Exhibit: LJN/12a Combined E-mails sent between PRYCE and OAKESHOTT -----Original Message---From: isabel oakeshott < Date: Tue, I Mar~2011 20:08:15 To: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:09:02 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 1003 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Exhibit: LJN/12a To: Ok I will ring an do it along these lines. Not sure I can do it in the morning though if not late afternoon or am I leaving it too late? Having lunch with Miriam C tmr. Should I hint at anything? I told Vince there is something hanging over him and he wanted to tell Clegg-I can say am being pestered by the press about something he did which CT let slip and which I know is true but have been protecting him so far but he has been such a shit not sure I can do it any longer. I am inclined to chance it but not disclose what it is. 1007 Exhibit: LJN/12a Should we be together? Of course he may not pick up so you need to say something to joel to worry him-not that I said no comment-or perhaps it is ok to say that? Lets talk later. Ring me when you get this if you can. Many thanks v -----Original Message----From: isabel uo To: Isabel Ua.Jl(eSJlou Sent: Sat, 7 May, 2011 8 Subject: Re: can you read this? Yes, I understand, have just been talking to Constance and surprisingly she is much more relaxed than me and thinks only a little tweaking will do it so the agreement will not need to change dramatically but I won't be able to engage her until 9.30 when she gets back here and then I will have something for you by 10. How is that? I am about 1012 Exhibit: LJN/12a ... to do school nm but will be back here and ready to start by..915 and we can work on the piece. I presume you have a tirst cut of it? Ps l seem to get very worries at nights when I am at my lowest must resist sending messages after I am .. X Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device -----Original Message----From: isabel oakeshott Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 0 To: Subj~ct: Re: can you yes, i understand that well - i sometimes have some pretty low moments myself at around that time.. lOam is fille i don't have a first draft of the piece because it was simply impossible yesterday. we got back from Isle of Wight and nigel went straight to work, so I had baby all afternoon as well as all the unpacking (which was copious.) ' There will be various meetings about the story frrst thing this morning and then i'll be able to start writing. What do you think about (you) warning Nick or Miriam about this story and telling them it's true?? anything to be gained from doing that, or not? obviously we haven't told CH yet that he's about to find himself at the centre of a shit storm, but we'll need to do that later today (probably not till late afternoon, if our lawyers think that is fair on him. he's only going to deny it anyway.) he hasn't actually had as much air time as i thought in the last 12 hours-:- I expected him to be all over the BBC News last night and Today programme this morning, so perhaps he has retreated to lick his wounds. I have never been sure what to make of what you say about CT telling the Mail on Sunday about the points in the first instance. i always assumed that was a bit of a fig leaf on your part and didn't take it seriously, but if you are telling me that is genuinely what happened, of course i believe you. it's strange though -why would she expose CH to such a big risk by blabbing such a thing? and why would he bring it up with her in the first place? ----- Original1vu;;:,:.c1)1.c From: Vl t'"'"'lnM1f' To: Isabel Sent: Sat, 7 May, 2011 8:56:35 Subject: Re: can you read this? 0 Also since I told you this apparently by accident not realising the importance of it I need to think when and if to tell them but also must think re MoS as we said. I spoke to David twice yesterday as you know. V (i5) 1013 Exhibit: LJN/12a Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device -----Original Message---,.From: isabel oakeshott Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 To: --?