From: Sullivan, Jacob Slut: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:17 PM uTo: Subject: Re: Proposed Quad Deal - Also, Bill trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets Into E. Libya In next 24 hours. from: Sullivan, Jacob lent: Wm, March 23, 2011 09:10 PM To: lubjod: Pie: Proposed Quad Deal Possible- l'rom: am: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:04 PM To: Sullivan, Jacob} - Subject: Re: Proposed Quad Deal I have the Turkish one pagan-asked for it from Dav. I'm worried that FR andfor the UK know about the Turks idea and want to derail it. From: Sullivan, Jacob [mailbmSullWanJJ?istabegov] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 08:43 PM To: Subject: RE: Proposed (2qu Deal Here's the deal on that- the Turks have Just sent a thoughtful 2-page'r on how a political process might unfold. Bill and i discussed it this evening and we think it makes a good deal of sense (with some tweaks) and it would be good to have the Turks out front on this. So we should encourage the UK and France to wait a bit, not rush this thing out. We should get C2 and London conference prep right before we move to this without thinking and talking it through very carefully. Haven?t heard from Jim and Phil, but Bill and I are on the same page. i will forward you the Turkish proposal momentarily. From: Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:42 PM To: Sullivan, Jacob .1 Subject: Re: Proposed Quad Deal Agreed but what about the letter from the From: Sullivan, Jacob [malito Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 08:40 PM To: Subject: FW: Proposed Quad Deal You probably saw this from HUma, but Burns will call and Gordon will call Audlbert and report to you before you talk to Juppe. . From: Gordon, Philip . Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 6:55 PM To: Steinbem, James a; 'Mcoomugh, Denis Rs; Burns, William Liz'; Daelder, Ivo Jacob . . Co: McEiciamrey, Harry i-ieI'I'em, John Spenoe, Matthew J. Subject: Proposed Quad Deal we are putting togethers conference call with Jupp?. Davutoglu and Hague tomorrow. Hero is the outcome I think the call should soul: to meet overybody's redlinos: i. Turkov agrees to tho NED on the NF: tomorrow. 2. Franco agrees that NATO will take on the "wider mission" Lo. fuil Implementation oi UNSCR Wild. including 0P4. Any political suporsituctum set Up {Big Toni. Contact Group, - Contributors Committee) will provide wide political guidance but not military direction that would be done by the NAC in coalition format. Franco would manifest this commitment by agreeing to 0 Nil.) tor UNSCR i973 missions tomorrow. 3. Turkey agrees that the rules of engagement adopted for the wider mission would cover full implementation of UNSCR 973 to. they would not restrict Franco's or anyone olse's actions to protect civilians as consistent with the UN mandate. 4. France would agree that countries not wanting to participate in 0P4 missions (Lo. Turkey] could do so by national opt-outs. lwent through this list Just now with Audibori. and he thinks France could agree. I do not believe. . there are any deal-breakers tor the Turks. given all we've heard including 5 from Dav. Ditto from Brits. You all good with this? ivo anything missing yttu need? This email is UNCLASSIFIED.