BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA

БОСНА И

ХЕРЦЕГОВИНА
Tužilaštvo - Тužiteljstvo Bosne i Hercegovine
Тужилаштво Босне и Херцеговине

Number: T20 0 KT 0007857 13
Sarajevo, 25.12.2014

DETENTION

COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERCEGOVINA
SARAJEVO
To pre-trial judge

Based on Article 35. paragraph 1. and 2. point i) and Article 226. and
227. Law on criminal code of Bosnia and Hercegovina, I f i l e,

INDICTMENT

AGAINST:

1. HUSEIN BOSNIĆ a.k.a. „Bilal“, the son of father Husnija and mother
Rasima, born Kanulić,

born on 09. 10. 1972 in Mrazovac Šišići

village, municipality Bužim JMBG 0910972111097, with residence
on the address of Brigovi bb, B&H citizen, married, father of seven
children, theologian by occupation, VSS, arrested on 03.09.2014 at
12:00hrs, is in detention according to the verdict of B&H Court no. S1
2 K014147 14 Kž of 04.12.2014.
Tužilaštvo-Tužiteljstvo Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo, Ul. Kraljice Jelene br. 88;
Тужилаштво Босне и Херцеговине,Сарајево, Ул. Краљице Јелене бр. 88;
Tel/Тел. ++ 387 33 707 222, 707 223; Fax: ++ 387 33 707 202

 Due to grounded suspicion that:

During 2013 and 2014, Husein Bosic, as a member of the so-called
Salafi Community in B&H which is organized in the territory of Bosnia and
Herzegovina - out of official institutions of the Islamic Community of B&H,
in several towns of the territory of B&H (such as the Community in Velika
Kladuša and Community in Gornja Maoč) - propagated for an expansion of
Islamic radicalism in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the region. From the
position of religious authority in that so-called Salafi Community, Husein
Bosnic consciously and publicly carried out activities which contain
elements of criminal offenses and public incitement on terrorist activities
from article 202a., recruitment for terrorist activities from Article 202b., and
organization of a terrorist group from article 202d. paragraph 2 of the
Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. As such, he publicly engaged on
meetings that gathered members of the so-called Salafi Community and
through Social Network such as YouTube, where his speeches are published
and addressed to the public youth. The videos contain a message with the
aim of inciting members of the so-called Salafi Community to become
members of the organized terrorist group ISIL in the so-called Islamic State
and, by joining ISIL (declared a terrorist organization by the UN), to take
part in activities that this terrorist organization ISIL implements. Husein
Bosnic addressing them (terrorists of ISIL) among others who are listening
the following public messages:

“Islam is execution of orders. Servitude to Allah, a.s. is a delight. There
are no men that did not hear about Mujahids. It is a pity that we are not
2

 with them, therefore we pray to Allah a.s. to make us feel like martyrs.”
(Published on 10.02.2013 in the YouTube social network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba:
Familiarity with brothers in Konjic)

„What makes the Lord of the servant, Allah, most happy is when his
servant like that, without vest flies into infidels and fights until he is
killed … I took the sabre, rolled up my sleeves, entered among the army
of infidels, killed and got killed“. (Published on 14.08.2013 in the YouTube
social network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Sleepy Bosnians“)

Killed and get killed – this is how the ones that helped this faith ended
up and who conveyed us this faith and which we should be proud with
until the judgment day. I pray to Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala da Bedr
and the lessons from Bedr and the fighting Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi
Wasallam may be our strategy and our manhaj so we know that it is an
ibadet of Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala…” (Published on 14.08.2013 in the
YouTube social network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Sleepy Bosnians“)

“Young men in their best age are fighting. Sarajevo brother ( Šabić
Muaz) fell as a sehid, and not as a coward. He sacrificed his life in
Allah’s path, since Islam mobilizes” (Published on 27.09.2013 in the YouTube
social network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Who was cursed by Allah)

“Fear Allah, a.s. truly, as he should be feared. Do not die any other way
but as a true Muslim. A true Muslim is the one who Allah is happy with.
Did you see these sehids (Martyr) that fell who say: ‘Lord, inform our
Messenger sallahu alejhi veseleme, Lord we are happy with you, be
happy with us, too.’ Do not die other way but as true Muslims” (Published
on 04.10.2013 in the YouTube social network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Iman
season, best days of the year“)
3

 “We always triumph brother. Believer never loses. What did those
Muslims that fell as sehids lose? Nothing! … Even the ones who are
joining now, brothers of some sehids. They have triumphed. We see
some signs only through their faces, let alone more than that with
Allah’s help” (Published on 09.03.2014 in YouTube social network titled “Bilal
Bosnić Hutba: Fitna)

“This is preparation for setting the Islam law in the whole world, and it
will start exactly from Sham (Syria). Best armies will gather there. The
best sehids will fall there” (Published on 09.03.2014 in YouTube social network
titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Fitna)

“What makes us most happy is that our brother died with his face toward
the infidels, speaking out the biggest words of truth, and that is that there
is no other God but Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala, and that Muhammed
Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam is Allah’s servant and messenger … I pray
Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala for us to take big ibret the example of this
brother of ours and pray that our death is in sehadet … let us die, with
our face toward the infidels. These are the sons that Bosnia needs; these
are the sons that the ummet (community) of Mohammed aleihi selam
needs….” (Published on 12.05.2014 in YouTube social network titled “Bilal
Bosnić Hutba: Bosnian sirkiet)

“We ask Allah a.s. to make us become the army for khilafet and to not
be ashamed of saying that. While others get mobilized to become
chetniks and tramps and drug addicts and that gay jamaat, we mobilize
that the army on Allah’s matabarek path can grow and that we don’t
4

 have to be ashamed to admit and say that publicly. We protect Islam
when Islam needs it and there is no other way but fight, then we are
lions. And when Islam can grow with diplomacy and dawaa, then we are
an example of behavior and patience” (Published on 01.06.2014 in YouTube
social network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: temptation, lessons and punishment)

“Deeds are valued upon their completion. If you act like a Muslim
everything will be calculated to you. If you act like an infidel, everything
will be cancelled. A man works for Islam, lives according to Islam, and
falls as a sehid. We pray Allah to make your death sehidic. And that it is
the best way of dying. The ones that died on Allah’s path are alive and
are rejoicing just now” (Published on 10.08.201 in YouTube social network titled
“Bilal Bosnić Hutba: media risk, media lies and deceits)

“Mujahids in Syria are the best sons of this community … they serve
Allah Tabarak Wa Taala and through that ibadet they want to reach the
highest level in heaven, and to leave order after them in the world, and
not disorder as some want” (Published on 06.09.2014 in YouTube social
network titled “Bilal Bosnić Hutba: War and shapes of war today)

As a result of this public incitement of Husein Bosnić, a bigger number of
members of the so-called Salafi Community in B&H left B&H and joined
the terrorist organizations of ISIL in Syria and Iraq (which are officially
declared as terrorist organizations and groups by the UN Security Council)
and with their participation in terrorist activities in Syria and Iraq they
carried out activities which contain elements of criminal offenses from
Article 201. paragraph 1. related to paragraph 5. point a) all related to
criminal offense of Article 202d. paragraph 2. CC of B&H. Following
citizens of B&H took part in public speeches of Husen Bosnić and died as
5

 members of the terrorist organization: Emrah Pilipović, Samir Begić, Amir
Crnjeković, Ismar Mešinović, Azmir Ališić, Muaz Šabić and others.
Meanwhile, others still take part in the activities of the terrorist organization
ISIL which they joined in Syria and Iraq. Their active membership presents
a risk for B&H by the fact that they get trained and ready for carrying out
terrorist activities even after their return to B&H.

THEREFORE:
Through public information means he officially addressed messages to the
public with the aim of inciting others to commit criminal offenses by getting
recruited for terrorist activities from Article 202b and Organization of
terrorist group from Article 202d, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of
Bosnia and Hercegovina

BY WHICH HE:
Committed the criminal offense of public incitement for terrorist activities
from Article 202a related to the criminal offenses of recruitment for terrorist
activities from Article 202b and organization of a terrorist group from
Article 202d, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Hercegovina.

I.
Investigation results:

6

 Investigation results have verified claims of the indictment that Husein
Bosnić has committed the criminal offense public incitement for terrorist
activities from Article 202a related to the criminal offenses of recruitment
for terrorist activities from Article 202b and organization of terrorist group
from Article 202d, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and
Hercegovina.
In fact, regarding the collected material documentation, the results of
Interrogations and analyzed published speeches of Bosnić, the expert
witness, Professor PhD. Vlado Azinović upon the order of B&H
Prosecution, verified that Husein Bosnić in his public speeches influences on
others to join terrorist organizations. Professor PhD. Vlado Azinović stated
clearly that Husein Bosnić in all his speeches directly produces or reinforces
the decision on the persons that hear him to join the battlefields of Syria and
Iraq. In his speeches, Bosnić obviously sets the idealistic model of being an
indisputable devoted believer with whom God (Allah) is only happy if he
ends his life by dying on God’s (Allah’s) path.

Furthermore, from the material documentation it is notable that a bigger
number of individuals who went to battlefields, out of which some died
meanwhile, regularly visited public hutbas of Bosnić and made photos with
him by even placing insignia of ISIL and the Islamic State in the premises
that Bosnić’s speeches would be held. Findings of telephones and
computers’ examinations taken from the individuals that were in battlefields
in Syria and Iraq, it is clear that they have contact with Husein Bosnić, and
recorded hutbas of Husein Bosnić are located in their computers. Statements
of the interrogated witness clearly note that B&H citizens who went to Syria
regularly listened to Bosnić’s hutbas and, according to testimonies of
witnesses, they were radicalized further by this. The consequence of this kind
of radicalization was that they went to Syria and Iraq to join on battlefields.
7

 Apart of the above-stated evidence collected, the financial investigation
resulted the notable fact that Husein Bosnić in the previous period received
high amounts of money from Arabian countries calculating at 200.000.00
US Dollars.

PROSECUTION OF BOSNIA AND HERCEGOVINA
PROSECU TOR
Dubarvko Čampara

8

 БОСНА И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНА

BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA

Tužilaštvo - Тužiteljstvo Bosne i Hercegovine
Тужилаштво Босне и Херцеговине

Broj: T20 0 KT 0007857 13
Sarajevo, 25.12.2014. godine

PRITVOR

SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
SARAJEVO
Sudiji za prethodno saslušanje
Na osnovu člana 35. stav 1. i 2. tačke i) te člana 226. i 227. Zakona
o krivičnom postupku Bosne i Hercegovine, p o d i ž e m,
OPTUŽNICU

PROTIV:
1. HUSEIN BOSNIĆ zv. „Bilal“ sin Husnije i majke Rasime rođene
Kanulić, rođen 09. 10. 1972.godine u mjestu Mrazovac zaseok Šišići,
opština Bužim JMBG 0910972111097, nastanjen na adresi Brigovi
bb, državljanin BiH, oženjen, otac sedamnaestoro djece, po zanimanju
teolog, VSS, lišen slobode dana 03.09.2014. godine u 12,00 sati,
nalazi se u pritvoru po rješenju Suda BiH br. S1 2 K014147 14 Kž od
04.12.2014.godine.

Tužilaštvo-Tužiteljstvo Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo, Ul. Kraljice Jelene br. 88;
Тужилаштво Босне и Херцеговине,Сарајево, Ул. Краљице Јелене бр. 88;
Tel/Тел. ++ 387 33 707 222, 707 223; Fax: ++ 387 33 707 202

 Zbog postojanja osnovane sumnje da je:

Tokom 2013. i 2014. godine, kao pripadnik tzv. selefijske zajednice
u BiH organizovane na području Bosne i Hercegovine, van zvaničnih
institucija Islamske zajednice Bosne i Hercegovine, u nekoliko gradova
na području Bosne i Hercegovine kao što su Zajednica u Velikoj
Kladuši i Zajednica u Gornjoj Maoči radi propagiranja i širenja
Islamskog radikalizma u Bosni i Hercegovini i regionu, svjesno, sa
pozicije vjerskog autoriteta u toj tzv. selefijskoj zajednici, javno vršio
radnje koje imaju obilježja krivičnih djela Javno podsticanje na
terorističke aktivnosti 202a., Vrbovanje radi terorističkih aktivnosti iz
člana 202b., i Organiziranja terorističke grupe iz člana 202d. stav 2.
Krivičnog zakona Bosne i Hercegovine, pa je tako javno na skupovima
na kojima je okupljao pripadnike selefijske zajednice kao i putem
društvene mreže You tube održavao, objavljivao svoje govore i
upućivao u istim javne poruke s ciljem podsticanja pirpadnika tzv.
Selefijske zajednice da postanu pripadnici organizovane terorističke
grupe ISIL u tzv. Islamskoj državi i kao pripadnici te grupe učestvuju
u aktivnostima koje organizuje ta teroristička organizacija ISIL (koja je
od strane UN proglašena terorističkom organizacijom) upućujući im
između ostalog javno slijedeće poruke:
“Islam je izvršavanje naredbi. Robovanje Allahu dž.š. je slast. Nema
čovjeka koji nije čuo za mudžahide. Žalosno je samo što mi nisamo sa
njima, pa molimo Allaha dž.š. da nas proživi kao šehidima” (Objavljeno
dana 10.02.2013.godine na društvenoj mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić
Hutba: Druženje s braćom u Konjicu)
2

 „Ono što najviše razveseli Gospodara robova, Allaha, je kada njegov rob
onako, bez pancira uleti medju nevjernike i bori se dok ne bude ubijen…
Uzeo samo sablju, zavrnuo rukave, ušao među nevjerničku vojsku ubijao
i bio ubijen.“ (Objavljeno dana 14.08.2013.godine na društvenoj mreži Youtube
pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:uspavani Bošnjaci“)

Ubiti i biti ubijen – tako završavaju oni koji su pomogli ovu vjeru i koji
su nam prenijeli ovu vjeru i s kojom vjerom se mi trebamo ponositi do
sudnjeg dana. Molim Allaha Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala da Bedr i pouke s
Bedra i ratovanje Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam bude naša
strategija i bude naš menhedž da znamo da je to ibadet Allaha
Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala…” (Objavljeno dana 14.08.2013.godine na društvenoj
mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:uspavani Bošnjaci“)

“Mladići u najboljim godinama se bore . Brat Sarajlija( Šabić Muaz) pao
kao šehid, a ne kao kukavica. Žrtvovao je svoj život na Allahovom putu
jer islam mobiliše” (Objavljeno dana 27.09.2013.godine na društvenoj mreži
Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:Koga je Allah prokleo)

“Bojte se Allaha dž.š. istinski, kako se treba bojati. Nemojte da umrete
osim kao pravi muslimani. Pravi musliman je onaj s kojim je Allah
zadovoljan. Vidite ove šehide kada su pali koji kažu: ‘Gospodaru,
obavijesti našeg Poslanika sallahu alejhi veseleme, Gospodaru mi smo
zadovoljni s tobom, budi i ti zadovoljan s nama.’ Nemojte umrijeti osim
kao pravi muslimani” (Objavljeno dana 04.10.2013.godine na društvenoj mreži
Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:Imanska sezona najbolji dani u godini“)

“Mi braćo uvijek trijumfujemo. Nikad vjernik ne gubi. Šta su izgubili
onimuslimani koji su pali kao šehidi? Ništa! … I ovo sad što se dešava,
braća neka šehidila. Oni su trijumfovali. Mi neke išarete samo s njihovih
3

 lica vidimo, a kamo li više od toga uz Allahovu pomoć” (Objavljeno dana
09.03.2014.godine na društvenoj mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:
Fitna)

“Ovo je priprema za uspostavljanje islamskog zakona na čitavom
dunjaluku, a počet će upravo iz Šama. Tamo će se sakupiti najbolje
vojske. Tamo će pasti najbolji šehidi” (Objavljeno dana 09.03.2014.godine na
društvenoj mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Fitna)

“Ono što nas posebno raduje da je naš brat poginuo okrenutog lica
prema nevjernicima, izgovarajući najveće riječi istine, a to je da nema
drugog boga do Allaha Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala, a da je Muhammed
Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam Allahov rob i poslanik… Molim Allaha
Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala da mi iz ovoga primjera našega brata uzmemo
veliki ibret i da molimo da i naša smrt bude na šehadetu… da poginemo,
a licem prema nevjernicima okrenuti. Takvi sinovi trebaju Bosni, takvi
sinovi trebaju ummetu Muhameda aleihi selama….” (Objavljeno dana
12.05.2014.godine na društvenoj mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:
Bosanski širkijet)

“Molimo Alaha dž.š. da budemo vojska za hilafet i da se ne stidimo da
to kažemo. Dok se drugi mobilišu da četnici budu, i da klošari budu i da
drogeraši budu, i da gej džemat budu, mi se mobilišemo da vojska na
Allahu matabarek putu budemo i ne stidimo se da to javno priznamo i
kažemo. Mi zagovaramo islam, pa kad treba islam i ne može drugačije
nego borbom, onda smo mi lavovi, a kad islam može diplomatijom i
dawom onda smo mi primjer ponašanja i sabura” (Objavljeno dana
01.06.2014.godine na društvenoj mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:
iskušenje,ibreti i kazne)

4

 “Djela se cijene po završetku. Ako skončaš k’o musliman sve će ti se
uračunati. Ako skončaš kao nevjernik, sve će ti se poništiti. Čovjek radi
za islam, živi po islamu i padne kao šehid. Mi molimo Alaha da nam
smrt bude šehidska. I to je najbolji način umiranja. Oni koji su poginuli
na Allahovom putu su živi i tek se sada raduju” (Objavljeno dana
10.08.2014.godine na društvenoj mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba:
opasnost medija, medijske laži i obmane)

“Mudžahidi u Siriji su “najbolji sinovi ovoga ummeta … oni robuju
AllahuTabarak Wa Taala i žele preko tog ibadeta da se dočepaju
najvećeg stepena u dženetu, a na dunjaluku da ostene red iza njih, a ne
nered kako to drugi žele” (Objavljeno dana 06.09.2014.godine na društvenoj
mreži Youtube pod naslovom“ Bilal Bosnić Hutba: Rat i oblici rata danas),

pa je nakon ovakvog javnog podsticanja Huseina Bosnića, veći broj
pripadnika tzv. Selefijske zajednice u BH – državljana BiH napustio
BiH te se priključio terorističkim organizacijama ISIL-a u Siriji i Iraku
koje su od strane Vijeća Sigurnosti UN-a proglašena kao terorističke
organizacije i grupe, te su učestvovanjem u terorističkim aktivnostima u
Siriji i Iraku izvršili radnje koje imaju obilježja krivičnih djela iz člana
201. stav 1. u vezi sa stavom 5. tačka a) sve u vezi sa krivičnim djelom iz
člana 202d. stav 2. KZ-a BiH te su državljani BH: Emrah Pilipović,
Samir Begić, Amir Crnjeković, Ismar Mešinović, Azmir Ališić, Muaz
Šabić i dr. koji su prisustvovali javnim predavanjima Husena Bosnića
kao pripadnici terorističke organizacije poginuli dok ostali i dalje
učestvuju u aktivnostima terorističke organizacije kojoj su pristupili i
tako predstavljaju opasnost za BiH na način da se obučavaju i
pripremaju i za provođenje terorističkih radnji i po povratku u BiH.

5

 DAKLE:
Javno putem sredstava informisanja upućivao poruke javnosti s ciljem
podsticanja drugih na izvršenje krivičnih djela Vrbovanje radi terorističkih
aktivnosti iz člana 202b. i Organiziranje terorističke grupe iz člana 202d.
stav 2. Krivičnog Zakona Bosne i Hercegovine
ČIME JE:
Počinio krivično djelo Javno podsticanje na terorističke aktivnosti iz
člana 202a. u vezi sa krivičnim djelima Vrbovanje radi terorističkih
aktivnosti iz člana 202b. i Organiziranje terorističke grupe iz člana
202d. stav 2. Krivičnog Zakona Bosne i Hercegovine.

TUŽILAŠTVO BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
TUŽILAC
Dubarvko Čampara

6

 PPK KR.no.464/2014
BASIC COURT IN PRISHTINË – Serious Crimes Department, pre-trial judge Vehbi
Kashtanjeva, with legal secretary Kimete Mehmeti, regarding the request of the Special
Prosecution of the Republic of Kosovo, PPS.NO.123/2014, of date 17.09.2014, for setting the
detention measure against the defendants: Bedri Robaj, due to grounded suspicion of having
committed criminal offense, recruitment for terrorism from the Article 130 of the CCRK and
the criminal offense- incitement for carrying out terrorist actions, from the Article 147 of
CCRK, the defendant Idriz Bilibani, due to grounded suspicion of having committed criminal
offense, recruitment for terrorism from the Article 130 of the CCRK and the criminal offense
- incitement of hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of
CCRK, and the criminal offense recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK, the
defendant Mazllam Mazllami, due to grounded suspicion of having committed criminal
offense - incitement for carrying out terrorist actions from the Article 141 of CCRK, the
defendant Alban Malsiu, due to grounded suspicion of having committed criminal offense incitement for carrying out terrorist actions from the Article 141 of CCRK, the defendant
Dardan Gjuka, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offense of
organization and participation in terrorist groups, from the Article 143 par.2 of CCRK, the
defendant Eroll Nesimi, due to grounded suspicion of having committed criminal offense incitement for carrying out terrorist actions from the Article 141 of CCRK, Leonard Ruli, due
to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offense of recruitment for terrorism,
from the Article 139 of CCRK, the defendant Sabahudin Selimi - due to grounded suspicion
of having committed the criminal offense of incitement of hatred, division, religious, racial or
ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK, the defendant Trim Ademi, due to
grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offense of recruitment for terrorism,
from the Article 139 of CCRK, deciding according to remarks of the Court of Appeal given
in the verdict PN1.no.1903/2014 of date 01.10.2014, after holding the hearing session on date
16.10.204, made this:
VERDICT
Against the defendants:
1. BEDRI ROBAJ, the son of father Hajrullah and mother Hasime, born on 07.04.1980
in Malishevë, Astrazup village of Malishevë, with personal no. 1016151790, with
residence in Astrazup village of Malishevë, has completed secondary education and
the Open American University, married, father of two children, of the medium
economic state, earlier worked as an imam, convicted earlier, Albanian, resident of the
Republic of Kosovo, is under detention, from the date 17.09.2014, at 06:08h.
2. MAZLLAM MAZLLAMI, the son of father Nasuf and mother Nurije, born on
01.05.1958 in Zapluxhë of Prizren, Prizren, with personal no. 1002841068, with
residence in “Selajdin Berisha” str. no. 4/B of Prizren, Albanian, has completed
theology faculty in Cairo, imam of Jeni Mahalla mosque in Prizren, married, father of
five children, of the medium economic state, not convicted earlier, no other

 procedures are being carried out against him for other criminal offences, resident of
the Republic of Kosovo, also resident of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, is
under detention, from the date 17.09.2014, at 06:20h.
3. FUAD RAMIQI, the son of father Xhavit and mother Rafete, born on 26.03.1960 in
Pozheran village Viti, with personal no. 1019698625, with residence in “Hamëz
Jashari” str. 16/26 – Prishtinë, Albanian, has completed faculty of defense in Sarejevo,
of the medium economic state, Secretary of Islamic Movement “Bashkohu”, married,
father of two children, convicted earlier, resident of the Republic of Kosovo, also
resident of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, is under detention, from the date
17.09.2014, at 07:40h.
4. EROLL NESIMI, the son of father Abdulhalim and mother Kumrije, born on
20.02.1981 in Mitrovicë, with personal no. 1003968574, with residence in “Agim
Hajrizi” str. 6/33 – Mitrovicë, Albanian, has completed theology faculty, married,
father of three children, works as an imam in Fidanishte mosque in Mitrovicë, of the
medium economic state, not convicted earlier, Albanian, resident of the Republic of
Kosovo, is under detention, from the date 17.09.2014, at 07:10h.
5. LEONARD RULI, the son of father Riza and mother Taibe, born on 27.09.1979 in
Prizren, “Musa Sheherzade” str. in Prizren, with personal no. 2016280057, Albanian,
has completed Islamic jurisprudence in Jordan, married, father of two children, of the
medium economic state, imam in Ebuhanite mosque in Dardania quarter of Prizren,
not convicted earlier, resident of the Republic of Kosovo, is under detention, from the
date 17.09.2014, at 06:05h.
6. SEBAHUDIN SELIMI, the son of father Musa and mother Sahide, born on
06.10.1981 in Smirë village, Viti, with personal no. 1012628958, Albanian, has
completed theology faculty in Medina, imam in Drobesh village, Viti municipality,
married, father of two children, of the medium economic state, not convicted earlier,
resident of the Republic of Kosovo, is under detention, from the date 17.09.2014, at
07:20h.
7. TRIM ADEMI, the son of father Nysret and mother Teuta, born on 10.04.1987 in
Prishtinë, “Lakrishte” quarter, Bill Clinton str. Entr. 5, floor 13 no.52, in Prishtinë,
with personal no. 1170869156, has completed faculty of economy in Prishtinë, works
as a director in ISC-SHPK, not married, of the medium economic state, not convicted
earlier, Albanian, resident of the Republic of Kosovo, is under detention, from the
date 17.09.2014, at 06:05h.
Against the defendants:
DETENTION IS SET
Against the defendants: Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi,
Leonard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi, and Trim Ademi, at the duration of 1 (one) month,
starting from 17.09.2014 until 17.10.2014.

