233636333963 for 5 0033 one indexin 33 to Lifetime Capital Gains Exempii?n "3m $500 000 to? $886 9. . it too; c. gogsiutt with Canadtans on how to supotement settings options wIIt Ith votuntary cont buttons 93-33033 ?3 3533313333533 an ?equivalent-to?soouse" Pension tnoome Credit for 83313:: II 2} Votes: Voted (Vote 53) in favour of an amendment 1330-35 deteting the ?en .. orov3s3ons supporting Seniors. . 3) CPC 2018 Conventioo Reselutions: . a. The Conservative Government Witt exempt frorn taxation the re3enUes 63 31:33:33; Plan received from government sources: the canadien (orIProsma the Oh! IAge Secur?y and the Supplement of Revenues 3) 2015 Platform: a. Tasseiopa NationaiAizheimef-s and-s Dementia Strategy 3 I ?3 improve assess? to Pat?ative Care . 0 Expand eiigibiifty for the: Comoass3ooate Care Benefit 33?? . implement a Nations: Strategy on Aging - 33-: .. 3 Reverse the __3ncreose 333 063 from 6? Ittjom 66. . ?3 3 a? I. 39% ~25335% II If?? increase the 3.: 333 3e- - 3 A Ameoo Fedora? Bankruptcy t3. 1-.dt6ipensjoners. and ?lm 633 long term up the tine of creditors When 6633 63333330363 declares 63333331393333 oeentets m3! pfotec33oo -2) 2036 Cohver333?0n Resolutions 3 - a - ?"333 . Be it Fiesotved 31363 the NDFx?rg? 3- worst-sonata cheogezgegrsmonsothat employees penetons are at; mom I lessees the CPPIQPP: I333 3 wa. Further resolved 3333336333166?? I a? noose ?rst not 363the -H6eso of Commong.I 36? QIHAT The :45? 13 THAT: The to Canada Pension be eoteiy on the oi the end not affected by other benefits received by the applicant; and THAT: Qualification forWidowMidower Beneiit and Canada Pension shalt not be made further restrictive; and FINALLY recipient of the WidowiWidower Benefit who has had this bene?t reduced may, upon aopiioatiijn have the full value of this bene?t restored. 6. Therefore: be it re'soivedwthet the NDP activeiyeernpaign for: An immediate doubting of the combined Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement minimum benefit; An increase of 15% to the Canada Pension Plan benefit phased In over titre reareg. i Creation of 3 Fewer Pension insurance Fund to. geerantee pensioners personal bene?t t?c?Whethere they eeid eeout this? Who are me arm-m vairdators weenght enrgage. Canadian Persons (CARP) and the National Seniore ,t?tanges to the system requires the Peiicy Preeosal 4: Access 16 Affordable Childcare Topic: Chiie Care Theme: Child Care . - 7,2013 .. Wred by: Hon. Katina Gould Date. December 1 What IS the problem 1, e13 eertuntty we re ang to some? Describe brie?y, Canadian twig? ahide:1111111211etter access to affordable secessihie and high 111181?? Child care current programs are met; 9 diiteteett ieveis e? accessibility across the country What evidence substantiates Briefly provide sevet'ei irhpertant facts", with reference 19- key 1 sources Chiid care fees have risen faster than inflation' 211. 823% 01 cities sihce 2014 (CCPA 20.1?) A Tetonte eoonomie modelling study shows that 75% cannot afford regulated 61815 care, and 75% e1 Manitotae respondents say that child care is too expensive (CCPA 2017) - 98?? to 0110101110 shild care centres maintain a 111318119 list as they do net have eneu?gis spaces (CCPA 2017} . . . . . APPROACH AND 1MPACT What did we say in the 2015 piatt?ehh (if anything)? A Liberai govemmeet wiil deveiop a child care framework that meets the needs 01' eian families wherever they titre with-the provinces teeteiietritories to introduce; 111s Muittiateral Early Learning and 0181121 here Framework and oemeed $7 5 btlitee over 11 years 1h; st 2017 to chiid care Most Canaeten are seeing Shite Impaet heme oommItment on tee actions of the prettiestai-gtevemments - W111 strengthen and expand en 111' anner of the Canada Heeith the Act wit! Create concrete ii? :17 in their 'catesewrees 111i erder to receive theassemated focus on or affordable seaces regardless f: t: 1 etevmces 1e .1 1iederal funeteg These Wtii?he a 51383:; improving to chi - is there we etmrfer ideas/#111611 Eetoeean 01110111111 20021116 EU set access of 5 1 en between 3 and the ma superheated by 211.19 (Penn, 201? ?Nasal Oh?d {8.2.7 . . killed Labour Lack of 5 Theme: Policy Proposa' 5- 78133918? Date: December 5,2018 Prepared by; 1. PROBLEM mm - What Is 88 8 8888 oppo Shel-I398 in 88888 The lack of 838% 888 workers and labo . 1 important facts, with reference :0 key sources. What 8888888 substantiales this concern? Brie?y 910889 save? 304118 facts according to Siatis?cs Canada as of Decemijer 2018: - T218 mwpioyment rate is now 4. 6 8 lowest 18 42 the lowest siIIrIcef 8193?;8 quE-Iime positions. . Th8 Qwemma?t added 94 100 new i805 last {88881 including a 93'? 0 88188.88 of 213 800 jobs The - Compared to 12 months earlier up? .2 per addition of 22? 400 full time positions offset a small decrease In - i '85 the 12 months to November empfoyment grew by 219 000 or 1 H281: Ieflecling gains full time work (+227: 000 Facts g'obbank. ca . .. . There are 88 030 jobs 888881810 Canada for skilled and unski?led 808818 38 Of December 5 2013*" . Here Is the breakdown of the number of: futHime jobs available by 888888 from December 5. 2018 0 cg 0151:1134 I 0.. .110 P522125 0 188-1848 - c3- 83? 84; 88? 0 8K 788 INIUZI 15 M3-1039 . . .. 0' AB: 7172 . QCFrom indeed there are 84. 699 ?ewg?obs posted In the iastMays . I . II From Monstercaasofmbers 2018 I I Hospitality arid Travel Inau5tfy . .. . FmIm IW?rkopo?s as Bf mmber 5 2018-I ?158881003 available - . . Hospil?ility 6 In. Engineering I28 234 IIonbsII 88388018;- lT 4 388 job8 8138881318 Skil18811'ade88enstructron 23, 802 Health 62 828 "388888888 . -. - Skilled trades: 2 87181088 88888818 Medical 30 1671085 88888818 - 35.226jobs available I8. 11' 8,522 onbs 88811888 Tradeai?000istruction 813 37 jobs available - i 0- 8888881 ?32,934 jobs available 0 88888 ?88888 1,844ij 3888888 8 84885081887808 ayailable 0000000 I I an industry? 