Reader’s Note: FOI Request 14-218 Please be advised that the invoice that is responsive to this request includes billing information for two reports that were produced by First Class Partnerships. The invoice bills $115,000 for the “Development of Concept Plans for GO Service enhancements and Toronto to London High Speed Rail”. In accordance with the Agreement for Concept Plans for an Ontario Rail Project, Schedule 1 – Schedule of Deliverables, Rates and Supplementary Provisions, approximately 75% of the invoice is attributable to the work undertaken for the “Development of a Concept Plan for GO Service Enhancements”, and approximately 25% of the invoice is attributable to the work undertaken for the “Development of a Concept Plan for Toronto to London High Speed Rail”. FIRST CLASS LTD 8 Devon House Maidstone Bulidlng Mews London SE1 165 United Kingdom Policy' and Pianning Division Ministry of Transportation 77 Wellesley Avenue 3rd Floor, Ferguson Viock, Toronto Ontario Mm 128 Details Quantity ANDREW POSLUNS 1.00 Deveiopment of Concept Plans for 60 Service enhancements and Toronto to London High Speed Raii Payment terms 14 days net Payment method BACS Bank 3317(1) Sort Code Account No BIC Email: accounts@fcpwor1d.net invoice Number: Date: Your Order Number: Account Ref: Unit Price Net Amount 115,000.00 115,000.00 Total Net scno Tote! Due SCAD 710987 31/03/2014 Andrew Posluns MINISTRY VAT VAT 0.00 0.00 115,000.00 115,000.00 Registered in England and Wales 2897318 VAT number 74? 0522 38 Client Prolect Consuftant FCP Advisor Activity Timesheet 2014 Policy and Pianning Division Ministry of Transportation Concept Prans for an Ontario Raif Project See Below ist thruagg 201410 31 st March 2014 FEHSI CUES PS Registered in EngEand and W365: Man 289?318 VAT [amber 74? 0522 35 Activity Hours Days David Potter 25 3.125 Jane Comthwaile 73 9.125 John Sega! 36 4.5 K3. Heller 32 4 Micheal Schabas 191 23.875 Chn's Stokes 26 3.25 Total Hours 383 4?.875 From: Michael Schabas Sent: May 14, 2014 10:36 AM To: Posluns, Andrew (MTO) Subject: GO RER and GO FAST invoice - invoice supporting information Andrew: All the people who worked on the project generally kept track of the time they worked on the project. We did in 2 weeks what would normally take 3 - 4 months, at a considerably higher costs. . . . We were able to do this mostly by drawing on our own experience. We charged up the agreed budget but probably spent 25% more hours on it. than the budget allowed - for which we did not charge. I worked for four weeks, from 12 February until we submitted the GO RER report on 3 March and the GO FAST report on 10 March. I actually have 200 hours recorded in my diary to March 10, and have probably provided another 40 hours service since, responding to questions, as well as a trip to Toronto for which I paid the airfare myself to brief of?cials. We only charged for 191 hours of my time as this was the maximum allowed in the budget. I provided overall leadership, wrote most of the ?nal report and also "topped and tailed? the model. Jane developed the revenue and bene?ts methodology for the GO RER study, prepared the estimates and built the excel model. Numerous changes were necessary because, among other things, Metrolinx did not provide us with key data until very late in the process. Rather than wait for their work, Jane built the model with available data and then had to update it. Had we not done this, we would have risked not being able to complete in the required time which we understood was very important. Jane billed 73 hours in total on this, including reviewing available information in advance of building the model, to understand what was available and what methodology would be practical to use. She also reviewed the text of the ?nal report. John Segal provided guidance and oversight of the RER work. He prepared several background notes on issues like elasticities and fares. His main work was to build the traf?c model for the GO Fast scheme. Some of the fares and elasticities notes are attached for reference. The conclusions were incorporated mostly in the ?nal reports. John also reviewed both draft reports and made various comments. John charged 4.5 days. Chris developed the train service plans that were a key input to Jane?s model. He also reviewed the available materials, and commented on the ?nal report. We allowed Chris to bill 26 hours although I am sure he worked 1 much more than this, probably 40 hours. Keith Heller and David Potter provided mostly verbal advice and also comments via email on speci?c operational and rolling stock issues. They reviewed the available information and reviewed and coxmnented on the draft report. They were limited to 32 and 26 hours respectively. Michael Schabas Partner FCP michael.schabas@fcpworld.net +44 7973 241 214 W. {3 LE3 . Trusted Advisors in Transport