 While, against the defendants:
1. IDRIZ BILIBANI, the son of father Elez and mother Mala, born on 11.11.1981 in
Prizren, Lubinje e Poshtme village of Prizren, with personal no. 1007270590, with
residence in “Aleks Budaj” str. n.n. Prizren, , has completed secondary education and
the Open American University, married, father of two children, of the medium
economic state, deals with translation of books from Arabic into Bosnian, not
convicted earlier, Bosniak, resident of the Republic of Kosovo, is under detention,
from the date 17.09.2014, at 06:05h.
2. ALBAN MALSIU, the son of father Sami and mother Imrije, born on 25.05.1987 in
Prishtinë, with residence in Ferizaj at Nezair Neziri str. n.n., with personal no.
K00236036, undergraduate at the faculty of economy, married, father of two children,
of the poor economic state, owner of religious bookshop in Ferizaj, not convicted
earlier, Albanian, resident of the Republic of Kosovo, is under detention, from the
date 17.09.2014, at 09:00h.
3. DARDAN GJUKA, the son of father Enver and mother Fatmire, born on 14.08.1987
in Pejë, in Pejë, with residence at “Ahmet Gjikolli” str. No.15, Pejë, has completed
secondary education, not married, of the poor economic state, unemployed, earlier
worked at Telenet company in Pejë, not convicted earlier, legal procedures are being
carried out against him for two other offenses, no notes that he was tried, Albanian,
resident of the Republic of Kosovo, is under detention, from the date 17.09.2014, at
06:00h.
The Court orders the measure of:
HOUSE ARREST
At the duration of 1 (one) month, in order that, according to this verdict, the house arrest
measure is calculated from 17.09.2014 until 17.10.2014
II. The defendants Alban Musliu, Idriz Bilibani, and Dardan Gjuka with the abovementioned
addresses are obliged to stay in their houses and they are not allowed by any means to leave
the premises of their residence without court’s permit.
III. Police stations in Ferizaj, Prizren and Pejë are obliged to verify implementation of these
measures and in case of their non-respect to inform the pre-trial judge of this Court.
IV. The Court can set detention in case that defendants violate the verdict without permit.
There is grounded suspicion that the defendants have committed the criminal offenses: Bedri
Robaj, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offense of recruitment
for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK and the criminal offense of incitement for
carrying out terrorist actions, from the Article 147 of CCRK; the defendant Idriz Bilibani,
due to grounded suspicion of having committed criminal offense - incitement of hatred,
division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK, and the

 criminal offense recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK; the defendant
Mazllam Mazllami, due to grounded suspicion of having committed criminal offense incitement for carrying out terrorist actions from the Article 141 of CCRK; the defendant
Fuad Ramiqi, there is grounded suspicion that he has committed the criminal offense of call
for resistance from Article 411 of the CCRK; the defendant Alban Malsiu, due to grounded
suspicion of having committed criminal offense - incitement for carrying out terrorist actions
from the Article 141 of CCRK; the defendant Dardan Gjuka, due to grounded suspicion of
having committed the criminal offense of organization and participation in terrorist groups,
from the Article 143 par.2 of CCRK; the defendant Eroll Nesimi, due to grounded suspicion
of having committed criminal offense - incitement for carrying out terrorist actions from the
Article 141 of CCRK; Leonard Ruli, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the
criminal offense of recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK; the defendant,
Sabahudin Selimi, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offense of
incitement of hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of
CCRK; the defendant Trim Ademi, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the
criminal offense of recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK.
Justification
Special Prosecution of the Republic of Kosovo has requested setting of the detention against
the defendants: Bedri Robaj, Idriz Bilibani, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Alban Malsiu,
Dardan Gjuka, Eroll Nesimi, Leonard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi, and Trim Ademi, PPS.no.
123/2014, of date 17.09.2014, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the abovementioned criminal offenses.
With the verdict of 19.09.2014, the pre-trial judge has set detention measure to the abovementioned defendants at the duration of one month, from 17.09.2014 to 17.10.2014.
With the verdict PN1,no.1903/2014 of date 01.10.2014, the Court of Appeal has approved
requests of defendants and their defenders, and it has annulled the decision of pre-trial judge
and has return their case to reclaim. Because their incriminatory actions of the defendants
have not resulted clearly the grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offenses
and the evidence that verify the grounded suspicion have not been described they proposed
that the in the reclaim the first instance Court should request from the case prosecutor to
argument or verify evidence that support the grounded suspicion that the defendants have
committed the criminal offenses they are suspected for. Furthermore, they have proposed that
the Court request from the prosecutor to argument or verify the evidence that support the
grounded suspicion that the defendants have committed the criminal offenses. With
prescription, the Court has requested from the Prosecutor to submit all the evidence that
argument the grounded suspicion, in order for the Court with the prescription of date
10.10.2014, which has been submitted to the Court on 13.10.2014, has presented the evidence
regarding the grounded suspicion that the defendants have committed the above-mentioned
criminal offenses.

 Special Prosecutor of the Republic of Kosovo states that as far as the criminal offense of
recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK is concerned, for the defendant
Bedri Robaj is suspected, while searching his house were found “lists” with names of
members that are evidenced in “Syri i Jetës” Association, which has operated in his office
with first and last names, such as the names of the persons Leutrim Krasniqi and Rexhep
Morina were found there, who were killed in the Syrian war. In these lists there is also
mentioned the amount of money that is suspected and believed that these persons have
allocated to families of the persons that have gone to war in Syria, while names on these lists
also include Besnik Hasani, who is in Syria, and it is described that this person has 7 family
members. As far the other criminal offense, for which the grounded suspicion exists that the
defendant has committed, incitement for terrorist criminal actions from the Article 147 of
CCRK, the evidence that support the grounded suspicion and secret measures and electronic
transcript that the defendant Bedri Robaj has incited other persons to commit terrorist
criminal offenses, among them are Pajtim Olluri, killed in Syria, Naman Demolli and Rexhep
Morina. Evidences and a laptop, CD, were collected during his house search, which have
been sent for examination and they are expected to be examined.
As far as the defendant Idriz Bilibani is concerned, there is grounded suspicion that he has
committed the criminal offenses incitement or hatred from Article 147 and recruitment for
terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK, the defendant published his speeches in YouTube,
in order for anyone to follow the same and with this his incriminatory actions have been
prescribed in the request of 10.10.2014, as far as the other criminal offense is concerned that
the defendant Idriz Bilibani has committed, while giving his statement to the police, the same
has admitted that parent of the person – Qendrim Kovaqi, who went to Syria, has blamed the
defendant of having influenced with his speeches to make him go to Syrian War.
As far as the third defendant Mazllam Mazllami is concerned, the Prosecution has also
extended the investigations as based on the evidence that we have taken afterwards to the
same one, there is grounded suspicion that he has committed the criminal offenses of
incitement for terrorism from Article 141 and the criminal offense of incitement of hatred,
division, religious intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK, incriminatory actions as far
the first offense are concerned have been described in the prescription of 10.10.2014, in the
case of completing the evidence we concretely present the statement of Yll Krasniqi, who
said that he has held religious courses in which the current defendants Idriz Bilibani, Idriz
Bilibani and Ebu Beker Ruli gave their speeches. On this occasion, when the when the
witness was asked if the imam Mazllam Mazllami preached about conflict in Syria, stated
that the Imam has said that the ones who are in the conflict circle should take part in the
conflict, and if they cannot win than the circle extends to give them full support. As far the
criminal offense that the defendant is suspected of is concerned, incitement of hatred, during
the preaches in the mosque that the defendant serves has incited hatred against the LGBT
group, who members live also in Kosovo, so in the Hytba, as it is also written in the verdict
of investigations, for which evidence there is also a CD, the same one was seized equipment
that were sent for examination in relation to this case.

 As far as the defendant Fuad Ramiqi is concerned, he is suspected of having committed the
criminal offense of call for resistance from the Article 411 par.1 of CCRK, which have been
described in the prescription of 10.10.2014 and adds that we have a CD that we support the
grounded suspicion that the defendant has committed this criminal offense are the calls for
resistance that the defendant has made publicly through the media – KTV.
As far as the defendant Alban Malsiu is concerned, apart of the ones that were mentioned in
the prescription of 10.10.2014, I have nothing to add, so the evidence that support the
grounded suspicion that Alban Malsiu has committed the criminal offense from the Article
141 of CCRK. As far as this criminal offense is concerned, there is grounded suspicion that
the defendant with the person, Visar Qukovqi, has held speeches for which the prosecution
does not have evidence as when and where they were held, while regarding the criminal
offense of recruitment for terrorism from Article 139 of the CCRK, for this defendant the
prosecution has his statement where he admitted that his family members have accused Alban
Malsiu of having influenced with his preaches on the late Hetem Dema, killed in Syria, to go
there.
As far as the defendant Dardan Gjuka is concerned, his incriminatory actions have been
described in the verdict of investigations and in the prescription of 10.10.2014, there is
grounded suspicion that he has committed the criminal offense 143 par.2. The same person
admitted that in 2013 he had gone to join the war in Syria, but he denied to have joined to
those groups that asked from them to take oath “there is no turning back, war until death.”
As far as the defendant Eroll Nesimi is concerned, he is suspected of criminal offenses
recruitment for terrorism from the Article 141 of the CCRK. There is grounded suspicion that
the defendant Eroll Nesimi has committed the criminal offense incitement to terrorism, why
the prosecution does not possess evidence to prove the grounded suspicion that Eroll Nisni
has committee the criminal offense recruitment for terrorism Article 139 of CCRK. The
defendant with his preaches in the mosque where he is an Imam has influenced on the
“audience” and the persons that heard his preaching. This offense was committed
continuously until he was arrested, having in mind that these recordings were published in
YouTube. So, the incriminatory actions have been described in the prescription of
10.10.2014.
As far as the defendant Leonard Ruli is concerned, he is suspected of criminal offenses
recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK and incitement to terrorism Article
141 of CCRK. Regarding the criminal offense of recruitment for terrorism, the prosecution
does not possess evidence by which it would verify the grounded suspicion that he has
committed the criminal offense of incitement to commit the criminal offense of terrorism
from the Article 141 of CCRK. The defendant has held speeches in NGO “Sinqeriteti”. This
is also proved by the witnesses, Yll Krasniqi and Dardan Veseli, who attended his speeches,
and he influenced with the same speeches on different persons to join the terrorist groups in
Albania. As far as the time of the criminal offense is concerned, the same offense has been
committed continuously until the moment of his arrest, having in mind that his speeches were

 posted in social networks and everyone now can have access to them and it can be influenced
on them.
As far as the defendant Sabahudin Selimi is concerned, after analyzing all the evidence the
SPRK concludes that there is no grounded suspicion that the defendant has committed the
criminal offense recruitment for terrorism Article 139 of the CCRK. As far as the criminal
action incitement of hatred from the Article 147 of CCRK is concerned, incriminatory actions
have been described in prescription of 10.10.2014, while a CD will also be attached to this
evidence.
As far as the defendant Trim Ademi is concerned, there is suspicion of criminal offense of
recruitment for terrorism, Article 139 of CCRK, as it is suspected that the same has also acted
in cooperation with the defendant Bedri Robaj by collecting funds on behalf of assistance in
Syria, while they are suspected of having using these funds, the exact amount of funds is not
known, for financing the expenses of people that went to Syria. The list of this Association’s
members was found in the house of the defendant Bedri Robaj.
1. The defendant Bedri Robaj regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states that he objects the request for setting the detention measure, as „I have not committed
the criminal offenses that I am suspected for the criminal offense of recruitment for terrorism.
I have not collected funds, but the list with different that was found in my house is with the
names of needy families in the municipality of Malishevë and it is related to the time period
2008-2009. These funds were by no means collected for the persons that went to Syria. As far
the other criminal offense that I am suspected for is concerned, it is not true that on the Friday
prayer (Jumu'ah) I have said the words that have been described on the SPRK’s prescription
of 10.10.2014.“
2. Defender of the defendant Bedri Robaj, av. Avdullah Robaj regarding the SPP request for
setting the detention measure states: „I consider that discrimination happened in this criminal
case, as the case prosecutor, few days after setting the detention measure to three defendants
has asked for quitting the detention measure to three defendants who were suspected for
almost the same criminal offenses. I consider that the provisions of the Constitution have
been violated, the Article 3 par. 2 equality before law has not been respected, Article 21 par
1. Basic human rights and freedoms, than the Article 38 and 39 in particular, where the
freedom of religion and faith is guaranteed and Article 39 on religious confessions. As far as
the additional evidence that the Prosecution refers to regarding my client, I have briefly and
imprecisely gone through that by not describing the relevant facts and incriminatory actions,
same as the evidence that support the grounded suspicion. SPRK bases its grounded
suspicion on SMS’s; however, there no arguments or words for incriminatory actions of my
client in these SMS’s.
My client has established a humanitarian association, which is not in contradiction with the
legal provisions. I also consider that in actions of my clients are not manifested elements of
the criminal offense of which he is suspected and in this case the Prosecution has violated
Article 1 of CCRK, which anticipates the limits of the criminal offense, in the concrete case

 as far as my client is concerned, the determination of the criminal offense was not done
which is in contradiction with Article 2 par.3 of the CCRK. With article 7,8 and 10 of the
CCRK related to the criminal offense, the manner of committing the criminal offense and the
place of committing the criminal offense, which has not been set by the prosecutor and
argued with additional evidence. In the concrete case, I consider that the Article 9 of CPHR
(Convention for the Protection of the Human Rights) has been violated. Due to these reasons,
there are no grounded suspicions that my client is charged with the offenses spoken about.
The conditions for setting the detention measure have not been met, as the Court of Appeal
also accepts this and it has annulled the verdict. I also strongly oppose this verdict and the
proposal for setting the detention measure falls under the base of Article 187. Par 1 sub-par.
1.1 and 1.2, which has also been mentioned in the Court of Appeal’s verdict. I propose that
the request for setting the detention to be refused, eventually to set the measure for appearing
in the police station.“
2. The defendant Idriz Bilibani regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states: „I object the request for setting of the detention measure, as I have not done the
incriminatory actions as they were described in the verdict for starting the investigations, as
in the additional prescription of 10.10.2014. I have by any means influenced on the person,
Qëndrim Kovaqi, to go to Syrian war. At the same time, I have done my preaching before a
year and a half when Qëndrim was there and heard them, so in that time the terrorist
organization “ISIS” still was not formed. It is not true that his father has accused me of
having influenced on his son to go to Syria, but he only asked me where his son was. Before
that, he was also asked in other organizations for his son. I consider that as far as the other
offense that I am charged with, the terms “Tekvirët and Tabutët” are also mentioned in the
Qur’an and hadiths of the Messenger, a.s. Due to these reasons, I consider that committing of
these criminal offenses do not exist in my actions.“
Defender of the defendant Idriz Bilibani, a.v. Hajrip Krasniqi: „We oppose the SPP request
for setting the detention measure by the SPP for my client as the request is illegal. Certainly,
the potential suspicions by which it is claimed that my client with his actions has caused, I
believed that the conditions have been met by Article 165 of KCC for setting detention and in
addition to the suspicion of having committed the criminal offense that my clients is
suspected for, the Article 147 and 139 of CCRK for the actions of my client, the date and the
place of action is not set, same as concrete incriminatory actions sanctioned by the CCRK. I
illustrate the provision of Article 147 that incitement of division and religious, ethnic
intolerance is not determined in the Republic of Kosovo in groups and persons with residence
in Republic of Kosovo. Therefore, my client with his religious preaching, title and
occupation, has given speeches in line with all the allowed legal norms in harmony with the
holy book Qur’an, and to whom the judge prescribes speeches held by the defendant Idizi in
the mosque of “Saraqanës” and in other mosques of Prizren, where the same one is engage
from imam colleagues of these mosques, while there is no word of hatred or other elements
described in this offense. The prosecutor’s claim that the defendant in his statement made a
self-accusation is not supported with the statement of Qëndrim Kovaqi’s parent, and no
statement of the person. As far as his speeches are concerned, he takes example and preaches

 from the holy books and different religious scholars where the persons that have abandoned
the faith or persons that do not believe in one God, Allah. His religious mission is to preach
trust in God. This is not illegal or sanctioned as a criminal offense that he is suspected for. As
far as the recruitment is concerned, theory and practice recognizes recruitment in the physical
preparation sense and knowledge for a human mission. In the actions of the defendant, there
are no speeches that the same, in the psychological sense, has eventually convinced persons
that have left Kosovo to take part with their actions in world conflicts. In this sense, I believe
that the pre-trial judge, lacking evidence prescribed by the SPRK and in the prescription of
10 October 2014, to release the defendant from this detention measure setting, and I request
that potential request for setting the detention measure to be refused. However, to be at the
citizens’ accountability, my client promises to the Court that will come forward to the court
and prosecution at any time, and eventually to be given the measure of appearing at the police
station, for the fact that he has a wife with two children, and his family is in danger in his
absence.“
3. The defendant Mazllam Mazllami regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention
measure states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure. I am in detention for
almost a month and I am entirely innocent, as I have not committed the criminal offenses that
I am suspected for. There is no evidence that I have committed the criminal offense,
incitement for committing the criminal offenses from Article 141 of the CCRK, since by no
means have I carried out the incriminatory actions as described in the prosecutor’s
prescription of 10.10.2014. At the same time, the prosecution has extended investigations
against me also for the criminal offense of incitement of hatred. I have never so far taken any
action toward this criminal offense. At the contrary, I am tolerant toward the minorities, as I
support the same. Nobody has been influenced by my preaching, as I have never incited
anybody or influenced anybody during my preaching to cause inter-national religious or
racial divisions.“
Defender of the defendant Mazllam Mazllami, a.v. Muhamet Humolli regarding the request
of SPP for setting the detention measure says: „I support the statement of my client in its
integrity and I underline that the imam of Prizren mosque is a scientist of religion for over 30
years, and he has dedicated his life to faith, humanism. He is an authoritative person in
Prizren, as well as in other municipalities. I object the SPP request for setting the detention
measure, as there is no such evidence that supported the grounded suspicion to request
detention measure. The prosecution only paraphrases the provision of Article 164 and the
basis for setting the detention measure; however, it does not verify it with any evidence why
my client would flee if he would be in freedom. His address is known. He has a house in
Prizren. He is imam in a mosque. If he considers himself innocent, even less in the case notes
there is no evidence that the same has committed criminal offences that he is charged with.
He has no interest to flee. There is no stand behind the conclusion that if he would be in
freedom than he would influence on witnesses. Which witnesses are we talking about? He
has thousands of witnesses to whom he preaches. It is not clear who are the witnesses spoken
about. Therefore, the conclusions that he would influence on witnesses and avoid the
procedure for having committed the criminal offences do not stand. He is doubted that in

 interaction, and then each individually with Enes Goga, Enis Rama, and Ekrem Avdiu. These
defendants mentioned have been quit the detention measure. What happened to the evidence
related to the three other defendants, and why shouldn’t my client be released. From this,
there is grounded suspicion that my client has not committed the criminal offences he is
suspected for, and I propose that the request for setting detention measure to be refused and
my client to be defended in freedom. However, in case the court proposes to set the measure
of appearing in the police station to my client, than my client promises that he will respond to
requests of the prosecution and court at any time.“
4. The defendant Fuad Ramiqi regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure. I have not committed the
criminal offence that I am suspected for, as I have not called for resistance against justice
bodies and no one else. Because I am the leader of a legitimate political entity registered in
regular manner, called “LISBA”, I have the right to express my opinion freely, a right which
is also guaranteed with the Constitution. The word, call for resistance, hasn’t been used in my
presentation by any means. But, the Prosecution misrepresented my statement and it was
drawn out of the context. I have never called for resistance and will not do so in the future,
either.“
Defender of the defendant Fuad Ramiqi, a.v. Skender Musa regarding the request of SPP for
setting the detention measure says: „I object the request for setting the detention measure and
I support the statement of my client in its integrity. Based on the verdict of the Court of
Appeal, as it has obliged the Basic Court in Prishtinë to seek from the Prosecution to
complement the evidence; however, we received only a note from the SPRK which
demonstrates that no new evidence was complemented. It is utterly this note received from
the SPRK which demonstrates best that the grounded suspicion that Fuad Ramiqi has
committed criminal offence cannot be verified by reading a quote of the prosecutor’s note:
“However, wild dictatorships have proved that something might happen, and this is
resemblance of a country with dictatorship,” which means that the Prosecution itself has not
emphasized that my client has called for resistance, but he has only accused governmental
institutions which have acted similar to dictatorships, taking into account that my client is the
leader of an opposition political party. This cannot be considered called for resistance, but
opposition making and objection of the government policy which is similarly done by AAK
leader when he insults the minister, or the other opposition party when it calls the
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo a branch of PDK, or when the other political
bloc accuses the Government. These are all statements which are way harsher than the
statement of my client. In order for this criminal offence to exist, there should be a certain
object of who was addressed to for resistance, which we do not have in this case, and if the
entire statement from KTV was taken that was in Index online the next day. He said that we
will not remain idle and will defend our party. According to par.1, three year sentenced have
been envisaged for this offence. I consider that there are no special conditions for setting
detention. Since he will not be leaving Kosovo, he will not be able to change the offences, as
his statement was given to KTV. Due to these reasons, I propose that detention measure is

 acquitted to my client and I propose that the same is defended in freedom, as his father is sick
and he is alone in his house, without other family members.“
5. The defendant Alban Malsiu regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure, as I have not committed the
criminal offences that I am suspected for. It is not true that I have ever collected funds or
materials in any way, although the prosecution neither has evidence to verify the time or the
place and the manner of their collection. It is not true that I have interacted with the late
Hetem Dema, killed in Syria, since I knew him because of the fact that my father was a cofighter with him in the KLA war. I also do not know the person with the name Visar
Qukovci. I also have never held religious speeches, as I am not an imam or head-imam. I am
not competent to do so. I also have never been a member of an organization, such as
“Shkëlqimi” was mentioned.“
Defender of the defendant Alban Malsiu, a.v. Bekim Sylejmani regarding the request of SPP
for setting the detention measure says: „I object the SPP request for setting the detention
measure in its integrity. It is not grounded, as my client has not committed the criminal
offences he is suspected for. In his statement, my client has also pleaded guilty and he has not
admitted guilt of having committed the criminal offences. With the Court of Appeal’s verdict,
the case is returned to reclaim. As far as my client is concerned, the prosecutor has not
offered any evidence according to the remarks of the Court of Appeal by which it would be
verified for the criminal offences he is suspected for, according to the prescription for
complementing the evidence of 10.10.2014. I propose to the Court to refuse the request for
setting the detention measure, and I propose that he is defended in freedom.“
6. The defendant Dardan Gjuka regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention
measure states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure, as it is not grounded
and I have not taken part in any terrorist group. I have neither committed the criminal
offences that I am suspected for, although the prosecutor has presented my statement given to
police as evidence to verify the suspicion. However, in that case I have not stated that I was
in Syria, but I was in vicinity to the border and my aim was not to go and join terrorist
groups.“
Defender of the defendant Dardan Gjuka, a.v. Isa Salihi regarding the request of SPP for
setting the detention measure says: „I support the statement of my client and I consider that
the SPRK even with complementation of the prescription for evidence has not verified the
grounded suspicion that my client has committed the criminal offence he is suspected for. We
consider that no measure can be set by not having grounded suspicion, let alone the detention
measure setting. The permanent address of my client is known. He has no chances to change,
destroy evidence. Since this evidence, which have already been secured by the prosecution, I
propose the Court to refuse the request for setting the detention measure. If the Court
considers that he must be set a measure, I propose that he is set one of the alternative
measures from Article 173 of KPPK.“

