xi533.35Sawamao: 29 um, um amaoaommao: No.23 U93 .. Umum Santana .6 200.53%? mmu BbboAm mo WEE: 03m .. Um? .6. noncamau ma BbhoAm . we x2: .5 03m .. Dmum Sagan. .6 30:30:?, own nmbtoAm mo 2.53.53.57? >mm5m$ szozoi 3.02 $33 ?533mm? Umasmm ucm? 3 303$ 433$. Dams? 03.510 Org?Mom ahoocmbdoz mango: $233 - mama mxnomanm ?88 momma: 823:3 - 395 539. mmnmo: ANN . mamas 4:5? 5 meommw mmomo: .75 3x3 .. w:va gamma?. Ommomq Momma: 3: 3 - ?Baum o: :5 0932.333." 3352 E20203 do: 383 >383 01.2?me >9?:st Emma 328m . 10.? >03?5?d239? mam. ?382.. 2328 .63. 30mm 33$ 26 332333.? <88; 5 2328 mow boa?253.9% ?aw?uowmm Ozr< 31%? 31%. 0mm 32% wcaaosm mso? 02.3 5.53%? ?03.30: 93303 was 09.3 a quma 42 533530: m?aa mosammoa ragga. om. 553%? m5 933%: 933%: 3:238 06 Kmao? m: 98:83.5 @3303 a wzo? 033 592%? .1, 50330: aamnmmoa A: .3838 ?Manama: as 53838 um woa?mmoa 320398 um 33% ms 933%: . . . . @8383: 43 55:8 mmnoamgm 20 Bondsman?: 53.0.8 025 mmuonmgm 20 8032585. 5323 0:5 358: 48V 2:330 ?$30:me enigma 888353168 223%? ?$3.633 cm?m?mm 303$ 22. 20 803333. 5:28 0:3 i338 ?baggage 3338 s: $503.53 029mm. 3. Up. 68 game ?3302.53 cmamwmw amamaa 80% am _m $9.320on min 33803 KS m. mm?msmac 65m 33 6:6 3,8 amnmaloonm am a m5: Um? 03m 0.0 338:8 Ema 33:33 9233., mi: Dam a Dam Qm swam.?on Ema am?msama 92:9? 650 48M Um? 3025? <81 rm Baa mama. 03:~ Zonal <81 hm bmamm mama. 205. ?03 Laamm mam babamammwm? 6302. 2223 035% 583mm 25.53 ?a game 06 83% am 832.3 0:53 Comamm 2:331 2:390 Q: .0233 am 8338 01:53 58:8 ZCBUQ a 5.33 of 33% am 8353 Emma 20. a 2:390 qm 23:0 532% Oosmmo: v5.8 20. .. 2:390 0.0 23% 35.5w 00:66: 396 20. a zcamao um 23% .3028 005%: 333.0: Baum madman, Eong 838505 our 03m mono: 02? @563 Dam memmnamsamo: 0&8: Lama", um 3:8 20. a 20 9m?. 3303: m. c: 3336: 33m c: moaqu .36:sz .2333 Umaoaama? 03m $0163 bmzoaamacw 02. 9.8 $9.33 02m wsoa 02m @563 Umwm Qwamadmammoa 9% 9.383938: Danna anR Qm. bomom 20. a .26 omoma a Lama? am 3:8 20. a 20 DE. DE. 02. car 00:38:; a Mmam 0:33.98 09.. 3603 mmum 00: 3303 mmam 3 5.. LEE 009mgv.35 RGMP File ii 25313-108142 Information of Cpl. Greg Horton CANADA . or ONTARIO D?nonclailon 0'9 I PRoch-E DE of Royal Canadian Mounted Police Peace Officer East! Est 0'9 (occupation! profession) (Region! Region) The informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that Le denoncialeur declare qu?il a des motifs raisonnables de croire qua Michael Dennis DUFFY 2710511946 (date of birth data de naissance) (1) between the entre le 22?d day of flour de December, 2008 and the 6th day of March 2013 atihe City of Ottawa in the said region 585': a(au) de dans ladite region being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing expense claims and/or residency declarations containing false or misleading information, contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (2) Between the 22'?d day of December, 2008, and the 6th day of March, 2013, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by filing expense claims andlor residency declarations containing false or misleading information, contrary to section 380(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. inappropriate expenses relating to personal and partisan activity: (3) Sometime after June 20?? 2009, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exeeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim T64-06754 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (4) Sometime after June 20?h 2009, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim 104-06754 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (5) Sometime after the period between the 21"" day of June, 2009, and the 26th day of June, 2009, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim T64-06755 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (6) Sometime after the period between the 215?day ofJune, 2009, and the 26th day of June, 2009, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim T64-06755 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (7) Sometime after the period between the 5th day of September, 2009, and the 8m day of September, 2009, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by filing travei expense claim T64-06774 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (8) Sometime after the period between the day of September, 2009, and the tim day of September, 2009, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (9) Sometime after the period between the 2"d day of July, 2010, and the day of July, 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim T64-06798 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (Long Form One or More Accused. i Formula inl?grale Un ou plusieurs acc.) cco-2-oeo-4 (rev. can 3) can (Continued i Suite) Page No. Page n? 2 (10) Sometime after the period between the 2nd day ofJuly, 2010, and the 3rd day ot'July, 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim 764-06798 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (11) Sometime after the period between the day of December, 2010, and the 12th day of December, 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim T64-09996 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (12) Sometime