Case: 11-15468 12/05/2012 ID: 8425931 DktEntry: 88 Page: 1 of 3 FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 05 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AL-HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation; WENDELL BELEW, a U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law; ASIM GHAFOOR, a U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law, Plaintiffs - Appellees, No. 11-15468 D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00109-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER v. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States, in his official capacity; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, Director of NSA, in his official capacity; OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, of the US Department of the Treasury; ADAM J. SZUBIN, Director of OFAC, in his official capacity; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, Director of FBI, in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellants. AL-HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation, Plaintiff, No. 11-15535 D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00109-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco Case: 11-15468 12/05/2012 ID: 8425931 DktEntry: 88 Page: 2 of 3 and WENDELL BELEW, a U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law; ASIM GHAFOOR, a U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States, in his official capacity; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, Director of NSA, in his official capacity; OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, of the US Department of the Treasury; ADAM J. SZUBIN, Director of OFAC, in his official capacity; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, Director of FBI, in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Before: PREGERSON, HAWKINS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. The opinion filed on August 7, 2012, and appearing at 690 F.3d 1089, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. Case: 11-15468 12/05/2012 ID: 8425931 DktEntry: 88 Page: 3 of 3 The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.