 7. The defendant Eroll Nesimi regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure, as I have not committed the
criminal offence, incitement for committing terrorist acts. It is true that have held preaching
six months ago, but it is not true that I have said the words described in the prescription of
10.10.2014, but the essence of these words by no means meant to incite someone to go to
Syria. My aim was rather to stop killing of Muslims between each other here in Kosovo. I
gave this speech because there were cases when students stabbed each other with knives in
Mitrovicë. I have not influenced on the people mentioned in prosecutor’s prescriptioin,
namely on Dush Smajli, Bujar Brahimi and Besnik Latifi to join terrorist groups in Syria, and
I do not know these persons well, although I know them as figures for four years now, but I
do not know if they have presented themselves during my speeches. The speeches I made
have been taken out of the Qur’an.“
Defender of the defendant Eroll Nesimi, a.v. regarding the request of SPP for setting the
detention measure says: „After legal specific and factual analysis of the SPRK request
addressed earlier, which we also objected earlier, and after analyzing the prescription of
10.10.2014 of SPRK, I have concluded that the basic condition for setting the detention
measure has not been met, as the SPRK request comes into contradiction with the Code of
Penal Procedure of the Republic of Kosovo, namely this request comes into contradiction
with the Article 141 of the KCC, incitement for terrorism actions, as, in order to have
suspicions for this criminal offence according to Article 135, the constitutional order of the
Republic of Kosovo must be infringed. Taking into account the provision of Article 135, I
consider that the criminal offence from the Article 141 cannot exist.
According to the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, religious freedom is guaranteed.
With the religious freedom it is meant, the freedom of preaching and faith - the freedom of
preaching and faith without abusing the rights of other beliefs. In the concrete case, my client
complied with the holy book, Qura’an, and his preaching was very serious. My client has also
described the circumstances why he has preached about negative phenomena of fratricide,
concretely in the Mitrovicë school. Islamic Community of Kosovo (ICK) has also given its
contribution for prevention of these phenomena. As far as direct influence on these persons is
concerned, the SPRK did not give us any argument about this. It did not comply with the
request of Court of Appeal, as my client described the situation in its fullness. Even during
his preaching in Hydba, and I do not see that his preaching was something bad and it was at a
good level. I call on the Court to be independent and find concrete arguments and
explanations. I also do not believe that the Prosecution has concrete arguments, as there
cannot be such ones. I consider that the grounded suspicion for the incriminatory actions, as
recommended by the Court of Appeal, has not been proved, and there is no reason of factual
ground for my client to remain under detention measure. I propose to the judge to give the
chance to my client to defend himself in freedom.“
8. The defendant Leonard Ruli regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure, as I have not committed the
criminal offence, incitement for committing terrorist acts from the Article 141 of CCRK,
since even in the speeches that I have held, I have never incited commitment of these

 offences. At the same time, I have not influenced on the witnesses – Ylli Krasniqi and Dardan
Veselaj.“
Defender of the defendant Eroll Nesimi, a.v. regarding the request of SPP for setting the
detention measure says: „After legal specific and factual analysis of the SPRK request
addressed earlier, which we also objected earlier, and after analyzing the prescription of
10.10.2014 of SPRK, I have concluded that the basic condition for setting the detention
measure has not been met, as the SPRK request comes into contradiction with the Code of
Penal Procedure of the Republic of Kosovo, namely this request comes into contradiction
with the Article 141 of the KCC, incitement for terrorism actions, as, in order to have
suspicions for this criminal offence according to Article 135, the constitutional order of the
Republic of Kosovo must be infringed. Taking into account the provision of Article 135, I
consider that the criminal offence from the Article 141 cannot exist.“
Defender of the defendant, a.v. Esat Gutaj, regarding the request of SPP for setting the
detention measure says: „I strongly object the request for setting the detention measure, since,
from the evidence that we were presented, there is no grounded suspicion that my client had
committed the criminal offence, since we are dealing with assumptions or evidence which
have not been fully verified by the SPRK and the investigators. Carrying out of investigations
and shedding light on the truth on the preaching made at the mosque he works in Sinqeriteti
Association and SMS’s that can verify the time and the date, and all other details, are also at
the interest of my client. Another measure which can be set and which would also be at the
interest of the Republic of Kosovo, due to limitation of expenses, is appearance at the police
station.„
9. The defendant Sabahudin Selimi regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention
measure states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure, as I have not
committed the criminal offence, incitement of hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic
intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK, as I have never incited hatred against other ethnic
groups, or anyone else. As far at the secret wiretapping measure that the prosecution called
on, the same one is not properly written, and if it remains the same one also textually with its
content, it cannot be ensured that I did any incitement for religious, racial or other hatred.“
Defender of the defendant, Sabahudin Selimi, a.v. Hilmi Zhitija, according to the
authorization regarding the request of SPP for setting the detention measure says: „SPP’s
request for setting the detention measure to my client, who is suspected for committing the
criminal offence, incitement of hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from
the Article 147 of CCRK, I consider that it is being verified that my client has given a speech
where he has underlined the words: “shia have never been and they will never be at the
assistance of Muslims” and “contemporary democracy is the biggest danger that is
threatening the world”. I consider that these two texts with these contents cannot be
considered hatred and cannot be elements of the criminal offence that my client is suspected
for. In order for the criminal offence of incitement of hatred to exist, there should also be one
other group of national or religious group, and by no means a single certain person. Due to
this, I say that jeopardizing of Kosovo’s public order does not stand. As far as the message

 which says that some money related to Saint George were donated to a project. Islamic
culture, Islamic doctrine and the holy Qur’an are the product of paganism fighting, and all
monotheist fight paganism. These educating imams, or the spirit of Islam, have no other task
to do but cultivate the fair Islam. In mosques they also preach for justice. For these reasons, I
demand that the request for setting detention measure against my client is refused and my
client to be defended in freedom.“
10. The defendant Trim Ademi regarding of the SPP request for setting the detention measure
states: „I object the request for setting the detention measure, as I have not committed the
criminal offence. The Prosecution has not offered evidence by which I am suspected of
having committed the criminal offence I am charged with. The lists that the Prosecution
mentions with the names of members of the Association, which were found at the house of
the defendant Bedri Robaj, have nothing to do with me. I admit that I was a member of “Drita
e Mirësisë” Association, which was an NGO that dealt with collection of assistance, but the
same never actually existed. At the same time, there is no evidence that I have collected or
used funds for financing persons that went to Syria.“
Defender of the defendant, Trim Ademi, a.v. Albana, regarding the request of SPP for setting
the detention measure says: „I object the SPP’s request for setting the detention measure and
I support the statement of my client. In today’s session, the Prosecution has not presented any
evidence that would support the grounded suspicion that my client has committed the
criminal offence he is suspected for. It has neither been verified that he has carried out the
incriminatory actions as it is described in the decision for launching investigations and
complementation of evidence. I propose that the request for setting detention is refused, and
my client to be defended in freedom.“
After listening to the defendants and their defenders, the Special Prosecutor of the Special
Prosecution of Kosovo, Haki Gecaj, states: “I give up from the request for setting the
detention measure against the defendants; Alban Malsiu, Idriz Bilibani and Dardan Gjuka. I
propose the house arrest measure against the same ones. While, in regard to the other
defendants; Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Leonard Ruli,
Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi, I stand behind the earlier request for setting the detention
measure, as I consider that other measures stipulated with Article 173 of CPPK will be
insufficient to implement the penal procedure.“
The pre-trial judge has analyzed all the reasons for setting the detention measure against the
above-mentioned defendants, and he has taken into account all conditions set for the concrete
measures to ensure presence of the defendants, and implement more stronger measures when
the softer measure is enough, therefore it has found the request of Special Prosecutor for
setting the detention measure against the defendants, Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad
Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Leonard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi is grounded, same as
the proposal of Special Prosecutor for setting the detention measure against the defendants
Alban Malsiu, Dardan Gjuka and Idriz Bilibani is grounded, since their presence in procedure
will be ensured with this measure, and the legal procedure will develop unimpeded.

 After assessing the request of Special Prosecution of Kosovo for setting detention measure
of 17.09.2014 against the above-mentioned defendants, the decision for launching
investigations , PPS.no.123/2014 of 16.09.2014, the verdict for extension of investigations
against the defendant Mazllam Mazllami, of 16.10.2014, criminal report of 16.09.2014 from
the SCD in Prishtinë, statements of defendants given to police, and those of the defendants
Bedri Robaj, Idriz Bilibani, Mazllam Mazllami, Eroll Nesimi, Dardan Gjuka, Leonard Ruli,
Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi, special report on analysis of SMS’s and statements where
the defendant Bedri Robaj is incriminated, special report on analysis of SMS’s and preaching,
and statements of 10.20.2014, where the defendant Mazllam Mazllami is incriminated; the
special report on analysis of preaching, where the defendant Leonard Ruli is incriminated; the
special report where the defendant Trim Ademi is incriminated; the special report of
preaching and SMS’s for the defendant Idriz Bilibani; for the defendant Idriz Bilibani; for the
defendant Sabahudin Selimi; the special report on analysis of preaching, where the defendant
Eroll Nesimi is incriminated; minutes of the interview with the witness Yll Krasniqi of
17.10.2014; statement of the witness Dardan Veselaj of 14.01.2014, minutes of the interview
with the witness Arbnor Ukzmajli of 02.05.2014; statement of the witness Alban Mavraj of
05.04.2014, statement of the witness Hafiz Ahmeti of 03.08.2014, statement of the suspect
Betim Ibrahimaj of 29.08.2014; statement of the suspect Alban Mavraj of 27.07.2014,
statement of the suspect, Kujtim Bytyqi of 01.09.2014, telephonic transcripts, the
sequestration order of 25.09.2014, orders for house control of the defendants, as well as
based on the case notes upon which there is grounded suspicion that:
1. The defendant Bedri Robaj, while searching his house were found lists with names of
members that are evidenced in “Syri i Jetës” Association, which has operated in his
office with first and last names, so the name of the person Leotrim Krasniqi and
Rexhep Morina were found there, who were kill in Syrian war. In these lists is also
mentioned the amount of money that is suspected and believed that these persons have
allocated to families of the persons that have gone to war in Syria, while names on
these lists also include Besnik Hasani, who is in Syria, and it is described that this
person has seven family members. This results that the defendant Bedri Robaj, has
carried out incriminatory actions by securing funds or material sources that would be
used for committing terrorist criminal actions, or terrorist activities. There is also
grounded suspicion that the defendant Bedri Robaj has incited other persons to
commit terrorist criminal offences, by influencing on Pajtim Olluri, who was killed in
Syria, Naman Demolli and Rexhep Morina. The defendant, Bedri Robaj, is also
suspected that in the improvised mosque at Termokos in Prishtinë has held speeches
illegally, thus influencing on different persons that attended his speeches to join
terrorist groups in Syria, which is proved by the SMS’s that are in the case notes.
Laptop and CDs were collected during defendant’s house search, which were sent for
examination.
2. The defendant Idriz Bilibani There is grounded suspicion that he has continuously
published speeches in YouTube and the same ones can be seen by anyone, which in
his speeches speaks about “takfiri” and “taguti” who considers them as takfirs as the

 ones that done apostasy, as they do not judge by the laws that were announced by
Allah, and calling for denial of tagutti and of being their enemies, thus inciting hatred
against that have different opinions o that attend other preaching, by calling: “hate
everyone that loves them, or argue with their help”. With this speech, he incites hatred
against other religious groups that have different opinions from those of Muslims.
With his incriminatory actions, he has influenced on other persons to take part in
terrorist groups in Syria.
3. The defendant Mazllam Mazllami There is grounded suspicion that as an imam in
“Jeni Mahalla” mosque in Prizren, he has held speeches which were also posted in
various social networks and private TV stations, where he conveyed messages for the
public that influenced on different persons to join terrorist groups later on. In the
speech “Help for Syria” he glorifies the land of Sham, which includes today’s territory
of Syria and Iraq, for which he says that the land of Sham is blessed by Allah. Allah
will place best believers in Sham, meleks have spread their wings in the land of Sham.
At the same time, there is grounded suspicion for the same one that he has held
speeches, preached also about the conflict in Syria, saying: “Those in the circle of
conflict are obliged to go to Syrian conflict, and if they cannot win it, than the circle
extends to give them full support”. This suspicion is grounded and verified based on
the statement of the witness Yll Krasniqi, which is in the case notes.

4. The defendant Fuad Ramiqi There is grounded suspicion that the latest arrests that
were done, on which occasion a big number of persons suspected for joining the
terrorists groups “ISIS” and “Al Nusra”, the defendant on 04.09.2014 and on
05.09.2014, with his public appearances in broadcast and print media called for
resistance against justice bodies. Therefore, in the KTV’s evening news edition, his
statement was broadcasted: “The state terror continues, against Muslims in particular,
as well as against our religious leaders, which is a phenomenon that cannot be
imagined within the Albanian people. But, wild dictatorships have demonstrated that
something might happen, and this resembles a place with the wildest dictatorship that
happened in the history of the people. We will surely take our steps in the coming
days, but we will have it clear what were the reasons these things happened and where
this dictatorial state is heading with these developments that are taking place in
Kosovo.

5. There is grounded suspicion that the defendant Alban Malsiu with the person Visar
Qukovci has preached. He is also suspected of having dealt with securing of funds,
material means, for persons that join the war in Syria, as it is suspected that with the
late Hetem Dema, killed in Syria. Electronic equipment that needs to be examined was
found during his house search.

 6. The defendant Dardan Gjuka There is grounded suspicion that during 2013 he went to
join the war in Syria, a fact that is verified based on his statement given to police, and
after a two-month stay there he returned to Kosovo. Electronic equipment, which will
be examined with the aim to find evidence, was found during the search of his house.

7. There is grounded suspicion that the defendant Eroll Nesimi Malsiu a year and a half
ago with his speeches, hydbas held on Friday’s on the topic of “Sainthood of
Muslims’ blood” which was also posted in social networks conveyed messages that
influenced on different people to later join terrorist groups. Speaking about the
Muslims, he says that the Muslim’s example is the example of the body – if a part of a
body hurts, than the entire body hurts as well. If your finger hurts and you have fever,
your entire body hurts. This should also be with the Muslims, whereas if a part of a
body, no matter where it is, is attacked, the entire body should hurt. During this
speech he also emphasized “It is pitiful how the Islam has turned into, as no one is
defending Islam. Only if a dog of an infidel is unjustly killed the whole world will
stand up on their feet. How many Muslims are there being killed?!” It is also
suspected that influenced and by hearing to his preaching, the persons – Dush Smajli,
Bujar Brahimi and Besnik Latifi joined the terrorist groups, against whom the legal
procedure is taking place in this court.

8. There is grounded suspicion that the defendant Leonard Ruli held speeches in NGO
Sinqeriteti, and the same were broadcasted in Facebook social network. In a speech of
01.03.2013, on the topic of “Who are Alevi’s – Shia?” he incited hatred against them
taking into account that members of this religious groups also exist in Kosovo. He
speaks and says that these sahib (swear a lot on Mohammad’s friends, are their biggest
enemies and they hate them”, so the same, with his speeches has influenced on
various persons to join the war in Syria, which is verified by the secret measure of
telecommunication interception. On 05.05.2012 at 13:11hrs, the defendant on his
telephone number 044-797-704, from telephone with the number 044-614-961, under
possession of an unknown person so far, received an SMS with the following content:
“I have arrived in Halep. It is in Syria. I am good.” From this SMS, it can be verified
that the defendant was in contact with the person that went to take part in war in Syria.
Based on the statements of witnesses Yll Krasniqi and Dardan Veseli, who attended
the speeches of the defendant, the latter influence with the same speeches on different
persons to join terrorist groups in Syria. As far as the time of committing the criminal
offence by the defendant is concerned, it was continuously committed until the
moment of his arrest, as his speeches were posted in social networks.

9. There is grounded suspicion that the defendant Sabahudin Selimi in his speeches that
are dedicated to the war in Syria, which were published in Facebook on 15.05.2013,

 the defendant said that the war in Syria has revealed two important things. With all the
tortures and massacres that are happening in Syria, it showed the world, Muslims in
particular, two important things: “Shia have never been and they will never be at the
support of Muslims, and the contemporary democracy is the biggest danger that is
threatening the world”, and, “there is no greater terrorism in this century than the
Western democracy” by which the defendant incites hatred against other ethnic
groups. From the secret interception of telecommunications on 26.04.2013 at 14:51hrs
it is verified that from his phone number he sent an SMS to the telephone 044-170439 with the following content: “As-Salaam-Alaikum brother. Are you well? A
brother might come in and leave some money with you for a project that we have
against Saint George, and we will take them later from you.” The CD is yet evidence
which supports the grounded suspicion for his incriminatory actions, which is attached
to the case notes.
10. The defendant Trim Ademi There is grounded suspicion that the same person in
interaction with the defendant Bedri Robaj has collected funds that are suspected of
having been collected as support for Syrian and used for financing expenses of the
persons that went to Syria, or they were used to support their family members that
remained in Kosovo. The list of names of the “Drita e Mirësisë” Association, which
operated in the offices of imam of “Termokosi” mosque, where the funds were
collected. During the search in the family of the defendant was found a black military
vest uniform and a sword of 1 meter length and electrical equipment such as laptops
temporarily have been seized, which need to be examined.
With the incriminating actions described above, there is grounded suspicion that the
defendants: Bedri Robaj, due to grounded suspicion that he has committed the criminal
offences, recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK and the criminal offence,
incitement of terrorist criminal offence from the Article 147 of CCRK; the defendant Idriz
Bilibani, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offence of incitement
of hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK and
the due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offence of incitement of
hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK and the
criminal offence recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK; the defendant
Mazllam Mazllami, due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offences
recruitment for terrorism from the Article 141 of the CCRK; the defendant Fuad Ramiqi,
there is grounded suspicion that he has having committed the criminal offence of call for
resistance from the Article 411 of CCRK; the defendant Alban Malsiu, due to grounded
suspicion of having committed criminal offence - incitement for carrying out terrorist actions
from the Article 141 of CCRK; the defendant Dardan Gjuka, due to grounded suspicion of
having committed the criminal offence of organization and participation in terrorist groups,
from the Article 143 par.2 of CCRK; defendant Eroll Nesimi, due to grounded suspicion of
having committed the criminal offences recruitment for terrorism from the Article 141 of the
CCRK; Leonard Ruli, due to grounded suspicion that he has committed the criminal offences,
recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK; the defendant Sabahudin Selimi,

 due to grounded suspicion of having committed the criminal offence of incitement of hatred,
division, religious, racial or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK; the defendant
Trim Ademi, due to grounded suspicion that he has committed the criminal offences,
recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK.
There are circumstances which indicate the risk if the defendants are in freedom, respectively
in full freedom, to avoid legal responsibility they have the opportunity to flee from their
places of residence and leave Kosovo, considering factual circumstances that all the
defendants in the past have been outside Kosovo, and also taking into consideration the fact
that for the criminal offences for which all the defendants are suspected of, with the legal
provisions stipulate relatively high imprisonment period. All these circumstances present
potential risks that if the defendants are found in freedom, than there is real chance that the
same would leave Kosovo in order to avoid legal responsibility, as they are aware that against
them a legal proceeding is being carried out against them for the above-mentioned criminal
offences. These present legal causes foreseen by Article 187 par.1 Sub-par.1.1, 1.21 points
1.2.1 of CCRK and Article 183 par.1 sub-par. 1.1 and 1., 2 of CCRK for setting the detention
and house arrest.
Also, if the defendants are free, namely in full freedom , the same will influence the normal
course of legal proceedings by influencing in this legal case by destroying, hiding or forging
evidence of criminal offences, taking into account the fact that during the search of their
houses material evidence have been taken which should be examined. There is also the risk
that if the defendants are in freedom, they can impede the legal proceeding course by
influencing on witnesses, namely: Ylli Krasniqi, Dardan Veselaj, Alban Mavraj and also the
defendants Hafiz Ahmeti, Betim Ibrahimaj, Alban Mavraj, Kujtim Bytyqi, members -of the
families of the persons who went and joined terrorist organizations in Syria, some of them
who have been killed in these fights. They can also influence on each-other. These present
legal violations from Article 187 par. 1. sub-par. 1.1, 1.2 points 1.2.2 of CCRK and Article
183, par. 1 sub-par. 1.1. and 1.2 for setting the detention, house arrest respectively.
Based on the manner and circumstances in which it is suspected that the criminal
offences were committed by the defendants, the nature and weight of the criminal offence for
which the defendants are suspected for, due to the fact that if the defendants are in freedom,
all these circumstances demonstrate the risk that if the defendants are in freedom there is the
chance for them to repeat the same criminal offence, or similar ones. These circumstances
present legal causes stipulated by Article 187 par. 1 sub-par .1.1 and 1.2 points 1.2.3 and
Article 183 par. 1 sub-par 1.1. and 1.2 of CCRK for setting the detention, house arrest
respectively.
Pre-trial judge took into account the claims of defenders of the defendants lawyers for some
of them to be released in freedom or for some of them to set alternative softer measures
stipulated by Article 173 of CCRK, namely: house arrest, reporting to police station or bail;
however, currently in this phase of the procedure none of the above-mentioned measures will
ensure the presence of the defendants in the procedure, the legal proceeding cannot be
developed unimpeded.