88158265000m2035 an increase of 33% . i; 899mm. -- I . If; 8' 31%? ?arIrIIPaign Platform 2919 II OIN Caucus SubmiseloI A. . ?.253 Inability to attract. retain and promote an bdeilitate with the citation as? I . MIME biiai Isobasgassociaied blitz I'IiboiiI shonlaiis are I level of qualitied employees I as slit a 8th to my workforce - - these 899%" mm as News. obopggni result in meaningful progression in the busioess Seasonal naturs oi work is not attractive to Canadians wart . I biatoihaiindiistnas pay more I II . II Perception that nature ol positibts rs8ulIs at little tiexibi ty - a APPaoacn IMPACT . bb I've sob in the 2015 platfom (if aa?hiag}? they need to find and keep good jobs We banadians at the IIainiIi elp Ills sad apbtade their credentials no investment In skills training II bated .Inozs opportunities to Improve their sit I. We will tasks A easier ibi adults to assess training programs by inoreasi Is help those Ireoeiving EImploymsIIt lssurasoe get the training they need to the are pros we will Inyest $500 amt year In provincial and territorial Labour Market D'svelopment AgreeII'Ients . . . To help those who do not qualify for Employment insurance or- are not currently employed we will invest an . adbziobal battles In tibini?ng programs led by the prayinbes and territories. .- ("it We will also invest $59. to Ienais and expand funding to ItIhIe Aboriginal Skills and Employment ?listings . . Purowde$25 Ini bibs each soar to facilities deliveIed to panoeIShip with laboIIr unless I - We still work with employers ans workers to deteIrni?ne an appropriate apprentibeship ratio for all federal i? Ourtetal invebment of so addillosal $775 million per yea} for job and skills traiti'ing help Canadians bet tbs: bb?nibb mayo need tb' ?nd and keep good jobA A - I: II We will kick: stab to grow our economy and erase good middle class jobA g; Io bot mom}! bi'owiisb abain we need to immediat?sly invest in helping eta bubn?'sses, entrepreneurs Is) botgotss miss issovbiive. competitive and. suesessliil I . .II the HGXTI three years--. invest $200Ibillion obit yearsI a bow innovation Agenda is Signi?cantly expand support lbi imbaiom sad - ,as Well as dis emerging national networlsior busmess Innovabon and ol'IEIIster support . a as additional $160 mtlson each year dis industrial Resesteh Assistants Program which has a WW babbmd it? I small andI medIurII Sizes basmesses to Innovate sod WI world leaders ?33 1 3:35:- 'MM?gIggi-e MM . WW wsdone .di?soe? Witatubpacthas libs. hobPIEM-jOb canbdaw are!? Canadjan - =bl ?33s ?the Prograrsbelps asbloysts the Atlaiitio (down to I -Iesidenis fits bandtdates till jabs lbssibpl '1 tibvs had trouble Io?b?uy tithe .I- I .. . -- . t??e candidab 99b II amt entsta Woman 9110?!!er closes. ob . . re 10 become assign . 8th under 91 . . anterna?nnai {a 3 PW- means; In . - sziim WW ?lo! tor 2013? mate: Ahm? Huesen has 8113mm ww?? . 0 Following the incr - Sums swam-t . acrees cha 860?? th 1WW now has a 2018 aim Of 2,800 Wpacae kW . . . anti Prince Edward ?ew :Igamsl antannuel target 2 000 and Wernahona! gtm?m? @1de the 9:93am I an 20.3? the f?derai .. . govemrn . :ha?lmo newcomers and hair fak?li an: and '23 mmgranen Wot Frogfam. . . B, New "306 PiiotPr . I. . .. . . . Hote?ers have gone ti?? me the Hetehere . .. .greezieegths with recruit I - - . weth [mmigfattgn Re - .. . . m8?! B?ortsto htge Canadtans ?rst. InciWanWW rWtzem parWWrehm 3th available heteijobg?es 3? m?ze?shlp'?a?ada (Ii?cgtto moba?ze at least 1,300 refugees and new games-WW: govemmeezmm 33W to mm . . es toI the A?antic CWWede' region by 2020 Waugh eta WW9 .oJuna . .. I . .. .. . I Eanada with Taurism Canada 'Wetne? me C?aa?ian Hotels Pilotupsse-n' and't'W a?nwfabie Bgfdieh Chagger, to announce' thei??erWyi?g Newcaners We 0 With mail? i; @5601 {emknown EImF?Wment?). . . . I03 an handing. THBC 9mg; PFQVingial-and 10:33! about market 9311mm, wit! 0 093mm.? @1919)? ?gwcomers- in sustainabie, long-term hate: iobswag stazt ln-??ve seleggediegiorts t0 success, then .ecateg ?p.20 iwude' additionai urban andmralgenters. {be ?ve regiofis ar?zYukpn; Gni?rio; and Atlan?c . . I. emP?OWees exesecWW te??e praised "in the tewwieer a? 201.3. - WW. . .0 pieiectts 31W immrtaht one for bahg?vammant and the accommodations $58810! Mame it :9?me a -. new Ggeat??me??hingml, 7590- ?Ebughg Our governmem WW1 Wfomahon from the Fe" Eca?on?t: Staterrt?ent' 3" 5550;000'newjob3 - - ma 0 V?e-?Ighethplogmeett tax? is W310 56% lowest in 4Q yeIgarsil?ta?0a1iW??d? as Decemnger 7. WWM women are.._sI_troWhg Wm} the?p'?ize 6? job gainsmormhan?mine?n' recent pe?o?g. 0 haaindteased fWWeWimWera?fs. 0W I Wiemmwan?mdemms wait lGWEerekducatiOna! attainment . - -. . WLJ .2321 ,e a on . .. . you3W- PRELIMIN 3331.33.: - x. . . I he. 243% . . . Wag? . . is? I-a-Ce43Hwemaemeop. WW. WW EmmetKiwis. . - . . . use?? We - ding'W?W . .. k. . -.- Cm? their?: arayp Mae 2- a? We WEWQW these . used the 1399mm. BENESW . .c I . I 35%. 33gm?. ?Vii"Hing- 5332?? I I . . . Wage. 0: 2'86egg? . I 33%: - .2 . 'i'szWant 81199.9?" . (W: WWamemtgrertts become mare WW We? s' . .-: WW. lo to permanent worker for' Immigtams as P. to streamline the transition from teissOrary ma? :3 to receive the some miniriiei settlement protections sis Furthermore Conservatives hope to work "with professisrtsi Canadiatn zodleggrligtggarazjm? programs tgriiffgza? asses skilled workers for certain toes The party also hopes eve n9 is ., Eggs nguals into the nation's worktortze and crests tits. criteria tor obtaInIng stems. i set st 1 the Cassettes The its? proposed an annual immigratiort perceo ..- soridorce. To support immigrsoss? desire to stay to the country. ttiis its?? is family reunification a priority is? aiming temposrs tosses meat is bring immediate faintly members to Canada with them. . . in addition to presiding Engiish and French language trainingsis proposed collaboration with essences and territories to aocsst foreign diplomas and professions: credentIats This process would include a West model for 2 .. the recognition and assessment of these accreditatiens The party also hopes to develop a system fer; the inspection oi its workforce to ensure that foreign iwriters arerl?t exploited or subjected to sees seating conditions Nests sesorted Lastly, the NDP wants to guarantee that an migrant work?rs ere. severed by? assropnate employes lessees tsithin the province or territory. either? employment .. . 2 2 station to meet the needs ols?te ?esgamf: has "3m? thatJagmees will sits-sis Per hoes? um image for 1.v'ro'rkers under teas - n? He 39? *9 ban ?