- ---- ~- Andrew Alderson festive greetings 3 messages ~ --- - - Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:: Andrew Alderson To: Constance Brls ,.. HI Constance I hope you had a good Christmas? I just trfed to r1ng you. Are we all "set" for blast-off this weekend? Could you gtve me a quick call please at home10.10am dropping off my younger daughter at rfdfng)? (but I will be out between 9.50am and Best wishes Andrew Wed, Dec 29,2010 at 11:02 'Mil call you when I have finished my military training. Constance a Sent using BlackBei"I'}'G frOm Orange Wed, Dec29, 2010at 11:25AI Thanks, Constance. I am here until 12 noon- and than back at about 1.30pm. Speak soon. Andrew [Quoted text hidden] David Dillon From: Sent: David Dillon 29 December 2010 18:49 To: constance..brlsco- SubJect: Re: Dear Constance, Thanks for yoor email and thanks also for al& ltla lime and effort you have put Into this matter thus far. I hope lhat lhe rollowlng wiU help clear up any concerns you have and bring us a lltue cJoser to making this work. I will do evetything can to reassure you and your friend. The email sent to you earller was a writtan guarantee thai The Mall on SUnday would not Identity the "relevant person" as the source ot Information and a guarantee that lhe Mall on Sunday would not publish the identity ol lhe "relevant persono. It you would like this to be drawn up as a legal document than 1willastc out lawyers for assiStance with that. If the story Is true then it Is unlikely to be contested. However, we would ldeaJiy !Ike corroboration of the details supplied by the orelevant petSOn" prior to publlc:a1lon. As we discussed Jn our meeting this corroboration would ideally coma from a third patty who Is fully aware of the facts of the story. Any documentary evidence which backs up the story would ol course also be esaenttaJ to us. If "heo asks The Malt on Sunday to reveal lhe source of our story wa WllUid of course refuse to do so. You have already received a wriuan guarantee of this. Please call or email me If you have any rurlher quesUons. 6 Dnvid Dillon r:rom: Sent: c.:onstance.brisco~ 30 December 20W 00:37 To: Subject: Constance Briscoe; David Dillon Re: Plcn~ forgive the delay. I have now spoken to the relevant person and a formaJ contract as to the agrt!cmcn is preferable. There are a number of olher points that can be dealt with tomorrow when I will email you.Constance Briscoe Sent using BlackBerry(R) from Orange From: Constance Briscoe matter !'O fur on holiday so that will slow things up. If you could send me the paragraph that my colleague Dominic sent 10 you il would help cnonnau~ly. Tit is e-rnaiJ and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. U contains information. which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named add~essee (or aulborised ro receive for .the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. f! you received it in error please notify !he sender immedialely and then delete ir from your S)> Martin Wood Group Legal Adviser Associated Newspapers Ltd Direct --- - Switchboard:- David Dlllon/NewsJTMOS/ANL 30/12/2010 15:14 T c Suojec Fw: Fwd: : 'o:: f?o.v: 1?\vd: Dear Vicky The Mail on Sunday con.finns that the infonnation you supply will be treated on a 'not for attribution' basis. We wiJl not publish any words or photographs which may lead to you being identified. We will not use the information you supply for any reason otherwise than for the purpose of publishing a story in the Mail on Sunday and its website, nor will we communicate to any third party that you are the source for the story. This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the .sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry ? St, Kensington, London, W8 5TT. Registered No 84121 England. 11ris e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views anrl onininn<~ 1~,;: hv: hvd: cxpre~sed in this c-mmlmay not n.:tlect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limi > l:mp_jl~~mess.agelabs.com/~ ! I -~ Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, Kensington, London W8 5TS Vicky Price 30 December 2010 By Courier Private and Confidential Dear Vicky, I understand that you have asked us to provide you with some written assurances with regard to the proposed story your friend, Constance Briscoe, has been discussing with Dave Dillon, the News Editor. ? I can therefore confirm that The Mail on Sunday will treat information you provide in respect of the proposed story on a 'not for attribution' basis. Furthermore, we have no intention. of publishing any words or photographs which may lead to you being identified as the source of the story or identifying you as the source to a third party. Information you supply to us in relation to the proposed story will be used strictly the purpose of publishing the story in The Mail on Sunday and on the newspaper website. I trust these assurances will allay any concerns you may have. Yours sincerely, John \VeHington Managing Editor fOI From: Sent: To: Subject: constance. nno<:rorlo Monday 03 January 2011 22:23 Dominic Turnbull Re: Please call me Com stance Briscoe Sent using BlackBerryTt, ~ from Orange --Original