 Due to the above-mentioned reasons, the judge considers that legal conditions for setting the
detention measure and house arrest, stipulated by Article 183, 187 and Article 183 pf CCRK
have been met.
BASIC COURT IN PRISHTINË
Serious crimes department
PKR-KR. 464/2014 of 16.10.2014
Legal secretary:
Kimete Mehmeti
LEGAL ADVICE
Appeal of the Courto f Appeal against this
verdict is allowed, at a timeframe of 24
hours from the day of acceptance. The appeal
does not stop execution of the verdict.

Pre-trial judge
Vehbi Kashtanjeva

  PPR KR.nr.464/2014

GJYKATA THEMEIBRE NE PRISHTINE Departamenti i Krimeve re Randa, gqutari i
procedur?s paraprake Vehbi Kashtanjeva, me sekretaren juridike Kimete Mehmeti, lidhur me kErkesEn 
Prokurorise Speciale t? Republik?s se Kosoviis, PPS.NR.123I2014, ti?. dat?s 17.09.2014, pEr oaktimin 
paraburgimit kund?r to pandehurve: Bedri Robaj, pEr shkak t5 dyshimit IE bazaar se ka kryer veprat penale
Rekrutimi par terroriz?m nga neni 139 re dhe vepr?n penale par vepra penale terroriste nga
neni 147 ta i pandehuri 1driz Bilibani, p?r shkak re dysliimit t5 bazaar 56: ka kryer veprat penale
intja urrejtjes, poroarjes ose mosdurimit kombEtar, raoor, fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 t? dhe
veprEn penaie Rekrutimi par terroriz?rn nga neni 139 IE i pandehuri Mazllam Mazllami, p?r
shkak to dyshimit t? bazuar se ka kryer veprat penaie dhe per kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni
I41 ta i pandehuri Fuad Ramiqi, ekziston dyshimi i bazuar so ka kryer vepr?n penael Thirrja p_?r
rezistence nga nei 411 te i pandehuri Alban Malsiu, p61- shkak ta dyshimit to bazuar se ka kryer
vepren penaie pEr kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 te KPRK-SE, i pandehuri Dardan
Gjuka p?r shkak t? dyshimit tE bazuar se kryer vepr?n penale Organizimi dhe pjes?marrja n? grupe
terroriste nga neni 143 par.2 re i pandehuri Erol] Nesimi par shkak re dyshimit to bazaar se ka
kryer vopren penale pEr kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 te Leonard Ruli, p?r
shkak te dyshimit te bazuar se ka kryer veprEn penaie Rekrutimi p?r terrorizem nga neni 139 t? i
pandehuri mSabahudin Selimi pEr shkak tE dyshimit te bazuar se ka kryer vepr?n penale intja urrejtjes,
poroarjes ose mosdurimit komb?tar, racer, fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 t? i pandehuri Trim
Ade-mi, per shkak re dyshimit IE bazuar 33 ka kryer vepr?n penale Rekrut?imi p?r terroriz?m nga neni 139 te
duke vendosur sipas varejtjeve te Gjykat?s se Apelit re dhEna n? aktvendimin 
t? dates 01.10.2014, pas mbajtjes s? s?ances d?gjimore me dt. 16.10.2014, mori kete:

A I 
Kund?r t? pandehurve: a a
- 'l

ROBAJ, i biri i'Hajrullahut dh?e n?nes Hasime, i lindur me 07.04.1980, 116 Malisheve,
fsh. Astrazup te Malisheves, me nr. personal 1016151790, me vendbanim n? fsh. Aztrazup t6 Malishev?s,
ka  kryer shkollen mesme dhe Universiteti I hapur amen-ikan, i ma?uar, babe i dy ??mijt?ve, i gjendj es s?
mesme ekonOmike, me pare ka punuar imam, me. pare i pad?nuar, shqiptar, shtetas i Republik?s se
Kosov?s, giendet' n? ndalim, nga dt.17.09.20l4,' n? ora 06:08 

2.MAZLLAM MAZLLAMI, i biri i Nasu?t dhe n?n?s Nurije, i lindur me 01.05.1958, ne fsh.
Zapluxhe re Prizrenit, Prizren, me nr. personal 1002841068, me vendbanir'n n6 rr. ?Setajdin Berisha" or.
te Prizrenit, shqiptar, ka t6 kryer fakultetin Teologjik me-Ka'iro, imam I xhamise Jeni mahalla 
Prizren, imartuar, babe i pese ?mij?ve, i giendjes se mesme ekonomike, me pare i pad?nuar, kundEr tij nuk
zhvillohet procedure p?r vep?r tj'etEr penale, shqiptar, shtetas i Republik?s se Kosoves, gjendet ne
ndalim, nga dt.17.09.2014, n? ora 06:20 

3.FUAD RAMIQI, i biri i Xhavitit dhe nen?s Rafete, i lindur me 26.03.1960, n6 fsh. Pozherani
Vitise, me nr. personal 1019698625, me vendbanim n? rr. ?Ham?z Jashari? 16/26 - Prishtine, Shqiptar, ka to
layer fakultetin mbrojtjes n6 Sarajevo, I giendjes se dob?t ekonomike, sekretar I levizjes ?islame
Bashkohu, i manner, babe 1 dy f?mij?ve, i giendjes se mesme ekonomike, me pare i padenuar, shtetas i
Republike?s Se Kosoves, shtetsa edhe I Bosnje Hercegovines, giendet n? ndalim, nga dt.17.09.2014, n?
ora 07:40 

4. EROLL NESIMI, i biri i Abdulhalim dhe nene?s Kumrije, i lindur me 20.02.1981, n?
Mitrovic?, me nr. personal 1003968754, me vendbanim no rr. ?Agim Hajrizi? nr. 5/33, Mitrovic?, ka te
kryer fakulte'tin Teologjise, i martuar, babe i he femijeve, punon imam ne xhamij?e Fidanisht n?
Mitrovice, igjendjes se mesme ekonomike, me pare i pad?nuar, shqiptar, shtetas i Republik?s Kosov?s,
giendet n6 ndalim, nga dt.17.09.2014, n? ora 06:50 I

5. LEONARD RULI, ibiri i Riza dhe nem?s Taibe, i lindur _me 27.09.1979, n? Prizren, rr. ?Musa
Sheherzade? ne Prizren, me nr. personal 2016280057, shqiptar, Re to jurispodencen islame ne
Jordani, i martuar, babe i dy f?mijeve, i giendjes s? mesme ekonomike, imam ne xhamin Ebuhanite ne
lagjen Dal-dariia n? Prizren, me pare i padenuar, shtetas i Republik?s s? Kosov?s, gjendet ne ndalim, nga
dt.17.09.2014, n? ora 06:05 

6. SEBAHUDIN SELIMI, i biri i Musa dhe n?nes Sahide, i lindur me 06.10.1981, 116 fsh. Sm'ire,
Viti, me nr. personal 1012628958, me vendbanim n6 fsh. Smire, _Viti, shqiptar, ka t? kryer fakultetin
Teoldgiik Medine, imam ne Komuna Viti. i martuar, babe i dy ?e?mij?ve, i giendjes se mesme

2
ekonomike, m? par? i pad?'nuar, shtetas i Republik?s s? Kosov?s, gjende't n? ndalim, nga dt.l7.09.2014~,
n? ora 07:20 

7.TRIM ADEMI, i biri i Nysretit dhe n?n?s Teuta, i lindur m? 10.04.1987, n? Prishtin?, lagja
?Lakrishte? rr.Bill Kllinton, Hy,5 kati l3 nr.52 n? Prishtih?, me-nr. personal 1170869156, ka t? kryer
fak?ulietin ?ekonomike 11E Prishtin?, punon s_i d'rejtor 116 ISC-SHPK, I pa martuar, i giendjes s? mesme
ekonomike, me par? i pad?imar, shqip'tar, shtetas i Republik?s 56 Kosov?s, gjendet n6 ndalim, nga
dt.17.09.2014, n? ora 06:05 

Kund?r t? pandehurvc 

CAKTOHET PARABURGIMI

Kund?r pandehurve: Beldri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Erol] Nesimi, Leonard
Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi, n6 koh?zgjatje prej 1 muaji, duke ?lluar prejhdates

2014.

Nd'e'rkaq kund?r t? pandehurve

BILIBANI, i biri i EleZit Mala, i lindur m6 11.11.1981, n? Prizren, fsh.
Posh'mi'e personal 1007270590, me vendbanim It. "Aleks Budaj pa 111?.?
Prizren, ka t? kryer slikoll?n 'mesme dhe fakultetin m?i univcrzitetin hapur amerikan, i manuar, 13:11:15 i :13;
fEmij?ve, i gjendjes 56 mesme ekonomike, merret me perkthimin libi'avc nga gjuha arabc 1:8 gjuhen
boshnjake'm? pal-? i pad?nuar, boshnjak, shtetas i Republiklis 56 Kosov?s, gjendet n? ndalim, nga
dt.17.09.2014, n? pm 06:05 

2.ALBAN MALSIU, i biri i Samiut dhe n?n?s Imrije, -i lindur me 25.05.1987, 116 Prishtin?, me
banim n? Ferizaj n? .rr.Nezair Neziri pa nr. me Dr. personal K00236036, apsolvent n? fakultetin'Ekonomik,
i. martuar, babe i dy-f?mij?ve, i giencljes  dob?t ekonomike,.,pronar I. .libraris fe'tare n? Ferizaj, m? par?i
pad?nuar, shqiptar, shtetas i Republik?s's? Kosov?s, gjendet n? ndalim, nga dt.'17'.09.2014, n6 orag?9i00
.

3.DARDAN i biri i Enverit dhe n?n?s Fatmire, i lindur m6 14.08.1987, n6 Pej?, me 111?.
personal 1172338492, me vendbanim :10 11'. ?Ahmet Gjikolli" nr. 15 Pej?, ka tE kryer shkoll?n mesme, i
pa maituar, i giiendjes s? duli?t ekonomike, 1 pa pun?suar, me pare [ca punuar nE?: ?rmeu 'I?elenet n6 Pej?,
ni? par? i pad?n?ar, ndaj tij zvillohet procadure penale edlie p?r dy vepra, nuk ka shenime 3e ka qen? 
gjykuax, shqiptar, shtetas i Republil?z?s 56 Kosov?s, gjendet n? ndalim, nga dt.17.09.2014, am 06:00 

Gjykata urdh?ron m'as?n 

ARRESTIT SHTEPIAK

koh?zgjatje prej 1 muaji, ashtu sipas k?tij aktvendimi masa arrestit sht?piak
do t?iu llogar?itet prej dates 17.09.2014, deri me date 17.10.2014. 

11. T6 pandehurit Alban Masliu, Idriz?Bilibani dhe Dardan Gj'uka me adresa t?la??p?rmendura,
obligohet q? t? q?ndr'ojn? n6 sht?pit? tyre ?dhe'n? asnj? m?nyr? pa leje t? gjykat?s nuk guxojn? t? largohen
nga lokalet ku ata kan? vendbanimin. 

Detyrohe? Stacidnet Policore n? Ferizaj, Prizren dhe ta. vbriflkojn? zbatimin 
masave 116 rast t? niosrespektimit t? saj- ta informoi 'gqutarin piccedur?s paraprake p'ran??k?saj Gjykate.

IV. Gjykata mund t? caktoi p'araburgimin n?se t? pandehurit pa leje shkelin 

Ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se t0 pandehurit Rana kryer veprat penale: Bedri Robaj, p?r shkak t6
dyshimit t6 bazuar 5e ka kryer veprat pcnale Rekrutimi p?r terrariz?m nga neni 139 t6 dhe vepr?n
penale p?r vepra penal: tsrroriste nga neni 14'? t0 i pandehuri Idriz Bilibani, p?r shkak t?
dyshimit tE bazuar ka layer veprat panale intja Urrejtjes, p?rgarjes ose m'osdurimit komb?tar, racor,

 3
fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 t6 dhe vepr?n penale Rekrutimi par terroriz?m nga neni 139 t6
'i pandehuri Mazllam Mazllami, p?r shkak te dyshimit t? bazuar se ka kryer vep?rat penale dhe
p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 ta! i pandehuri FuadRamiqi, ekziston
dyshimi i bazuar 5e ka kryer vepr?n penael Thirrja par rezistence nga nei 411 i pandehuri
Alban Malsiu, p?r shkak te dyshimi: tE bazuar 5e ka kryer vepr?n penale per kryerjen veprave'
terroriste nga neni 141 t? KPRK4SE, i pandehuri Dardan Gjuka pEr shkak tE dyshimit te bazuar 5e ka kryer
vepr?n penale Organizimi dhe'pjesemarrja n6 grupe terrorism nga neni 143 par.2 te i pandehu'ri
Eroll Nesimi p?r shkakt? dyshimit t? bazuar se ka kryer vepr?n penale p?r kryerjen yeprave
terroriste nga neni 141 to Leonard Ruli,?per shkak t6 dyshimit te bazuar se ka kryer vepr?n
penale Rekrut'imi p?r terroriz?m nga neni 139 t? i pandehuri mSabahudin Selimi per shkak t?
dyshimit t? bazuar 56 ka kryer vepr?n penale intja urrejtjes, p?roarj es 053 mosdurimit komb?tar, racer,
feta: apo etnik nga neni 147 t6 i pandehuri Trim Ade-mi, p?r shkak IE dyshimit t6 ba?zuar se ka
kryer vepr?n penale RBkrutimi per terroriz?m nga neni 139 t6 

Arsyetim

Prokuroria Speciale Republiki'?s s? Kosoves, ka b?r? k?rkes? pEr eaktimin paraburgimit kudn?r
t? pandehurve: Bedri Robaj, Idriz Bilibani, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Alban Malsiu, Dardan Gjuka,
Eroll Nesimi, Leonard RuIi, Sebahudin Seiimi dhe Trim Ademi, dat?s 17.09.2014, p61-
shkak te dyshimit te bazuar se kan? kryer veprat penale te lart?cekura.

 'Gjy'qtari i procedUreS paraprak?e' me aktvendirnin dat?s 19.09.2014, ~ua ka caktuar. to pandehurve.
t? lart?p?nnendur paraburgimin n? koh?zgjatje prej nje muaji, pre'j dat?s 17.09.2014, deri me dat?n
17.10.2014.

Gjykata Apelit, me aktvendimin PN1.nr1903/2014 t6 dat?s 01.10.2014, i ka aprovuar ankesat 
te pandehulfve dhe ?mbrojt?sve t? tyre ka? an'uluar aktvendimin Gqutarit t? procedures paraprake dhe
e?shtjen ka kthyer n6 rivendosje. Pet shkak se nuk kan? rezultuar qart? veprimet inkrimnuese t?
pandehurve dhe nuk ?sh?t v?rtetuar dyshimi i bazuar se kan? kryer veprat penale p?r t6 cilat dyshohen dhe
nuk jane provat q? venetojn? dyshimin bazuar dhe kane propozuar q? n? rivendosje Gjykata 
shkall?s s? par? duhet t? k?rkoj nga Prokurori i QEShtjes q? t6 argumentoj? apo v?rtetoj? provat q?
mb?shtesin dyshimin bazuar se to pandehurit kan? kryer veprat penale per t? cilat dyshohen, dhe kan?
propozuar qe Gjykata t? kEIkoj? nga prokurori qe t6 argumentoj? apo v?rtetoj? provat qe mb?shtesin
dyshimin bazuar se t? pandehurit kan? kryer veprat penale. Gjykata me parashtres? ka kErkuar nga
Prokurori q? ti dor?zoj? t6 gjitha provat q? argumentojn? dyshimin bazuar, ashtu q? Prokuroria me
parashtres?n dates 10.10.2014, cila Eshte dor?zuar ne giykate me dat?n 13.10.2014, ka paraqitur provat
lidhur me dyshimin bazuaf se t? pandehurit kan? kryer veprat penale t? lart?cekura.

Prokurori Special i Republik?s so Kosov?s deklaron se sa i p?rket vepr?s penale rekrutimi p?r
terroriz?m nga neni 139 te p?r t6 cil?n dyshohet i pand?ehuri Bedri Robaj n6 rastin kontrollit
n? ShtEpine tij jan? gietm' ?lista? me emrat andtar?ve q? jan? t6 evidentuara n? shoqat?n ?Syri i Jet?s?
cila ka vepruar n? zyr?n tij me emra dhe mbiemra ashtu qe aty ?shte gjetur emri i personit Leutrim
Krasniqi dhe Rexhep Morina ashtu qe km dy persona jan? vrar? n6 luften Sirise. Nga kEto lista
p?rmende't edhe shuma parave q? dyshohet dhe besohet se ju kan? ndar? familjeve te personave qe kane
shkuar ne lu?e n? Siri nd?rsa k?ta emra ne kem lista p?rmendet edhe emri i personit Besnik Hasani i cili
ndodhet nw Siri dhe ku se ky person i ka 7 an?tar? te familjes. Sa i p6rket vepr?'s tjeter p?r te
cil?n ekzistoni dyshimi i bazuar si ka kryer i pandehuri p6r vepra penale terroriste nga neni 147 te
prova q? mbeshtesin dyshimin bazuar dhe atw' masa te fshehta dhe transkriptet elelctronike
se i pandehur Bedi Robaj ka personat tjer? par kryerjen veprave penale terroriste nd?rsa ta
Pajtim Olluri i vrar? ne Siri Naman Demolli dhe _Rexhep .Morina. Ne sht?pi tij ne ra'stin bastisjes jane
kon?skuar prova dhe ate llapton, cd to cilat jan? d?rguar ne ekzamenin dhe pritet q? t? ekzaminohen.

Sa i p?rket t? pand'ehmfit Idriz Bilibani ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se ka kryer veprat penale
nxitja urrejtjes apo perearjes nga neni 147 dhe rekrutimi p?r terroriz?m neni 139 te i pandehuri
n? ?ale i ka publikuar ligj?ratat ne Youtube, ashtu q? do kush mund ti parcjelle? te nj?jtat dhe me k?to
ashtu qe Veprimet tij inkriminuese jane t? parashtruara n? k6rkes?n dt. 10.10.2014. sa i p?rket vepr?s
tjet?r penale qe ekzistoni dyshimi i bazuar sel ka kryer i pandehuri. Idriz Bilibani i nj?jti me rastin 
dh??nies se deklzirat?s ne polici ka pranuar se prind?ri i personit andrim Kovaqi, i shkuar n6 lu?e n6 Siri
ka fajesuar t? pandehurin se ka ndikuar me ligj?ratat tij q? t? shkoj ne Lu??n Siris?.

4

83 i p?rket te pandehurit t0 tret Mazlinm Mazllami prokuroria Re new edhe zgjerimin 
hetimevo me qene se nebaze te provave kemi marr? ma vone to i nj?jtit ekzistoni dyshimi i bazuar se ka
kryer veprat penale slitytja no ten?oriz?m nga neni 141 si dhe vepr?n penale nxitja urrejtjes pErgarjes mos
durimit raeore alga neni 14']r te veprimet inkrirninuese on i parket vepr?s so pare jane 
ne parashtrese dt. 10.10.2014, oe rastin plot?simit te provave dhe konkretisht paraqesim deklarat?n 
Krasniqi i e111 ka deklaruar se ka mbajte kurse fetare no te oilat kane ligj?ruar toni te pandehurit [driz
Bilibani, Idriz Bilibani dhe Ebu Beker Ruli dhe me kEtE rest kur Esht? pyetur ky dashmitare se an Ice
ligj?ruar lioxha Mazilam Mazllami p?l? kon?iktin ne Siri Esme pErgjigjet se Hovth Mazllam Mazllami ka
deklaruar so no konflikte kane obligim me shkuar ata qe jam? ne rreth te konfliktit nz?se eta nuk munde
fitojne ate here rrethi vjen duke zgjeruar pEr te ju dliene ndihme deri n5 porkrahje te plote. So i p?rket
vepre's penale pair to oil?n dyshohet i pandehuri per nxitje urrejijes so i pandehuri gjate lingratave
predikimeve ne xhamin ku sh?rben ka nxitje urrejtje ndaj grupit LGBT, pjes?taret to oilit jetojne edhe
ne Kosch 351ml q? no Hytb?n, sikurse Esht? shkuar edhe no aktvendimi hetimeve p?r te cil?n si prove
ekziston edhe CD, to nj?jtit ju kan? koo?skua pajisje t6 cilat jan? d?rguar n6 ekzarninim lidhur me k?t?
rast.

Sa i p?rket tie-pandehurit Fund Ramigi dyshohet par vepriin penale thirrja pEr rezistenc? nga neni
411 par [to te cilat jan? t0 n0 parashtres?n dt. 10.10.2014 dhe shion s'e kemi nj?
cd q? mb?shtesin dyshimin bazuar so i pandehuri ka kryer kere vep?r penale jan? 5e thirrjet per
rezistenc? i pandehurit i ka here publikisht p?rmes mjeteve t? informimit KTV.

Sa i p?rket to pandehorit 'A'lban Malsiu p?rvet; tyre q? jane cekura n6 p'arashtrese 'te cit."
10.10.2014, nuk kam asng tjetvEr pEr re shtuar ashtu q? provat te oilat mb?shtesin dyshimin bazuar se
Alban Malsiu ka layer vepr?n penale nga neni 141 to so i porket kESaj vepre penale ekziston
dyshimi i bazuar 5e ipandehuri me personi Visor Qukovqi ka mbajte ligjiiraia pEr te cii?n prokororie rink
ka prova ku jane mbajtur dhe ne oil?n kohe, ndErka-q se. i p?rket vepr?s penale to Rel-outimit p?r
terroriz?m nga neni 139 to par kEte t? pandehuri prokuroria 3 ka si prove deklarat?n Lij i oili
ka pranuar se familjaret tij [cane akuzuar re pandehuri Alban Maisiu se ice vepruar no te ndjerin Hetero
Donia to vrare ne Siri, qe me lingrimet ti ice. ndiicuar t? shkoj atje.