@335 tit part of academic. programs anti__ companies-ts titre .2 Employees are? they ve we Developing ?Mass st Wade? products dirough I sksied, value- aem TaMss m" edits onetimentives towarssjew i investment Canadaisct'and ?2 21 Polio Pro Topic: Mental Health Health Prepared by: Lloyd Longfield Date: November 271b, 2038 1} 2,3909%} identi?cation: Mental Health improving outcomes for Canadiaos facing meotaf nealth a enges such as stress, depression, suicide tendencies, and addictions. 2} 993993999 and Impact: Work with Ministerial Advisory Council on Mentat Heettn, and with provinces and territories to estaoltsh common indicators and review bilateral agreements to see where fedetel government can support service deliirery. Focus On oreuentton of mental illness and suicide, indodt?g links to addictions, trauma, and adverse childhood effects, WOW through; Canadtan Mental Health Association, Mental Health Commisston of Cartoda, health service agencies: and community tirealth programs as well as business associatioes and ousioessos directly. Provide opportunities-lot Pen 'Canadieo discussions on funding, framework, strategies! and rosette, including how many Canadians are getting-tastier as a result of treatmeet. Govelot} grograms for mental health in the workplace, sounselling benefits, supoon?staff and services: 3) Preliminary D?ta and Costing: Mental fitness: ind?reotiy affects all Canadianset some time through a famity member, f?end or colleague. in any given, yoga 1 to 5 o'eople in experience a mentalheatth emblem of Mefntal?ittness affects people-of all ages, education, lemme levels, andoultures. Approximately 8% otedoifs W91: experience mater depression at some time in their lives, Aw,_s% of. Ga'nadiansyill bigplarsoisgrder (or- ?manic ?depress?oo?), roe e'oonornic oostgf mentagiilloossesin?emda?lor the health care-system was estimated to be at toast $7.9 some?: 1998 $4.7 billion locate, egg ogilio? in disability and early death. $6.3 . trillion wee mot-on soinsoreo?meotai 'tjgalln segices assume off work for depressor; and distress that ,iwas? not treated 99 the attadMis??lOns. in general?nospitals (1.5 .. 1, re?nes. hospital gays) wereduetoaoxretydisotdets, ?tpoler disorders, schizophrenia, ntajor depression, pegsonos?yi??rsotde?; egting?pdisorid rsano swords! maxi?torSources; Tho Reootfon- oriental illness in Canes Wt 2002.58.10 1,398 (Helecselnoasm sop-hens er a are - {a '98 as}. mental 91891111 and -- hometemess Meme EMSgrosidef??godfeol?gw so be ms?de?ed ?999999? 9099 {99999.1 . .. . sensed?oe?enanop look e. balanoe ?me5? formal ?rm relying on'lggootgoos t'o?orov'ide .. .QIHCC sooalsmoreenlzaoonsh?m wepsolneero atfayc . oops sex.? a go" 23 propafvaifa: indigenous Services Jane Phiipett es mg is chsing On Reserve Theme; indigenous Peepiss Prepared by: Jane Phiipcit i, PROBLEM IDENTIFICATEON Em Dem? 12, 33013 $13158: ii] S: 235:: $22?0?umfy We ?re trying it} Shit/e? Describe brie?y, sentence. Indigenous Moptes, so @15in $133933 the legacyfci ehtrenched underfunding on housing for i . 3 segment participate In and contribute to our economy and our 81;:fo on as! ave the opportunity 0 tons gingz Ig?airiIajiequate housing can impact family health; education and easy chii dhood seveicbrnent? i en a and physics? wetthess? of families; care lot the elderly; the prevention 01 am; Vic shoe and crime. No government is dais has fully adciresSsd the gap ?13381 in overcrowding, unhealthy iiving conditions, and homelessness for indigenous 9W3 What evidence SLibstantiates this concern? The testers? government is engaging with the Assam First 3 Naticss on a housing strategy Key fisdiegs intiicate that First Naticns need 41 300 new housing units and 44 23.0 maior housing renovatIons over $9 on investments needed immediately (study as of Eiec 2016p There arc humorous reasons for this growing houssig gap on reserve; Lack of Icng3term manning, preposial baSedI, ?scal yeasts: year driven proiects issu?icie?ht and fluctuating iundicg ieveis Heavy compiiance? reqUirIed i'nclUding top-dowciieporting tiurdens and lack oi ?exibility- Limited training and argd Ihccm? for community masses In housmg bu?ds Lack cf resources for operations maintenance "Lack of Innciiatisii ass nest techneicgies . =is5tiit'icisht capitai and lack of fleicbilitg In tiaaricingi 3" i I .. Lack of Icagaciiy, ans qii?ai rites staihantt iahor 33 i I . ass his polices a ., A First Natimsied esmsiuniig appiWh to housmg isusisefisct capacity gaps community claiming long- 3 munchies to ass rssalr gnasing, op 33tisos acct magmas and geverriance This be basic es data with indigenous approaches ts governance foaming, nets gases cs isday?s sseds and sage gossip sass-iv: esiei?ped with risiis "VEMjf'w sci-35$ 0 0s Is oI-c cf 0 126as?? 3 - orJ?is?vfz' gig?" VII. gigs Wt igw. mug ?fx; The Wis Pam st Gsnada coinmitted'to resetting fig relatimship betsgec . . . . ,i 3 ts eccnomic growth We will immstiiateii . .. . ?aigprogress We issuegi 24 . What have we done. since What impact has ?ns had? Budget 2016 invested two Wars, to address urgent housing needs on reserve. This was a first step to seveiop an 9- ?rm . approaotz as part ?at a broader National Housing Framework. - sates then. Budget 2018 took further steps by investing in distinctionvbased housing strategies: This funding was provided through a menstruation of Budget 201? and ?edget 2(118 monies. First Nations on-ressrve $606 miilion over three years tnuit received $406 miilion over 10 years for a specific housang strategy . . The testis Nation reserved $500 million to years for a strategy. however, the need is so great to; First Nations on~resenre that more investment is essential. Preposed new initiative: Qesenbe ?oouple sentences how. the propose! would work: The Gov?emment of Canada will Invest $3 billionever 7 years in First Nations housing err?tome to complete re commitment to Canada?s {stinger-Ir National Housing strateSle, ?this investment in housing will promo 3 new generation of families with safe homes in WhiCh ?0 These families and W?igoeoome' the. backbone of Canada'fs strongiesmomic growth in the future. ?3 the/e 30mm? $9 WW 356111? similar ideas fror?'io?ontestio or international wraparateisfg The goveanment?is? currently engaged in a number of?aotivities to close the gaggia First Nation?s, housing: 9 Canasta is set {0 mourning? Homes and initiative to provide grants to based on innovation. . . CMHC a call tor nominationsfor?ihe First Nations Market Housing Fund Seam ?metastases ream the institution. - g. . g. The-govem?ietzt has funded the Assembly of?First Nations to undenakeiiema-gathering survey to; .. . better determine the Species housingv?eeds of each First New community?. . go The government eggtinues togeogage with the AFN Chiefs Cor?'rriittee on Housing and Infrastructure witi?ei?r?goalof Migrating the ten-year NationaIl-lousrog Strategy-Cosme - new meme-would rarest? is new Hi?i?pending nemesis We ?ver 3%,960 Nations eeoplgs livei-?fe??