Atkins LLP Lilli ??sli Egg EM 30th Floor 360 Main Street .. . . 4C1 WESTERN MW elements-eases no. 1: $23? F: TAeLEo?ev H/Fm?frf??l I Deterrence CLERK May 1 8, 201 8 Carolyn Roberts Legal Assistant ?x ~11; 204 957-4738 '1 he Honourable Steven Fletcher no, Inc I Emmi}: 3723 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, MB R314 2A8 Steven J. Koltu Direct Line: (204) 957-460? Fax: li-mail: skolut@ntltaikinscom VIA EMAIL AND REGISTERED MAIL Dear Sir: Re: Defamatory Social Media Posts Regarding Delta 9 Cannabis Inc. We are legal counsel to Delta 9 Cannabis Inc. (?Delta Our client has brought to our attention a series of social media posts published on your personal Facebook pro?le on May 17, 2018 which, upon review, are deeply concerning. The ?rst post was published at approximately 11:00 am. and reads as follows: Steven Fletcher 4 or Good con?ict of Interest legislation protects publlc Interest and elected representatives from Innuendo and other suggestion of Improprtety. We don't have this Updated Iegtstatton In Manitoba. it falls far short. The Commisslonere report agrees with me. changes need to be Implemented. #mbpotl #TheLastTory Like Comment A) Share a) 8 Almost immediately thereafter, a second post was published which refers to our client by name: Steven Fletcher 3 If} Strange that Delta 9 stock price went from $0.20 to Oct 17 up to $3.20. that Is over 1000% increase in stock price those in the knew could have made a fortune. i guess we?ll never know. All We do Know is that proper Con?ict of Interest tegislatton is far overdue. #mhpoll #TheLastToty if) Like Comment pi) Share 5 [mt I ha attenuating WESTERN LAW FIRM We are advised that the posts were also shared via your perSOnal Twitter account. The posts have been ?liked? and ?shared? by individuals connected to you on social media. These statements are highly inappropriate. hey imply, in the complete absence of any evidence, that the supposed inadequacy of Manitoba?s conflict of interest legislation somehow allowed Delta 9 and its shareholders to engage in insider trading or other impropriety for ?nancial gain. Our client categorically denies and resents the implication. These statements are even more inappropriate coming from an eiected public of?cial. It is beyond disappointing to our client to see its goodwill and reputation impugned simply in an effort to elicit support for your Bill. Delta 9 has Spent years developing its reputation as one of the leading licensed producers of cannabis in Canada. Be advised that it is our client?s position that these publications are highly defamatory in the sense that they are false, devoid of merit and severely damage the reputation of Delta 9 and its shareholders in the eyes of any reasonable person. Where defamation is proved, substantial damages may be awarded without proof of actual loss or injury. These defamatory statements will not be tolerated. As the individual in control of the Facebook and 'l?witter accounts, you may consider this letter a formal demand that you immediately cease publishing the offending statements. We require your response within two (2) days of the date of this letter con?rming that you have removed the posts. in addition, we require you to publish an ap010gy to our client on your Facebook and Twitter pro?les within two (2) days of the date of this letter. Your apology should include werds to the effect that: i) you are retracting your earlier post which mentioned Delta 2) that, you have absolutely no basis to believe that anyone associated with the company has engaged in any impropriety; and 3) it was not your intention to make this implication in your social media post. We will consider a lack of Such response with such time period an indication that the publication will continue and is intended to further damage the reputation of our client. If the publication continues, we will advise our client accordingly as to the full scope of remedies available to it under the law. We look forward to your immediate attention to this matter. Yours truly, MLT AIKENS LLP Steven J. Kohn