 

So i pErket re pandehurit Dardan Giuka an i perket veprimeve inkrirninuese te tij iane 1e
no aktvendimi hetimeve dhe ne parashtres?n dt. 10.10.2014, ekziston dyshimi ibazuar 5e ka.
kryer veprt?n penaie .143 par 2 i njejti ka pranuar so gjate vitit 2013 kishte shkuar per te ju bashkangjitur
Iu??s no Siri por kn mohuar q? te ju ka bashkangjitur k?tyre grupeve prej tyre Esme k?rkuar te jep
betimi ?nuk ka kthim prapa iu?e deri ne vdekje?.

Saip?rkett? pandehurit Eroll Nesimi dyshohetp?r veprat penaie rekrutimi neterroriziim nga
neni 141 to KPRK vi pandehuri Ero'll Nesimi ekziston dyshimi i bazaar se ka kryer vepr?n penale
ne terroriz?m ndErkaq prokuroria nuk ka prove par te venemar dyshimin bazuar se Eroll Nisni kn
kryer edhe veprEn penale rekrutimi p?r terrorizem 139 to i pandehuri'i ligj?ratat tij ne xhamin
ku Esme imam ka bar? ne ?xhemat? k3 pas dhe ndikim ne personat te oilat keno
p?rcjell? ligj?rimin _e tij dhe kjo vep?r ?sht? kryer ne vazhdim?si derisa 651116 arrestuar me qene se kEto
ingjizime jan? t? publikuar n6 youtube. Ashtu q? veprimet inkriminuese jane parast no parashtrese 
dt. 10.10.2014. 

Sa 1 p?rket t6 pandehurit Leonard Ruli dyshohet p?r vepr?n penale rekrutim no terroriz?m nga
neni .139 to dhe ne terroriz?m .141 to so i porket vepr?s penale te rekrutimit pEr
ierroriz?m prokuroria nuk ka prove mete eilat do ta v?rtetonte dyshimin banner se k3 kryer ?veprat penale
p?r kryerjen vepr?s penale terroriz?rn nga neni 141 1:15 ipandehuri ka mbejte ligieirata
ne OJQ- sinqoriteii Mite (105111110an edhe d?shmitaret Krasniqi dhe Dardan Veseli to cilat i kan? ndjek
lingrata tij dhe me te njejtat kan? ndikuar qe persona te ti grupeve terroriste ne
Shqip?ri. Sa 1 porket koli?r. 5e vepr?s penaie njEjta kryhet ne vazhdim?si deri ne momentin arrestim 

tij me qene se ligj?rimet tij jan? te postuar ne rrjetet sociale dhe tani gdo kush ka qasje no to dhe tani
mund te ndikohet no to.

Sa i p?rket to pandehurit. Sabnhudin Selimi PSRK pas analizimit te gjitha provave nok
ekziston dyshimi i bazoar se i pandehuri ka kryer vepr?n penaie rekruiimi per terrorizEm nga neni 139 t0
so i p?rket veprEs penale nxitje urrejtjes nga neni 14? veprimet inkrirninuese
jane t? ne parashtres?s dt. 10.10.2014 dhe kESaj si prove i bashk?ngjitet edhe CD.

5

Sa i p?rket t6 'pandehurit Trim- Ademi ekziston dyshohet i p?r vepr?n penale rekrutim p?r
terroriz?m 139 te KPRK-56, me qene se dyshohet se i nj?jti ka vepruar ne has.th veprim edhe me te
p?ndehurin Bedri Robaj ne at? ?m?nyr? q? kan? mbledhur fonde kinse jan? mbledhur neV em?r te ndihmave
ne Siri por dyshohen se k?to fonde dhe nuk dihet shuma sakte k?tyre fondeve te cilat dyshohen q? jan?
p?rdor? per ?nancim te shpenzimevete personave q? kane shkuar tic Siri. Ashtu q? lista an?tareve tg
k?saj shoqate jan? gjetur he sht?pin? a te pandehurit Bedri Robaj. 

1.I pandehuri Bedri Robaj lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit deklaron;
se ekund?rshton?kerkesen p6: caktimin paraburgimit pasi nuk i kryer veprat penale pr? t6 cilat
dyshohem sa i parket vepr?s penale rekrutimi p?r terroiz?m nuk kam mbledhur fond mir?po lista q? m6
?sht? gjctur n6 sht?pi me' emra t6 ato kan? qen? p?r familjet skamnore n? Komun?n 
Malishev?s dhe?ate ka t? me periudh?n kohore 2008 2009. kurrsesi k?to fonde nuk jan? mbledh? p?r
personat q? kan? shkuar n? Siri. Sa i p?rket vepr?s tjet?r penale p?r t6 cil?n dyshohem nuk ?sht?- vertet?
q? un? n? hydben mbajtur n? dit?n xhumas? q? i kam th?n? ?al?t q? jan? n? parashtres?n 
PSRK t? dt. 10.10.2014.

Mbrojt?si i t6 pandehurit Bedri Robaj, av. Avdullah Robaj lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin
paraburgimit deklaron: konsideroi se n? k?t? geshtje penale ?sht? b?r? nj? diskriminim meqenase
prokuroir i g?shtjes sa i p?rket tre t? pandehurve n? nji?aI afat t6 shkurt?r disa dit? pas caktimit t6 paraburgut
k_a k?rkuar tiu nd?rpritet paraburgu, tre t? pandehurve ne t6 njejtin grup t? c'il?t kan? qen? t? dyshuar gati
p?r veprat njejta penale. Kbnsideroi se jan? shkelur edhe dipsozitat Kushtetut?s, nuk ?sht? respektuar
neni 3 par. 2 barazia para ligjit. Neni 21 par. 1 t? drejtat dhe lirit? themelore pastaj neni 38 dhe 39 he
garantohet-li?aebesimit dhe fes? dhe neni39 konfesionet fetare. Sa i p?rket provave
shtes? t6 cilave iu referohet Prokuroria sa i p?rket f6 mbrojturit tim un? kam shkuar n6 m?nyr? t6 slikurt?r
jo t6 pre?cizuar dhe duke mOs i faktet relevante dhe veprimet inkriminuese si dhe provat n6 t?
cilat mb'?shtet dyshimin bazuar. PSRK dyshimin bazu'ar bazon n6 SMS mir?po me asnj? argument
dhe ?ale nuk ka n6 k?to mesazhe dhe SMS nga i mbrojturi im.
I mbrojturi im ka formuar nj? shoqat? humanitare ?cila nuk ?sht? n? kimd?rshtim me dispozitat ligjore.
Po ashtu konsideri nse n? veprimet t? mbrojturit tim nuk manifestohen elementet veprave penale p?r t?
cilat dyshohet dhe me k?t? rast Prokuroria ka shkelur nenin 1 t5 me t6 cilin parashihen ku?iijt? 
vepr?s penale, n? rastin konkret sa i p?rket t? mbrojturit tim nuk ?sht? bare p?rkLi?zimi i veprave penale q?
bie ndesh me nenin 2 par. 3 t? KPRK-SEE. Me nenenin 7 8 dhe 10 t6 KPRK ku ka t? b?j? me 'vepr?n penale
m?nyr?n kryerjes s? vepr?s pen'ale koh?n dhe vendin kryerjes penale ku nuk jan? t? p?rcaktuara nga
pro'kurori dhe t6 argumentuara me proVat shtes?. N6 rastin konkret konsideroi se ?sht? shkelur neni 9 i
KEDNJ. Nga k?to arsye nuk ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se i mbrojturi im ngarkohet me veprat n? fjal?. Nuk
jan? plot?suar k?ushtet p?r caktmin e? paraburgut pasi q? nj? gj? t6 till? akcepton edhe Gjykata Apelit dhe
6 ka anuluar aktvendimin dhe kund?rshtoj' fuqish?m k?t? aktvendim dhe propozimi p?r caktimin 
paraburgut bie baz? t? nenit 187 par. 1 n?npar. 1.1. dhe 1..2 t? cilat jan? t? p?rmendura edhe n?
aktvenidmin Gjykat?s s? apelit, propozoj q? k?rkesa pEr caktim t? paraburgut t? refuzohet eventualisht ti
caktohet masa paraqitje n6 stacion policor.

2.1 pandehuri Idriz Bilibani lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r c'aktimin paraburgimit
deklaron: kudn?rshtoj k?rkes?n p?r caktimin paraburgimit meqen?se nuk i kahn kryer veprimet
inkreiminues sikur qe ?sh?t n? aktvendimin p?r ?llimin hetimeve si 116 parashtres?n shtes? t?
dt. 10.10.2014, un? n6 asnj? ?nyr? nuk kam ndikuar q? personi Q?ndrim Kovaqi, t? shkoj? n6 luft?n 
Siris?'. Po ashtu, ligjeratat i kam mbajtur pra nj? viti kur ka qen? Q?dnrimi dhe i ka d?gjuar t?
nejtjat ashtu qc? n? at? koh? nuk ka qen? fonnuar organizatat terroriste Nuk ?sh?t v?rtet? q?
babai i tij m? ka akuzuar se kam ndikuar q? djali i tij t5 shkoj? n6 Siri, por i njejit vet?m In? ka pyetur se? ku
gjindet djali im. Paraprakisht ka qen? edhe n? organizatat tjera per t? pyetur p?r djalin? tij. Konsideroi sc
sa i p?rket vepr?s tejt?r p?r t6 cil?n ngarkoh?m terminet ?Tekvir?t dhe Tabut?t jan? t? p?rmendur edhe n?
KURAN dhe' hadiset Pengamberit Alehi sel'am. Nga kjo arsye konsideri se n? veprimet mia nuk
ekzison kryerja k?tyre veprave penale.

it? pandehurit Idriz Bilibani, av.Hajrip Krasniqi, lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin
pairaburgimit nga ana PPS par t? mbrojturin tim nga se k?rkesa- paraburgirnit ?sht? k'udn?rsligish'me- 
kund?rshtojm? giiothsesi dyshim?et eventuale n6 t6 cilat pretendohet se ki mbrojturi im me veprimet veta i
ka shakkatuar mendoj se nilk jan? plot?suar ksutjhet nga eni 165 t6 KPPK p?r caktmin paraburgut dhe se
n? plot?sim t? dyshimit t? kryerjes s? Verpave 'penale p?r t? cilat dyshohet i mbrojturi im nga enni 147 dhe
neni 139 t? KPRK p?r veprimet t? mbrothirit tim nuk p?rcaktoeht vendi i veprimit koha' veprimit dhe
veprimet konkrete inkriminuese t6 sanksiOnujar amei KPPK. Ilustroi dispozit?n nenit 147 se nxitja 
pr?qarjes mosdurimit fetar etnik p?rku?zohet Ii? territorin R. T6 Kosov?s n? grape n? persona me

6
vendbanim vendq?ndrim n6 R. T6 Kosov?s. Andaj i mbrojturi im me ligjeratat veta fetare titullin dhe
profesionin vet q? ka ka ligj?eruar. n6 p?rputhje me t? gjitha norat lejuara ligjore n6 p?rputhje me
libim shenj t6 KURANI p?r t? i a parashtrojm? ligjeratat mbajtura t?te pandehrit Idriz
ne' xhamin ?Saraqan?s? dhenn? xjhamit? tjera n? prizren ku i njejti ?sht? angazhuar nga koleg?t imam?t 
atyre xhamive ku nuk shifet asnj? ijal? urrejtje apo elemtnt tje?tr. t? pr?shrkaur n6 kt? veper. Pretendimi i
prokm'orit se i pandehrui deklarata?n vet vetakuzen vetv?ehten prokurori nuk mbeshtet me
dekalrat?n prindit t6 Q?ndrim Kovaqit por me asnj? dekalrate t? perosnit nd?rkaq sa i p?rket ligjerimeve
t? tija ai merr shembull dhe ligjeron nga librat' shenjta nga dijetar?t fetar ku p?rmenden
personat t? dalur nga jasht besimi dhe jobesimtar n? nj? zot n6 ALLAH misioni i tij fetar Esht? t6 ligjeroj n6
besimi?nn? zot dhe nuk ?sh?t i kudn?rligjsh?m as i sanksionuar si vepre penale pEr t6 cil?n dyshohet. Sa i
prket rekrutimit teria dhe praktika din rekrutin 116 kupitmin fizik nt?. pregatitje dhe dije pEr nj? mision
jonjer?zor. veprimet t? pandehruit nuk asnje ligjemtt? ku i njejti 11E kuptimin psikoiogjik i ka
bindur e?ventualisht perso?nat t6 cil?t 'jan? larguar nga kosova qe t? man-in pjes? me vpeirmet tyre n6
konfkiiktet bot?rore. NE k?t kuptim mendoj se gqutari i1 proc. Paraprake n6 ?munges? t6 provae t?
parashtruara nga ana PSRK dhe 1115 paralistes?n 3 dt. 10 tetor 2014 ta liroj? t? pandehruin nga kjo-mas? 
cktimit ti: paraburgimit dhe k?rkoj q? k?resa cventauiep?r ca?ktmin paraburgut t? refuzohet mir?po p?r t?
qen? n? p?rgj egj?s?i te qytetarit i mbrojturi im i premton gjykat?s se do ti paraqitet prokuroris? dhe gjykat?s
11E 9do koh? dhe eventualisht ti caktohet masa paraqitje n? stac'ion policor p?r faktin se ai ka bashk?shorten
dhe dy fe'mij? dhe ?sht? rrezikuai' ?nailja tij n? mung'es? t6 tij.

3.1 pa-ndehuri Ma?zllalii Mazllami,? lidhur me k?'r?kes?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklaronze kund?rshtoj k?rkesen per caktimin paraburgimit dhe giendenm n6 paraburgim gati qe nje
mu?aj dhe tine plbt?si'shf i ?afajsh?m pasi qE nukji kam krye?r' veprat penale 'p?r t6 cilat dyshohe'm;

Nuk ka asnj? prove q? 11116 kam-layer vepr?n penale p?r kryerjen veprave penale nga
neni 141 ti! KPRK meqen?ss n? asnj? m?nyr? nuk i kam kryer veprimet inkriminuese siq Esht? 
n6 parashtres?n pmkurorit tedt. 10.01.2014, po ashtu, Prokuroria ka btir? zgjerimin hetimevezkund?r
meje edhe p?r shkak t? vepr?s penale. t6 nxitjes s? urrejtjes, un? asnj?her? deri me tani nuk kam nd?rmarr
kurfat? vepiimi n6 drejtim t? k?saj vepre penale dhe p?rkundrazi ?ne jam tolerant ndaj vpakicave meqen?se i
perkrahu t? nj ejtat. Askush nuk ?sh?t n'dikuaf nga ligjeratat mija meqen?se asnj ?he?r me rastin ligjerimit
dhe te predikiinit nuk kam nxitur askerid apo nuk kam ndikuar te askush p?r p?rqajre nd?rnaciona?le fetar'e
dhe racore.



Mbrojt?si i t? pandehurit Mazllam Mazllami av. Muhamet Humolli lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r
caktimin parabuxgirnit deklaron p'?rkrahu n6 tertisi tjaleii t? mbr'oturit tim theksoj se hoxha imam i
xhamis? s6 Prizrenit ?sht? shkenc?tar i fes? p?rmbi 30 vite't?r? jet?n ka kushtuai? fes?bamire'sis? ?sht?
persona autoratitiv ne'Prizren por edhe n6 Komuant tje?ra; kudn?rshtoj kark'es?n PPS caktimin 
paraburgut n?ga se val-fete nuk ka' asnj? prove t? cilat'e inb?shte'sin ne bazuarp?r t6 cilat ?sh?t
k?rkuar t6 caktohet paraburgu. Prokurria vet?m parafr'azon dispozit?n nenit n164 dhe bazat pr? caktiinin
paraburgut mir?po me asnj? prov? konkrete nuk v?rteton' se pse do t? arratisej i mbrojturi im po qe se
gjendet n6 liri. Atij i dihet adresa ka sht?pin? Prizren ?sht? imam n6 xhami, andaj, n?se edhe 
konsideron vehten t? pafajSh?m?aq me pak n6 shkresa t? i?nd?s nuk ka asnj? prove: se i njejti. ka kryer
veprat penael? p?r t6 cilat ngarkohet nuk ka asnj? interes t? _arratiset, nuk q?ndron as konstatimi se po t?
gjendet n? liri'i njejti do t6 ndikoje nt?. d?shmita?r? p?r cil?t d?shmitar? Esht? fjaia, ai ka me mija
d?shmitar? t6 cil?ve predikOn, nuk dihet per cil?t d?sli'mitar? behet fjal?, k?shtu nuk q?ndron 'se pse ka t?
ndikoj? n? d?shmitar? ose ti shmanget procedur?s p?tkryerjen k?tyre veprave penale. Ai dyshohet q? n?
bahsk?veprim secili m? pastaj veq veq? me Enes Goga Enis Rama dhe Ekrem Avdiu .e p?r t6
pandehrui've' n? ?al? iu nd?rpre paraburgu qka ndodhi me provat lidhur me tre t6 pandehurit tjer? pse
mos t? lirohet edhei mbrojturi im. Nga-k?to ekziston .dyshimi i bazuar se i mbrojturi .im nuk- i ka kryer
veprat penaie p?r t? cilat dyshohet propozoj q? k?rkesa p?r caktim t6 paraburgut' t6 refuzohet . dhe i
mbrojturi 1m t? mbrohet'n? liri. Mir?po n6 rastin se gjykata piopOzoj q? _t6 mbrojturit tim ti caktohet masa
paraqitje n?stacion policor pasi q? i mbrojturi im jep premtimin se neng k?ohtl do ti p?rgjigjet fetesave t?
Prokuroirse' dhe t? gjykat?s. 

pandehuri Fuad Ramiqi lidhur me ;k?'rkeS?n PPS per caktimin paraburgimit
deklaron?1e kimdershtoj kerkesen per ca?ktimin masesls??paraburgimitmuk _e kam kryer vepr?n penale p?r
t? cile?n dyshohem meqen?se nuk kam b?r? thirrje piSr rezistenc? ndaj' organeve t? dr'ejt?sise dhe dnaj askujt
tjet?r meqen?se lider i'nj? subjektipolitik legiitiin i regjistruar n6 m?nyr? t? rregullt, i? quajtur
kam te dreth ta shprehu iirisht mendimin tim cila drejt? ?sht? garantuar edhe me Kushtetut?.
Ne asnj? menyr?? n?'paraqitjet mia nuk ?sh?tp?rdor'e fjala thirrje per rezistenc?. Por Prokuroria ka b?r?
shtremb?rirne ndaj deklarat?s sime dhe ?sht? nxjerr?' nga kontesti. Asnj?her? nuk kam b?r? thirrje p61-
rezistenc? dhe n6 t? ardhmen nuk do t? 

7

Mbrojt?Si i to pandehurit Fuad Ramiqi,av. Skender Musa lidhur me k?rkeSEn PPS pEr caktimin 
paraburgimit'deklaron, kud?rshtoj kerkesen per caktimi ne paraburgut, dhe p?rkrahu n6 tEr?si deklarat?n
t? mbrojturit tim duke bazuar aktvendin gjykat?s s? apelit p?r shkak se ka obliguar Gjykat?n
Themelore n3 prishtine q? t? k?rkoj? nga Prokuroia ti plot?soj? provat mir?o nga naa PSRK kemi marr?
nga nj? shkrese nga ?cila shihet sdhe nuk ?shte plot?suar asnje prove re, pik?risht kjo shkrese man-e
nga PSRK d?shmon?me se miri se nuk mund t6 venetOhet dyshimi i bazuar Se Fuad Ramiiq ka kryer
vep?r penale duke lexuar nje citat te shkreses ?Por diktaturat egra kane d?shmuar qe
mudn t? ndohde diqka dhe kjo po i ngjan nje vendi me diktatur? oka do te thete se as vet prokuroria nuk
ka potencuar se i mbrojturi im ka bare thirrje p6r rezistenc? por vetem ka akuzuar insitutcionet qeveritare
qe kan? vepruar ngjajsh?m si diktat?ura duke pasur parasysh se i mbrojt?uri im Eshte lider i partise poliitike
opozitare kjo nuk mudn te konsiderohet thirrje p?r rezistence por berje opozites dhe kudn?rsthim i
polit?c?s qeveritare te 'cilk?n gj? ngjajshem b?n edhe lideri i AAK kur fyen ministrin, ose partia tjet?r
opozitare kur gjykat?n Kushtetuese te R. Te Kosov?s quan deg? t? PDK dhe ose blloku tjet?r politik qe 
akuzon qeverin?, t5 gjitha kEto jane deklarat shume t6 ashpra se sa deklarata mborjturit tim. Per te
ekzistuar kjo vep?r penale duhet t6 jet? objekti i caktuar se kujt iu ka drejtuar per to here rezistence qe n6
k?t? rast nuk kem dhe n?se ?sht? nxjerr? komplet dekarata nga KTV cila ka qene n6 Index online t?
neseremen i njejit ka th?ne nuk do t? rrim? qe ne do ta mbrojme partine tone; Sipas par. 1 kjo
veper ?sht? parapare denimi me tri Vite. Konsiderooi se nuk ekzistojn? kushtet veqanta pEr caktimin 
paraburgut pasi nuk do te largohet nga kosova nuk ka mudn?si qe ti veprat penale pasi qe
deklarata tij Eshte dhen? n? KTV nga kEto arsye propozoj ndaj te mbrojturit tim ti nd?rprehet maSa 
paraburgimit dhe proponj q? i njejti t6 mbrohet n6 liri, pasi qe babain ka te semur? dhe ?sht? i vet?m n?
Sht?pin? tij' pa aSHj? an?tar? t?familjes. - i - -

5.1 pandehuri Alban Malsiu lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklaroan kundershtoj k?rkes?n p6r caktimin paraburgimit, meqen?se veprat penale per t? cilat
dyshohem n? asnje m?nyre nuk i kam kryer.Nuk ?shte vertete qe une ne ndonj? m?nyre kam mbledhur
fonde apo mjete materiale asnj?her?, meqen?se edhe per- k?te Prokuroria nuk ka prova konkrete p?r ta
v?rtetuar kohen dhe vendin dhe m?nyr?n m'bledhjes se tyre. Nuk Esh?t v?rtet? q? une kam vepruar me t?
ndjerin Hetem Dema i vrar? n? Siri meqen?se t? nejtjin kam njohur se per faktin se babai im ka qen?.
bashk?luftar mete ne luft?n ashtu un? nuk njoh pero'snin me ermin Visar Qukovci. Po ashtu
asnj?her? nuk kam mbajtur ligjerata fetare ngase nuk jam hoxh? apo imam nuk jam kompetent, po ashtu
nuk kam qene ane'tar? i ndonj? organizate siq jan? p?rmendur ?Shk?lqimi?.