-freserve. There sting were to 's'upport housing-WJ . .. :x I. Bntinonnresefo Wlilee the imm; l. (v 79', . . if" I j' ?eldi?m?ii?re?ne ?attens . JOSUPm-rlindisstim is?. 3.- yes! a; sag-er?? a'x 35:} 1 WW Proposal 9: Poverty Reduction Topic: Poverty reduction theme: Social Polio Prepared by: Lloyd LOng?els' Date: tievember ?lth, 2018 2 Problem identification: providing fairness and between the top it; an Po cross link to housing, jobs mental health foes security those middle class and reversing the trend ol the growing gap ugg mg to rein the middle class The undeltying issue is fairness 3. Approach and impact: The voices clematisace to Ild fNattonal Adv'sori? Council on Poverty has been created iwith 17 diverse and hot fer profit Organizeaftton thebbalrlers to success and potential linkages between people struggling ns seniors Children People asinesses and levels of government. issues discussed to include with disabilities, and women The Nader-lat Advise ry Council should back to Parliament annually to hold the government accountable PfERmime Qata anId Costing. {De?ning poverty using Statistics Canada measoternents of low income cute? (U00) low income measure (LIM) and market pastel measure (MBM) In 2015 the steel or poverty was 12.1%ill Canada (4, .000 people) with agoal of 10% by 2020 (we are at 16.4%) and 5% by 2:530 including urban rural and remote? Canadians By 2020 we would have taken 77? 000 people out of poverty and by 203s we weeIe have taken 2 238 cap people out a poverty We need to segregate by welnen yetitll seniors immigrants and ether at groups. There are currently 3 million Canadians In poverty incitidtilg 1.9 million families. The Rational AdvisoIry Council ee Poverty ls aligning Canada 5 goals with till Sustainable Devetppment Goals The National Housing Strategy has committed $4ttb oval; ll) years Mental Health of $513 over 10 years; social innovation investment at $75llm and PM Security as a part et the National .. Foes Strategy Is still to be budgeted The lost cast to the economy and supposing social programs is multiples of the investments toI Iledlice poverty . 5. Pelitiml- Cameras! and Stakeholder Awareness: and look 1e haiance midgets by i: melee serelees alld cutting seats for: secret plegtams . . I Stakeholders: muni 94?th andtelrrtonal govemments health care Ilaroviders social assistance . . agencles, not till profit I advoCacy groups communities. Rt osal 19: El Reform Policy Prop Them: Topic; E2 Reform Prepared by: Adam Vaughan Date: December 2013 1. PBOELEM - What is the protatem! oeoodetrity We're trying te sotve? ?mptoymenf ?Wang" oety reaches 68% the Waters pay tote it. ear peopte in high emeioyment areas especieity ii?t sectors defined as areas Wiih precarious work the numbers are even fewer. Expanding. benefits and must happen it} address gap and 9% .. . . Canadians access to the bene?ts that they pay for. What evidence substantiates' this concem?. HUMA did a study which identified ?it-939$ 7719 Canadian Lab?? Congress has also highlighted Ei as a programme requiring a compiete? overhaul. Severe? private ?19me Wis have tried to parts of the e?rogtamote as they pertain to Maternity bene?ts. episodic dtsabti?'y and . 2. APPROACH me was?: What did we say"'in the 2015 platfomt (if. anything) onty made. modest butneffeotive changesto the programme enrolment, and extended Whaf m?inoe? Mat-impact has this had? Wanting 1while on bene?t. faster . fume demote and inclusive maternity bene?ts have at! been achieved in this mandate, the targer more chaiienging issues such as the mitten um weeks needed totqohiify. and theissue ofSeasenai Workers remain a;prootem;;? We promised comprehensive reforms in 2015 but so far. have Progosed {my {tesoribe in annotate sentenceshow thepmpesai'womd work, the outcome it maid have, and how It addresses the mew-problem. This shoutdfee written in people-orientediaeguage. . We need to make the programme easier. to qualify tor and'r'ecogeize and accommodate precarious work. We 'Shouto also ?nd a way-to get'more seif egtpteyed Workers engaged'in the pfegramme. Other mihor reforms '(see above WES. rm Wheat ?edtes) magi-teed tees-ineladed - - . . .. a. i . - HOW. mail)! steeple-wide: Wfs?rnated Bests tier itea?'lncitgde any releeant i??toz? Departmenthas these figures mensengmadm ?mgram that this ceetd'tie pr reputodsed? 1N0 eggyet-1mm 4?3: "fez-j, 2:1 28 Policy Proposal 12: Digital Infrastructure?Broadband Topic: Broadband Theme: Rural at remote communities Prepared by: Deb Schulte Date: December 2013 PROBLEM What is the probiemfopoortuoity we?re trying to solve? In too than? rural and remote communities there is inadequate access to Broadband which is hampering economic development, heetth care, education see seniors supports. ?rst evidence substantiates this concern? Recent analysis of ozoadband aocess across Canada identi?ed 0:10 be a Drooiern requiring many billions of dollars to selVe. In Budget 2016 money was ptovided tor a ?nest to innovate program that was significantly over subscribed. 