after the period between the 9th day of December, 2010, and the 12th day of December, 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim T64-09996 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (13) Sometime after the period between the 30th day of December, 2011, and the 5th day of January, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim T644 8674 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (14) Sometime after the period between the 30th day of December, 2011, and the 5th day of January, 201 2, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim T644 8674 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (15) Sometime after the period between the 9?h day of July, 2012, and the 10?? day of July, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim T64-20139 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (16) Sometime after the period between the 9?h day ofJuly, 2012, and the 10?? day of July, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim T64-20?l39 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (17) Sometime after the period between the '11th day of September, 2012, and the 13"1 day of September, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claim 164-20671 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (18) Sometime after the period between the 11?? day of September, 2012, and the 13?? day of September, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claim T64-20671 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. inappropriate expense claims associated with personal attendance at funerals and related ceremonies: (19) Between the 10th day of April, 2009, and the 2?d day of March, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by filing travel expense claims T64-05408, Tile-18659, T64-20166, and T64-20164 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (20) Between the 10th day of April, 2009, and the 2?d day of March, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by filing travel expense claims T64-05408, T64-18669, T64-20166, and T64-20164 containing false or misleading information contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. 6% COO-2.0004 ansertf encarf) CSD (rev. 03:05) (posted af?ch?e 05l24f05) Continued on page no. Suite a la page n? 3 (Continued 2' Suite) Page No. Page n? 3 Claims Associated with Payments to Gerald Donohue: I (21) Between the 23rd day of February, 2009, and the 5th day of April, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by awarding consulting contracts in favour of Gerald Donohue, contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (22) Between the 23rd day of February, 2009, and the 5?h day oprril, 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, fatsehood or other fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by awarding consulting contracts in favour of Gerald Donohue, contrary to section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Disbursements of monies previously paid to Gerald Donohue for iilegitimate expenses: (23) On or about May 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by facilitating a payment to Ashley Cain, contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (24) On or about May 3rd, 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exceeding $5,000, by facilitating a payment to Ashley Cain contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (25) Sometime after May 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by facilitating a payment to Jacqueline Lambert, contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (26) Sometime after May 2010, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or other frauduient means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, not exceeding $5,000, by facilitating a payment to Jacqueline Lambert contrary to section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (27) Between March 2010 and January 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by facilitating payments to Mike Croskery, contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. (28) Between March 2010 and January 2012, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, did by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means defraud the Senate of Canada of money, exceeding $5,000, by facilitating a payments to Mike Croskery contrary to section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Charges pertaining to the receipt of $90,172.24 payment, originating from Nigel Wright: (29) Between the day of February, 2013, and the 23?h day of March, 2013, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being a member of Parliament did directly or indirectly corruptly accept, obtain, agree to accept, or attempt to obtain, for himself, money, valuable consideration, or office in respect of anything done or omitted, or to be done or omitted by him in his official capacity contrary to section 119(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (30) Between the 0th day of February, 2013, and the 28?h day of March, 2013, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did for his benefit and without the consent in writing of the head of the branch of that government of which he is an official, accept an advantage or benefit of money originating from Nigel Wright, a person having dealings with the government of Canada contrary to section 121(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. (31) Between the day of February, 2013, and the 28lh day of March, 2013, at the City of Ottawa, in the East Region, being an official in the Senate of Canada, did commit a breach of trust in connection with the duties of his office by accepting an advantage or benefit of money originating from Nigei Wright contrary to section 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. 29 CCO-2-000-4 ?nsert encarf) CSD (rev. 03l05) (posted af?ch?e 05i24l05) Continued on page no. i Suite a la page n? Language Notification Issued I Langue do notification El interpreter! interprets APPEARANCES -- ADJOURNMENTS COMPARUTIONS AJOURNEMENTS Page .?isEgg Reasonfor Date Accused Adjoumment Appearance Deraits Adjournment a 2% l; a, ?5 ?gr Date Accuse(e) Ajoumement .3 f; Detaiisdeia comparutrcn Raison oraroumemenr 8e: tee seea?ee Justice?s Date Clerk Reporter For Crown For Accused Initials Date Gret?er Stenograpne Pour ta Couronne Pouri'accuse{e) initiates do juge Accused Accus?(e) Notice Given Under H.T.A. Suspension lmpoundment Avis en vertu du Code de ia route Suspension Mice en foum'ere Accused Accusem): 51563.1) Detained in custody primarin because of a previous conviction YesI I No I I Date: Detention sous garde fond?e principatement our one condemnation ant?n'eure Out Non Date Con?rmed and initiaited by the Judgetdustice of the Peace in the appropriate box above Con?rme et paraphe par onfe) fuge/juge de pant dens ta case appropn??e ci?haut At the Bail Review dated: 515(9.1) was El con?rmed [3 made (see application) Au moment de to revision du cautionnement, re 515 (9.1) a con?rme r?voqu? execute (voir ta requete) Accused Accuse(e): 515(9.1) Detained in custody primarily because of a previous conviction Yes I I No I I Date Detention sous garde fond?e principaiement sur une condemnation ant?n'eure Out Non Date Con?rmed and initiailed by the JudgetJustice of the Peace in the appropriate box above Con?rm? et parapn? par unto) juge/juge o'e patx dans to case appropn??e ci-haut At the Bail Review dated: . 515(9.1) was con?rmed El rescinded made (see application) Au moment de la revision du cautionnement, re 515 (9.1) a are con?rme r?voqu? execute (voirta requete) Accused tAccuse(e): 515(9.1) Detained in custody primarily because of a previous conviction Yes I I No I I Date: Detention sous garde fondee pn'nctoatement sur one condemnation ant?n?eure Out Non Date At the Bait Review dated: coo-2.0004 (rev. 09113) 089 Au moment o'e ta revision do cautionnement, te .515(9.1) was 515 (9.1) a Con?rmed and tnitiailed by the JudgetJustioe of the Peace in the appropriate box above I Con?nne et paraph? par unto} joge?oge do paix dens ta case appropri?e d?haut con?rmed con?nn? rescinded r?voqu? made (see application) execute (voiria requ?te) Sworn before me at the D?clar? sous serment dot/ant moi afau) of i do in the Province fOntario i dens ta province de i?Ontan'o this four de Justice of the Peace Jugs o?e paix Appearance Notice Promise to Appear El Recognizance for 20 Citation a comparaiire Promesse de comparaitre Engagement pour is (day, month (four, mots) CHECK ONE OF THE COCHEZ LA CASE DECRIT VOTRE SITUATION Cancelled - Police to notify defendant Cancelled - Summons El Con?rmed on . 20 Annui?(e) La poir'ce informers ia pariie d?fenderesse Annul??e) Sommatr'on Con?rm?(e) is (day, month Hour, mois} I: Cancelled - Warrant issued Annuie(e) Mandat d?iivr? Justice of the Peace 1' Juge de paix . 20 Publication ban pursuant to Justice of the Peace 1 Jugs de paix (day. month Hour, moiS) interdiction de publication en vertu de Date Crown Elects to Proceed Summariiy By Indictment Summary Conviction Oftence(s) El indictable Offenceis) Date Choix de la Couronne Procedure Acts d?accusation infraction(s) punissabie(s) sur d?ciaraiion infractionfs) punissabte(s) par sommaire o'e cutbabitr?t? parproc?dure sommaire mise an accusation Elects Trial by Pre?mi Heatin - Chef-X drun prom devant Abs Pleads I Plaidoyet' Superior Court Ontario Court We WW 4 Date Accused . . . June. . Not 6th to Counts Date Acws?fe) Coursup?neure CourdeiOnta-no demnd?e lambs Comp Gunty to Counts Non cougablepow Judge Judge we we seconds: - . . Jugs Jugs etjury damam Our Non d'accusairon Found Guitty on . . . Counts . Commdied (or) 0rd. Std. Test *On Counts Discharged on Counts Not Gurlty on Counts ?23181?) intem?fe} (on) remoy?fe} a son proces pour Lib?r?(e) pouries Non coupabte pouries chefs i'es chefs d'accusabbn chefs d?accusa {ion reps shag: d'accusaiion d?accusation I: With consent of accused and prosecutor, without taking or recording any evidence (or) further evidence Avec ie consentement o?e et du poursuivant sans ou consigner a) de preuve (on) b) de prewe suppt?mentaire El Victim Surcharge Time to Pay Suramende compensaioire D?iai de paiement Judge 1 Jugs 060-2?000-4 (rev. 3) 0313