Messag~ From: Dominic. Tum Date: Mon, 20 Dec 201 To: J Subject 0 lease find below with reference to your earlier discussion with David Dillon o VIcky Pryce Dear VIcky The Mail on Sunday confirms that the Information you supply will be treated on a 'not for attribution' basis. We ' publiSh any words or photographs which may lead to you being Identified. We will not use the information you s for any reason otherwise than for the purpose of publishing a story In the Mail on Sunday and its website, nor wi commun~te to any third party. that you 1U'e the source for the story. (Embedded image moved to file! pic14485.jpg) This e-mail and any attache4 files an;t.intendec;l for the named addressee only. It contains information which ma) confidential? and legally priVileged and also p~ by copyright Unless you are the named addressee (or autt to receive for the addressee) you may nc;>t copy or ?use it. .or diSclose it to anyone else. If you received? it in error ~ notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinion expressed In this e-maii may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Umited or any of its subsidiary companie$. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to ch this e-mail and any attachments to it for Viruses as we can take ?no responsl~ifity for any computer virus which Ini transferred by way of this &-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail .facility signifies consent to any interception we rr law(UIIy carry out to prevent !'lbuse ?of these facifitles. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Nortl'lcfiffe House, 2 Derry S~ Kensington, London, WB 5TT. ? ..... -egistered No 84121 England. ? ? ? This e-mail and any e1ttached files are intended tor the named addressee only. It contains information; which may coofident~J.and legally privilege<;t and also protected by? copyright Unless you are the named addressee (or auth< to receive for tne addr~ssee) you may not copy or use it. or dlscl6se it to anyone else. If you received it in error pi? notify the sender immediately and then de.lete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions . expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep ?out network free from viruses. However, yo~ <;to need to?chE this e-mail and any attac;hments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which rna transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consentto any interceptien we mi lawfuiJy carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities. Associated Newspapers ltd.. Registered Office: Nor:thcfiffe House, 2 berry St. Kensington, London, WB 5Tf. Registered No 84121 England. This email has been scanned by the Messag~Labs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://WwW.messagelabs.com/einail 1 o httpt://m;UI. goog.lc.c.om/m;ul c~aii Andrew Aldarson??????????- VP 1 message Tue, Feb 15,2011 at 8:46AM Good morning Cave I had my (sflghUy grumpy) contact on the phone on Sunday asJdng if you went no longer Interested In the big staty o or the story about her planned book? I simply said that as fat as I knew you were gclng to ring her last Tuesday and sort out a Qolnt) "plan" (after taking legal ac:Mce). I am well awant that In the anent oe11mate" joumallsts . . being very carefully now for ob-Aous reaaons but surely If an lndlvfduallndapendently decides? to <10 the snaring o and you ultimately benefit o that's hi~ "car? Anyway, I asked her to reave everything until Tuesday (after your weekend) - Ia today. Are you going to speak to her? Ate you happy It o as VP wanted In the first place nine days - I now gJve the book story to Rlc:hant Kay? I am home this morning if you want to talk anything hough... 15 19/1212012 09:11 (;mml ?Chris Huhno c~ail Andrew Alderson ., \ oo o:1, Chris Huhne tm~e Tuft, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:47AM HtOave, I spoke to our mutuaJ 111end yesterday and she was very happy with the at11de o and the very careM way you had handled things. She also suggutec:S you had discussed how to move the stoty on (le ''the biggiej but she was a1 worlc and didn't go Into any detail. Preddatlly enough. your story led to a whole load of new inquiries from journalists ("What WUI the book say?' to ocan we help you write the bdok?') - but she didn't give anything away. Unlese you want me to get InvolVed, I am just going to leave things to you and her on .,he blggle"... but obviously let me know If you think J can help In any way. Best wishes Andrew PS AdllafiV, t think ow- mutual IHend said you are on holiday tl'lls week, In which case have a good break and lers talk on your return... 16