2, What did we say in the 2015 platform? Nothing! What have we done since? What impact has this had? invested $500 Miliion in the Program (Currently Oversubsoribed) I Proposed neer initiative: Describe in a couple how the prowl ?route week. the outcome it woeid have, and how it addresses the rhain problem. I We are requesting that Connect?tmieoovate be renewed with a $200 Millie's; per year, over 5 years. that will continue to leverage other partners to connect coremuotties with what is now deemed ae essential service. Key changes need to be made to theprograre to attow for last mite areas. aanLieiNAaY DATA AND cosrme, . teeny esopie would it affect? Honorees at thousands oi pews am; undetsenied in our rurai and remote oommenittee with highee?ed internet which is here tieoorhi?ng an essential sezyicegaur medical . Stems, agri?tjitural areas; smelt ensin'eSS, sesame and sewerage being underserved ween they caoeot ?get access; to high spew (and in many oases, no.) interest. . istgere anlexisting seendm program @131 this could-(be Mariam 6?:?ie?pufposed? .Qonoem-teteeovate elm-"nice .- mum? . 8339' niiai?elvm? 1. 3 es the key stake._ We em: varef?ators ewe i . 29gwam - -- - - Mei3?9 policy Proposal 13: Global Migration refugees 1 Julie Dzerowicz TopiC- Immigration and 8erqu Theme . . Date: 7~December Dze?rowiez - 208 5. PROBLEM What '3 tbe problem opportunity we re trying to solve? Descnbe brie?y I it has become clear based on public feedb ac refugees will be an issae it; the 20 and how to aadrese 1831185 of Immigrat' Opposition rhbtoric that Immigration and the embossing at 19 election As such we require a very clear idea aboat what our position is and Ion ar?Ir??l broader issues of global migration What evidence substantiates ibis concem? Brie?y provide severe; important facts with re {arenas to Ire sources AS per the few provided during meetings oitae Caucus on Immigration and Refugees immigratlo" ?3 the {gamer one topic thatbAPs hear treat constitiz?Er'Its about at the (foot The CFC has aiso relied heavily on anti- imm'gt?atim rhetoric as Sosa in the debate surrounding the obal Compact for Migration. There are essenuy 258 million people worldwide who are on the move due to internal eonilict?; violent regimes and tbe impact at at mate change. As these numbers bananas to increase ?we restate a co'tnprehensive plan to dea?l? with - the meat at asylum seekers to Canada . 2 APPROACH memento? - mess we Say in tire 20t5 piatfoea (tram/tiring}? - 1339:2562-63me Weiss! make it Ilwep Canada and contribute to the economic "as; 3qu of all medias team -I . . are part of Carissa 's ecerzornic growth but over thevgast Iz. .. Stephen Harper has rumba me back on welcom?ing those who want to contribute I swibess We will take immediate; ailowed for parents and .. .. tbe budget for probeseiag terse 3; class '5 wii come dogm? windy was atre rage at lmost soar yeaiis for parent and Wm are - i 3 WW have Canadian siblings by we ?Emma's the maxim age it): z. ?er children to Canada We will at so grant Canada, at" I the sec-year waiting batted . - -1 abbady spent in Canada ??We Isitl ??year. We salt 3 nearly 3U rseas. We will make it more affordable for Canadian workers to send remittance industry, so that We wiil work with provincial and territon?ai to better rage! at tees. Th residents or Canada who send money overseas to help family members $223233; singing ways It; veil include working with Canada 3 banks to ensure low cost access to iron I I who abuse the Canada Post to offer remittance services and imposing tough new penalties on thos system and take advantage of valnerahle newcomers to Canada I I I I We will make it easier and more affordable to hire caregivers Canadian testifies looking for caregivers to help famiiy members with physical or mental disabilities must 933! a $1 000 Labour Mamet impact Assessment fee. We will eliminate that fee We will alscbi nIrith the evelop a system of regulated companies to hire caregivers 0" a 0 provinces and territories to i make it simpler for families to hire caregivers. and protect oarea?treis atiOWi?nIgI them to lamil' tree This wit change employers in the case of bad relations or abuse.? I Refugees: We will restore Canada 5 reputation and help more people in need through a progIIrarnIItllIatdIs safe secure and humane. Canada once welcomed refugees openlyI but that proud history as a after a decade of mismanagement under Stephen Harper We will renew and expand our commitment to resettle more refo?gees ahd deliver a refugee program that Is safe seoure; and hormone. We willI . fully restore the lnterim IFederat Healtli Program that provides limited and temporary health hepatitis to refugees and refugee claimants; - establish an amen human rights panel to detennine desrgnated coentries ot?ongrn and provrde a right to appeal refugee decisions for citizens frem thesis1 countries; and - appoint aidividoals with appropriate sabiecomatter expertise to Canada Immigration and Refugee Whathatre we done srnce? Wrapped has this had?? is; .- - 9 job skills overcoming language challenges and Supporting newcomer women Iin pulleap accessing afferdaeie child care through a $82 million Investmeat 033i 3 years moi requrred that sponsored Miners live Eliminated Consttir?e . tResrdeecyI status In Canada This ammo: pet I I . 3? vstinere?l? retI release 3 ?a 9:933 wanton and girls to be resettlee in Egg}; .a Whe?? I.I goon wall-gayIng Ions the 33 a . creating 1 company 31 Helping new workers such as youn return to saber}: to get the train benefits they need to support 9 3&3 recent Immr 1' ants wit they need to find a new i0 9 are ioohtng Mention it themselves and their tenth lies 2 losmg the 9 ?tone -In. lourvout" rote whr?ti tanned how ion 9 ?1813}! In Canada so thatt temporary workers can now extend mes years in order to. keep their permanent status. . inseam? that ail Canadians?~inetuding deal citizens?are treated equally once again by are a aw that repeats entair provisions In the Citizenship not that created two?tiered seizes . Reunited more families increasing the number of spouses partners and dependent ehtteren robe admitted t33: 12 it and shortened processing times for spousal applications from 26 to 12 months in 2916. Proposed new initiative: Describe In a so is sentences how the In at would work the outcome it woeid have, and how It addresses met {min problem 9 pos This should be Written in peopie- oriented iangeage A nerking Qfouplcommittea should he should struck immediately to begin brainstorming megahemree ?0 Wit-{0V6 (bit system and hear to britter handle the influx oi claimants we are currehtty is titers {entering we imow SImIiar ideas initiatives front domestic or intl cornperators? fiat to be determined. 