Mbrojt?si i t? pandehu'rit Alban Malsiu av. Bekim Sylejmani lidhur me kErkesen PPS p?r
caktimin paraburgimit deklaron: kudnr?shtoj n? ter?si kErkes?n PPS par caktimin paraburgimit,
?shte pabazuar sepse klienti im nuk i ka kryer veprat penale per t? cilat dyshohet. Edhe n? deklaratat 
dh?na klienti im nuk kam pranuar faj?sine se ka kryer veprat penale . Me aktvendimin Gjykat?s se
Apelit q?shtja kthehet n? rivendosje sa i p?rket klienitt tim prokurori nuk ka ofru asnje prove sipas
v?rejtejve t? Gjykat?s se apelit me te cilat do to v?rtetohej se pair veprat penale pEr t? cilat dyshohet me
parashtres?n plot?simit t? provave t? dt. 10.10.2014. I propozoj gjykat?s q? t? refuzohet kerkesa pr?r
caktimin parabUrg'imit dhe propozoj qe t6 l?shohet t6 mbrohet n6 liri.

6.1 pandehuri Dardan Gjuka, lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklaron:e kundershtoj k?rkesen per caktimin paraburgimit pasi q? nuk Esh?t bazuar une nuk kam
marre pjese n? asnj? grup terrorist. Dhe vepr?n penale per te cil?n dyshOohem nuk kam kryer edhe pse
prokurori s'i prove ka paraqitur dekh?at?n time par ta vertetuar dyshimin bazuar t6 cil?n kma dhEne ne
polici mir?po une me ate fast nuk kam th?ne q? kam qen? ne Siri por kam qene n? af?rsi t? ku?rit dhe
q?llimi im nuk ka qen? shkuarja p?r tiu bashk?n?gjitm grupeve terroriste.

Mbrojt?si i t? pandehurit Dardan Gjuka av. Isa Salihi lidhur me k6rkesen PPS pEr caktimin 
paraburgimit deklaron m?bshtes deklarimin te mbrojturit tim dhe konsideri se PSRK edhe me
plotESimin parashtres?s per provat nuk ka vertetuar dyshimin bazuar se i mbrojturi im' ka kryer vepr?n
penale p?r t6 cil?n dyshoet. Konsideroij se? duke mos pasur dyshim t6 bazuar nuk mudn? t6 caktohet asnj?
mas? dhe aq me pak, caktimi i paraburgut. Te mbroturit tim i dihet adresa pEIhershme, nuk ka mund?si q?
tebej? asgj?simin provave meqen?se t6 njejtat tani jane t6 siguruara n? prokurori i propozoj
gjykat?s q? k?rkes?a p6r caktim t6 'paraburgut t6 refuzohet n?se gjykata konsideron qe dueht ti caktohet
ndonje mase propozoj q? ti' caktohet ndonj?ra nga masat alternative nga neni 173 to KPPK:

7.1 pandehuri Eroll Nesimi, lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklaro'nze kundershtoj kerkesen p?r caktimin paraburgir'nit, meqen?se nukme kam kryer vepr?n penale

8
pe'r kryerjen veprave terroriste ?sth? kryer q? un? kam mbajtur ligjerat? para 6 muajsh s?sht? 
v?rtet? q? i kam-th?n? ijal?t ku n6 parashtres?nle prOkuroris? t6 'dt. 10.10.2014, mir?po esenca
kEtyre th?njeve n? asnj? m?nyre' nuk ka pasur p?r q?lliniq? ti nsxis? diken p?r t6 shkuar n? Siri por
q'?llimi im ka qen? q? mos t? vriten musliman?t? n6 mes veti k?tu Kosov?. Dhe un? kam mbjtur k?t?
l'igjerat? pasi q? k?a ndodhur rastet therrjeve me thik? t? nx?n?sve n6 Mitrovic?. Un? nuk kam ndikuar-n?
personat q? pmremdnen n? parashtres?n prok?roirt dhe ate Dush Smain Bujar? Brahimi dhe Besnik Lati?
p?r tiu bashk?ngiitur gruprev'e terriste n? Siri, dhe un? nuk di se k?ta persona edhe pse'i njoh si figura par
akat?r viteve por nuk di a kan? prezentuar giat? ligjeratave t? mija. Ligjeratat' t? cilat i kam mbajtur jan?
t? nxjen'ilra nga KURANI.

it? pandehurit Eroll Nesimi av. lidhurme k?ri-ces?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklaron, pa's analizimitspecifik ligjor dhe faktik t?k?rkes?s 36 PSRK 5 parashtruar nit-E para ti! cil?n kemi
kudn?rshtuar m? ?par? si dhe pas anlaizimit t? parashte'rs? st? dart-Es 10.10.2014 t? PSRK kam konstatuar q?
nuk ?sht? pe'rmbushur- kushti es'encial p?r caktimin mas?s s? paraburgimit nga 5e k?reksa PSRK bie 11E
kudn?rsthim me Kod?in procedur?s penael si dhe me KOdin Penal teR. TE Kosvo?s, konkretisht kjo
k?rkes? his 116 kudn?rshtim me nenin 141 t? p?r veprime terrOriste sepse p?r t? dyshuar
par kEt? vep?r peuale sipas nenit 135 duhei tH cenohet rcndi kushtetues i R. TE Kosov?s. Duke marr?
parasysh dispozit?n neuit 135 konsideroi 5e nuk mund t? ekzistojj? vepi'a penale nga neni 141 t? KPRK.

Sipas Kushtetut?s 5% R. Kosov?s liria fetare ?sht? garantuar. Me lirine fetare kuptoj lirin? 
predikimit dhe lirin? besimit. Liria predikimit dhe besimit pa i cenuar t6 drejtat e- koncesioneve tjera
fetal-e 113 math; konkrat kiienti im in ka pEmlbajt? librit t? shenj?t KURANIT dhepredikimi, i tijlka qen?
shum serioz dhe klienti im ka skajruar rrethan?n se pse ?e predikuar p?r dukurin? negative t?

*Vliavr?a?gjes? dh??t? fasti Mitrovi??'s, ecme koii'tribut 1561? 'pa'r?indaliniin   9"  

k?tyre dukurive. Sa 1' p?rket nclikimit direkt tek k?ta persona IE cituar PSRK nuk na dha asnj? argument nuk
p?r?lli venidmin gjykat?s 5E5 apelit, pEr arsye se klienti im skjaroi situat?n 11E tar?si, dhe giat?
ligjerimit n? hydbe un? nuk shah diqka q? ka foi? dhe predikimi i tij Ra qen? n15 nivel, lus gjykat?n q? 
beheni ta pavarur dhe gjeni argumente dhe skjarime konkrete dhe nuk besoj se Prokuroria nuk ka
argumente konkrete por nuk- besoj q? mund t? ket? tilla, konsiederoj nuk ?sht? d?slimuar dyshimi i
bazuar nuk an??p?rfshir? veprimet inkriminues'e ashtu ka rekomnaduar Gjykata-e apleit dhe nuk ka
as'nj? arsye asnj? baz? faktike q? klienti im t6 q?ndroj? n? ,mas?n paraburgut i propozoj giyqtarit q?
klientin tim ti jep mund?sin? t? mbrohet n? liri. .
:55

8.1 pand?ehuri Leonard Ruli, lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklar'onze kuridershtOj k?rkes?n per caktimin'e paraburgimit meqen?se nuk kam kryer vepr?n penael
p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 t? KPRK meqen?se as 111% ligjeratat q? kam mbajtur
asnj?he?r nuk kam b?r? per kryerjen k?tyre veprave. Po ashtu un? nuk kam ndikuar n?
d?shmitai'?t Ylli Krasniqi dhe' Dardan Veselaj.

Mb'rojte'si i t6 pandehurit . av.Esat Gutaj lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r- caktimin paraburg?imit
deklaron: kudn?rshtoj k?rkes?n p?r caktimin paraburgimit fuqimisht kudn?rshtoj p?r shkak se nga
provat ofruara t? cilat na jan? prezentuar nuk ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se i mbrojturi im t? ket? rkyer
vepr? penale por meq? kemi t? bejm? me supozime ape me prova t? cilat nuk jam! t6 veri?kuara n? m?nyr?
t6 plot? nga PSRK dhe nga hetuesit n6 interes t6 mbrojtturit tim ?shte dhe drejt?sis? jan? t6 zhvillohem
hetimet t? zbardhet v?rteta n? lidhje me mmbajtjen iigjeratave 11E xliamin ku punon n5 shoqat?n
Sinqeriteti dhe t? zbardhet' edhe SMS ku mund t? vertEtohet koha dhe data dhe t? gjitha tE dhEHat tjera.
Edhe me? nj? mas? tjet?r q'e kishte: me qen? n? interes edhe t? R. T6 Ko?sov?s p151~ shkak t? limitimit t6
shpenzimeve ti caktohet masa paraqitje n? stacion pqlicor. A

9.1 pandehuri Sebahudin. Selimi lidhur me k?rkes?n PPS p?r caktimin e-paraburgimit
deklaronze kund?rsht'oj k?rkes?n p?r caktimin paraburgimit pasi q? nuk kam kryer?vepr?n penale intja
u?ejtjes p?rqarjes ose mosdurimit kombetar rracor etar ape _etnik? nga neni 147 te-?KPRk meqen?se
asnj?he?r nuk kam nxit? unejtje ndaj grupeve tj era etnike apo ndokujt tjet?r. Sa i p?rket mas?ss? fsheht? t6
pErgjimit n5 t? cil?n Esht? thirrur Prokuroria njejta nuk ?sht? shkriiar n? m?nyr? t? drejte edhe n?se
q?ndron njejta ashtu tekstualisht em p?mibajtjen saj nuk mund t6 sigui'ohet. se kam b61516 ndonj? nxitje
p?r urrejtje fetare ape rracorc etj.

Mbrojt?s?i i t? pandehurit S'ebahudin Selimi av.Hihjni Zhitija sipas autor'izimit lidhu'r me k?rkes'?n 
PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit deklaron: K?rkesa PPS p?r caktimin parab'urgimit i mbrojturi im
dyshohet p?r vepr?n penale par urrjejtje p?rqalje ose mosdurim' komb?tar rracor fetar_apo emik, nga neni
147 t6  konsideroi se edhe po qe se vertetohet 156 i mbrojturi- im-lca mbajtur njE ligjerat? ne ta cil?n ka
theksuai? ?al?t: ?shit?t kur nuk. kan? qen? dhe kur nuk do t? je'n?'n? ndihm? t? musiiman?ve dhe 



9

dmeokracia bashk?hore Esht? rreziku me i madh qt! p0 i kanoeet bows" konsidemi 5e. k?to tekste me keno
pEmibajtje nuk mund te konsiderohen urrejtje dhe nuk mund re jene elemente te veprEs penaie pEr re ciiEn
dyshohet i mbrojturi im. tE ekzistuar vepra penale nxitjes 5e urretjes duhet ekzietuar gmpi ose ndonji?
bashkesi tjetei' nacionale ape fetare asesi ndonje person i caktuar. Si pasoj? kEsaj eitoj se mundet ta
rtezikoj rendin publik r18 Kosove kjo nuk q?ndron. Se i parket mesazhit 11% re thetE se jane dedikuar
disa holla lidliur me shEngjergjin par nje projekt. Kuitura islame doktrina islarne dhe kurani fam?larte
jane prednkt i lu?imit ta paganizmit. Dhe gjitha fete moniste lu?ojne paganizmin dhe kEta imam
edukatore apo shpirti i islamit nuk kane tjet?r detyre pi?Srveq ta kultivojne isimain drejte dhe n?p?r xhami
predikejne pEr dret?si nga keno arsye p?r 1E mbrojturin iim karkej q? kEreksa pEr caktim tE?. paraburgut t?
refuzohet dhe i mbrojturi im te mbrohet ne liri.

10.1 pandehuri Trim Ademi, lidhur me k?rk?es?n PPS p?r caktimin paraburgimit
deklaron: kund?rshtoj kErkesen pEr caktimin paraburgimit meqen?se vepr?n penale per te cil?n
dyshohem nuk 6 Ram layer meqen?se Prokuroria nuk ka ofru prova me te cialt dysohem se kam. kryer
vepren penale per tE cilEn ngarkohem. Sa i parket lietave t? cilat i p?rmend Prokuroria n? emra te an?tar?ve
te shoqat?s te cila! jane gjetur ne sht?pine te pandehurit Bedri Robaj t? njejtat memua nuk kane te bejne
asgj?franej 5e item qene aniitai' i sheqat?s ?Drita Mi??sis?? cila ka qen? OJQ cila ?shte mane me
tubimin ndihmave mirEpo njejta ne reaiitet nuk ka funskionuar asjeher?. Po ashtu nuk ka prova so we
kam mbledhur apo p?rdorur mjete p?r ?nansim t6 personave q? kan? shkuar n6 Siri.

Mbrojte'si i te pandehurit Trim Ademi, av Albania iidhur me kErkesEn PPS par caktimin 
paraburgimit deklaron: kundarshtoj kErkesen PPS dhe mbEshtes deklarat?n te mbrojturit tim,

"prokmoria'edhe'ne' prezentnar asnje prove me tee-Ila: do-te -vertetohej- dyshimi 

bazuar se i mbrojturi im ka kryer vepr?n penale par t6 cil?n dyshohet. Po ashtu nuk Eshte venetuar qt! i kn
kryer veprimet inkriminuese sie pershki'uhet n? aktirendmin pei' ?llimin hetimeve dhe n15 plotEsimin 
provve propozoj q? k?rkesa p?r caktim parabuigu te refuzohet dhe i mbrojturi im te mbrohet ne liri.

Prokurori Special i Prokurorise Speciale te Kosoves Haki Gecaj pas dEgimit te t? pandehurve dhe
te mbrojturve t? tyre deklaron: heqi dore nga k?rkeSa parcaktim tE paraburgimit kudner t6 pandehurve:
Alban Malsiu, Idirz Bilibani, dhe Dardan Gjuka dhe ndaj te njejt?ve propozoj mas?n arrestit shtpiak kurse
ne raport me te pandehruit tjere Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Broil Nesimi, Leonard
Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi Trim Ademi, mbetem pran? k?rkese seim?parme p?r caktimin paraburgimit pasi
q? konsider?oi se masat tjera t6 parapara me nenin 173 t6 do t? jen? t? pa majaftueshme p?r
zbatimin procedures penale jan? t? pamjaftueshme.

Gqutari i procedures paraprake i ka analizuai' te gjitha arsyet mbi caktimin paraburgimit kund?r
te pandehurve te iatt?cekur 5i dhe i Ice matte parasysh kushtet pErcaktuaIa per masat konkrete pEr ta
siguruar pranine te pandehurve dhe mos te zhatoje mase me t? r?nd? kur mjafton masa me ebute dhe ka
gjetur 5e keIicesa prokurorit special par caktirnin paraburgimti kunder te pandehurve Bedri Robaj,
Mazilam Mazllami, Fund Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Leonard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi, dhe Trim Ademi Eshte
bazuar, si dhe propozimi i prokurorit special pEr caktimin arrestit shtepiak kunder t6 pandehurve Alban
Malsiu, Dardan Gjuka dhe Idriz Bilibani Eshte bazuar meqen?se edhe me k?t? mase do te sigurohet
prezenca tyre ne procedure. Dhe do t? zhvillohet procedura penale pa pengesa.

Gqutari pas vlerESimit te kerkeSES s? Prokurorise Speciale t6 Kosoves, per caktimin 
paraburgimit te dat?s 17.09.2014, kunder te pandehurve te Iarte'cekur, aktvendimit per ?llimin hetimeve
tedat?s 16.09.2014, aktvednimit pEr zgjerimin hetimeve kund?r te pandehnrit Mazllam
Maleami, t6 dat?s 16.10.2014, kall?zimit penal te dat?s 16.09.2014, nga DKT 11E Prishtine, deklaratave t6
te pandehurve te dhEn? ne polici, dhe ate t? pandehurit Bedri Robaj, Idriz Bilibani, Mazllam Mazllami,
Eroll Nesimi, Dardan Gjuka, Leonard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi, dhe Trim Ademi, raportit t? vegant? mbi
analizimin ligjratave dhe dhe deklaratave ku inkriminohet i pandehrui Bedri Robaj, raportit t6
vegante mbi analizimin ligjeratave deklaratave ku inkriminohet i pandehuri Mazllam Mazllami i
dt. 10.10.2014, raporti i' vegante mbi analizimin ligjeratave me te cilat inkriminohet i pandehrui Leonard
Ruli, raporti i vecante me te cilat ink'rmindhet i pandhuri Trim Ademi, raporti i vegant i ligieratave dhe SMS
p?r t? pandehurin Idriz Bilibani, p?r t6 pandehurin Sabahudin Selimi, raporti i vegant mbi analizimin 
SMS dhe deklaratave ku inkriminohet i pandehi'ui Fuad Ramiqi, raporti i veeant mbi analizimin 
ligjeratave ku ink'rminohet i pandehuri Eroll Nesimi, procesverbali mbi intervisitimin d?shmitarit 
Krasniqi me dt. 17.01.2014, deklarata d?shmitarit Dardan V'es'elaj dates 14.01.2014, procesverbali mbi
marrjen n? pyetje te deShmitarit Arbnor Ukzmajli, i dt. 02.05.2014, deklarata dij?shmitarit Alban Mavraj, 
dat?s 05.04.2014, deklarata deshmitarit Ha?z Ahmeti, dates 03.08.2014, deklarata te dyshuaritBetim
Ibrahimaj dat?s 29.08.2014, deklarata t? dyshuarit Alban Mavi'aj, dat?s 27.07.2014, deklarata t6

10

dyshuarit 6 dates 01.09.2014, transkriptet telefonike, urdh?ri p?r sekuestrimm idat?s
25.09.2014, urh?resat p?r kontrollin sht?pive t? pandehurve si dhe n6 baz? t? shkresave. tjera t? 16nd?s
r16 baz? t? t? cilave ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se:

1.

2.

1? -

I pandeiiuri Bed ri Robai. me rastin kontrollit te shtepise st! tij jane gjetur lista me emra to
an?tart?ve q? jam; to evidentuar n5 shoqat?n Syri i Jet?s eila ka vepruar ne zyren tij, aty
tastier gjetur edhe emri i pereonit Leotrim Krasniqi dhe Rexhep Marina, ttE cii?t jane wart! ne?
lu?En Sirise. NE kEto lista permenden edhe shame to parave q? dyshohet se in kane ndarti
familjeve personave- q? kan? shkuar n? Lu??n Sirist?. dhe nd?r k?ta emra ne lista
p?rmendet edhe emri i personit Besnik Hasani i eili ndodhet ne Siri. Ku Eshte se i
ka shtat? an?tar?t? familjes nga kjo rezulton se i pandehuri Bedri Robaj, ka kryer veprime
inkriminuese duke sigumar fonde apo burirne materiaie te eilat do t6 p'?rdOren p?r kryerjen 
veprave penaie terroriste, apo aktiviteteve terroriste. Po ashtu i pandehuri Bedri Robaj,
ekziston dysiu'mi i bazaar se i ka ehtyr? personat tjera pot kryerjen veprave terroriste duke
ndikuar te Pajtim  Crlluri i cili Esme were 115 Siri, Naman Demolli dhe Rexhep Morina Po
ashtu i pandehuri Bedri Robaj dzshohet so 116 xiiamin? improvizuar te Termokoei n?
Priehtine ka mbajtur iingrata n6 many/re ilegale duke ndikuar te personat ndryehem (115 i
kane percjellur iingratat tij p?r tu bashkauar grupeve terroriste n? Sir-L, q? v?rtetohet nga
SMS ?at qe gienden nE iEndE. sht?pin? 6 t6 pandehuritjan?-konfiskuar
iiap top CD tit eilat jane dErguar ne ekzaminim. 

I pandehuri?ldriz Bilihani Ekaiston dyshimi i bazuar se ka publikuar ligierata n? Youtub 11E 

 ?edits tani ode tE: iijejtaf""'i e' tij 

?tek?riit? dhe "Tagut?t? t? eilEt i konsideron se si fal?shues kafira tt?. oil?t kane dalur nga
rruga Allahut sepse ate nuk gjykojne sipas ligjeve slipeilura nga Allahu, dhe duke bEre
thirrje qe te mohohen tagutte dhe t6 jene armiq te tyre, duke nxitur urrejtje ndaj tyre qe kane
mendime tjera qpo qe ndjekin predikime tjera duke thirmr "urrejeni gdo kend qe i don ate ose
poiemizo me ndihme te tyre? me kete ligjerate i njejti nxit? urrejtje ndaj grupeve tjera fetare
ose q? kene mendime t6 ndryehme nga musliman?t. Me veprimet tij ka ndikuar
ne personat tjera par re marr? pjes? n? grupe terroriste n6 Siri.

I pandehuri Mazllam Mazllami, ekzistoii dyshimi i bazuar se si imam n?r xhaminiir ?Jeni
mahalla? n6 Prizren ka mb'ajtur ligjerata t6 cilat jam! postuar edhe ne rrjete te 
sociale dhe televizione private ka p?rcjell? mesaziie p?r pubiikun q? k3. ndikuar q? persona t?
me vom?? tu bashkengjiteu grupeve terroriete. Ne ligjeratEn ndihme piir Sirine, 
madh?ron tokt?n Shamit, ciia pErfshin territorin Sirist? dhe t6 Irakut to sot?m par to ciIEn
thot?. se toka Shemit Esme bekuar nga Allahu. Aliahu do ti vendor. besimtar?t m3 t? mire
no Sham1 meiekEt i kane shtrire kra?h?t n6 tok?n Shamit. Po as?nm, i njejti ekziston dyshimi i
bazuar 5e ka mbajtur ligjerata, ka ligjeruar edhe par kon?iktin ne Siri, duke tin-tine: ?ne
konfliktin Siris? kanE obiigirn me shkuar eta qe jade ne rreth te konfliktit n?se ata nuk
mund ?tojne, atehere rrethi vjen duke zgjeru par t?iu dhEnE ndihm? deri ne p?rkrahje te
plot?? i eili dyshim i bazaar v?rtetohet n6 haze t? deklarat?s se deshrnitarit Krasniqi qe
gjendet 111% shkresat 

 

I pandehuri Fuad Ramigi, ekziston dyshimi i bazuar 5e pas arrestimeve t? fundit q? kishin
ndodhur ku jam! arrestuar nje num?r i personave t? dyshuer q? po i bashk?ngjiten grupeve
terroriste ?Isis? dhe Nustra? n6 Siri, i pandehuri me dt. 04.09.2014 dhe, dt. 05 
paraqitjet tij publike 11E mjetet infomiimit dhe rte ditor ka bear thirrje p?r
rezistence ndaj organeve te?. drejtt-Esise, k?shtu qt! m! emieionin lajmeve t6 mbr?mjes eta KTV
Heine tranemetuar deklarate tij: ?vazhdon terrori shtet?ror ndaj musliman?ve n? veganti, po
edhe ndaj prijsve tane fetar q? Esme dukuri qe- nuk mund to imagjinohet qe mund re ndodhe
brenda popullit shqiptar, por diktaturat egra kane d?shmuar q? mund t6 ndodhe gjithgka
dhe kjo p0 i ngjan nj? vendi me diktature me te eg?r qe ka ndodhur ne historine popullit,
sigurisht qe do ti marrin hapat ne ditet ne vijim por do ta kemi tE qarte se me qfare arsye jane
be?r? k?to gj?ra dhe kur do te shkoje ky shtet diktatoriai me k?to q? jane duke
ndo?dhur n? Kosov?'.

