Mote  (sublet: cm s: ?03 Headoi.

 

Officer in Charge




0n the 6th of April 1992, as a result of information from one

Terry and one . Teina PORA was noninated by
them as a suspect in the homicide. a

statement nnHined the fact that she had had a
conversation with Teina, in which he had admitted

having intercourse with the victim and that his mate had killed
her. -

M.

Teina PORA was initially interviewed by myself at about 12.30am

on the 7th of April 1992. A statement was ahtaina? Gwen PORA

where he denied the allegations that A had made-
stetement was corroborated by

who also claimed that Teina had made certain disc10sures about
the homicide. 3

During the enquiry Teina PORA was nominated by other members of
the PORA extended family and friends. i

As a result of this- on the 28th of May 1992, Teina 903A,
PORA and were reintervievweda Teina Page
continued to deny the allegations of a ,gand it was
obvious that one of the two was lying. During the reinterview of
she eventually admitted that her original statement
was incorrect to the extent that she had conspired with her 
Aunties, terry . and . ts concoct a
story implicating The motive ior this was that
neither hunty approves of Teina's criminal behaviour and they all
wanted him placed in prison and out of their way. 1

.6/2

 

    
 

It appears that a was the lesser party and is dominated
by Terry 

re1_a_ QnTt; a?insj- 
?garth?e; tar-e false?ln?iomatlon-AZM
 v?i?a's??ifacY and Aunt 1 es . 

 

- 7  
agsyf?mb?q?'Policg?gesources wasted 1n 

For your information and direction.

K.A. WRIGHT ST CLAIR

Det.Sgt. 7488
10/06/92

?up.

?.Laax?n