3 orbit Arte cosnrte Threw manyr people would it affect? Seahorse costs per year? lnciurte any referent info To Be Determined .14.. vagng'i' is there are atesbng spending program brat this oi: r. be drann from or repurpesed?? To Be :Determined 1 4. POLITICAL comes? mo sranHeLoen AWARENESS - . -- stance on the aghts at immigrants In Canada and on the ternporary ananly the exprefsred that family reenrtroatzen should be the mo empty the Canadian The party wants its strep an the Issuing oi visitor?s for peeple setattves drop no graneepphcatten and landingtees and allow - - \te Who is not a member at the family class to? a test me tamIlrr ?ss sponsor?ltip tor?: 33;. . Policy Proposal 14: National School Food Program Topic: ?atIonal School Food Program Theme Heaiih Prepared by: MP Julie Dabrusie Date! 671mm I 1) PROBLEM What ?5 the problem W9 Wing ie solve? Describe beefy i senience. . giggzgigaslghi?d?g food and nutrition habits they. need to lead heaithy lives and Im ement an school food erogra'm. adequately Iiunded national cost shared Iuniversai healthy . Cenade Is the only country In the without a Nalionai Food Pier: . Canada is. one o? the only Organizations for Economic Cooperation and Developme?i (0399) _-coe:titries without one and Canadian chiidren are not provided consistent access zo healthy food at school where they soend more thee haif their waking hours were: evidm Staysiantraies this concern? Brie?y provide several Important faci3,;I reith reference to key Swims I . . I . I Soiree: reed pregame improve children? 5 women retro-term health school performance attendanoe, me cohesion and contribute to local eoeewomiee as recognized by the House of Commons Seeodio'g 2} APFROACH moment? - We more our part to ?heip Canadia .. . I. thoommeroral ?ierketing of Wealthy food and beverages ?ro ch?oreo .. _.--piaoe inQuebeog. - reguiam to eirremate fete? Similario arose mere and to Ireduoe eaitI Io 34 . During consultallons many speci?c calls ?cr zhe implementaticn salted? fact! mace. Panicipacis thought that School nutritional cculd help allewatc ac well. it was suggested that provision cf meals in erasurelhat eat a sufftcacnt quantity of heazrhy food. a concern limiieti'lo lower income grggups; There .wer? alum calls mvised school lunch guwcl?ncs. iccluding ensuring stude?is have enoughtimcto..eat;_ Fad?ra' funding was provided in 201?10 the ?Farm to Cafeteria Canadc Progrgl'n" Farmed new inltjamc: Become in a couple s?nlenccs hc?w the pfcposal _vlwcugd work, theculccm?? if 118%, cad how if a dresses the mega} ambl?m; 99de in maple-oriented fanggaw A federal gra??l'ccls organicalichs?waritle? and provincial landia?g would expand their impale? and improve health and cducati?h octmeei, ?cwcring futugg costs while econom?e?.335?- My? .m nag93W lnfi?fafiVES-Iomcomesfm omnternatlonaicom mowFwwhey In as; In theccnsum on W3. and ?99993; Smecls 9' cl! eta!? 2012), . . 739%.. - . ?whim-@0066: . . . canThis mulled les anall- clan" $2ch wha?ricrja??dotbe? .. dr?osatwe wads 63% M. 261-3?) 3' .1 rs: ini?gaCtlon ~62; - - 5?wi?ta?-~ I "a . f?g3l' 3&the" ?xmur?asicg?nm etc; W?{Ga?es etaizo-?gl) 2'35; c211" y- . .. 25'3?: m3? flat-local tics; n?fu'trit"if: "f ?x .513.? Ia) pneuwmwa?u 3% . '5 ?33 mml'wm? .. 1.. .mM STAN gmwm?sm%QWM%th? 90m gawwmw?sa?mmeknowny . . ?rm Wm 38 Poiioy Proposal 15: Disability inouronco Program Topic: research iota oisaooity insurance Thoma: Econdojic Dooelopmont Prooaroo by: Anita Vandenbelo 3 Date: December 5111,: 2913 '31; 33 3* SUMMARY Persons with chronic disobif?ties are not weii served in 0o iop of boith foo of Zoo poor and mo: people' In mow, the Sop?on syoismo: in ?3803 correniiy are simoi?y no: 123 %o the task. A new systom is calied for a universai oisaoiiriyinsmance systorri . S. too: 33! strati?catIoo crooie greater opportunities and {nus ooaofo momma social oo?oom San . inclusion across this groai Sonia: oivide as Witnesood by such a program in Anora?o To ?at? ?od a -. {939331 orooram is preposeo to examioe the feaszbliity, and ooSIrooilIty oSf pubiiciyi 1W . SS 2. .3 Who: ?35 3?9 ?3 0990mm?? SW6 trying to Ssoivo? Describe 3333333333331 1' sentence The proo?om is the failing ano incr?asing?iy unmana chronic disabilities in Canada which foils s_ Mat evideoce oub?aotrates this coocem ?ne?y? Wide several ?mpg. . 363333333693 3 . ?3:35 . . . om ago- Cooenoo the disab'W sumo systems canada. (an gig; Homes} are 'oad?me- loony ioopio with Sof?osi Sba'sic esSenS .433 (My WINES and two In cold soars .. by the Phrase Woo iis'fo? ?egimaied 5:003?! -. some IiItyrocem hm?q?sm?emoes? netting oai' in oowos ofthe outagSou .. .931th . Un?ua? the ievoi Soi Sne . depeooing; on woo mo are. they are. We do Hrs-.4 I (1:33on 3W .. . [mosteni? people W3: 1' . is ono?s . d; it Is-= -, yew 611% :Sorz, S. ..- 1..- "so: 37 23APPROACH AND mastoid we say in the 2915 platform (.I . if ehylhis :3 commitment the ddress accessibility ssues with giggfmiusr 03:31 disabi era! jur What have we done Since? What - . 3 . I . . the creation (currently before the Sgpacihas ?713 had? Our Commitments rs acsessibil't tegitimized federal invotvemeni in oi the Accessibility Act. lmportantts this agenda 9f social inclusionand Canada? issues. But it was at best a partial solution to the broader . . . . 3 3 3 CU . 3 {Disabilities Th?s disabiitty insurance plan 61:13:?me ?meme Conventionm the Rights of Persons with eiticrent way which has 2.. . 93393 was evident irr isolation. Proposed new initiatwould ha vs, and in a simple how the proposal would work, the outcome it $933119 main problem. This should be written in peoptsroriested languagecomgre?esg?f?fjgig Emil-m $091.? asthma the dimensions and challenges of prosigina a Standards an 33.3 3'333 stat? W3 at; is disability supports for persons with chronic disabilities where 3 and 3. 3333 as 0 aSSessed and validated bassoon and analysis of persons seess . t3 3% roughout a persott?s lifetime. The outcomes wimid isolud?e: persons With chronic: disabttities overcom??93 degree enalglea through subports, impediments toxiheii full inclusion in society grids. care givers being. liftestrom full'eesponSibility so as to esable'ithem to return toiworis. More broadly, improvements to the esonomy and social fabric weuid be impitoved economic seams-3. 