 

Ekziston dyshimi i bazaar so i pandehuri Alban Malsiu, me personin Visar Qukovei, ka
mb'ajt? ligjerata dhe i njejti dyshohet se ?sht? matte me sigurirnin fondeve mjeteve materiale
p?r personat q? i bashk?ngjiten lu??s 5E Sirise, siq dyshohet so ka vepruar me t? ndjerin

10.

1 1
Hetem Dema i vfar? n6 Siri. Gjat? kontrollit n6 sht?pin? tij jan? gjetur pajisje elektronike
t? cilat duhet t? ekzaminohen.

I pandehuri Dardan Gluka, Ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se gjat? 2013, kishte shkuar p?r
t?iu hashk?ngjitur lu??s n? Siri, i cili fakt venetohet 11E baz? t6 dekiarat?s 55 tij t6 dh?n? nE
polici, dhe pas q?ndrimit t6 tij n13 koh?zgjatje prej dy muajve ?shte kthyer nE Kosove. Gjat?
kontrollimit te sht?pis? 56 tij jam: gjeur pajisje elektronike t? cilat duhet ta ekzaminohen me

q?llim t6 gietjes s6 provave.

Ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se i pandehuri Erol] Nesimi, para nj? viti n6 Mitrovic? n6
ligieratat tij' hydbe t6 mbajtura ditave t? premte me tem?n ?Shenj?t?ria gjakut t6
musliman?ve? cila ?sht? posmar nE rrjetet sociale ka parcjell? mesazhe q? ka ndikuar n5
persona q? i116 von? tu bahsk?ngjiten grupeve terroriste. Duke folur p?r
musliman?t ai thot? shembulli i muslimanit ?sht? ?si shembulli i trupit n?se nj? pjes? trupit t6
dhemb, dhemb krejt trupi, n?se gishti t? dhemb dhe kc temperatur? i t?r? trupi t6 dhemb
k?shtu duhet m'e qen? musliman?t, ku nj? pjes? trupit pa man-? parasysh ku ?sht? n?se nj?
pjesE trupit suimohet krejt trupi duhet me dhimt? dhe gjat? k?saj ligjerate ka theksuar ?mjcr?
p?r islamin n? qfare dereng ka ardh?" pasi qE nuk mbron askush muslimanin, ?vet?m n33
qen i pabesimtar?ve me mbyt? padrejl?sisisht krejt dynjaja qohen nE k?mb?" 5a 6 5a
musliman po vriten, p0 ashtu dyshohet se n?n ndikimin tij duke i d?gjuar ligeratat tij
personat Dush Sniajli, Bujar Brahimi dhe Besnik Lati? iu kan? bashk?ngjitur grupeve
terrofiste ndaj t6 cil?Ve n? k?t? gjykat? Esht? duke zhviiluar procedur? penal?.

Ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se i pnadehuri Leonard Ruli, ka mbajtur ligjerata n6 OJQ
Sinqeriteti, ashtu t? njejtat jan? transmetuar n6 rrjetet sociale n? Facebook ashtu gjat?
nj? ligjerate me at?n 01.03.2013, me tem?n ?FKush jan? alevijt? Shijjat? ai nxiti urrejtje ndaj
tyre? duke pasur parasysh se pjestar?t k?tij grupi fetar ekzistojn? edhe n6 Kosov? ai ?et duke
th?n? se k?ta sahab (shok?t Muhamedit i shajnle shum?, i kan? armiq m6 t? m?dhenj? dhe i
u'rrejn? ata? po ashtu, i njejti me ligjertat tij ka :1de q? persona t? ti
bashk?ngjiten lu??s n6 Siri, q? v?rtetohet nga masa fsheht? p?rgjimt t6 telekomunikimeye
me dat?n 04.05.2012, n6 ora 13,11 i pandehuri n6 telefonin tij 044-797-704, nga telefoni me
nr. 044-614-961, q? ?sht? n6 Aposedim t? personit tani t? panjohur ka pranuar SMS me k?t?
p?rmbajtje: ?Kam mb?rri n6 Halep ?sh?t n? Siri, mir? jam . Nga ky SMS v?rtetohet se i
pandehuri ka qen? n? kontakt me 'personin q? ka shkuai' p?r t? marr? pjese n6 mm: [16 Siri. Po
ashtu, n? baz? t6 deklarat?s s? d?shmitar?ve Krasniqi dhe Dardan VeSeli, t6 cil?t kan?,
ndjek? ligjeratat t6 pandehurit me t? njejtat i pandehrui ka ndikuar q? me persona t6
q? ti bashk?ngiiten grupeve terroriste n? Siri dhe sa i p?rket koh?s s6 kryerjes s?
veprs? penale nga i pandehrui njejta ?sht? kryer n5 vazhdim?si deri n? momentin 
arrestimit t? tij meqen?se ligieratat tij jan? postuar n? rrjetet sociale.

Ekziston dyshimi i bazuar se i pandehuri Sabahudin Selimi, n? ligjeratat q? i dedikohen
Luft?s s6 Siris? cila ?sht? publikuar n? facebook me dt. 12.05.2013, ipandehuri ka deklaruar
se lu?a nE Siri shpalosi dy gj?ra me r?nd?si me gjith? torturat dhe masakrat q? po ndodhin n6
Siri, megjithate Siria ia shpalosi bot?s sodimos musliman?ve dy gj?ra me r?nd?si: ?shit?t
kur nuk kan? qen? dhe kur nuk do t6 jen? n6 ndihm? t? musliman?ve dhe demokracia
bashk?kohore ?sh?t rreziku me i madh q? po i kanoset bot?s? dhe nuk ka terroriz?m m6 t6
madh n6 k?t? shekull se sa demokracia percndimore, se i pandehuri nxit? urrejtje ndaj grupeve
tjera ctnike v?rtetohet edhe nga masa fsheht? p?rgjiineve t? telekomunikimeve me dat?n
26.04.2013 n? ora 14,51 nga telefoni i tij ka d?rguar nj? SMS n? telefonin 044-170-349 me
k?t? p?rmbajtje: ?Selamun alejkum si je vlla a je mir?, ndoshta Vjen nj? vlla i Ien pak
pare te ti p?r nj? projekt q? kmei kudn?r sh?ngjergjit, tani i marrim prej teje? ashtu si
prov? q? nib?shtet dyshimin bazuar p?r ve'primet inkriminuese t? tij ?sht?, edhe CD-ja q? i
bashk?n?gjitet n6 shkresa t6 16nd?s.

I pandehuri Trim Ademi ekziston dyshimi i bazular se i njejti n? bashk?veprim me t6
pandehurin Bedri Robaj', kan? mbledhur fOnde t6 cilat dyshohen se jan? mbledhur p?r
ndihma've p?r Sirin?, dhe jan? pardor? p?r ?nansimin shpenzimeve? t6 personave q? kan?
shkuar n? Siri, apo jan? p?rd'or? p?r ndihm? per an?tar?t familjeve t? tyre t? mbetura n6
Kosov?. Lista emrave t? an?tar?ve t6 sho'q'at?s ?Drita Mir?sis?? cila ka vepruar n? kuad?r
t? zyr?s s? imamit te xhami's? ?fTe'rmokosi? n? t6 cil?n jan? mbledhur fondet. Gjat? bastisjes
n? familjcn 6 t6 pandehruit ?sht? gietur nj? jelek uniform? ushtarake zez? dhe nj?

12
shpat? gjat?sis? 1 m. dhe jan? marre perkoh?sisht pajisje elek?trike si llap top t? cil?t
duhet t6 ekzaminohen. 

.Me veprimet inkriminuese te me iart ekziston dyehimi i bazuar se to pandehurit 
Bedri Robaj, pt-Lr shkak tit dyshimit te bazuar se ka kryer veprat penale Rekrutimi p?r terroriz?m nga neni
139 te dhe penale pEr vepra penale terroriste nga neni 147 to i pandehuri
Id'riz Bilibani, per shkak t? dyshimit t6 bazuar se ka kryer veprat penale intja urrejtjes, poroarjes ose
mosdurimit komb?tar, racor, fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 t? dhe wepr?n penale Rekmtimi par
terroriz?m nga neni 139 we ipandehuri Mazllam Mazllami, p?r shkak te t3 bamar se ka
kryer veprat penale dhe pot kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 rd i pandehuri
Fuad Ramiqi, ekziston dyshirni i bazuar 5e ka kryer vepr?n penael Thirrja par rezisteuee nga nei 411 at
i pandehuri Alban Malsiu, pEr shkak to dyshimit re bazuar 3e ka kryer penale pEr
kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 to i pandehuri Dardan Gjuka p?r shkak te dyshimit re
bazuar so ka kryer vepr?n penale Organizimi dhe pjestimarrja no grupe terroriste nga neni 143 par.2 te
i pandehuri Eroll Nesimi par shkak tit Emit re bazuar 3e I-ta kryer vepr?n penale pEr
kryerjen veprave terroriste nga neni 141 to Leonard Ruli, pEr shkak to dyshimit te bazaar 3e ka
kryer vepr?u penaie Rekrutimi par terroriz?m nga neni 139 to i paudehuri mSabahudin Selimi
pt?r shkak t? dyehimit re bazuar se ica kryer penale intja urrejtjes, pttroarjes OSB mosdurimit
komb?tar, racor, fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 to i pandehuri Trim Ademi, p?r shkak te dyshimit
re bazaar 5e ka. kryer vepr?n penaie Rekrutimi pEr terroriz?m nga neni 139 to 

Ekzistojnei rrethauat qe tregojn? rrezikun se po IE gjenden re pandehurit nt?. liri respektivisht no 1iri
"16' 91015113 o?et?t??i sh?r?ira?gur tiergjegiesise penale kaue laundesi to arratisen nga~vendbanimetwe tyre, dhe-to

largolren nga Kosova duke marr? parasysh rrethanat konkrete 5% qt! re gjithe te pandehurit he re kaluart?n 

af?rt kane qene jasht Kosovtts, si dhe duke man-? parasysh fakt so veprat penale pEr te eilat tani jane
to dyshuar to gjithe re pandehurit me dispozitat ligjore parasljihet denirni me burg relativism re 1art. Te
gjilita kero rrethana paraqesin rrezik potencia] so 130 qe se to pandehurit gjenden 11E 1iri ekziston mund?sia
reale qe njejtit te iargohen nga Kosova t'iu shmangur pergjengsit-E penale, pasi qe re njejtit jane no
dijeni se kund?r tyre oshte duke zhvilluar procedure penale par veprat penale KEto
paraqesin shkaqe ligiore re parapara nga neni 187 par. 1. Nedpar. 1.1, 1.2. pikat 1.2.1. re dhe
nenin 1113 par. 1 nEnpar. 1.1. dhe 1.. 2. re KPRK p?r oaktimin e?paraburgimit dhe to arrestit sht?piak.

PJ ashtu, po qe so to pandehurit gjenden ne liri re?pektivisht n? liri te plote, te njejtit do te
ndikojne rrjedhen non-male te procedures penaie duke ndikuar ne kete penale duke asgj?suar
fshehur dh falsi?kuar prova te? veprave penale duke metre parasysh faktin se me rastin kontrollit ne
sht?pite re jane mane prove materiale to cilat duhet to ekzaminohen. Po ashtu ekziston rreziku se po qe
5e re pande urit gjenden no liri mund ta pengojne rrjedht-Zn procedureS penale duke ndikuar ne doshmitart?t
dhe ate 11i KrasniqL Dardan Veselaj, Alban Mavraj, si dhe 11% re pandehurit Hafiz Ahmeti, Betim
ibrahimaj, lban Mavraj, Kujtim - dhe ate familjar?t personave te eilt keno shkuar dhe
iu kantt ha hic?ngjitur organizatave tenoriste n6 Siri, disa prej te eiitwe jaue vrartt ne kitto luftime. Po
ashtu, mun re ndikojne edhe ne nj?ri tjetrin. KEto paraqesin ehkaqe ligjore nga neni 187 par. 1. Nonpar.
1.1, 1.2. at 1.2.2 re dhe nenit 1113 par. 1 nonpar; 1.1. dhe 1.2. 9111' eaktimin paraburgimit
respektivis to arrestit sht?piak.

ke utbazuar n? m?nyr?n dhe rrethanat me t6 eilatl dyshohet se jan? kryer veprat penale nga t?
paudehuri pesh?n dhe natyr?n r?nd? t? veprave penale p?r re cilat dyshohen t6 pandehurit, p?r faktin se
po qe 56 re pandehurit gjenden n6 liri t6 gjitha k?to rrethana tregojn? rrezjiku 56 p0 qe se t? pandehurit
gjenden no liri ekziston mu'nd?sia q? t6 njejtit ti p?r?srisin? veprat penale t6 njejta apo t? ngjajshme. K?to
rrethana paraqesin shkaqe ligjOre t? parapara nga neni 187 par] 1 n?npar. 1.1 dhe 1.2. pikat dhe nenit
183 par; 1 n?npar. 1.1. dhe 1.2. t? p?r caktin?n paraburgimit 'respektivisht t6 arrestit sht?piak.

Gqutari i procedur?s p?araprak?e mori parasysh preterfdimet mbrojt?sve to pandehurv'e q? disa
prej tyre t? loshohen par tu mbrojtur n? liri ose q? disave prej tyre t?iu caktohen masa me to buta alternative
q? parashihen me nenin 173 t? KPPK dhe ate: arresti sht?piak,?araqitja n? stacion'in policOr apo dor?zania,
mir?po tani p'?r tani n6 k?t? faz? t6 procedur?s asnj?ra, 11% masat permendura nuk do t? sigurohet

prezenca to pandehurVe n? procedure, nuk mund to zlwillohe procedura penale pa pengesa.



13

. P?r afsyet cekura m6 latt giyqtari kOnsider?on sejan? plot?suar kushtet ligjore p?r caktimin 
mas?s s? paraburgimit dhe tearrestit sht?piak, t5 parapara? me nenin 185, 187, dhe nenit 183 t6 

GJYKATA THEMELORE NE PRISHTINE
Departamenti'p?r krime ti! r?nda
i 

Sekretarja juridike:
Kimete Mehmeti

JURIDIKE

KundEr k?tij aktvendimi ?sht? lejuar ankesa
Gjykat?s s6 Apelit, n6 afat prej 2.4

or?sh nga? dita pranimit. Ankesa nuk ndalon
ekzekutirhin aktvendirhit.

 

PN1.No. 2091/2014
KOSOVO COURT OF APPEAL – the panel composed of the judges Mejreme Memaj,
President, Fillim Skoro and Ferit Osmani, members; with the professional associate Eroll
Gashi, process holder, in the legal issue against the defendants: Bedri Robaj, from Ostrozub
village of Malishevë, for criminal offence of recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139
of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo (CCRK) and incitement for carrying out
terrorist actions, from the Article 141 of CCRK, Mazllam Mazllami, from Prizren, “Selajdin
Berisha” street, No. 4/B, for the criminal offence, incitement to carry out terrorist actions,
from the Article 141 of CCRK and incitement of hatred, division, religious, racial or ethnic
intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK, Fuad Ramiqi, from Prishtina, “Hamëz Jashari”
street, 16/26, for the criminal offence – call for resistance, from the Article 141 of CCRK,
Eroll Nesimi from Mitrovica, “Agim Hajrizi” street, No. 5/53, for the criminal offence
recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK and incitement for carrying out
terrorist actions from the Article 147 of CCRK, Leonard Ruli, from Prizren, “Musa
Sheherzade” street, for criminal offence of recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of
CCRK and incitement for carrying out terrorist actions, from the Article 147 of CCRK,
Sabahudin Selimi, from Smirë village, Viti municipality, for criminal offence of recruitment
for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK and incitement for carrying out terrorist actions
from the Article 147 of CCRK, and Trim Ademi, from Prishtina, “Dardania” quarter, SU 7/31, for criminal offence of recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK, deciding
in regards to complaints of the lawyers of the defendants Abdullah Robaj, Muhamet Humolli,
Skënder Musa, Kadri Osaj, Esat Gutaj, Hilmi Zhitija and Albana Kelmendi, addressed
against the verdicts of Basic Court in Prishtinë, PPR.KR.No. 464/2014, date 19 September
2014 and PPR.KR.No. 464/2014, date 17.10.2014, in the panel session held on 27 October,
made this:

VERDICT
I.

With the approval of requests of lawyers of the defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam
Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim
Ademi, the verdict of Basic Court in Prishtinë PPR.KR.No. 464/2014 on date
17.10.2014, changes to the form that detention measure to the above-mentioned is
quit from the day of making the verdict and they are placed under house arrest, a
measure which according to this verdict will be extended until 17.12.2014.

II.

The defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi,
Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi are obliged to stay in their houses,
and they are not entitled to leave their houses of residence in the addresses as in
the introduction to this verdict, unless, this is absolutely necessary for fulfillment

 of their living needs or for carrying out, and that with decision of the Court - pre-trial
judge.
III.

The above-mentioned defendants are forbidden to communicate with each other
and to have telephone communications or through electronic networks.

IV.

The defendants are informed that in case they violate this verdict without approval,
the Court can set the detention measure against them.

V.

Kosovo Police – Police Stations in Prishtinë, Malishevë, Viti, Prizren and
Mitrovicë stations are obliged to verify implementation of this measure, and
inform the Court immediately, in case of its non-implementation by the
defendants.

VI.

Complaints of lawyers of the defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad
Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi, presented
against this verdict of the Basic Court in Prishtinë PPK.KR.No.467/2014 are nonsubjective.

VII.

The above-mentioned verdict regarding the defendants Idriz Bilibani, Alban
Musliu and Dardan Gjuka remains non-scrutinized.

Justification
Basic Court in Prishtinë, with its verdict PPK.KR.No.464/2014, taken on date 19 September
2014, against the defendants Bedri Robaj, Idriz Bilibani, Enes Goga, Mazllam Mazllami,
Ekrem Avdiu, Enis Rama, Fuad Ramiqi, Alban Malsiu, Dardan Gjyka, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard
Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi, has set the detention measure of 1 (one) month, due
to grounded suspicion that the defendant, Bedri Robaj, has carried out the criminal offence of
recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK and incitement to carry out terrorist
actions, from the Article 141 of CCRK, the defendant Idriz Bilibani, the criminal offence of
incitement of divisive hatred or national, racial, religious or ethnic intolerance, from the
Article 147 of CCRK and recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK, the
defendants Enes Goga, Mazllam Mazllami, Ekrem Avdiu and Enis Rama, each individually,
for the criminal offence of incitement for carrying out terrorist actions from the Article 141 of
CCRK, the defendant Fuad Ramiqi the criminal offence of call for resistance from Article
139 of CCRK, the defendant Alban Malsiu the criminal offence of Recruitment for terrorism
from the Article 139 of CCRK, and incitement to carry out terrorist actions, from the Article
141 of CCRK, the defendant Dardan Gjuka the criminal offence of participation in terrorist
groups, from the Article 143 par.2 of CCRK, the defendants Eroll Nesimi and Leonard Ruli,
the criminal offence of recruitment for terrorism, from the Article 139 of CCRK and
incitement to carry out terrorist actions, from the Article 141 of CCRK, the defendant
Sabahudin Selimi the criminal offence of incitement of divisive hatred or national, racial,
religious or ethnic intolerance, from the Article 147 of CCRK and recruitment for terrorism,
from the Article 139 of CCRK, and the defendant Trim Ademi, the criminal offence of

 recruitment for terrorism from the Article 139 of CCRK. The detention measure was set to
defendants in conformity with provision of Article 187 par.1 sub par.1.1 and 1.2 point 1.2.1,
1.2.2 and 1.2.3 of CCRK, in order that according to this verdict this measure was calculated
to defendants from 17.09.2014 and will last until 17.10.2014.
According to complaints of the lawyers of the defendants, this verdict was annulled with the
verdict of this Court PN1.No.1903/2014 on date 1 October 2014, with justification that no
reasons were given regarding the decisive facts on legal grounds that can set the detention
measure.
In the reclaim the first instance Court with the verdict PPR.KR.No.464/2014 on date
16.10.2014 has re-set the one-month long detention against the defendants Bedri Robaj,
Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim
Ademi, due to grounded suspicion that the defendants have carried out the abovementioned
criminal offence, while to defendants Idriz Bilibani, Alban Malsiu and Dardan Gjuka it set
the house arrest measure, which measures would expire on 17.10.2014.
Prior to expiration of this period, the State Prosecutor presented a request for extension of
detention against the defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll
Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi, while it proposed extension of the
house detention measure against the defendants Idriz Bilibani, Alban Musliu and Dardan
Gjuka.
By deciding in regards to Prosecutor’s request with verdict PPR.KR.No. 464/2014, on date
17.10.2014 the first instance Court, namely the pre-trial judge, extended the detention for two
months to the defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi,
Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi, which was calculated from 17.10.2014 until
17.12.2014. . The detention measure and house arrest measure was extended to defendants in
conformity with provision of Article 187 par.1 sub par.1.1 and 1.2 point 1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 1.2.3
of CCRK.
The complaints were filed against the above-mentioned verdicts (PPR.KR.No.464/2014 date
16.10.2014 PPR.KR.No 464/2014 date 17.10.2014) by:
1.- Defender of the defendant Bedri Robaj, lawyer Avdullah Robaj, due to essential
violations of provisions of the criminal procedure for detention setting and extension, with
the proposal that the Court of Appeal in Prishtinë to approve the request, the attacked verdict
to change in line with Article 416 of the CCRK, by setting a softer measure for the defendant,
in line with Article 173 of the CCRK.
2.- Defender of the defendant Mazllam Mazllami, lawyer Muhamet Humolli, due to essential
violations of provisions of the criminal procedure for detention setting and extension, with
the proposal that the Court of Appeal in Prishtinë to approve the request, the attacked verdict
to change in line with Article 416 of the CCRK, by setting a softer measure for the defendant.
3.- Defender of the defendant Fuad Ramiqi, lawyer Skënder Musa, due to verdict for
detention setting and extension, with the proposal that the Court of Appeal in Prishtinë to

 approve the request as grounded, to change the attacked verdict, and enable the defendant
Eroll Nesim to be defended in freedom.
4.- Defender of the defendant Eroll Nesim, lawyer Kadri Osaj, because of mistaken
application of Kosovo Criminal Code, with the proposal that the Court of Appeal in Prishtinë
to approve this request, the attacked verdict as not grounded in the law, in order for the
defendant to be quitted the detention measure and be defended in freedom.
5.- Defender of the defendant Leonard Ruli, lawyer Esat Gutaj, considering the verdict on
setting and extension of detention as unfair and ungrounded on legal provisions, with the
proposal that the Court of Appeal in Prishtinë, to quit detention measure to defendant
Leonard Ruli, and to set him one of the alternative measures stipulated by Article 173 of the
CCRK.
6.- Defender of the defendant Sabahudin Selimi, lawyer Hilmi Zhitija, due to essential
violations of provisions of CCRK – Article 187 par.1 and 2, Article 185, 189 as well as
Article 165 of the CCRK and wrong proving of the situation of facts, with the proposal that
the Court of Appeal in Prishtinë, to approve the complaint and quit detention to his
defendant, or replace it with another alternative measure stipulated by the Code of Criminal
Procedure.
7.- Defender of the defendant Trim Ademi, lawyer Albana Kelmendi, due to essential
violations of criminal procedure provisions from Article 7 and 187 par.1, sub-par 1.1 and 1.2
point 1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 1.2.3 on CCRK, with the proposal that the Kosovo Court of Appeal to
approve the complaint in its integrity and change the attacked verdict, in order for the
defendant Trim Ademi, is replaced the detention measure with one of the softer measures for
ensuring defendant’s presence based on Article 173 of CCRK.
Prosecutor of Appeal in Prishtinë, with the note PAR/INo.1513/14 date 24.10.2014, has
proposed refusal of defendants’ defenders complaints as ungrounded, and confirm the
verdicts.
In the panel session, after looking at the case notes, Kosovo Court of Appeal assessed
complaining claims in the complaints, and found that:
-

Complaints of the defenders of defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad
Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi presented
against the verdict of Basic Court in Prishtinë PPR.KR.No.464/2014 date 16.10.2014
are non-subjective.

