Judgment in a Criminal Case UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -vs- WILLIAM DENNIS DANIELSON AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1,1987) Case Number CR 99-60035-1-AA Bryan Lessley Defendant's Attorney On April 28,2000, the defendant was found guilty by a jury of Count 2 of the Indictment after a plea of not guilty. Subsequent to that time, the government, defendant, and counsel for defendant all agreed that Count 2 would be reduced to a misdemeanor charge pursuant to 16 USC 4 3373(d)(2). Accordingly, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is guilty of the following offense: Title & Section Nature of Offense Date Offense Count Concluded Number 16 USC tj 3373(d)(2) Possession, Sale & Transportation of Illegally September 16, 1998 2 Possessed Wildlife The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 4 ofthis judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The defendant has been found not guilty on counts 1 and 3 of the Indictment, and is discharged as to such counts. Defendant shall pay a special assessment in the amount of $25.00 for Count 2. The court acknowledges, and the government, defendant and counsel for defendant all agree, that this special assessment has been paid in full. IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change ofname, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant's economic circumstances. Date of Imposition of Sentence: April 6,200 1. Judgment was amended on February 3,2005. to reflect charge reduced to misdemeanor, reduction in special assessment, acknowledgment the special assessment has been remitted. acknowledgment that fine has been remitted. defendant has completed his sentence of incarceration and there is no term of supervised release imposed. The Judgment [#2591 is vacated and this Amended Judgment fully states the agreement of the court, the government. the defendant, adcounsel for the defendant. -[ ALL4 L, ANN AIKEN, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 4- day of February, 2005 Dated this Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 2 DANIELSON, William Dennis 2 of 4 CR 99-60035- 1 -AA IMPRISONMENT The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for time served. * * The Bureau of Prisons will determine the amount of prior custody that may be credited towards the service of sentence as authorized in Title 18 U.S.C. 5 3585(b) and the policies of the Bureau of Prisons. RETURN I have executed this judgment as follows: Defendant delivered on to at , with a certified copy of this judgment. UNITED STATES MARSHAL By: Deputy U.S. Marshal Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 3 DANIELSON, William Dennis 3 of 4 CR 99-60035- 1 -AA SUPERVISED RELEASE The government and the court agree, as does the defendant and his counsel, that no term of supervised release is imposed. Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 4 DANIELSON, William Dennis 4 of 4 CR 99-60035- 1 -AA FINE A fine of $20,000.00 was previously imposed and has been remitted.