3 and gieater social cohesion ass mam . 3_ .. -.3.. 3 3 teasers anything we lsiowsboas?smt?ar ideas from dessestio or iniernalfsnai-somp?ratoi?s? I. ThsNaiionai' Disability Insurance Schema irf 'Australia whish after 8 years of research suggesting was. iuliy' Iaanched iaaluiyot 2'81 Review by of the Gosemtaent'of Anstralla in Oct, 2617 ?suggest this scheme passesutted ih'7s'imsiified navigation its theisisaoied. Better sgpposts, ass improved 0*??ng whiis?reitiiclng?fhe numbsg of the-govesiment haste da?sl witi'i directly?2 This is sous mention th's positive assets on soonoiinisgrowth and esploymentesabted by the pragratsi A highs .- tluaiity. roll gout success. -- pass Kim oosrmo How many seoeh wseid?a?es? Estimated lndude any rat's vent-info? 3_ 3 _3 1?4 of the Weight? seenistion' aged. 1.5 years or eldeeseas million individuals, oss in: - hastig sat ssiiy 'aiatWitieS, white ass/o of "Canadians . Wid??imreiits f" merit. rs o; {finesse was blt?rtenn heal?a conditloos, disabilityseeds or aging asedss. amiss 3.3 milligan Gsnadsansage?ts years or swam sidisaotitty, ass/o Wise ?iassi?ed as - ewes shite ehabi?hy 36% emoeeatesh - 23 f84?h000 areas tee! $0,000; very prevalanoast sassntetsitd as differ Significastly bastw?eisili'ezihihen mess severe or (Bethe . -- - gigs? . 92. . I 5":tei' 333 . maria-rm 2619 ON Caucus Submission - 2. 2018-12-12. touch on" and em some 0111c? To at theta thitiatht? mtg-mm msurahcc program as Asstsied Dying at? Leg 39" - Policy Proposal 16: Standing Orders I Bardish Chagger I Topic: Standing OI?ders prepared by: Bardish Chagger I IDENTIFICATION Desire to have a more representative and incinsIve The rules of the House of Commons are written I) Commons contained no women and oniy ever so changed over the last century keeping Pariiament far from bei functions. 2.APPROACH AIVID IMPIACT This was notain the 20I5 platform However tIie Government House L?edeII did put forIwaIcIi a Diecussieii Paper which Included the subjeoI' In 2017. It was also peI'I of the Government Leader {nanoate Theme: Modernizing Pariiarnent Date: December ouse of Commons 3: mo Ior men. One hundred years 3% Home of ntained a hendfoi oi etfinic men. Much has I ye: the House remains unrepr?sentative and Its working pramoes dated ng truly repre'seritetive, transparent accountabie andoif?ctive inpali o3 letter, . i - When poosibIo deIorrant votes after OP: Not as Inany late nILvotes Tooiing of House caiendar prior to wioummem MP5: and staff- are t6 pla??cheduies _Itggisioted parenfai ioIav? option for MP3 giviore tIeXIIiility for NEW parents . mowing infants In Chamber fi? More ?mm ?606 Expaodod SEWICQS on- ParIIament plusi?; '?oc responswe *0 current needs of ?6?s {Stooge tafiiesin washrooms;- ohairsm ?a ?g . - 55-" . . I35 ?i?m ponIcIIes . gpmivetomity make hood: I II '3 . is}. .onday as cono?UGW I 113 3. Policy Proposal 17: Ontine Hatred Topic: Section 13 of Canadian Hama . Rights Act -- Hatred :1 Them: Human Hiatus prepared by: Ari! Want Date: Wednesda- 0331111111311 261' 1' 1. PROBLEM 10511111101113)? - -- 8? :6 1131333111305 and 111031 recentty 1111113111 31130113 The 1119310115 1131113: 30 9 3113111 30111131311113 targeting 3:111:13 hatred. Human 3311111131: ?3313? 5; What 911111131139 311113131111319511113 001109111? Varzous human {?ghts 1311111315 and 3:011:15 111310313 {113%11. 13 was an ?9033111300 ?0 39101?? Combat 3nd 11163311111319 speech3 - -- 3? 3313 313 Supreme 01- Ca?ada 31111111311 the 1139111111301: human n?g'hts tegmiatton that 13% 1139' 51003011 11151111113?: cucumstances 1:1 Saskatchewan A11- e?SE'cerpt from the decision 313133, 311313 $139603 ?31371; the groundworlg 101 131131, 11:03:13: attacks on vu?tnembla gr?ups that 03:: 1311911110111 td 1131;131:1311: segregation deportatmr: 11111191103 and mm 1111151 11311111135133 genoctde :3 we "The ?ee speach 13101111031131 193111119 up ?0 the events of 11-13 repeat 01?- '13 was I11 respon?e111 301113 113111311 was a 1300: 11131111119 Ihewlanguage 1:12 3. 1'3 and 1113313115 3uempts1o :310:11: if 333. . - 53;; E33315 1.1119 1118 Quebec {311}: M?squa 3m- death 0113011611 Boush:e 1:1 83511310th 313 resu'?ing Invec?ve directed 101131011111113311311 1131301111 cu?ure the Twenta 1111351111131 cand'?acy 03F31113 113: 3113331: oonneohon 101119 arson attempt 313 ?1310110 hotel 1101131113 11119131113 the 1113:3511 In 3:11: . . 8311111511111: 12313113 31111 1131119 1131-; crimes 131131113313333?1111 the horrifj 0 Pittsburgh, 3130 3:11:01: Canada is 1101" 111111111113 13 T13 $35119 23133113110 or: i?te Cr: 130m31 :??eaith? 33m?gwe 3 .35' 21115111133 42 restoring a modemized version oi s. 13 oi the Canadian Human Rights Act, we will wait to curb the spread of hated ontine and pregame a "vision Canada that doesn?t just tolerate our differences. gout out! that oelebrates them. is mere aogsamg we know oboe: simitar ideas I initiatives from domestic or iniemationei comparators? Brie?ydesmbe (if info avaiiabfa}. - We know that atmost every other demomatic country in the wertd has strict ieguiagions and meals are hatter.? A ?1 The strength 0? 3- 13 was its power to Obtain {tease-and-desist orders the Canadian humaa . .- ?ghts theme! and enforce them through theoourts, . . 3. PRELIMJNARY me me cosrme Hear {sang people would it affect? Estimated costs per year? This would have a direct imeaot oaiall visible gingnties in Canada, asweii as all indigenous personsaad re iigious minoritiesg partiegtarly Jews and an existing agendas program that this come be are wn from or reggmoege? sesame identifieq? other than supports, for the. Human Rights generally vIaJustlee 4.- POLITICAL sngHotoen' How does this contrast wistwhe Ckservaiitres and lesiudeitaferenoe to peikggorie'a ers? . ?lm: Conservativgs suspense ?a?ifepeal of 5.13 vigg'e Frigate Member?s Egigirong their (51.th oaakbeaoher. it is probable they woui?d oppose any attetfoptrto reinsetgt s, 13 back mtothe Ca?adian Hgman Rights Act, on the basis-?at this iggpedg'stree This as hatred. asiuailttaf . . undermines the values thatiaee 'e'XpressiOn ?is four ed ?this hm Intact, on great deal ofitime estimating the Jewish haveatmos . the Jewish. contteanity is keen for a robust r??ens?ijo onlineggigatrey? 2 N953: Noe apposed me-rgpeaiet 5. 13am: it is ititgiy jzneywettd bes ofmfomand reinsertion of s. 13; Moreever, Stegtghassampa'igqegghigrg 1.9131691 3,73% a resggose to racism. It is very likeiy that the NDP .1001 curb airline-aged platform. if members! Party ereemts teto?Black a Wa?dnd 5. aed Jewish stakeholders i9 implement a plan, asagove.sim9nt;ito~ target ortline Who are the key stakeholders or suggma! . daze? - trivia-{Sorter attempted tit? never moved east first resisting died an 13 {Wet-is address the .?at? . .23. Policy Pr 18; Songs; Sweetened Eeverages Levi-193?? Sweetened Beverages Le pp 22 a national health Theme; strategy eating Health a [tacking - 0328M epiderrdc Prepared by: MP Ho . Wiseman ?and and EVan Date. . . . . . emanate . 1* PROBLEM teem-tamed?: What Is the problem beverages being 100 f; 23:21:: re trytog to soa92We have a problem 222th sugar sweetened . odesity Epidemig? . a 9 3120f} tow a tones in our seciety and his maseteety coetdbuttdg to the What I I I I. .2 ewdence sebstsattates this gohoem? Currentty?, Sugar Sweetened severeges (SSBs) contribute be twee :2 t0 It: and 15% of math 5 oaloti'c intake. Research from the University of Watertoe reveais tt?tst em 98W drunk metion' Is projected to tissue in seer 63 000 deaths and cast the healthCare system more an $50 btllion? IoverI ItIhe aext 25 years 3 2 APPROACH ANDIMPACT .: Whetddwe say In IIthe sets platform (steaming)? II I 223232 have we dame sinoej2 What impact has this had? The revised hesith standards In the new aeatthy eating guide will lee useful for helping to guide families te more nutr'itiods less sugary rams. However the deity.- 2eoe2nntended ameant o2 sugar far. exceeds Internationai guide tines established by the OI axed gives the tmpresston that high tevels otI sugar in. 888s Its 9229 when that not. the case at atlLi-"r- gProposed 21922 inidattvet Desonbe in a ooupte sentences how the proposal would. work the outoome it '3 as wetten in people- seemed tsaguage Zine amass 22 sample Ptaoe ate-wan SS5 teeush consumers away from purehasmg them while using . a nattanat healthy eatIng st2ategy prowde nutntieus to a" egg I 22222 $332? W325 dare we most! about satitastdese rarestmes from domestta or mtemattonal oomparators? Wt." otsaooessfui amatemeddtloaat saga". are {sued in Name France Hungany, 2 {intend Norway. rating list of 222 the United States (is. among eaters? to dense pumhases of taxed beverages have decreased over 2220 oonseattive yaw 322d puedtases of healthy beverages are uoI. II . eda? 5 Canada. us ion . 6 and nefir. . . . . 293,320 I - .-: ..-, . .5 . . 3. DATA ANS Haw many people would it street? Estimated costs per year? it 77077: have a nationai impact or! anyone who buys SSB. Qveraii a 20% 888 tax is estimated to postpone 7 874 deaths and avert $209 44?} in Canada over 25 years. The direct hesith care savings from a 20% 588 tax are estimated at atmost $7 77 i or: ion {57 350 6647 242) across 25 years. Annual tax revenue is projected to be almost $1 2 185 903 122) assuming an average price of 50 per titre The 25.. ?year totai tax revenue is an7 estimated 529 6 billion ($29 647 578 H056) not adjusting for secuiar trends' In beverage consumptm or cheapest a population demographics The combined health care savings. and revenue from a 20% 883 tax ever this period would be $36 998 242. 299. . .A is there an existing spending program that this cooid be drawn from or reperpos?ed2 None at the Federai tovet. For the healthy lunch aspect there rs the "Lunch Lady? supported by different parts of; the copatry as welt tee a ?farm to cafeteria? program that sources local tood into cafeterias Both of these inhiatives couid be drawn on for the iunch aspect of this pregram 7 4 POLITICAL CONTRAST AND STAKEHOLDER AWARENESS :27 How does this contrast with the Conservatives and Weed/A . . . . . NDP: NDP government in BC has recently been somewhataosupportive of the idea that is hack 12y hair coalition partners the Green Party of BC. LL93 ?was: she ca/oevrsicanadar?nevr- -brucsaricidoreen? -paity- promIses-suoar-saeetened drink-tax- 4828965 . . 777 $7 Green Pay: to the past the Green Party has entertained adopting this propose! 7 cafes/cohvention? Oi?rvotinQZresoiotroes/gi?wa?- . .. . 77 . 7777' 2 7' - 2 . Who are the key stakeholders or exteroai vaadators are rrirght engage? - g? Many heaith organizations in Canada are for such atevy with the looming oeesrty epidemic or: the horizon. As stated above Heart and Stroke Canada is active on this file. not so is the Canadian Cancer 7 .7 Society Athena Poi? icy Coalition for Chronic Disease JPreverttion Chiidhood 01395335. Foundation 7 .2 researchers at [Jeff and Waterloo, to hams-a few Many of their states can he toured betas? but the existing literature in academia ES significant the {riding a report (1006 wide many of the. above .- organizatioas also linked before: . 777777 7. .77; 7. ?ow. diabetes ca/gei?attao?zment/Ne .. . Canadiaao?The Hearth and? -Tax .pdf. ma: - caliaitat- levy benefit-canadians .. . 77177 . . ~ir-"7m- 4?91.. J.- 45 - Policy Proposal 19: Toronto Ravine System Topic: Toronto Hawaii-System Thoma: infrastructure prepared by: Adam Vaughah Dato: November 2?1h,2018 1. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION. What Is the problem . I moor-warty we re trying to solve? Toronto Iegendary ravine system is Begin?ing *0 as a cr?rcai part of the city? 3 system its restoration' Is criticaf sis; What evzdenoe substantiates this concern? A series of city reports referenced in this articIe detail the ori a: $3 con?nows! ta/2018111/07/howIIoro-ntos ravines- -have- become-crItIcailv TE and they-cao-bomsavod. him! via @torontostari, 2 APPROACH AND I I I tootin natural What did We say in the 2015 platfoirrn anyihing)? but did oommit to: pro 9 envrronmants and designating more areas for protector: of awe Io What have wo- dooe 82369?? What Impact has this had? The has fieerI $175m :set Io uog designation of the ecological Imporfaot areas . . utooroe It the proposal woylo Work, the ?3 Describe In a coupie SW?ems how to ian 99 a: Ih? main problem ThIs should oo w?ttan peopIe-oneo $53 as Erato entIiro rovino oysIom the. oty .. moms almost every moonoos to Ihe 905 roang: a 36 . IoIha" *9 Ios andsho?ld noi . . made Wh??mtm '5 a?nouriced - aso no "IfWig; I Hoot many it a?eot? .2 -