Considering the claims in complaints that in the concrete case in the reclaiming
procedure, the Prosecutor did not manage to argument the grounded suspicion that
defendants have not committed suspected criminal offence, this Court assesses that they
are not grounded. However, taking into account the evidence that argument the grounded
suspicion, incriminatory actions that the defendants, Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami,
Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi are

 suspected of, this Court considers that ensuring of this defendants in procedure could be
done by setting of a softer measure.
After looking at the case notes, the Court of Appeal assessed complaining claims of the
defenders of the defendants regarding the evidence that support articulatory grounds to
believe that the defendants might flee; destroy, conceal, change or forge evidence of the
criminal offence, or when special circumstances show that they will obstruct the flow of
criminal procedure by influencing on witnesses, in the affected or in co-participants; or when
the weight of the criminal offence, the manner or circumstances how the criminal offence
was carried out, his personal characteristics, earlier behavior, environment and the conditions
he lives in or any other personal circumstance that demonstrates the risk that he can repeat
criminal offence, found that in the concrete case there are no actual circumstances that justify
legal grounds of detention extension, having in mind the fact that the identity of the
defendants is known, their place of residence is known, they are familiar people, the case
notes do not result that they were convicted earlier, therefore I set the HOUSE ARREST
measure in conformity with Article 183 related to Article 187 par.1, sub-par 1.1 and 1.2 point
1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 1.2.3 on KCC, as even with this measure, according to this Court’s
consideration, the defendants will be stopped from fleeing, influencing the investigation and
the possibility of repeating the criminal offence. So, this Court considers that their presence
in the procedure might also be ensured even with the house arrest measure; therefore I change
the appealed verdict, as in the dispositive of this verdict.
In the sense of Article 183 par.3 of CCRK, the defendants are stopped from leaving their
houses, in certain addresses at the introduction of this verdict, while they the defendants can
exclusively leave their houses in cases necessary for fulfillment of their living needs, namely
medicinal, or for carrying out an important job; however, the court permit should be initially
asked for this.
The defendants are warned that in case they violate this measure against them without permit,
than the Court might set detention. Police will monitor implementation of this measure.
Meanwhile, the complaints of defenders of the defendants Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami,
Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi and Trim Ademi presented
against the decision of the first instance PPR.KR.No.464/2014 date 16.10.2014, this Court
treats them as non-subjective, as the period which was set as detention to the defendants has
expired, therefore it reviews and considers only the complaints presented against the last
verdict.
Since the defendants, Idriz Bilibani, Alban Malsiu and Dardan Gjuka have not opposed the
verdict that extended their house arrest; this part of the verdict was not reviewed.

From what was said above, and based on the Article 416 par.2 related to par.1 of KCC, it was
decides as the in dispositive of this verdict.

 KOSOVO COURT OF APPEAL – PRISHTINË
PN1.No.2091/14, date 17 October 2014

Professional associate

President of the Panel

Eroll Gashi

Mejreme Memaj

Translator’note: STAMP OF THE COURT OF APPEAL

 PNl.nr.2091/2014

GJYKATA APELIT - kolegji i p?rb?r? nga gqutar?t?gw
kryetare, Fillim Stigjge?eriLOsmani, an?tare?, me bashk?pun?torin profesional Eroll Gashi,
procesmbeit?s,  penale ndaj te' pandehurve: Bedri Robaj, nga fshati Ostrozub i
Malishev??s, pe'r veprat penale rekrutimi pe'r terrorize'm, nga neni 139 te' Kodit Penal t?
Republik?s s? Kosov?s (KPRK) dhe p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste, nga neni 141 t?
KPRK, Mazllam Mazllami, nga Prizreni, rruga "Selajdin Berisha?, nr.4/B, p?r vepr?n penale,
p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste, nga neni 141 t? KPRK dhe nxitja urrejtjes,
p?rcarjes, mos durimit fetar, racor apo etnik, nga neni 147 te' KPRK, Fuad Ramiqi, nga
Prishtina, rruga Ham?z Jashari?, 16/26, p?r vepr?n penale thirrje p?r rezistenc?, nga neni
411 t? KPRK, Eroll Nesimi, nga Mitrovica, rruga "Agim Hajrizi?, nr.5/53, pe'r veprat penale
rekrutimi p?r terroriz?m, nga neni 139 t? KPRK dhe p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste,
nga neni 141 t? KPRK, Leonard Ruli, nga Prizreni, rruga "Musa Sheherzade?, pe'r veprat
penale rekrutimi p?r terroriz?m, nga neni 139 t? KPRK dhe pe'r krye'rjen veprave
terroriste, nga neni 141 t? KPRK, Sabahudin Selimi, nga fshati Smir?, komuna Vitis?, p?r
veprat penale rekrutimi pe'r terroriz?m, nga neni 139 t? KPRK dhe pe'r kryerjen 
veprave terroriste, nga neni 141 t? KPRK dhe Trim Ademi, nga Prishtina, Iagjja ?Dardania?,
7/3?1, p?r vepr?n penale rekrutimi p?r terroriz?m, nga neni 139 t? KPRK, duke vendosur
pe'rkitazi me ankesat mbrojt?sve t? t? pandehurve avokat?ve Abdullah Robaj, Muhamet
Humolli Sk?nder Musa, Kadri Osaj, Esat Gutaj, Hilmi Zhitija dhe Albana Kelmendi, te'
ushtruara kund?r aktvendimeve t? Gjykat'e's Themelore n? Prishtine?, 
dat? 19 shtator 2014 dhe date 17.10.2014, ne' seanc?n kolegjit t?
mbajtur me 27 tetor 2014, mori 

AKTVENDIM

I. Me aprovimin ankesave t'e' mbrojt?sve t? t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam
Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi,
aktvendimi i Gjykat??s Themelore ne' Prishtin? date 17.10.2014,
ashtu q? ndaj t? t? Iartcekur nd??rpritet masa paraburgimit nga
dita marrjes s? aktvendimit dhe ju caktohet masa arrestit sht?piak cila mas?? sipas k?tij
aktvendimi do tju zgjase? deri me 17.12.2014.

II. Detyroheh pandehurit Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi,
Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi q? t? q?ndrojn? n? shte'pit? tyre, dhe nuk
kan? t? drejt? t? Iargohen nga sht??pit? tyre t? banimit adresat si n? hyrje t? k?tij
aktvendimi, p'e'rveg kur kjo ?sht'e? p?'r p?rmbushjen nevojave t?


\ftyre jet??sore ose p'e'r kryerjen ndonj?? pune, dhe at? me lejen Gjykat?s?gqutarit t?
procedur?s paraprake.

Po ashtu t? pandehurve t'e Iartcekur ju ndalohet t? komunikojn? me njeri tjetrin si
dhe t? ken? komunikime telefonike apo n?p?rmjet rrjeteve elektronike.

IV. Njoftohen pandehurit se n?se pa leje shkelin ket? aktvendim Gjykata mund t'e'
caktoj mas?n paraburgimit ndaj tyre.

V. Detyrohet policia Kosov?s-Stacionet Poiicore ne' Prishtin?, Malishev?, Viti, Prizren
dhe Mitrovic? q? ta verifikojn? zbatimin k?saj mase dhe n? rast te' moszbatimit saj

nga pandehurit menj??her? ta informojn?' ijkat?n.

VI. Ankesat mbrojt?sve t? t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad
Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi, t? paraqitura kund?r
aktvendimit t? Gjykate's Themelore n? Prishtin? date 16.10.2014 jan?
jole'ndore. I

VII. Aktvendimi i Iartcekur p?rkitazi me t? pandehurit Idriz Alban Malsiu -
Dardan Gjuka ngel i 

Arsyetimi

Gjykata Themelore ne' Prishtin?, me aktvendimin dat? 19 shtator
2014, ndaj t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Idriz Bilibani, Enes Goga, Mazllam Mazllami, Ekrem
Avdiu, Enis Rama, Fuad Ramiqi, Alban Malsiu, Dardan Gjyka, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli,
Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi, ka caktuar paraburgimin n? koh?zgjatje prej 
muaji, p??r shkak te' dyshimit t? bazuar se: i pandehuri Bedri Robaj ka kryer veprat penale
rekrutimi per terroriz?m nga neni 139 t? KPRK dhe p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste
nga neni 141 t? KPRK, i pandehuri Idriz Bilibani veprat penale nxitja urrejtjes p?rgar?se
ose mos durimi komb?tar?, racor?, fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 t? KPRK dhe rekrutimi per
terrorize'm, nga neni 139 t? KPRK, te' pandehurit Enes Goga, Mazllam Mazllami, Ekrem Avdiu
dhe Enis Rama, secili vege vet; vepr?n penale p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste nga
neni 141 t? KPRK, i pandehuri Fuad Ramin vepr?n penale thirrje p?r rezistenc? nga neni
411 t? KPRK, i pandehuri Alban Malsiu veprat penale Rekrutimi p?r terroriz?m nga neni 139
t? KPRK, dhe p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste, nga neni 141 t? KPRK, i pandehuri
Dardan Gjuka vepr?n penale Organizimi dhe pjese'marrja n? grupe terroriste, nga neni 143
par.2 t? t? pandehurit Eroll Nesimi dhe Leonard Ruli, veprat penale rekrutimi p?r
terrorize'm nga neni 139 t? KPRK dhe p?r kryerjen veprave terroriste, nga neni 141
t? KPRK, i pandehuri Sabahudin Selimi veprat penale intja urrejtjes p??rgar?se ose mos
durimi kombe'tar?, racor?, fetar apo etnik nga neni 147 t? KPRK dhe Rekrutimi p?r
terroriz?m, nga neni 139 t? KPRK, dhe i pandehuri Trim Ademi, vepr?n penale regrutimi p??r

terrorizem, nga neni 139 te t? pandehurve ju ?sht? caktuar
at:


4

.I
 

   

    

konform diSp'ozit?s s? nenit 187 par. 1 n?n par. 1.1 dhe 1.2 pika 1.2.1, 1.2.2 dhe 1.2.3 te?
KPRK, ashtu qe' sipas k?tij aktvendimi kjo mas'e' t? pandehurve ju ?shte' llogaritur prej
17.09.2014 dhe do t'e' ju zgjas? deri me 17.10.2014.

Ky aktvendim sipas ankesave t'e' mbrojt?sve t? t? pandehurve ?sht? anuluar me
aktvendimin k?saj Gjykate PN1.nr.1903/2014 dat? 1 tetor 2014, me arsyetim se nuk jane'
dhe'n? arsye p?rkitazi me faktet vendimtare sa i p?rket bazave ligjore per te' cilat mund t?
caktohet masa paraburgimit.

rivendosje Gjykata shkail?s se? par? me aktvendimin date"
16.10.2014 ka caktuar p?rse'ri paraburgimin ndaj t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam
Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi p?r
shkak t? dyshimit t? bazuar se t? pandehurit i kan? kryer veprat penale lartcekura n?
koh??zgjatje prej nj? muaji, kurse ndaj t? pandehurve idriz Bilibani, Alban Malsiu Dardan
Guka ka caktuar mase'n arrestit sht?piak, te' cilat masa do te' skadonin me 17.10.2014.

Para skadimit t? k?saj periudhe Prokurori i Shtetit ka paraqit kerkes? p'e'r vazhdimin 
paraburgimit kunde'r t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll
Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim'Ademi, kurse ka propozuar q? ndaj t?
pandehurve ldriz Bilibani, Aiban Musliu Dardan Gjuka t? vazhdohet masa arrestit arresti
sht?piak.

Gjykata Shkall?s par?? respektivisht gqutari i procedures paraprake duke vendosur
p?rkitazi me k?rkesen Prokurorit me aktvendimin dat? 17.10.2014
ndaj t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli,
Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi ka vazhduar paraburgimin edhe p?r dy muaj i cili ju
?sht? llogaritur prej17.10.2014 deri me 17.12.2014, kurse ndaj t? pandehurve Idriz Bilibani,
alban MaiSiu dardan Gjuka ka vazhduar mas?n arrestit sht?piak, edhe pe'r dy muaj 
cila mas? ju ?sht? Ilogaritur prej 17.10.2014 deri me 17.12.2014. Masa paraburgimit dhe
masa arrestit sht?piak te' pandehurve ju ?sht? vazhduar konform dispozit?s s? nenit 187
par.1 n?npar.1.1 dhe 1.2 pika 1.2.1, 1.2.2 dhe 1.2.3 t? KPP.

Kund?r aktvendimeve t? lartcekura date' 16.10.2014
dat? 17.10.2014) ankesa kan'e' ushtruar:

1.- mbrojt?si i te' pandehurit Bedri Robaj, avokati Avdullah Robaj, p?r shkak t?
shkeljeve esenciale te' dispozitave t? pro'cedur?'s penale per caktim dhe vazhdimin 
paraburgimit, me propozim q? Gjykata Apelit ne' Prishtin??, ta aprovoj ankes?'n,
aktvendimin atakuar ta n? pajtim me nenin 416 t? duke caktuar nj?
mas? me t? bute' ndaj t? pandehurit, ne' pajtim t? nenit 173 t? 

mbrojte'si i t? pandehurit Mazllam Mazllami, avokati Muhamet Humolli, p?r shkak t?
shkeljeve esenciale t? dispozitave t? procedures penale p?r caktimin dhe vazhdimin 
paraburgimit, me propozim q? ankesa t? aprovohet, aktvendimi i kund?rshtuar t? anulohet
dhe t? pandehurit t?i shqiptohet nj? mas? t? but??.

 

3.- mbrojt?si i t? pandehurit Fuad Ramiqi, avokati Sk?nder Musa, p?r shkak t? vendimit

mbi caktimin dhe vazhdimin paraburgimit, me propozim q? Gjykata Apelit n? Prishtin?,

ta aprovoj k?t? ankese' si t? bazuar, ta anuloj aktiIendimin atakuar si te' pabazuar n? ligj,
ashtu q? ndaj t? pandehurit t? nd?rpritet masa paraburgimit dhe t? mbrohet n? Iiri.

4.- mbrojt?si i t? pandehurit Eroll Nesim, avokati Kadri Osaj, p?r shkak te' apiikimit te'
gabuar te Kodit Penal t? Kosove?s, me propozim qe' Gjykata Apeiit n? Prishtin?, ta aprovoj
k?t? ankese', aktvendimin atakuar ta dhe t? pandehurit Eroll Nesim ti
mund?sohet t? mbrohet n? Iiri.

5.- mbrojt?si i t? pandehurit Leonard Ruli, avokati Esat Gutaj, p?r shkak t? aktvendimit
mbi caktimin dhebvazhdimin paraburgimit si t? padrejt? dhe t? pa bazuar n? dispozitat
ligjore, me propoZim q? Gjykata Apelit n? Prishtin?, t? pandehurit Leonard Ruli t?ia
nd?rpres mas?n paraburgimit dhe ndaj tij ti caktoj ndonj?ra nga masat alternative t?
'parapara me nenin 173 t? 

5.- mbrojt?si i te' pandehurit Sabahudin Selimi, avokati Hilmi Zhitija, p?r shkak t?
shkeljeve qen?sore t? dispozitave te' ?nenit 187 par.1 dhe 2, nenit 185, 189 si dhe
nenit 165 t? dhe v?rtetimit t? gabuar t? gjendjes s? fakteve, me propozim qe'
Gjykata Apelit ne' Prishtin?, ta aprovoj ankes?n dhe t? mbrojturit t? tij ti nd?rpritet
paraburgimi apo ti z?vend??sqhet me ndonje' mase" tjet?r alternative t? parapar? sipas Kodit
te' Procedures Penale.

7.- mbrojt?sja t? pandehurit Trim Ademi, avokatja Albana Kelmendi, p?r shkak t?
shkeljeve esenciaie t? dispozitave t? procedures penale nga neni 7 dhe 18g par.1
nenpar.1.1 dhe 1.2 pika 1.2.1, 1.2.2 dhe 1.2.3 t? me propozim qe' Gjykata Apelit
Kosove?s, ta aprovoj? ankese'n n? tersi si t? bazuar dhe ta aktvendimin atakuar,
ashtu q? t? pandehurit Trim Ademi, mas??n paraburgimit t'ia zevend?soj me nj'e'r?n nga

'masat m? t? buta per sigurimin pranis? s? t? pandehurit n? baz? t? nenit173t? 

Prokurori i Apelit n? Prishtin?, me shkres?n date 24.10.2014, ka
propozuar q? t? refuzohen si t? pabazuara ankesat mbrojt?sve t? t? pandehurve, nd?rsa
aktvendimet t? v?rtetohen.

Gjykata Apelit Kosov?s n'e' seanc?n kolegjit, pasi q? shkresat lend?s,
vier?soi pretendimet ankimore n? ankeSa, gjeti se:

ankesat mbrojt?sve te" t? pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad Ramiqi,
Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi t? paraqitura kund?r
aktvendimit te' Gjykat?s Themelore ne' Pris'htin? date 17.10.2014 jan?
t? bazuara, kurse te' paraqitura kund?r aktvendimit t? Gjykat??s Themelore n? Prishtin?
dat? 16.10.2014 jane' jol?ndore.

I Duk?e i vler?suar pretendimet n? ankesa se n? rastin konkret n? procedur?n 
rivendosjes Prokurori nuk ka arrit q? t? p?rshiguggpf q? argumentojn? dyshimin 
bazuar se t? pandehurit i kan? kryer veprat 

   

 

jane' te' pabazuara. Mir?'po, duke pasur parasysh provat q? argumentojne' dyshimin bazuar,
veprimet inkriminuese p?r t? cilat dyshohen t? pandehurit Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami,
Fuad Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi kjo Gjykat?
'vler?son se edhe sigurimi i ke'tyre t? pandehurve n? procedure do te' mund t? behej me
caktimin ndonj? mase' me t? bute'.

Gjykata Apelit pasi q? shkresat le'nde's, vler?soi pretendimet ankimore t'e'
mbrojt?sve te' te' pandehurve p?rkitazi me provat q? mbe'shtesin bazat artik'ulueshme pe'r
t? besuar se t? pandehurit mund t? arratisen; t? asgj?sojn?, fshehin, ose
falsifikojn? provat vepr?s penale, ose kur rrethanat posagme tregojn?? se do t? pengojn?
rrjedh?n procedur??s penale duke ndikuar n? d?shmitar?, n? t? d?mtuarit apo n?
bashk?pjes?marr?sit; ose kur pesha vepre's penale, m?nyra ose rrethanat ne' t? cilat ?sht?
kryer vepra penale, karakteristikat tij personale, sjellja m?parshme, ambienti dhe
kushtet ne'n t? cilat ai jeton ose ndonj? rrethan? tjete'r personale q? tregon rrezikun se
mund t'e? pe'rs?risin veprat penale, gjeti se n? rastin konkret nuk ka rrethana konkrete q?
arsyetojn? bazat ligjore te' vazhdimit paraburgimit, kur kihet parasysh fakti se t?
pandehurve ju dihet identiteti, ju dihet vendbanimi, jan? familjar, nga shkresat l?nd?s nuk
r'ezulton se me par? kan? qen? te' denuar, prandaj ndaj tyre caktoj mas?n ARRESTIT
SHTEPIAK konform dispozit?s s? nenit 183 lidhur me nenin 187 par.1 n'e'par.1.1 1.2 pika
1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3 t? KPP, ngase edhe me ket? mase sipas Vler?simit t? ke'saj Gjykate do t?
mund t? pengohen t? pandehurit nga arratisja, ndikimi n? hetime dhe mund?sia 
p?rse'ritjes se? veprave penale, pra, kjo Gjykat?? vler?son se edhe me mase'n arrestit
sht??piak do to" mund t? sigurohet prania tyre he procedure, prandaj edhe 
aktvendimin ankimuar sikurse ne' dispozitivin ke'tij aktvendimi. 2%

Ne kuptim te' nenit 183 par.3 t? t? pandehurve ndalohet t? largohen nga
shte'pite' tyre, ne' adresat cekura n? hyrje t? k?tij aktvendimi, nd?rsa 'p?'rjashtimisht te'
pandehurit mund t? largohen nga sht?pitia'I tyre vete'm n? raste t? domosdoshme p?r
p?rmbushjen nevojave jete'sore respektivisht mjek?sore apo kryerjen ndonj? pune me
r?nd?si, mir?po se? pari per k?t? duhet te' k?rkuar leja gjykate's.

Te pandehurit paralajm?rohen se ne' rast se pa leje shkelin k?t? mase ndaj tyre
gjykata mund te'. caktoj? paraburgimin. Mbike?qyrjen zbatimit t? k?saj mase do ta b?j?
policia.

Nd?rsa, ankesat mbrojt?sve t? te pandehurve Bedri Robaj, Mazllam Mazllami, Fuad
Ramiqi, Eroll Nesimi, Lenard Ruli, Sabahudin Selimi dhe Trim Ademi t? paraqitura kund?r
aktvendimit t? shkall?s s? pare' date 16.10.2014 kjo Gjykat? i trajtoj si
jol??ndore, ngase ka skaduar periudha per t? cil?n t? pandehurve ju ?sht? caktuar

paraburgimi, prandaj i dhe vlere'soj vet?m ankesat paraqitura kund?r vendimit te'
fundit. 

Meq? t? pandehurit ldriz Bilibani, Alban Malsiu Dardan G'juka nuk kan? kund?rshtuar

aktvendimin me te' cilin ju ?sht? vazh @Mt?piak n? kete' pjes? aktvendimi nuk 
I ?5315--

  
 

   

Nga sa tha m? lart?, n? baz? t? nenit 416 par. 2 lidhur me par. 1 t? KPP, vendos
sin? dispozitiv t'e' k?tij aktvendimi.
GJYKATA APELIT KOSOVES - PRISHTINE
PN1.nr.2091/14, dat? 27 tetor 2014

   
 

Kryetarja Kolegjit
Eroll Gashi I Mejreme Memaj
 IO
-r ye uhhkamam
\3
- (053% viiwmrmeg
1 HA FUTVREMKNE:

111121"mi: